Shading decreases plant carbon preferential allocation towards the most beneficial mycorrhizal mutualist

New Phytologist

Volumn 205, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 361-368

  Zheng, Chaoyuan ^a,b,c   Ji, Baoming ^d   Zhang, Junling ^a,b   Zhang, Fusuo ^a,b   Bever, James D ^c  

^a CHINA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF POSTS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS   (China)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d BEIJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Arbuscular mycorrhizas (AM); Carbon (C) allocation; Mutualism; Phosphorus (P) uptake; Shading

Indexed keywords

CARBON; PHOSPHORUS;

ALLIUM; GLOMEROMYCOTA; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; MYCORRHIZA; PHYSIOLOGY; SYMBIOSIS;

ALLIUM; CARBON; CARBON RADIOISOTOPES; GLOMEROMYCOTA; MYCORRHIZAE; PHOSPHORUS; SYMBIOSIS;

EID: 84911877209     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: 14698137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/nph.13025     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Bennett AE, Bever JD. 2009. Trade-offs between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal competitive ability and host growth promotion in Plantago lanceolata. Oecologia 160: 807-816.
2. Bever JD. 2002. Negative feedback within a mutualism: host-specific growth of mycorrhizal fungi reduces plant benefit. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 269: 2595-2601.
3. Bever JD, Morton JB, Antonovics J, Schultz PA. 1996. Host-dependent sporulation and species diversity of mycorrhizal fungi in a mown grassland. Journal of Ecology 75: 1965-1977.
4. Bever JD, Richardson SC, Lawrence BM, Holmes J, Watson M. 2009. Preferential allocation to beneficial symbiont with spatial structure maintains mycorrhizal mutualism. Ecology Letters 12: 13-21.
5. Bever JD, Schultz PA, Pringle A, Morton JB. 2001. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: more diverse than meets the eye, and the ecological tale of why. BioScience 51: 923-932.
6. Boerner REJ. 1990. Role of mycorrhizal fungus origin in growth and nutrient uptake by Geranium robertianum. American Journal of Botany 77: 483-489.
7. Boucher DH, James S, Keeler KH. 1982. The ecology of mutualism. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 13: 315-347.
8. Bronstein JJ. 2001. The exploitation of mutualisms. Ecology Letters 4: 277-287.
9. Chapin FS III, Bloom AJ, Field CB, Waring RH. 1987. Plant responses to multiple environmental factors. BioScience 37: 49-57.
10. Clark AL, St Clair SB. 2011. Mycorrhizas and secondary succession in aspen-conifer forest: light imitation differentially affects a dominant early and late successional species. Forest Ecology and Management 262: 203-207.
11. Compant S, van der Heijden MGA, Sessitsch A. 2010. Climate change effects on beneficial plant-microorganism interactions. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 73: 197-214.
12. Denison RF, Kiers ET. 2004. Lifestyle alternatives for rhizobia: mutualism, parasitism, and forgoing symbiosis. FEMS Microbiology Letters 237: 187-193.
13. Denison RF, Kiers ET. 2011. Life histories of symbiotic rhizobia and mycorrhizal fungi. Current Biology 21: 775-785.
14. 2. Ecology Letters 14: 349-357.
15. 2. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 107: 10938-10942.
16. Fitter AH. 2006. What is the link between carbon and phosphorus fluxes in arbuscular mycorrhizas? A null hypothesis for symbiotic function. New Phytologist 172: 3-6.
17. 2 and nitrogen fertilization in a warm temperate forest. Plant and Soil 303: 301-310.
18. Gehring CA. 2003. Growth responses to arbuscular mycorrhizae by rain forest seedlings vary with light intensity and tree species. Plant Ecology 167: 127-139.
19. Goto R, Okamoto T, Kiers ET, Kawakita A, Kato M. 2010. Selective flower abortion maintains moth cooperation in a newly discovered pollination mutualism. Ecology Letters 13: 321-329.
20. Hinkley DV. 1969. On the ratio of two correlated normal random variables. Biometrika 56: 635-639.
21. Hoeksema JD, Bruna EM. 2000. Pursuing the big questions about interspecific mutualism: a review of theoretical approaches. Oecologia 125: 321-330.
22. Hoeksema JD, Schwartz MW. 2003. Expanding comparative-advantage biological market models: contingency of mutualism on partner's resource requirements and acquisition trade-offs. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 270: 913-919.
23. Hofland-Zijlstra JD, Berendse F. 2009. The effect of nutrient supply and light intensity on tannins and mycorrhizal colonisation in Dutch heathland ecosystems. Plant Ecology 201: 661-675.
24. Hunt R, Hope-Simpson JF. 1990. Growth of Pyrola rotundifolia ssp. maritima in relation to shade. New Phytologist 114: 129-137.
25. Hurst SE, Turnbull MH, Norton DA. 2002. The effect of plant light environment on mycorrhizal colonization in field-grown seedlings of podocarp-angiosperm forest tree species. New Zealand Journal of Botany 40: 65-72.
26. Johnson NC. 2010. Resource stoichiometry elucidates the structure and function of arbuscular mycorrhizas across scales. New Phytologist 185: 631-647.
27. Johnson NC, Graham JH, Smith FA. 1997. Functioning of mycorrhizal associations along the mutualism-parasitism continuum. New Phytologist 135: 575-585.
28. Johnson NC, Hoeksema JD, Bever JD, Chaudhary VB, Gehring CA, Klironomos JN, Koide R, Miller RM, Moore J, Moutoglis P et al. 2006. From Lilliput to Brobdingnag: extending models of mycorrhizal function across scales. BioScience 56: 889-900.
29. Johnson NC, Rowland DL, Corkidi L, Allen EB. 2008. Characteristics of plant winners and losers in grassland eutrophication-importance of allocation plasticity and mycorrhiza function. Ecology 89: 2868-2878.
30. Johnson NC, Rowland DL, Corkidi L, Egerton-Warburton L, Allen EB. 2003. Nitrogen enrichment alters mycorrhizal allocation at five mesic to semiarid grasslands. Ecology 84: 1895-1908.
31. Johnson NC, Wilson GWT, Bowker MA, Wilson JA, Miller RM. 2010. Resource limitation is a driver of local adaptation in mycorrhizal symbioses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 107: 2093-2098.
32. Jones MD, Smith SE. 2004. Exploring functional definitions of mycorrhizas: are mycorrhizas always mutualisms? Canadian Journal of Botany 82: 1089-1109.
33. Kiers ET, Duhamel M, Beesetty Y, Mensah JA, Franken O, Verbruggen E, Fellbaum CR, Kowalchuk GA, Hart MM, Bago A et al. 2011. Reciprocal rewards stabilize cooperation in the mycorrhizal symbiosis. Science 333: 880-882.
34. Kiers ET, van der Heijden MGA. 2006. Mutualistic stability in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis: exploring hypotheses of evolutionary cooperation. Ecology 87: 1627-1636.
35. 2 overestimates community response in a model plant-soil system. Nature 433: 621-624.
36. Louis I, Lim G. 1988. Effect of storage of inoculum on spore germination of a tropical isolate of Clomus clarum. Mycologia 80: 157-161.
37. Millar JA, Ballhorn DJ. 2013. Effect of mycorrhizal colonization and light limitation on growth and reproduction of lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus L.). Journal of Applied Botany and Food Quality 86: 172-179.
38. Morton JB, Bentivenga SP, Wheeler WW. 1993. Germ plasm in the international collection of arbuscular and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (INVAM) and procedures for culture development, documentation and storage. Mycotaxon 48: 491-528.
39. Sachs JL, Simms EL. 2006. Pathways to mutualism breakdown. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21: 585-592.
40. Schwartz MW, Hoeksema JD. 1998. Specialization and resource trade: biological markets as a model of mutualisms. Ecology 79: 1029-1038.
41. Smith SE, Read DJ. 2008. Mycorrhizal symbiosis. New York, NY, USA: Academic Press.
42. Soares MC, Côté IM, Cardoso SC, Bshary R. 2008. The cleaning goby mutualism: a system without punishment, partner switching or tactile stimulation. Journal of Zoology 276: 306-312.
43. Son CL, Smith SE. 1988. Mycorrhizal growth responses: interactions between photon irradiance and phosphorus nutrition. New Phytologist 108: 305-314.
44. Tester M, Smith SE, Smith FA, Walker NA. 1986. Effects of photon irradiance on the growth of shoots and roots, on the rate of initiation of mycorrhizal infection and on the growth of infection units in Trifolium subterraneum L. New Phytologist 103: 375-390.
45. Thompson JN. 2005. The geographic mosaic of coevolution. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.
46. Verbruggen E, Mouden CE, Jansa J, Akkermans G, Bücking H, West SA, Kiers ET. 2012. Spatial structure and interspecific cooperation: theory and an empirical test using the mycorrhizal mutualism. The American Naturalist 179: 133-146.
47. Vogelsang KM, Bever JD. 2009. Mycorrhizal densities decline in association with nonnative plants and contribute to plant invasion. Ecology 90: 399-407.