Higgs boson coupling measurements and direct searches as complementary probes of the phenomenological MSSM

Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Volumn 90, Issue 9, 2014, Pages

  Cahill Rowley, M ^a   Hewett, J ^a   Ismail, A ^b,c   Rizzo, T ^a  

^a SLAC NATIONAL ACCELERATOR LABORATORY   (United States)

^b ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84911872865     PISSN: 15507998     EISSN: 15502368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.095017     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. G. Aad (ATLAS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 716, 1 (2012); PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020
2. S. Chatrchyan (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 716, 30 (2012). PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.021
3. A. Djouadi (MSSM Working Group Collaboration), arXiv:hep-ph/9901246;
4. C.F. Berger, J.S. Gainer, J.L. Hewett, and T.G. Rizzo, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2009) 023. JHEPFG 1029-8479 10.1088/1126-6708/2009/02/023
5. M.W. Cahill-Rowley, J.L. Hewett, S. Hoeche, A. Ismail, and T.G. Rizzo, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 2156 (2012). EPCFFB 1434-6044 10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-2156-1
6. M.W. Cahill-Rowley, J.L. Hewett, A. Ismail, and T.G. Rizzo, Phys. Rev. D 86, 075015 (2012); PRVDAQ 1550-7998 10.1103/PhysRevD.86.075015
7. M.W. Cahill-Rowley, J.L. Hewett, A. Ismail, and T.G. Rizzo Phys. Rev. D 88, 035002 (2013); PRVDAQ 1550-7998 10.1103/PhysRevD.88.035002
8. M.W. Cahill-Rowley, J.L. Hewett, A. Ismail, and T.G. Rizzo Proc. Sci., ICHEP2012 (2013) 135, arXiv:1211.7106;
9. M.W. Cahill-Rowley, J.L. Hewett, A. Ismail, and T.G. Rizzo in Community Summer Study 2013, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 2013, http://www.slac.stanford.edu/econf/C1307292/Snowmass2013Proceedings.html.
10. M. Cahill-Rowley, J.L. Hewett, A. Ismail, and T.G. Rizzo, arXiv:1407.4130.
11. M. Cahill-Rowley, R. Cotta, A. Drlica-Wagner, S. Funk, J. Hewett, A. Ismail, T. Rizzo, and M. Wood, arXiv:1405.6716;
12. M. Cahill-Rowley, R. Cotta, A. Drlica-Wagner, S. Funk, J. Hewett, A. Ismail, T. Rizzo, and M. Wood arXiv:1305.6921.
13. For an overview of MSSM physics and phenomenology as well as mSUGRA, see M. Drees, R. Godbole, and P. Roy, Theory and Phenomenology of Sparticles (World Scientific, Hackensack, 2004), p. 555;
14. H. Baer and X. Tata, Weak Scale Supersymmetry: From Superfields to Scattering Events (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006), p. 537;
15. S.P. Martin, in Perspectives on Supersymmetry II, edited by G.L. Kane (World Scientific, Singapore, 2010), p. 153.
16. T. Cohen and J.G. Wacker, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2013) 061. JHEPFG 1029-8479 10.1007/JHEP09(2013)061
17. B.C. Allanach, Comput. Phys. Commun. 143, 305 (2002). CPHCBZ 0010-4655 10.1016/S0010-4655(01)00460-X
18. A. Djouadi, J.L. Kneur, and G. Moultaka, Comput. Phys. Commun. 176, 426 (2007). CPHCBZ 0010-4655 10.1016/j.cpc.2006.11.009
19. E. Komatsu (WMAP Collaboration), Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 192, 18 (2011); APJSA2 0067-0049 10.1088/0067-0049/192/2/18
20. P.A.R. Ade (Planck Collaboration), Astron. Astrophys., 571, A16 (2014). AAEJAF 0004-6361 10.1051/0004-6361/201321591
21. A. Djouadi, M.M. Muhlleitner, and M. Spira, Acta Phys. Pol. B 38, 635 (2007). APOBBB 0587-4254
22. Thanks to M. Spira, we employed HDECAY 5.11 in the analysis. The latest version of HDECAY can be obtained from http://tiger.web.psi.ch/hdecay/;
23. For the original reference, see A. Djouadi, J. Kalinowski, and M. Spira, Comput. Phys. Commun. 108, 56 (1998). CPHCBZ 0010-4655 10.1016/S0010-4655(97)00123-9
24. J.R. Ellis, K. Enqvist, D.V. Nanopoulos, and F. Zwirner, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 01, 57 (1986); MPLAEQ 0217-7323 10.1142/S0217732386000105
25. R. Barbieri and G.F. Giudice, Nucl. Phys. B306, 63 (1988). NUPBBO 0550-3213 10.1016/0550-3213(88)90171-X
26. S. Chatrchyan (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 713, 408 (2012); PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/j.physletb.2012.06.023
27. S. Chatrchyan (CMS Collaboration) Phys. Lett. B 713, 68 (2012). PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/j.physletb.2012.05.028
28. R. Aaij (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 101805 (2013); PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.101805
29. S. Chatrchyan (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 101804 (2013); PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.101804
30. The analysis as presented here, however, employs the earlier results as given in R. Aaij (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 021801 (2013), The numerical impact of these later results on our analysis is very minor. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.021801
31. T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P.Z. Skands, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2006) 026. JHEPFG 1029-8479 10.1088/1126-6708/2006/05/026
32. J. Conway, PGS4, Pretty Good detector Simulation, http://www.physics.ucdavis.edu/~conway/research/software/pgs/pgs4-general.htm.
33. W. Beenakker, R. Hopker, M. Spira, and P.M. Zerwas, Nucl. Phys. B492, 51 (1997); NUPBBO 0550-3213 10.1016/S0550-3213(97)80027-2
34. W. Beenakker, M. Kramer, T. Plehn, M. Spira, and P.M. Zerwas, Nucl. Phys. B515, 3 (1998); NUPBBO 0550-3213 10.1016/S0550-3213(98)00014-5
35. W. Beenakker, M. Klasen, M. Kramer, T. Plehn, M. Spira, and P.M. Zerwas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3780 (1999); PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.3780
36. W. Beenakker, M. Klasen, M. Kramer, T. Plehn, M. Spira, and P.M. Zerwas Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 029901 (2008). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.029901
37. J.A. Conley, J.S. Gainer, J.L. Hewett, M.P. Le, and T.G. Rizzo, Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1697 (2011); EPCFFB 1434-6044 10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1697-z
38. J.A. Conley, J.S. Gainer, J.L. Hewett, M.P. Le, and T.G. Rizzo arXiv:1103.1697 [Phys. Rev. D (to be published)].
39. See ATLAS, Reports No. ATLAS-PHYS-PUB-2013-001, No. ATLAS-PHYS-PUB-2013-002, No. ATLAS-PHYS-PUB-2013-004, and No. ATLAS-PHYS-PUB-2013-011 for details of this analysis.
40. The Higgs coupling results from ATLAS based on 7 and 8 TeV data can be found at https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/AtlasPublic/HiggsPublicResults, while those from CMS can be found at https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMSPublic/PhysicsResultsHIG.
41. We employ the results as presented by ATLAS in Report No. ATL-PHYS-PUB-2012-004;
42. and by CMS as presented by J. Olsen, in Snowmass Energy Workshop, University of Washington, Seattle, 2013.
43. In the numerical analysis presented here, we make explicit use of these projected coupling determinations as given in S. Dawson, A. Gritsan, H. Logan, J. Qian, C. Tully, R. Van Kooten, A. Ajaib, A. Anastassov, arXiv:1310.8361.
44. We follow the results as presented by M.E. Peskin, arXiv:1207.2516;
45. M. Klute, R. Lafaye, T. Plehn, M. Rauch, and D. Zerwas, Europhys. Lett. 101, 51001 (2013); EULEEJ 0295-5075 10.1209/0295-5075/101/51001
46. H. Baer, The ILC Technical Design Report (2013), vol. 2, http://www.slac.stanford.edu/econf/C1307292/Snowmass2013Proceedings.html;
47. Here we make explicit use of the Higgs coupling analysis results as presented in D.M. Asner, T. Barklow, C. Calancha, K. Fujii, N. Graf, H.E. Haber, A. Ishikawa, S. Kanemura, arXiv:1310.0763.
48. M. Carena, S. Gori, N.R. Shah, C.E.M. Wagner, and L.-T. Wang, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2013) 087. JHEPFG 1029-8479 10.1007/JHEP08(2013)087
49. P. Draper, G. Lee, and C.E.M. Wagner, Phys. Rev. D 89, 055023 (2014). PRVDAQ 1550-7998 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.055023