The 90-Day Mortality After Pancreatectomy for Cancer Is Double the 30-Day Mortality: More than 20,000 Resections From the National Cancer Data Base

Annals of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 21, Issue 13, 2014, Pages 4059-4067

  Swanson, Richard S ^a   Pezzi, Christopher M ^b   Mallin, Katherine ^c   Loomis, Ashley M ^c   Winchester, David P ^c  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b Family Medicine Residency Program   (United States)

^c AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; COMORBIDITY; DATA BASE; FEMALE; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; INCOME; INSURANCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAID; MEDICARE; MORTALITY; PANCREAS CANCER; PANCREAS RESECTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; VERY ELDERLY; ADOLESCENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FACTUAL DATABASE; HIGH VOLUME HOSPITAL; LOW VOLUME HOSPITAL; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; SURVIVAL RATE; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FEMALE; HOSPITALS, HIGH-VOLUME; HOSPITALS, LOW-VOLUME; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREATECTOMY; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; RISK FACTORS; SURVIVAL RATE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84911487914     PISSN: 10689265     EISSN: 15344681     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-4036-4     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Lieberman MD, Kilburn H, Lindsey M, Brennan MF. Relation of perioperative deaths to hospital volume among patients undergoing pancreatic resection for malignancy. Ann Surg. 1995;222:638–45.
2. Gordon TA, Burleyson, GP, Tielsch JM, Cameron JL. The effects of regionalization on cost and outcome for one general high-risk surgical procedure. Ann Surg. 1995;221: 43–9.
3. Glasgow RE, Mulvihill SJ. Hospital volume influences outcome in patients undergoing pancreatic resection for cancer. West J Med. 1996;165:294–300.
4. Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ, Brennan MF. Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA. 1998;280:1747–51.
5. Kotwall CA, Maxwell JG, Brinker CC, Koch GG, Covington DL. National estimates of mortality rates for radical pancreaticoduodenectomy in 25,000 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9:847–54.
6. Simunovic M, To T, Theriault M, Langer B. Relation between hospital surgical volume and outcome for pancreatic resection for neoplasm in a publicly funded health care system. CMAJ. 1999;160:643–8.
7. Killeen SD, O’Sullivan MJ, Coffey JC, Kirwan WO, Redmond HP. Provider volume and outcomes for oncological procedures. Br J Surg. 2005;92:389–402.
8. Janes RH, Niederhuber JE, Chmiel JS, Winchester DP, Ocwieja KC, Karnell LH, Clive RE, Menck HR. National patterns of care for pancreatic cancer: results of a survey by the Commission on Cancer. Ann Surg. 1996;223:261–72.
9. Bilimoria KY, Stewart AK, Winchester DP, Ko CY. The National Cancer Data Base: a powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:683–90.
10. Facility Oncology Registry Data Standards Revised for 2013, appendix B, p. 385. Retrieved 15 February 2014 at http://www.facs.org/cancer/coc/fords/fords-manual-2013.pdf.
11. Elixhauser A, Steiner, C, Harris DR, Coffey RM. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care. 1998;36:8–27.
12. Lieffers JR, Baracos VE, Winget M, Fassbender K. A comparison of Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity measures to predict colorectal cancer survival using administrative health data. Cancer. 2011;117:1957–65.
13. Southern DA, Quan H, Ghali WA. Comparison of the Elixhauser and Charlson/Deyo methods of comorbidity measurement in administrative data. Med Care. 2004;42:355–60.