A Novel Method for Intraoperative Sentinel Lymph Node Detection in Prostate Cancer Patients Using Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles and a Handheld Magnetometer: The Initial Clinical Experience

Annals of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 21, Issue 13, 2014, Pages 4390-4396

  Winter, Alexander ^a   Woenkhaus, Joachim ^b   Wawroschek, Friedhelm ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OLDENBURG   (Germany)

^b Institute of Pathology Oldenburg   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; SUPERPARAMAGNETIC IRON OXIDE NANOPARTICLE; CONTRAST MEDIUM; MAGNETITE NANOPARTICLE; RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL AGENT;

AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; GLEASON SCORE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MAGNETOMETER; MALE; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION; CANCER STAGING; CELL TRACKING; DEVICES; DIAGNOSTIC USE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FOLLOW UP; LYMPH NODE; MAGNETOMETRY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT MONITORING; PROCEDURES; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; SCINTISCANNING;

AGED; CELL TRACKING; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LYMPH NODE EXCISION; LYMPH NODES; MAGNETITE NANOPARTICLES; MAGNETOMETRY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; NEOPLASM STAGING; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS; SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY;

EID: 84911469414     PISSN: 10689265     EISSN: 15344681     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-4024-8     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Withrow DR, DeGroot JM, Siemens DR, Groome PA. Therapeutic value of lymph node dissection at radical prostatectomy: a population-based case-cohort study. BJU Int. 2011;108:209-16.
2. Schumacher MC, Burkhard FC, Thalmann GN, Fleischmann A, Studer UE. Good outcome for patients with few lymph node metastases after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2008;54:344-52.
3. Holl G, Dorn R, Wengenmair H, Weckermann D, Sciuk J. Validation of sentinel lymph node dissection in prostate cancer: experience in more than 2,000 patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36:1377-82.
4. Sadeghi R, Tabasi KT, Bazaz SM, et al. Sentinel node mapping in the prostate cancer. Meta-analysis. Nuklearmedizin. 2011;50:107-15.
5. Straver ME, Meijnen P, van Tienhoven G, et al. Sentinel node identification rate and nodal involvement in the EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(7):1854-1861.
6. Musch M, Klevecka V, Roggenbuck U, et al. Complications of pelvic lymphadenectomy in 1,380 patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy between 1993 and 2006. J Urol. 2008;179:923-8.
7. Winter A, Vogt C, Weckermann D, Wawroschek F. Complications of pelvic lymphadenectomy in clinically localised prostate cancer: different techniques in comparison and dependency on the number of removed lymph nodes. Aktuelle Urol. 2011;42:179-83.
8. Wawroschek F, Vogt H, Weckermann D, Wagner T, Harzmann R. The sentinel lymph node concept in prostate cancer - first results of gamma probe-guided sentinel lymph node identification. Eur Urol. 1999;36:595-600.
9. Wawroschek F, Vogt H, Weckermann D, Wagner T, Hamm M, Harzmann R. Radioisotope guided pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer. J Urol. 2001;166:1715-9.
10. Ahmed M, de Rosales RT, Douek M. Preclinical studies of the role of iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles for nonpalpable lesion localization in breast cancer. J Surg Res. 2013;185:27-35.
11. Johnson L, Pinder SE, Douek M. Deposition of superparamagnetic iron-oxide nanoparticles in axillary sentinel lymph nodes following subcutaneous injection. Histopathology. 2013;62:481-6.
12. Douek M, Klaase J, Monypenny I, et al. Sentinel node biopsy using a magnetic tracer versus standard technique: the SentiMAG multicentre trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;23:175-9.
13. Thill M, Kurylcio A, Welter R, et al. The Central-European SentiMag study: Sentinel lymph node biopsy with superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) vs. radioisotope. Breast. 2014;23:175-9.
14. Wawroschek F, Wengenmair H, Senekowitsch-Schmidtke R, et al. Prostate lymphoscintigraphy for sentinel lymph node identification in canines: reproducibility, uptake, and biokinetics depending on different injection strategies. Urol Res. 2003;31:152-8.
15. Buckle T, Brouwer OR, Valdés Olmos RA, van der Poel HG, van Leeuwen FW. Relationship between intraprostatic tracer deposits and sentinel lymph node mapping in prostate cancer patients. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:1026-33.
16. Weingärtner K, Ramaswamy A, Bittinger A, Gerharz EW, Vöge D, Riedmiller H. Anatomical basis for pelvic lymphadenectomy in prostate cancer: results of an autopsy study and implications for the clinic. J Urol. 1996;156:1969-71.
17. Winter A, Kneib T, Henke RP, Wawroschek F. Sentinel lymph node dissection in more than 1200 prostate cancer cases: Rate and prediction of lymph node involvement depending on preoperative tumor characteristics. Int J Urol. 2014;21:58-63.
18. Joniau S, Van den Bergh L, Lerut E, Deroose CM, Haustermans K, Oyen R, Budiharto T, Ameye F, Bogaerts K, Van Poppel H. Mapping of pelvic lymph node metastases in prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2013;63:450-8.
19. Jeschke S, Lusuardi L, Myatt A, Hruby S, Pirich C, Janetschek G. Visualisation of the lymph node pathway in real time by laparoscopic radioisotope- and fluorescence-guided sentinel lymph node dissection in prostate cancer staging. Urology. 2012;80:1080-6.
20. Van der Poel HG, Buckle T, Brouwer OR, Valdés Olmos RA, van Leeuwen FW. Intraoperative laparoscopic fluorescence guidance to the sentinel lymph node in prostate cancer patients: clinical proof of concept of an integrated functional imaging approach using a multimodal tracer. Eur Urol. 2011;60:826-33.
21. Manny TB, Patel M, Hemal AK. Fluorescence-enhanced robotic radical prostatectomy using real-time lymphangiography and tissue marking with percutaneous injection of unconjugated indocyanine green: the initial clinical experience in 50 patients. Eur Urol. 2013 Nov 21. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.017.
22. Shiozawa M1, Kobayashi S, Sato Y, et al. Magnetic resonance lymphography of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer using superparamagnetic iron oxide: a feasibility study. BreastCancer. 2012 Aug 28.
23. Van den Berg NS, Valdés-Olmos RA, van der Poel HG, van Leeuwen FW. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for prostate cancer: a hybrid approach. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:493-6.
24. Van den Berg NS, van Leeuwen FW, van der Poel HG. Fluorescence guidance in urologic surgery. Curr Opin Urol. 2012;22:109–120.
25. Van Leeuwen AC, Buckle T, Bendle G, et al. Tracer-cocktail injections for combined pre- and intraoperative multimodal imaging of lymph nodes in a spontaneous mouse prostate tumor model. JBiomed Opt. 2011;16:016004.
26. Faries MB, Bedrosian I, Reynolds C, Nguyen HQ, Alavi A, Czerniecki BJ. Active macromolecule uptake by lymph node antigen-presenting cells: a novel mechanism in determining sentinel lymph node status. Ann Surg Oncol. 2000;7:98-105.
27. Troyan SL, Kianzad V, Gibbs-Strauss SL, et al. The FLARE intraoperative near-infrared fluorescence imaging system: a first-in-human clinical trial in breast cancer sentinel lymph node mapping. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2943-52.
28. Brouwer OR, van den Berg NS, Mathéron HM, et al. A hybrid radioactive and fluorescent tracer for sentinel node biopsy in penile carcinoma as a potential replacement for blue dye. Eur Urol. 2014;65:600-9.
29. Fortuin AS, Smeenk RJ, Meijer HJ, Witjes AJ, Barentsz JO. Lymphotropic nanoparticle-enhanced MRI in prostate cancer: value and therapeutic potential. Curr Urol Rep. 2014;15:389. doi: 10.1007/s11934-013-0389-7.
30. Motomura K, Ishitobi M, Komoike Y, et al. SPIO-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of metastases in sentinel nodes localized by computed tomography lymphography in patients with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:3422-9.