Quantitative multi-hazard risk assessment with vulnerability surface and hazard joint return period

Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 35-44

  Ming, Xiaodong ^a   Xu, Wei ^a   Li, Ying ^a   Du, Juan ^a   Liu, Baoyin ^b   Shi, Peijun ^a  

^a BEIJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Copula; Joint probability distribution; Multi hazard; Risk; Vulnerability surface

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL ROBOTS; CROPS; DISASTERS; FLOODS; HAZARDS; INSURANCE; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; RISK MANAGEMENT; RISKS;

AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT; AGRICULTURAL HAZARDS; COPULA; FUNCTIONAL RELATIONSHIP; JOINT PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; JOINT RETURN PERIOD; MULTI-HAZARDS; QUANTITATIVE APPROACH;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT; DISASTER MANAGEMENT; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; PROBABILITY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; VULNERABILITY;

CHINA; YANGTZE DELTA;

EID: 84911450325     PISSN: 14363240     EISSN: 14363259     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00477-014-0935-y     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Annaka T, Satake K, Sakakiyama T et al (2007) Logic-tree approach for probabilistic tsunami hazard analysis and its applications to the Japanese coasts. Pure appl Geophys 164(2–3):577–592
2. Arnold M, Chen RS, Deichmann U et al (2006) Natural Disaster Hotspots Case Studies. World Bank Publications, Washington
3. Bell R, Glade T (2004) Multi-hazard analysis in natural risk assessment. WIT Press, Boston
4. Benjamin J, Cornell C (1970) Probability, statistics, and decision for civil engineers. McGraw-Hill, New York
5. Cardona OD (2003) The need for rethinking the concepts of vulnerability and risk from a holistic perspective: a necessary review and criticism for effective. In: Bankoff G, Frerks G, Hilhorst D (eds) Mapping vulnerability: Disasters, development and people. Earthscan, London, pp 37–51
6. Corotis RB (2007) An introduction to the special issue: an overview, history and context for the consideration of risk in the built environment. Int J Risk Assess Manag 7(6):759–772
7. Crichton D (1999) Natural Disaster Management. In: Ingleton J (ed) The risk triangle. Tudor Rose, London, pp 102–103
8. Dilley M (2005) Natural disaster hotspots: a global risk analysis. World Bank Publications, Washington
9. Ehrlich D, Zeug G, Gallego J et al (2010) Quantifying the building stock from optical high-resolution satellite imagery for assessing disaster risk. Geocarto Int 25(4):281–293
10. Eskelinen H, Hirvonen T (2006) Positioning Finland in a European Space. Ministry of the Environment, Helsinki
11. Favre A-C, El Adlouni S, Perreault L et al (2004) Multivariate hydrological frequency analysis using copulas. Water Resour Res 40(1):1–12
12. FEMA (2011) Getting started with HAZUS-MH 2.1. Technical Manual. Department of Homeland Security, Washington
13. Fleischhauer M, Greiving S, Schlusemann B (2005) Multi-risk assessment of spatially relevant hazards in Europe. European Safety Management Group Symposium. Nürnberg, Germany, pp 1–14
14. Ge Y, Dou W, Gu Z et al (2013) Assessment of social vulnerability to natural hazards in the Yangtze River Delta, China. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 27(8):1899–1908
15. Genest C, Favre A-C (2007) Everything you always wanted to know about copula modeling but were afraid to ask. J Hydrol Eng 12(4):347–368
16. Greiving S (2006) Integrated risk assessment of multi-hazards: a new methodology. Natural and technological hazards and risks affecting the spatial development of European regions. Geol Surv of Finl, Special Paper 42:75–82
17. Grünthal G, Thieken HA, Schwarz J et al (2006) Comparative risk assessments for the city of cologne—storms, floods earthquakes. Nat Hazards 38(1–2):21–44
18. Kappes MS, Keiler M, Elverfeldt K, Glade T (2012) Challenges of analyzing multi-hazard risk: a review. Nat Hazards 64(2):1925–1958
19. Khanduri AC, Morrow GC (2003) Vulnerability of buildings to windstorms and insurance loss estimation. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 91(4):455–467
20. Lee KH, Rosowsky DV (2006) Fragility analysis of woodframe buildings considering combined snow and earthquake loading. Struct Saf 28(3):289–303
21. Li Y, Van de Lindt JW (2012) Loss-based formulation for multiple hazards with application to residential buildings. Eng Struct 38:123–133
22. Li N, Liu X, Xie W et al (2013) The return period analysis of natural disasters with statistical modeling of bivariate joint probability distribution. Risk Anal 33(1):134–145
23. Liu B (2011) Multi-hazard Risk Assessment in the Yangtze River Delta Region: A Case Study on Human Life. Dissertation, Beijing Normal University (in Chinese)
24. Melchiori, M. (2003). Which Archimedean copula is the right one? YieldCurve.com e-Journal. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1123135. Accessed 25 May 2013
25. Merriam DF, Lippert RH (1966) Geologic model studies using trend-surface analysis. J Geol 74(3):344–357
26. Mosquera-Machado S, Dilley M (2009) A comparison of selected global disaster risk assessment results. Nat Hazards 48(3):439–456
27. Murray AT (2009) Quantitative Geography. Journal of Regional Science’s 50th Anniversary Conference. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, New York
28. Nelson R (1999) An introduction to Copulas. Springer, New York
29. Pammenter NW, Vander Willigen C (1998) A mathematical and statistical analysis of the curves illustrating vulnerability of xylem to cavitation. Tree Physiol 18(8–9):589–593
30. Rahman A, Weinmann PE, Hoang TMT, Laurenson EM (2002) Monte Carlo simulation of flood frequency curves from rainfall. J Hydrol 256(3–4):196–210
31. Rodriguez JC (2007) Measuring financial contagion: a Copula approach. J Empir Finance 14(3):401–423
32. Saucier WJ (2003) Principles of meteorological analysis. Courier Dover Publications, New York
33. Schmidt J, Matcham I, Reese S et al (2011) Quantitative multi-risk analysis for natural hazards: a framework for multi-risk modelling. Nat Hazards 58(3):1169–1192
34. Schmidt-thomé P, Kallio H, Greiving S, Fleischhauer M (2003) Development of Natural Hazard maps for European Regions. EU-MEDIN Forum on Disaster Research “The Road to Harmonisation”. Thessaloniki, Greece, pp 26–27
35. Shankman D, Keim BD, Song J (2006) Flood frequency in China’s Poyang Lake region: trends and teleconnections. Int J Climatol 26(9):1255–1266
36. Shi P (2011) Atlas of Natural Disaster Risk of China. Science Press, Beijing
37. Shi P, Shuai J, Chen W, Lu L (2010) Study on large-scale disaster risk assessment and risk transfer models. Int J Disaster Risk 1(2):1–8
38. Shi P, Wang J, Fang X et al (2013) Natural Disaster Risk Assessment in the Yangtze River Delta region of China: Multi-hazard risk assessment and risk mapping. Science Press, Beijing in Chinese
39. Shiau JT (2003) Return period of bivariate distributed extreme hydrological events. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 17(1–2):42–57
40. Thierry P, Stieltjes L, Kouokam E et al (2008) Multi-hazard risk mapping and assessment on an active volcano: the GRINP project at Mount Cameroon. Nat Hazards 45(3):429–456
41. Toro GR, Resio DT, Divoky D et al (2010) Efficient joint-probability methods for hurricane surge frequency analysis. Ocean Eng 37(1):125–134
42. Unwin DJ (1975) An introduction to trend surface analysis. Geo Abstracts Limited, Norwich
43. Wang XL, Zhang J (2007) A nonlinear model for assessing multiple probabilistic risks: a case study in south five-island of Changdao National Nature Reserve in China. J Environ Manage 85(4):1101–1108
44. Yin YJ, Li Y (2011) Probabilistic loss assessment of light-frame wood construction subjected to combined seismic and snow loads. Eng Struct 33(2):380–390
45. Zhang L, Singh V (2006) Bivariate flood frequency analysis using the copula method. J Hydrol Eng 11:150–164. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2006)11:2(150)