Adoption and development of integrated crop-livestock-forestry systems in Mato Grosso, Brazil

Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment

Volumn 199, Issue , 2015, Pages 394-406

  Gil, Juliana ^a   Siebold, Matthias ^a   Berger, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOHENHEIM   (Germany)

Author keywords

ABC credit program; Agricultural intensification; Innovation diffusion; Integrated crop livestock forestry systems; Land use change

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE AGRICULTURE; BIOMASS; DATA SET; FARMERS ATTITUDE; FEDERAL SYSTEM; FORESTRY PRACTICE; INTEGRATED APPROACH; LAND USE CHANGE; MIXED FARMING; PASTURE; PERCEPTION; SOIL ORGANIC MATTER;

BRAZIL; MATO GROSSO;

EID: 84911434861     PISSN: 01678809     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2014.10.008     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. ACRIMAT Diretrizes para o Desenvolvimento da Pecuária de Corte no Estado do Mato Grosso 2012, Associação dos Criadores de Gado do Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, MT.
2. Alves-Pinto H., Newton P., Pinto L. Certifying Sustainability: Opportunities and Challenges for the Cattle Supply Chain in Brazil 2013, CCAFS/CGIAR, Copenhagen, DK.
3. Arvor D., Meirelles M., Dubreuil V., Bégué A., Shimabukuro Y.E. Analyzing the agricultural transition in Mato Grosso, Brazil, using satellite-derived indices. Appl. Geogr. 2012, 32(2):702-713.
4. Reference Document Crop-Livestock-Forestry Integration 2011, 1. EMBRAPA.
5. Batlle-Bayer L., Batjes N.H., Bindraban P.S. Changes in organic carbon stocks upon land use conversion in the Brazilian Cerrado: A review. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2010, vol. 137(1-2):47-58.
6. Batz F., Janssen W., Peters K.J. Predicting technology adoption to improve research priority-setting. Agric. Econ. 2003, vol. 28(2):151-164.
7. Bonaudo T., Bendahan A.B., Sabatier R., Ryschawy J., Bellon S., Leger F., Magda D., Tichit M. Agroecological principles for the redesign of integrated crop-livestock systems. Eur. J. Agron. 2014, 57:43-51.
8. Sistemas de Integração Lavoura-Pecuária-Floresta - A Produção Sustentável 2012, EMBRAPA, Brasília. second ed. D.J. Bungenstab (Ed.).
9. Byerlee D., Stevenson J., Villoria N. Does intensification slow crop land expansion or encourage deforestation?. Global Food Secur. 2014, 3:92-98.
10. Carvalho J.L.N., Raucci G.S., Frazao L.A., Cerri E.C., Bernoux M., Cerri C.C. Crop-pasture rotation: a strategy to reduce soil greenhouse gases emissions in the Brazilian Cerrado. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2014, 183(1):167-175.
11. Carvalho J.L.N., Raucci G.S., Cerri C.E.P., Bernoux M., Feigl B.J., Wruck F.J., Cerri C.C. Impact of pasture, agriculture and crop-livestock systems on soil C stocks in Brazil. Soil Till. Res. 2010, 110(1):175-186.
12. Cerri C.C., Bernoux M., Maia S.M.F., Cerri C.E.P., Costa C., Feigl B.J., Frazão L.A., Mello F.F.C., Galdos M.V., Moreira C.S., Carvalho J.L.N. Greenhouse gas mitigation options in Brazil for land-use change, livestock and agriculture. Sci. Agric. 2010, 67(1):102-116.
13. CNA Guia de Financiamento Para Agricultura de Baixo Carbono 2012, Confederação da Agricultura e Pecuária do Brasil, Brasília, DF.
14. Cohn A., Bowman M., Zilberman D., O'Neill K. The Viability of Cattle Ranching in Brazil as a Strategy to Spare Land and Mitigate Green House Gases Emissions 2011, CCAFS/CGIAR, Copenhagen, DK.
15. Cohn A.S., Mosnier A., Havlík P., Valin H., Herrero M., Schmid E., O'Hare M., Obersteiner M. Cattle ranching intensification in Brazil can reduce global greenhouse gas emissions by sparing land from deforestation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2014, 111(20):7236-7241.
16. CONAB, 2014. Séries Históricas Relativas às Safras 1976/77 a 2013/14 de Área Plantada, Produtividade e Produção. [Homepage of Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento] [Online]. [2014]. http://www.conab.gov.br/conteudos.php%3Fa=1252&t=.
17. Current D., Lutz E., Scherr S.J. The costs and benefits of agroforestry to farmers. World Bank Res. Obser. 1995, 10(2):151-180.
18. Daniel J. Sampling Essentials: Practical Guidelines for Making Sampling Choices 2012, Sage Publications, Inc.
19. EMBRAPA Sistema Brasileiro de Classificação de Solos 2006, EMBRAPA Informação Tecnológica/EMBRAPA Solos, Brasília, DF. second ed.
20. Engler-Palma A., Hoag D.L. Accounting for risk and stability in technology adoption. Can. J. Agric. Econ. 2007, 55(3):365-379.
21. Fearnside P.M., Righi C.A., Graça P., Keizer E.W.H., Cerri C.C., Nogueira E.M., Barbosa R.I. Biomass and greenhouse-gas emissions from land-use change in Brazil's Amazonian arc of deforestation: the states of Mato Grosso and Rondçnia. For. Ecol. Manage. 2009, 258(9):1968-1978.
22. Godfray H.C.J., Beddington J.R., Crute I.R., Haddad L., Lawrence D., Muir J.F., Pretty J., Robinson S., Thomas S.M., Toulmin C. Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 2010, 327(5967):812-818.
23. Henry C., Sharma M., Lapenu C., Zeller M. Microfinance Poverty Assessment Tool 2003, IFPRI, Washington, D.C.
24. IBGE, 2006. National Agricultural Census 2006 [Homepage of Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística], [Online]. [2014]. http://www.ibge.gov.br.
25. IMEA Agro MT. 2022 Outlook 2012, Instituto Matogrossense de Economia Agrícola, Cuiabá, MT.
26. IMEA Bovinocultura Mato-Grossense - Caracterização da Bovinocultura no Estado de Mato Grosso 2010, Instituto Mato-Grossense de Economia Agropecuária, Cuiabá, MT.
27. IMEA, 2010. Mapa de Macrorregiões do Mato Grosso [Homepage of Instituto Mato-Grossense de Economia Agropecuária]. [Online]. [2014]. http://imea.com.br/.
28. Lee D.R. Agricultural sustainability and technology adoption issues and policies for developing countries. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2005, 87:1325-1334.
29. Lemaire G., Franzluebbers A., Carvalho P.C., Dedieu d.F. Integrated crop-livestock systems: strategies to achieve synergy between agricultural production and environmental quality. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2014, 190:4-8.
30. Nepstad D., Soares-Filho B.S., Merry F., Lima A., Moutinho P., Carter J., Bowman M., Cattaneo A., Rodrigues H., Schwartzman S., McGrath D.G., Stickler C.M., Lubowski R., Piris-Cabezas P., Rivero S., Alencar A., Almeida O., Stella O. The end of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Science 2009, 326(5958):1350-1351.
31. Nepstad D., McGrath D., Stickler C., Alencar A., Azevedo A., Swette B., Bezerra T., DiGiano M., Shimada J., Seroa da Motta R., Armijo E., Castello L., Brando P., Hansen M.C., McGrath-Horn M., Carvalho O., Hess L. Slowing Amazon deforestation through public policy and interventions in beef and soy supply chains. Science 2014, 344(6188):1118-1123.
32. Observatório ABC Agricultura de Baixa Emissão de Carbono: Financiado a Transição - Análise dos recursos do Programa ABC 2013, Fundação Getúlio Vargas.
33. Pattanayak S., Mercer D.E., Sills E., Yang J., Cassingham K. Taking Stock of Agroforestry Adoption Studies 2002, RTI International.
34. 4 emissions and carbon pool due to integrated crop-livestock in a subtropical ferralsol. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2014, 190:87-93.
35. Rogers E. Diffusion of Innovations 2003, Free Press, New York. fifth ed.
36. Salton J.C., Mercante F.M., Tomazi M., Zanatta J.A., Concenço G., Silva W.M., Retore M. Integrated crop-livestock system in tropical Brazil: toward a sustainable production system. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2014, 190:70-79.
37. de Silva F.D., Amado T.J.C., Ferreira A.O., Assmann J.M., Anghinoni I., de Carvalho P.C.F. Soil carbon indices as affected by 10 years of integrated crop-livestock production with different pasture grazing intensities in Southern Brazil. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2014, 190:60-69.
38. Silva J.E., Resck D.V.S., Corazza E.J., Vivaldi L. Carbon storage in clayey Oxisol cultivated pastures in the Cerrado region Brazil. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2004, 103(2):357-363.
39. Strassburg B.B.N., Latawiec A.E., Barioni L.G., Nobre C.A., da Silva V.P., Valentim J.F., Vianna M., Assad E.D. When enough should be enough: improving the use of current agricultural lands could meet production demands and spare natural habitats in Brazil. Global Environ. Change 2014, 28:84-97.