Development of a diurnal dehydration index for spring barley phenotyping

Functional Plant Biology

Volumn 41, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 1249-1260

  Rischbeck, Pablo ^a   Baresel, Peter ^a   Elsayed, Salah ^a   Mistele, Bodo ^a   Schmidhalter, Urs ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

abiotic stress; drought tolerance; high throughput; phenomics; precision phenotyping; spectroscopy

Indexed keywords

BARLEY; BIOMASS; CANOPY; CROP YIELD; CULTIVAR; DEHYDRATION; DROUGHT STRESS; FIELD METHOD; PHENOTYPE; SPECTROMETRY; WATER AVAILABILITY;

HORDEUM;

EID: 84911432763     PISSN: 14454408     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1071/FP14069     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bastiaanssen WGM, Noordman EJM, Pelgrum H, Davids G, Thoreson BP, Allen RG (2005) SEBAL model with remotely sensed data to improve water-resources management under actual field conditions. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 131, 85-93. doi:10.1061/(ASCE) 0733-9437(2005)131 : 1(85)
2. Bowman WD (1989) The relationship between leaf water status, gas exchange, and spectral reflectance in cotton leaves. Remote Sensing of Environment 30, 249-255. doi:10.1016/0034-4257(89)90066-7
3. Carter GA (1991) Primary and secondary effects of water content on the spectral reflectance of leaves. American Journal of Botany 78, 916-924. doi:10.2307/2445170
4. Ceccato P, Flasse S, Tarantola S, Jacquemoud S, Gregoire JM (2001) Detecting vegetation leaf water content using reflectance in the optical domain. Remote Sensing of Environment 77, 22-33. doi:10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00191-2
5. Ceccato P, Flasse S, Gregoire JM (2002) Designing a spectral index to estimate vegetation water content from remote sensing data-Part 2. Validation and applications. Remote Sensing of Environment 82, 198-207. doi:10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00036-6
6. Ceccato P, Gobron N, Flasse S, Pinty B, Tarantola S (2002) Designing a spectral index to estimate vegetation water content from remote sensing data. Part 1: Theoretical approach. Remote Sensing of Environment 82, 188-197. doi:10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00037-8
7. Elsayed S, Mistele B, Schmidhalter U (2011) Can changes in leaf water potential be assessed spectrally? Functional Plant Biology 38, 523-533.
8. Erdle K, Mistele B, Schmidhalter U (2011) Comparison of active and passive spectral sensors in discriminating biomass parameters and nitrogen status in wheat cultivars. Field Crops Research 124, 74-84. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2011.06.007
9. Federal Biological Research Center for Agriculture and Forestry. Growth stages of mono-And dicotyledonous plants 2001 In 'BBCH Monograph. (2nd edn) (Federal Biological Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry: Berlin and Braunschweig, Germany)
10. Font L, Körösi F (2005) Optical measuring system for water stress indication of tomato plants. Acta Horticulturae 691, 781-788.
11. Gao BC (1996) A normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space. Remote Sensing of Environment 58, 257-266. doi:10.1016/S0034-4257(96)00067-3
12. Girma FS, Krieg DR (1992) Osmotic adjustment in sorghum. I: Mechanisms of diurnal osmotic potential changes. Plant Physiology 99(2), 577-582. doi:10.1104/pp.99.2.577
13. Gutierrez M, Reynolds MP, Klatt AR (2010) Association of water spectral indices with plant and soil water relations in contrasting wheat genotypes. Journal of Experimental Botany 61, 3291-3303. doi:10.1093/jxb/erq156
14. Gutierrez-Rodriguez M, Reynolds MP, Escalante-Estrada JA, Rodriguez-Gonzalez MT (2004) Association between canopy reflectance indices and yield and physiological traits in bread wheat under drought and well-irrigated conditions. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 55, 1139-1147. doi:10.1071/AR04214
15. Hackl H, Mistele B, Hu Y, Schmidhalter U (2013) Spectral assessment of wheat plants grown in pots and containers under saline conditions. Functional Plant Biology 40, 409-424. doi:10.1071/FP12208
16. Kipp S, Mistele B, Schmidhalter U (2014) Identification of stay-green and early-senescence phenotypes in high-yielding winter wheat and their relationship to grain yield and grain protein concentration using highthroughput phenotyping techniques. Functional Plant Biology 41, 227-235. doi:10.1071/FP13221
17. Kipp S, Mistele B, Schmidhalter U (2014) The performance of active spectral reflectance sensors as influenced by measuring distance, device temperature and light intensity. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 100, 24-33. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2013.10.007
18. Liu L, Wang J, Huang W, Zhao C, Zhang B, Tong Q (2004) Estimating winter wheat plant water content using red edge parameters. International Journal of Remote Sensing 25, 3331-3342. doi:10.1080/ 01431160310001654365
19. Millar AA, Jensen RE, Bauer A, Norum EB (1971) Influence of atmospheric and soil environmental parameters on the diurnal fluctuations of leaf water status of barley. Agricultural Meteorology 8, 93-105. doi:10.1016/ 0002-1571(71)90099-9
20. Mistele B, Elsayed S, Schmidhalter U (2012) Assessing water status in wheat under field conditions using laser-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and hyperspectral measurements. In '11th International Conference on Precision Agriculture. (International Society of Precision Agriculture: Indianapolis, IN USA)
21. Penuelas J, Pinol J, Ogaya R, Filella I (1997) Estimation of plant water concentration by the reflectance water index WI (R900/R970). International Journal of Remote Sensing 18(13), 2869-2875. doi:10.1080/014311697217396
22. Rascher U, Blossfeld S, Fiorani F, Jahnke S, Jansen M, Kuhn AJ, Matsubara S, Märtin LLA, Merchant A, Metzner R, Mueller-Linow M, Nagel KA, Pieruschka R, Pinto F, Schreiber CM, Temperton VM, Thorpe MR, van Dusschoten D, van Volkenburgh E, Windt CW, Schurr U (2011) Noninvasive approaches for phenotyping of enhanced performance traits in beans. Functional Plant Biology 38, 968-983. doi:10.1071/FP11164
23. Römer C, Wahabzada M, Ballvora A, Pinto F, Rossini M, Panigada C, Behmann J, Leon J, Thurau C, Bauckhage C, Kersting K, Rascher U, Plumer L (2012) Early drought stress detection in cereals: Simplex volume maximisation for hyperspectral image analysis. Functional Plant Biology 39, 878-890. doi:10.1071/FP12060
24. Schmidhalter U, Burucs Z, Camp KH (1998) Sensitivity of root and leaf water status in maize (Zea mays) subjected to mild soil dryness. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 25, 307-316. doi:10.1071/PP97047
25. Seelig HD, Hoehn A, Stodieck LS, Klaus DM, Adams WW, Emery WJ (2008) The assessment of leaf water content using leaf reflectance ratios in the visible, near-, and short-wave infrared. International Journal of Remote Sensing 29, 3701-3713. doi:10.1080/01431160701772500
26. Smart RE, Bingham GE (1974) Rapid estimates of relative water content. Plant Physiology 53, 258-260. doi:10.1104/pp.53.2.258
27. Van Iersel MW, Oosterhuis DM (1995) Diurnal water relations of expanding and full sized cotton fruits and subtending leaves. Plant, Cell & Environment 18, 807-812. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00585.x
28. Weatherley PE (1950) Studies in the water relations of the cotton plant. New Phytologist 49, 81-97. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1950.tb05146.x
29. Weber JA, Ustin SL (1991) Diurnal water relations of walnut trees: Implications for remote sensing. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 29, 864-874. doi:10.1109/TGRS.1991.1019470
30. Winterhalter L, Mistele B, Jampatong S, Schmidhalter U (2011) High throughput phenotyping of canopy water mass and canopy temperature in well-watered and drought stressed tropical maize hybrids in the vegetative stage. European Journal of Agronomy 35, 22-32. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2011.03.004
31. Zarco-Tejada PJ, Berni JAJ, Suarez L, Sepulcre-Canto G, Morales F, Miller JR (2009) Imaging chlorophyll fluorescence with an airborne narrowband multi-spectral camera for vegetation stress detection. Remote Sensing of Environment 113, 1262-1275. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2009.02.016
32. Zimmermann D, Reuss R, Westhoff M, Geer P, Bauer W, Bamberg E, Bentrup FW, Zimmermann U (2008) A novel, non-invasive, online monitoring, versatile and easy plant-based probe for measuring leaf water status. Journal of Experimental Botany 59, 3157-3167. doi:10.1093/jxb/ern171