Relationships between stomatal behavior, xylem vulnerability to cavitation and leaf water relations in two cultivars of Vitis vinifera

Physiologia Plantarum

Volumn 152, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 453-464

  Tombesi, Sergio ^a   Nardini, Andrea ^b   Farinelli, Daniela ^a   Palliotti, Alberto ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PERUGIA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TRIESTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

VITIS VINIFERA;

WATER;

DEHYDRATION; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT LEAF; PLANT STEM; PLANT STOMA; TREE; VITIS; XYLEM;

DEHYDRATION; PLANT LEAVES; PLANT STEMS; PLANT STOMATA; PLANT TRANSPIRATION; TREES; VITIS; WATER; XYLEM;

EID: 84911394031     PISSN: 00319317     EISSN: 13993054     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ppl.12180     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Abrams MD, Kubiske ME (1990) Photosynthesis and water relations during drought in Acer rubrum L genotypes from contrasting sites in central Pennsylvania. Funct Ecol 4: 727-733
2. Ache P, Bauer H, Kollist H, Al-Rasheid KA, Lautner S, Hartung W, Hedrich R (2010) Stomatal action directly feeds back on leaf turgor: new insights into the regulation of the plant water status from non-invasive pressure probe measurements. Plant J 62: 1072-1082
3. Alsina MM, de Herralde F, Aranda X, Save R, Biel C (2007) Water relations and vulnerability to embolism are not related: experiments with eight grapevine cultivars. Vitis 46: 1-6
4. Baltzer JL, Davies SJ, Bunyavejchewin S, Noor NSM (2008) The role of desiccation tolerance in determining tree species distributions along the Malay-Thai Peninsula. Funct Ecol 22: 221-231
5. Bartlett MK, Scoffoni C, Sack L (2012) The determinants of leaf turgor loss point and prediction of drought tolerance of species and biomes: a global meta-analysis. Ecol Lett 15: 393-405
6. Beis A, Patakas A (2010) Differences in stomatal responses and root to shoot signalling between two grapevine varieties subjected to drought. Funct Plant Biol 37: 139-146
7. Blackman CJ, Brodribb TJ, Jordan GJ (2010) Leaf hydraulic vulnerability is related to conduit dimensions and drought resistance across a diverse range of woody angiosperms. New Phytol 188: 1113-1123
8. Brodribb TJ, Holbrook NM (2003) Stomatal closure during leaf dehydration, correlation with other leaf physiological traits. Plant Physiol 132: 2166-2173
9. Brodribb TJ, Holbrook NM, Edwards EJ, Gutierrez MV (2003) Relations between stomatal closure, leaf turgor and xylem vulnerability in eight tropical dry forest trees. Plant Cell Environ 26: 443-450
10. Cai J, Tyree MT (2010) The impact of vessel size on vulnerability curves: data and models for within-species variability in saplings of aspen, Populus tremuloides Michx. Plant Cell Environ 33: 1059-1069
11. Chatelet DS, Wistrom CM, Purcell AH, Rost TL, Matthews MA (2011) Xylem structure of four grape varieties and 12 alternative hosts to the xylem-limited bacterium Xylella fastidiosa. Ann Bot 108: 73-85
12. Chaves MM, Zarrouk O, Francisco R, Costa JM, Santos T, Regalado AP, Rodrigues ML, Lopes CM (2010) Grapevine under deficit irrigation: hints from physiological and molecular data. Ann Bot 105: 661-676
13. Choat B, Cobb AR, Jansen S (2008) Structure and function of bordered pits: new discoveries and impacts on whole-plant hydraulic function. New Phytol 177: 608-626
14. Choat B, Jansen S, Brodribb TJ, Cochard H, Delzon S, Bhaskar R, Bucci SJ, Field TS, Gleason SM, Hacke UG, Jacobsen AL, Lens F, Maherali H, Martínez-Vilalta J, Mayr S, Mencuccini M, Mitchell PJ, Nardini A, Pitterman J, Pratt RB, Sperry JS, Westoby M, Wright IJ, Zanne AE (2012) Global convergence in the vulnerability of forests to drought. Nature 491: 752-755
15. Chouzouri A, Schultz HR (2005) Hydraulic anatomy, cavitation susceptibility and gas-exchange of several grapevine cultivars of different geographical origin. Acta Hortic 689: 325-331
16. Cochard H, Cruiziat P, Tyree MT (1992) Use of positive pressures to establish vulnerability curves. Further support for the air-seeding hypothesis and implications for pressure-volume analysis. Plant Physiol 100: 205-209
17. Cochard H, Coll L, Le Roux X, Ameglio T (2002) Unraveling the effects of plant hydraulics on stomatal closure during water stress in walnut. Plant Physiol 128: 282-290
18. Comstock J (2002) Hydraulic and chemical signalling in the control of stomatal conductance and transpiration. J Exp Bot 53: 195-200
19. Cowan IR (1977) Stomatal behaviour and environment. Adv Bot Res 4: 114-228
20. Davies WJ, Zhang J (1991) Root signals and the regulation of growth and development of plants in drying soil. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 42: 55-76
21. Domec JC, Johnson DM (2012) Does homeostasis or disturbance of homeostasis in minimum leaf water potential explain the isohydric versus anisohydric behaviour of Vitis vinifera L. cultivars? Tree Physiol 32: 245-248
22. Domec JC, Noormets A, King JS, Sun G, Mcnulty SG, Gavazzi MJ, Boggs JL, Treasure EA (2009) Decoupling the influence of leaf and root hydraulic conductances on stomatal conductance and its sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit as soil dries in a drained loblolly pine plantation. Plant Cell Environ 32: 980-991
23. Ennajeh M, Simões F, Khemira H, Cochard H (2011) How reliable is the double-ended pressure sleeve technique for assessing xylem vulnerability to cavitation in woody angiosperms? Physiol Plant 142: 205-210
24. Franks PJ (2004) Stomatal control and hydraulic conductance, with special reference to tall trees. Tree Physiol 24: 865-878
25. Hochberg U, Degu A, Fait A, Rachmilevitch S (2013) Near isohydric grapevine cultivar displays higher photosynthetic efficiency and photorespiration rates under drought stress as compared with near anisohydric grapevine cultivar. Physiol Plant 147: 443-452
26. Jones HG (1998) Stomatal control of photosynthesis and transpiration. J Exp Bot 49: 387-398
27. Jones HG, Sutherland RA (1991) Stomatal control of xylem embolism. Plant Cell Environ 11: 111-121
28. Lens F, Sperry JS, Christman MA, Choat B, Rabaey D, Jansen S (2011) Testing hypotheses that link wood anatomy to cavitation resistance and hydraulic conductivity in the genus Acer. New Phytol 190: 709-723
29. Lenz TI, Wright IJ, Westoby M (2006) Interrelations among pressure-volume curve traits across species and water availability gradients. Physiol Plant 127: 423-433
30. Lo Gullo MA, Salleo S, Piaceri EC, Rosso R (1995) Relations between vulnerability to xylem embolism and xylem conduit dimensions in young trees of Quercus cerris. Plant Cell Environ 18: 661-669
31. Lovisolo C, Hartung W, Schubert A (2002) Whole-plant hydraulic conductance and root-to-shoot flow of abscisic acid are independently affected by water stress in grapevines. Funct Plant Biol 29: 1-8
32. Lovisolo C, Perrone I, Carra A, Ferrandino A, Flexas J, Medrano H, Schubert A (2010) Drought induced changes in development and function of grapevine (Vitis spp.) organs and in their hydraulic and non-hydraulic interactions at the whole plant level: a physiological and molecular update. Funct Plant Biol 37: 98-116
33. McCutchan H, Shackel KA (1992) Stem-water potential as a sensitive indicator of water stress in prune trees (Prunus domestica L. cv. French). J Am Soc Hort Sci 117: 607-611
34. Medrano H, Escalona JM, Cifre J, Bota J, Flexas J (2003) A ten year study on the physiology of two Spanish grapevine cultivars under field conditions: effects of water availability from leaf photosynthesis to grape yield and quality. Funct Plant Biol 30: 607-619
35. Meinzer FC (2002) Co-ordination of vapour and liquid phase water transport properties in plants. Plant Cell Environ 25: 265-274
36. Meinzer FC, Johnson DM, Lachenbruch B, McCulloh KA, Woodruff DR (2009) Xylem hydraulic safety margins in woody plants: coordination of stomatal control of xylem tension with hydraulic capacitance. Funct Ecol 23: 922-930
37. Mitchell PJ, Veneklaas EJ, Lambers H, Burgess SSO (2008) Leaf water relations during summer water deficit: differential responses in turgor maintenance and variation in leaf structure among different plant communities in southwestern Australia. Plant Cell Environ 31: 1791-1802
38. Mott KA, Franks PJ (2001) The role of epidermal turgor in stomatal interactions following a local perturbation in humidity. Plant Cell Environ 24: 657-662
39. Nardini A, Salleo S (2000) Limitation of stomatal conductance by hydraulic traits: sensing or preventing xylem cavitation? Trees 15: 14-24
40. Nardini A, Tyree MT, Salleo S (2001) Xylem cavitation in the leaf of Prunus laurocerasus and its impact on leaf hydraulics. Plant Physiol 125: 1700-1709
41. Palliotti A, Silvestroni O, Petoumenou D, Vignaroli S, Berrios JG (2008) Evaluation of low-energy demand adaptive mechanisms in Sangiovese grapevine during drought. J Int Sci Vigne Vin 42: 41-47
42. Palliotti A, Silvestroni O, Petoumenou D (2009) Photosynthetic and photoinhibition behaviour of two field-grown grapevine cultivars under multiple summer stresses. Am J Enol Vitic 60: 189-198
43. Palliotti A, Poni S, Silvestroni O, Tombesi S, Bernizzoni F (2011) Morpho-structural and physiological performance of Sangiovese and Montepulciano cvv. (Vitis vinifera) under non-limiting water supply conditions. Funct Plant Biol 38: 888-898
44. Palliotti A, Tombesi S, Frioni T, Famiani F, Silvestroni O, Zamboni M, Poni S (2014) Morpho-structural and physiological response of container-grown Sangiovese and Montepulciano cvv. (Vitis vinifera) to re-watering after a pre-veraison limiting water deficit. Funct Plant Biol. DOI: 10.1071/FP13271
45. Perrone I, Pagliarani C, Lovisolo C, Chitarra W, Roman F, Schubert A (2012a) Recovery from water stress affects grape leaf petiole transcriptome. Planta 235: 1383-1396
46. Perrone I, Gambino G, Chitarra W, Vitali M, Pagliarani C, Riccomagno N, Balestrini R, Kaldenhoff R, Uehlein N, Gribaudo I, Schubert A, Lovisolo C (2012b) The grapevine root-specific aquaporin VvPIP2;4N controls root hydraulic conductance and leaf gas exchange under well watered conditions but not under water stress. Plant Physiol 160: 965-977
47. Poni S, Bernizzoni F, Civardi S (2007) Response of Sangiovese grapevines to partial root-zone drying: gas-exchange, growth and grape composition. Sci Hortic 114: 96-103
48. Pou A, Medrano H, Tomas M, Martorell S, Ribas-Carbò M, Flexas J (2012) Anisohydric behavior in grapevines results in better performance under moderate water stress and recovery than isohydric behavior. Plant Soil 359: 335-349
49. Pou A, Medrano H, Flexas J, Tyerman SD (2013) A putative role for TIP and PIP aquaporins in dynamics of leaf hydraulic and stomatal conductances in grapevine under water stress and rewatering. Plant Cell Environ 36: 828-843
50. Sack L, Cowan PD, Jaikumar N, Holbrook NM (2003) The hydrology of leaves: co-ordination of structure and function in temperate woody species. Plant Cell Environ 26: 1343-1356
51. Saliendra NZ, Sperry JS, Comstock J (1995) Influence of leaf water status on stomatal response to humidity, hydraulic conductance, and soil drought in Betula occidentalis. Planta 196: 357-366
52. Salleo S, Nardini A, Pitt F, Lo Gullo MA (2000) Xylem cavitation and hydraulic control of stomatal conductance in laurel (Laurus nobilis L.). Plant Cell Environ 23: 71-79
53. Schultz HR (2003) Differences in hydraulic architecture account for near-isohydric and anisohydric behavior of two field-grown Vitis vinifera L. cultivars during drought. Plant Cell Environ 25: 1393-1405
54. Soar CJ, Dry PR, Loveys BR (2006) Scion photosynthesis and leaf gas exchange in Vitis vinifera L. cv. Shiraz: mediation of rootstock effects via xylem sap ABA. Aust J Grape Wine Res 12: 82-96
55. Sperry JS, Saliendra NZ (1994) Intra- and inter-plant variation in xylem cavitation in Betula occidentalis. Plant Cell Environ 17: 1233-1241
56. Syvertsen JP (1982) Minimum leaf water potential and stomatal closure in citrus leaves of different ages. Ann Bot 49: 827-834
57. Tardieu F, Simonneau T (1998) Variability among species of stomatal control under fluctuating soil water status and evaporative demand: modelling isohydric and anisohydric behaviours. J Exp Bot 49: 419-432
58. Tombesi S, Johnson RS, Day KR, DeJong TM (2010) Interactions between rootstock, inter-stem and scion xylem vessel characteristics of peach trees growing on rootstocks with contrasting size-controlling characteristics. AoB Plants 2010: plq013
59. Tramontini S, Vitali M, Centioni L, Schubert A, Lovisolo C (2013) Rootstock control of scion response to water stress in grapevine. Environ Exp Bot 93: 20-26
60. Tyree MT, Dixon MA (1983) Cavitation events in Thuja occidentalis L. Ultrasonic acoustic emissions from the sapwood can be measured. Plant Physiol 72: 1094-1099
61. Tyree MT, Sperry JS (1988) Do woody plants operate near the point of catastrophic xylem dysfunction caused by dynamic water stress? Plant Physiol 88: 574-580
62. Tyree MT, Sperry JS (1989) Vulnerability of xylem to cavitation and embolism. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 40: 19-38
63. Vandeleur RK, Mayo G, Shelden MC, Gilliham M, Kaiser BN, Tyerman SD (2009) The role of plasma membrane intrinsic protein aquaporins in water transport through roots: diurnal and drought stress responses reveal different strategies between isohydric and anisohydric cultivars of grapevine. Plant Physiol 149: 445-460
64. Vilagrosa A, Morales F, Abadía A, Bellot J, Cochard H, Gil-Pelegrin E (2010) Are symplast tolerance to intense drought conditions and xylem vulnerability to cavitation coordinated? An integrated analysis of photosynthetic, hydraulic and leaf level processes in two Mediterranean drought-resistant species. Environ Exp Bot 69: 233-242
65. Zufferey V, Cochard H, Ameglio T, Jl S, Viret O (2011) Diurnal cycles of embolism formation and repair in petioles of grapevine (Vitis vinifera cv. Chasselas). J Exp Bot 62: 3885-3894