Ecological limit functions relating fish community response to hydrologic departures of the ecological flow regime in the Tennessee River basin, United States

Ecohydrology

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 1262-1280

  Knight, Rodney R ^a   Murphy, Jennifer C ^a   Wolfe, William J ^a   Saylor, Charles F ^b   Wales, Amy K ^c  

^a U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

^b TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY   (United States)

^c Tennessee Valley Authority Chattanoog   (United States)

Author keywords

Ecological flow regime; Ecological limit functions; Hydrologic alteration; Tennessee River; Wedge distributions

Indexed keywords

AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS; FISH; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RIVERS; STREAM FLOW; WATERSHEDS;

ECOLOGICAL FLOWS; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS; FISH SPECIES RICHNESS; FUNCTIONAL RELATIONSHIP; HYDROLOGIC ALTERATIONS; HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS; STATISTICAL EVALUATION; WEDGE DISTRIBUTIONS;

FUNCTION EVALUATION;

EID: 84911391443     PISSN: 19360584     EISSN: 19360592     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eco.1460     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Abell RA, Olson DM, Dinerstein E, Hurley PT, Diggs JT, Eichbaum W, Walters S, Wettengel W, Allnutt T, Loucks CJ, Hedao P. 2000. Freshwater Ecoregions of North America: A Conservation Assessment. Island Press: Washington, DC, USA.
2. Ali GA, Roy AG, Turmel MC, Courchesne F. 2010. Source-to-stream connectivity assessment through end-member mixing analysis. Journal of Hydrology 392: 119-135. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.07.049.
3. Armanini DG, Monk WA, Tenenbaum DE, Peters DL, Baird DJ. 2011. Influence of runoff regime type on a macroinvertebrate-based flow index in rivers of British Columbia (Canada). Ecohydrology 5: 414-423. DOI: 10.1002/eco.234.
4. Armstrong DS, Richards TA, Levin SB. 2011. Factors influencing riverine fish assemblages in Massachusetts. US Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2011-5193; 58 pp. Available at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2011/5193 [accessed December 2013].
5. Arthington AH, Bunn SE, Poff NL, Naiman RJ. 2006. The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems. Ecological Applications 16: 1311-1318. DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1311:TCOPEF]2.0.CO;2.
6. Balon EK. 1975. Reproductive guilds of fishes: a proposal and definition. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 32: 821-864. DOI: 10.1139/f75-110.
7. Blench T. 1957. Regime Behaviour of Canals and Rivers. Butterworth Scientific Publications: London, England and Toronto, Canada.
8. Bonta JV. 2004. Concentration-discharge regression parameters in watersheds of varying lithology subjected to surface coal mining and reclamation. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 59: 86-101.
9. Bonta JV. 2005. Changes in concentration-discharge regression parameters due to coal mining and reclamation activities. Hydrological Sciences Journal 50: 155-173. DOI: 10.1623/hysj.50.1.155.56335.
10. Booth DB, Karr JR, Schauman S, Konrad CP, Morley SA, Larson MG, Burges SJ. 2004. Reviving urban streams: land use, hydrology, biology, and human behavior. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 40: 1351-1364. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2004.tb01591.x.
11. Bryan K. 1922. Erosion and sedimentation in the Papago country, Arizona, with a sketch of the geology. US Geological Survey Bulletin, 730-B; 19-90.
12. Cade BS, Noon BR. 2003. A gentle introduction to quantile regression for ecologists. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1: 412-420. DOI: 10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0412:AGITQR]2.0.CO;2.
13. Cade BS, Terrell JW, Schroeder RL. 1999. Estimating effect of limiting factors with regression quantiles. Ecology 80: 311-323. DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[0311:EEOLFW]2.0.CO;2.
14. Camp Dresser and McKee Inc, Bledsoe BD, Miller WJ, Poff NL, Sanderson JS, Wilding TK. 2009. Watershed Flow Evaluation Tool Pilot Study for Roaring Fork and Fountain Creek Watersheds and Site-Specific Quantification Pilot Study for Roaring Fork Watershed (Draft). Colorado Water Conservation Board: Denver, CO.
15. Carlisle DM, Falcone J, Wolock DM, Meador MR, Norris RH. 2010. Predicting the natural flow regime: models for assessing hydrological alteration in streams. River Research and Applications 26: 118-136. DOI: 10.1002/rra.1247.
16. Carter JL, Purcell AH, Fend SV, Resh VH. 2009. Development of a local-scale urban stream assessment method using benthic macroinvertebrates: an example from the Santa Clara Basin, California. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 28: 1007-1021. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40792584 [accessed December 2013].
17. Catalinas M, Cantón ÁG. 2012. Relationships between anthropogenic pressures and ecological status in a Mediterranean river basin district in Spain. In 9th International Symposium on Ecohydraulics 2012 Proceedings, Mader H, Kraml J (eds). ISBN: 978-3-200-02862-3. Available at: http://www.ise2012.boku.ac.at/papers/17527_2.pdf [accessed March 2013].
18. Chanat J, Rice K, Hornberger G. 2002. Consistency of patterns in concentration-discharge plots. Water Resources Research 38: 1147. DOI: 10.1029/2001WR000971.
19. Clarke KR, Ainsworth M. 1993. A method of linking multivariate community structure to environmental variables. Marine Ecology Progress Series 92: 205-219.
20. Clarke KR, Gorley RN. 2006. PRIMER Version 6: User Manual/Tutorial. PRIMER-E Ltd.: Plymouth, United Kingdom.
21. Constantz J. 1998. Interaction between stream temperature, streamflow, and groundwater exchanges in alpine streams. Water Resources Research 34: 1609-1615. DOI: 10.1029/98WR00998.
22. Davis JC. 2002. Statistical and Data Analysis in Geology. John Wiley & Sons: New York.
23. Dowling DC, Wiley MJ. 1986. The effects of dissolved oxygen, temperature, and low stream flow on fishes: a literature review. Illinois Natural History Survey Aquatic Biology Technical Report 1986(2). Available at: https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/10530/inhsaqbv01986i00002_opt.pdf [accessed December 2013].
24. Dubrovsky NM, Burow KR, Clark GM, Gronberg JM, Hamilton PA, Hitt KJ, Mueller DK, Munn MD, Nolan BT, Puckett LJ, Rupert MG, Short TM, Spahr NE, Sprague LA, Wilber WG. 2010. The quality of our nation's waters - nutrients in the nation's streams and groundwater, 1992-2004. US Geological Survey Circular 1350, 174 pp. Available at: http://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/nutrients/pubs/circ1350 [accessed December 2013].
25. Etnier DA, Starnes WC. 1993. The Fishes of Tennessee. The University of Tennessee Press: Knoxville.
26. Evans C, Davies T. 1998. Causes of concentration/discharge hysteresis and its potential as a tool for analysis of episode hydrochemistry. Water Resources Research 34: 129-137. DOI: 10.1029/97WR01881.
27. Fenneman NM. 1938. Physiography of the Eastern United States. McGraw-Hill Book Company: New York.
28. Fleming SW. 2005. Comparative analysis of glacial and nival streamflow regimes with implications for lotic habitat quantity and fish species richness. River Research and Applications 21: 363-379. DOI: 10.1002/rra.810.
29. Foltz JW. 1982. Fish species diversity and abundance in relation to stream habitat characteristics. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, 305-311. Available at: http://www.seafwa.org/resource/dynamic/private/PDF/FOLTZ-305-311.pdf [accessed December 2013].
30. García AM, Hoos AB, Terziotti S. 2011. A regional modeling framework of phosphorus sources and transport in streams of the Southeastern United States. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 47: 991-1010. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2010.00517.x.
31. Gerritsen J, Green J, Preston R. 1993. Establishment of regional reference conditions for stream biological assessment and watershed management. In Proceedings from Watershed '93, A National Conference on Watershed Management, Alexandria, Virginia, 21-24 March, 1993; 797-801. EPA 840-R-94-002. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA.
32. Gilbert GK. 1914. The transportation of debris by running water. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 86.
33. Godsey S, Kirchner J, Clow D. 2009. Concentration-discharge relationships reflect chemostatic characteristics of US watersheds. Hydrological Processes 23: 1844-1864. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7315.
34. Hamilton DA, Sorrell RC, Holtschlag DJ. 2008. A regression model for computing index flows describing the median flow for the summer month of lowest flow in Michigan. US Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2008-5096. Available at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2008/5096/ [accessed December 2013].
35. Hiddink JG, Kaiser MJ. 2005. Implications of Liebig's law of the minimum for the use of ecological indicators based on abundance. Ecography 28: 264-271. DOI: 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.04063.x.
36. Hoos AB, McMahon G. 2009. Spatial analysis of instream nitrogen loads and factors controlling nitrogen delivery to streams in the southeastern United States using spatially referenced regression on watershed attributes (SPARROW) and regional classification frameworks. Journal of Hydrological Processes 23: 2275-2294. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7323 [accessed December 2013].
37. Hoos AB, Terziotti SE, McMahon G, Katerina S, Tighe KC, Alkons-Wolinsky R. 2008. Data to support statistical modeling of instream nutrient load based on watershed attributes, southeastern United States, 2002. US Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008-1163. Available at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2008/1163/ [accessed December 2013].
38. House WA, Warwick MS. 1998. Hysteresis of the solute concentration/discharge relationship in rivers during storms. Water Research 32: 2279-2290. DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00473-9.
39. Jaccard P. 1901. Étude comparative de la distribution florale dans une portion des Alpes et des Jura. Bulletin de la Société Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles 37: 547-579.
40. Karr JR. 1981. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries 6: 21-27. DOI: 10.1577/1548-8446(1981)006<0021:AOBIUF>2.0.CO;2.
41. Kendy E, Sanderson JS, Olden JD, Apse CD, DePhilip MM, Haney JA, Knight RR, Zimmerman JKH. 2009. Applications of the ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA) in the United States. Int. Conf. on Implementing Environ. Water Allocations, Port Elizabeth, South Africa, 23-26 February. Available at: http://depts.washington.edu/oldenlab/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Kendy-et-al-ELOHA-applications_2009.pdf [accessed December 2013].
42. Kendy E, Apse C, Blann K. 2012. A practical guide to environmental flows for policy and planning with nine case studies in the United States. The Nature Conservancy. Available at: http://www.conservationgateway.org/ConservationPractices/Freshwater/EnvironmentalFlows/MethodsandTools/ELOHA/Documents/Practical%20Guide%20Eflows%20for%20Policy-low%20res.pdf [accessed December 2013].
43. Kennen JG, Riskin ML. 2010. Evaluating effects of potential changes in streamflow regime on fish and aquatic-invertebrate assemblages in the New Jersey Pinelands. US Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2010-5079. Available at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2010/5079/ [accessed December 2013].
44. King EG, Caylor KK. 2011. Ecohydrology in practice: strengths, conveniences, and opportunities. Ecohydrology 4: 608-612. DOI: 10.1002/eco.248.
45. Knight RR, Gregory MB, Wales AK. 2008. Relating streamflow characteristics to specialized insectivores in the Tennessee River Valley: a regional approach. Ecohydrology 1: 394-407. DOI: 10.1002/eco.32.
46. Knight RR, Gain WS, Wolfe WJ. 2012. Modelling ecological flow regime: an example from the Tennessee and Cumberland River basins. Ecohydrology 5: 613-627. DOI: 10.1002/eco.246.
47. Koltun GF, Whitehead MT. 2002. Techniques for estimating selected streamflow characteristics of rural, unregulated streams in Ohio. US Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2002-4068; 50 pp. Available at: http://oh.water.usgs.gov/reports/wrir/wrir02-4068.pdf [accessed December 2013].
48. Konrad CP, Brasher A, May J. 2008. Assessing streamflow characteristics as limiting factors on benthic invertebrate assemblages in streams across the western United States. Freshwater Biology 53: 1983-1998. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2008.02024.x.
49. Langbein WB, Iseri KT. 1960. General introduction and hydrologic definitions. Manual of hydrology, part 1. General Surface-water Techniques: US Geological Survey Water-supply Paper 1541-A, 29 pp.
50. Lee DS, Gilbert CR, Hocutt CH, Jenkins RE, McAllister DE, Stauffer JR, Jr. 1980. Atlas of North American freshwater fishes. North Carolina State Museum of Natural History, Raleigh, North Carolina. Publication No. 1980-12.
51. Leopold LB, Maddock T, Jr. 1954. The hydraulic geometry of stream channels and some physiographic implication. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 252.
52. Li J, Ban J, Santiago LS. 2011. Nonparametric tests for homogeneity of species assemblages: a data depth approach. Biometrics 67: 1481-1488. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01573.x.
53. McManamay RA, Orth DJ, Dolloff CA, Mathews DC. 2013. Application of the ELOHA framework to regulated rivers in the upper Tennessee River Basin: a case study. Environmental Management 51:1210-1235. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-013-0055-3.
54. Murphy JC, Knight RR, Wolfe WJ, Gain WS. 2012a. Predicting ecological flow regime at ungaged sites: a comparison of methods. River Research and Applications 29: 660-669. DOI: 10.1002/rra.2570.
55. Murphy JC, Hornberger GM, Liddle RG. 2012b. Concentration-discharge relationships in the coal mined region of the New River basin and Indian Fork sub-basin, Tennessee, USA. Hydrologic Processes. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.9603.
56. Nelson KC, Palmer MA, Pizzuto JE, Moglen GE, Angermeier PL, Hilderbrand RH, Dettinger M, Hayhoe K. 2009. Forecasting the combined effects of urbanization and climate change on stream ecosystems: from impacts to management options. Journal of Applied Ecology 46: 154-163. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01599.x.
57. Olson DM, Dinerstein E. 1998. The global 200: a representation approach to conserving the Earth's most biologically valuable ecoregions. Conservation Biology 12: 502-515. DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.012003502.x.
58. Omernik JM. 1987. Ecoregions of the conterminous United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 77: 118-125. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1987.tb00149.x.
59. Poff NL, Allan JD. 1995. Functional organization of stream fish assemblages in relation to hydrological variability. Ecology 76: 606-627. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1941217.
60. Poff NL, Zimmerman JKH. 2010. Ecological responses to altered flow regimes: a literature review to inform the science and management of environmental flows. Freshwater Biology 55: 194-205. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02272.x.
61. Poff NL, Allan JD, Bain MB, Karr JR, Prestegaard KL, Richter BD, Sparks RE, Stromberg JC. 1997. The natural flow regime. BioScience 47: 769-784.
62. Poff NL, Richter BD, Arthington AH, Bunn SE, Naiman RJ, Kendy E, Acreman M, Apse C, Bledsoe BP, Freeman MC, Henriksen J, Jacobson RB, Kennen JG, Merritt DM, O'Keeffe JH, Olden JD, Rogers K, Tharme RE, Warner A. 2010. The ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA): a new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards. Freshwater Biology 55: 147-170. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02204.x.
63. Porterfield G. 1972. Computation of Fluvial-sediment Discharge. Book 3, Chapter C3. Techniques of Water-resources Investigations of the United States Geological Survey: Reston, VA.
64. Qian SS, Cuffney TF. 2012. To threshold or not to threshold? That's the question. Ecological Indicators 15: 1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.08.019.
65. Rasmussen PP, Gray JR, Glysson GD, Ziegler AC. 2009. Guidelines and Procedures for Computing Time-series Suspended-sediment Concentrations and Loads from In-stream Turbidity-sensor and Streamflow Data. Book 3, Chapter C4. US Geological Survey Techniques and Methods. Available at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/tm3c4/ [accessed December 2013].
66. Reich B, Bondell HD, Wang HJ. 2010. Flexible Bayesian quantile regression for independent and clustered data. Biostatistics 11: 337-352. DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxp049.
67. Rice KC, Chanat JG, Hornberger GM, Webb JR. 2004. Interpretation of concentration-discharge patterns in acid-neutralizing capacity during storm flow in three small, forested catchments in Shenandoah National Park, Virginia. Water Resources Research 40: W05301. DOI: 10.1029/2003WR002709.
68. Richter BD. 2010. Re-thinking environmental flows: from allocations and reserves to sustainability boundaries. River Research and Applications 26:1052-1063. DOI: 10.1002/rra.1320.
69. Richter BD, Davis MM, Apse C, Konrad C. 2012. A presumptive standard for environmental flow protection. River Research and Applications 28: 1312-1321. DOI: 10.1002/rra.1511.
70. Richter BD, Baumgartner JV, Wigington R, Braun DP. 1997. How much water does a river need? Freshwater Biology 37: 231-249. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.1997.00153.x.
71. Sanderson JS, Rowan N, Wilding T, Bledsoe BP, Miller WJ, Poff NL. 2012. Getting to scale with environmental flow assessment: the watershed flow evaluation tool. River Research and Applications 28: 1369-1377. DOI:10.1002/rra.1542.
72. Schmidt TS, Clements WH, Cade BS. 2012. Estimating risks to aquatic life using quantile regression. Freshwater Science 31: 709-723. DOI: 10.1899/11-133.1.
73. Shrestha RR, Peters DL, Schnorbus MA. 2013. Evaluating the ability of a hydrologic model to replicate hydro-ecologically relevant indicators. Hydrological Processes (accepted article, early view). DOI: 10.1002/hyp.9997.
74. Siegel J. 2009. Examining monthly relationships between temperature, precipitation, snowpack, and streamflow in the Upper Klamath Basin over a 26 year SNOTEL record. Master's Thesis, Vassar University. Available at: http://faculty.vassar.edu/macunningham/past_theses/Jared_Siegel_2009_Thesis.pdf [accessed December 2013].
75. Stein B, Kutner L, Adams J. 2000. Precious Heritage: The Status of Biodiversity in the United States. Oxford University Press: New York.
76. Stewart GB, Anderson R. 2007. Fish-flow investigation: I. Two-dimensional modeling for predicting fish biomass in Western Colorado. Colorado Division of Wildlife. Available at: http://wildlife.state.co.us/SiteCollectionDocuments/DOW/Research/Aquatic/pdf/SpecialReportpart1.pdf [accessed December 2013].
77. Stoddard JL, Larsen DP, Hawkins CP, Johnson RK, Norris RH. 2006. Setting expectations for the ecological condition of streams: the concept of reference condition. Ecological Applications 16: 1267-1276. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40062000 [accessed December 2013].
78. Tennessee Valley Authority. 1997. Protocol for Conducting an Index of Biotic Integrity Biological Assessment. Tennessee Valley Authority: Knoxville, Tennessee.
79. Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency. 2010. TWRA Instream Flow Program. Available at: http://www.tn.gov/twra/instream.html [accessed December 2013].
80. Terrell JW, Cade BS, Carpenter J, Thompson JM. 1996. Modeling stream fish habitat limitations from wedge-shaped patterns of variation in standing stock. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 125: 104-117. DOI: 10.1577/1548-8659(1996)125<0104:MSFHLF>2.3.CO;2.
81. Thomson JD, Weiblen G, Thomson BA, Alfaro S, Legendre P. 1996. Untangling multiple factors in spatial distributions: lilies, gophers, and rocks. Ecology 77: 1698-1715. DOI: 10.2307/2265776.
82. US Environmental Protection Agency. 1999. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Wadable Streams and Rivers Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates, and Fish. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, D.C. EPA 841-B-99-002.
83. US Environmental Protection Agency. 2013. Level III and IV ecoregions of the continental United States: Corvallis, Oregon, U.S. EPA, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/wed/pages/ecoregions/level_iii_iv.htm [accessed December 2013].
84. Ulrich MA, Bragg HM. 2003. Monitoring instream turbidity to estimate continuous suspended-sediment loads and yields and clay-water volumes in the upper North Santiam River Basin, Oregon, 1998-2000. US Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 03-4098.
85. Vanoni VA. 1946. Transportation of suspended sediment by water. American Society of Civil Engineering Transactions 111: 67-133.
86. Vaz S, Martin CS, Eastwood PD, Ernande B, Carpentier A, Meaden GJ, Coppin F. 2008. Modelling species distributions using regression quantiles. Journal of Applied Ecology 45: 204-217. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01392.x.
87. Viger RJ, Hay LE, Jones JW, Buell GR. 2011. Hydrologic effects of urbanization and climate change on the Flint River Basin, Georgia. Earth Interactions 15(20): 25. DOI: 10.1175/2010EI369.1.
88. Von Liebig J. 1840. Die Organische Chemie in Ihrer Anwendung auf Agrikultur und Physiologie. Friedrich Vieweg. Available at: https://openlibrary.org/books/OL24190326M/Die_organische_Chemie_in_ihrer_Anwendung_auf_Agricultur_und_Physiologie [accessed December 2013].
89. Walling DE. 1977. Assessing the accuracy of suspended sediment rating curves for a small basin. Water Resources Research 13: 531-538. DOI: 10.1029/WR013i003p00531.
90. Walling DE, Webb BW. 1980. The spatial dimension in the interpretation of stream solute behavior. Journal of Hydrology 47: 129-149. DOI: 10.1016/0022-1694(80)90052-9.
91. Wilding TK, Poff NL. 2008. Flow-ecology relationships for the watershed flow evaluation tool. Colorado State University. Available at: http://www.oregon.gov/owrd/docs/SB839/2008_Wilding_and_Poff_Flow_Ecology_Relationships.pdf [accessed December 2013].
92. Zorn TG, Seelbach PW, Rutherford ES. 2012. A regional-scale habitat suitability model to assess the effects of flow reduction on fish assemblages in Michigan Streams. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 48: 871-895. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2012.00656.