Validation of the Mandarin Chinese version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire in bronchiectasis

International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease

Volumn 18, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 1431-1437

  Gao, Y H ^a   Guan, W J ^a   Xu, G ^a   Gao, Y ^a,b,c   Lin, Z Y ^a   Tang, Y ^a   Lin, Z M ^a   Li, H M ^a   Luo, Q ^a   Zhong, Q N S ^a   Birring, S S ^d   Chen, R C ^a  

^a GUANGZHOU MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bronchiectasis; Cough; LCQ; Quality of life; Validity

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRONCHIECTASIS; CHINESE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONCURRENT VALIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DISEASE EXACERBATION; DRUG EFFICACY; DRUG RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MANDARIN CHINESE VERSION LEICESTER COUGH QUESTIONNAIRE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPEATABILITY; RESPONSIVENESS; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL PARAMETERS; STEADY STATE; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; TRANSLATING (LANGUAGE); TREATMENT DURATION; ASIAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; CHINA; CULTURAL FACTOR; DISEASE COURSE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; ETHNOLOGY; HEALTH STATUS INDICATOR; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOLOGY; QUALITY OF LIFE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; ASIAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; BRONCHIECTASIS; CHINA; CULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TIME FACTORS; TRANSLATING; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84911387478     PISSN: 10273719     EISSN: 18157920     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5588/ijtld.14.0195     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Pasteur M C, Bilton D, Hill A T. British Thoracic Society guideline for non-CF bronchiectasis. Thorax 2010; 65 (Suppl 1): I1-58.
2. Tsang KW, Tipoe G L. Bronchiectasis: Not an orphan disease in the East. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2004; 8: 691-702.
3. Wilson C B, Jones P W, O'Leary C J, et al. Validation of the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire in bronchiectasis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997; 156: 536-541.
4. Chan S L, Chan-Yeung M M, Ooi G C, et al. Validation of the Hong Kong Chinese version of the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire in patients with bronchiectasis. Chest 2002; 122: 2030-2037.
5. MurrayMP, Turnbull K, MacQuarrie S, et al. Validation of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. Eur Respir J 2009; 34: 125-131.
6. Jones P W, Quirk F H, Baveystock C M, et al. A self-complete measure of health status for chronic airflow limitation. The St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire. Am Rev Respir Dis 1992; 145: 1321-1327.
7. King P T, Holdsworth S R, Freezer N J, et al. Characterisation of the onset and presenting clinical features of adult bronchiectasis. Respir Med 2006; 100: 2183-2189.
8. Birring S S, Prudon B, Carr A J, et al. Development of a symptom specific health status measure for patients with chronic cough: Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ). Thorax 2003; 58: 339-343.
9. Leung C M, Wing Y K, Kwong P K, et al. Validation of the Chinese-Cantonese version of the hospital anxiety and depression scale and comparison with the Hamilton Rating Scale of Depression. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1999; 100: 456-461.
10. Zigmond A S, Snaith R P. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983; 67: 361-370.
11. Miller M R, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, et al. Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J 2005; 26: 319-338.
12. Mahler D A, Wells C K. Evaluation of clinical methods for rating dyspnea. Chest 1988; 93: 580-586.
13. Pasteur M C, Helliwell S M, Houghton S J, et al. An investigation into causative factors in patients with bronchiectasis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162: 1277-1284.
14. ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function. ATS statement: Guidelines for the sixminute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002; 166: 111-117.
15. Terwee C B, Bot S D, de Boer M R, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007; 60: 34-42.
16. Liang M H, Fossel A H, Larson M G. Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation. Med Care 1990; 28: 632-642.
17. Berkhof F F, Boom L N, ten Hertog N E, et al. The validity and precision of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire in COPD patients with chronic cough. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2012; 10: 4.
18. Bland J M, Altman D G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-310.
19. Raj A A, Pavord D I, Birring S S. Clinical cough IV: What is the minimal important difference for the Leicester Cough Questionnaire? Handb Exp Pharmacol 2009: 311-320.
20. Polley L, Yaman N, Heaney L, et al. Impact of cough across different chronic respiratory diseases: Comparison of two cough-specific health-related quality of life questionnaires. Chest 2008; 134: 295-302.