Estimating the efficacy of alcoholics anonymous without self-selection bias: An instrumental variables re-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research

Volumn 38, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 2688-2694

  Humphreys, Keith ^a,b,c   Blodgett, Janet C ^a,b,c   Wagner, Todd H ^a,b,c  

^a VA PALO ALTO HEALTH CARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Alcoholics anonymous; Mutual help groups; Research methods; Self help; Treatment outcome

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL ABSTINENCE; ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS; ALCOHOLISM; HUMAN; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SELECTION BIAS; SELF CARE; STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS; ALCOHOLISM; HUMANS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; SELECTION BIAS; SELF CARE; TEMPERANCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84911381832     PISSN: 01456008     EISSN: 15300277     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/acer.12557     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Babor TF, Del Boca F, eds (2010) Treatment Matching in Alcoholism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
2. Crits-Christoph P (1997) The National Institute on Drug Abuse Collaborative Cocaine Treatment Study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 54:721-726.
3. Crits-Christoph P, Siqueland L, Blaine J, Frank A, Luborsky L, Onken LS, Muenz LR, Thase ME, Weiss RD, Gastfriend DR, Woody GE, Barber JP, Butler SF, Daley D, Salloum I, Bishop S, Najavits LM, Lis J, Mercer D, Griffin ML, Moras K, Beck AT (1999) Psychosocial treatments for cocaine dependence: National Institute on Drug Abuse collaborative cocaine treatment study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 56:493-502.
4. Emrick CD, Tonigan JS, Montgomery H, Little L (1993) Alcoholics Anonymous: What is Currently Known?, in Research on Alcoholics Anonymous: Opportunities and Alternatives (McCrady BS, Miller WR eds), pp 41-77. Rutgers Center for Alcohol Studies, New Brunswick, NJ.
5. Food and Drug Administration (1998) Guidance for Industry: E9 Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials. Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, MD.
6. Fortney J, Booth B, Zhang M, Humphrey J, Wiseman E (1998) Controlling for selection bias in the evaluation of Alcoholics Anonymous as aftercare treatment. J Stud Alcohol 59:690-697.
7. Humphreys K (2004) Circles of Recovery: Self-help Organisations for Addictions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
8. Humphreys K, Moos R (2007) Two year clinical and cost offset outcomes of facilitating 12-step self-help group participation. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 31:64-68.
9. Humphreys K, Moos RH (2001) Can encouraging substance abuse inpatients to participate in self-help groups reduce demand for health care?: a quasi-experimental study. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 25:711-716.
10. Humphreys K, Phibbs CS, Moos RH (1996) Addressing self-selection effects in evaluations of mutual help groups and professional mental health services: an introduction to two-stage sample selection models. Eval Program Plann 19:301-308.
11. Kelly JF, White WL, eds (2011) Addiction Recovery Management: Theory, Research and Practice. Humana Press, New York.
12. Litt MD, Kadden RM, Kabela-Cormier E, Petry N (2007) Changing network support for drinking: initial findings from the Network Support Project. J Consult Clin Psychol 75:542-555.
13. Magura S, McKean J, Kosten S, Tonigan JS (2013) A novel application of propensity score matching to estimate Alcoholics Anonymous' effect on drinking outcomes. Drug Alcohol Depend 129:54-59.
14. McCrady BS, Epstein EE, Hirsch LS (1996) Issues in the implementation of a randomized clinical trial that includes Alcoholics Anonymous: studying AA-related behaviors during treatment. J Stud Alcohol 57:604-612.
15. McCrady BS, Epstein EE, Hirsch LS (1999) Maintaining change after conjoint behavioral alcohol treatment for men: outcomes at six months. Addiction 94:1381-1396.
16. McKellar JD, Stewart E, Humphreys K (2003) AA involvement and positive alcohol-related outcomes: Cause, consequence, or just a correlate? J Consult Clin Psych 71:302-308.
17. Moos RH (2007) Theory-based active ingredients of effective treatments for substance use disorders. Drug Alcohol Depend 88:109-121.
18. Moos RH (2008) Active ingredients of substance use-focused self-help groups. Addiction 103:387-396.
19. Morgenstern J, Labouvie E, McCrady BS, Kahler CW, Frey RM (1997) Affiliation with Alcoholics Anonymous following treatment: a study of its therapeutic effects and mechanisms of action. J Consult Clin Psych 65:768-777.
20. Nowinski J, Baker S, Carroll K (1995) Twelve-Step Facilitation Therapy Manual: A Clinical Research Guide for Therapists Treating Individuals with Alcohol Abuse and Dependence. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Rockville, MD.
21. Pisani VD, Fawcett J, Clark DC, McGuire M (1993) The relative contributions of medication adherence and AA meeting attendance to abstinent outcome for chronic alcoholics. J Stud Alcohol 54:115-119.
22. Project MATCH Research Group (1993) Project MATCH (Matching Alcoholism Treatment to Client Heterogeneity): rationale and methods for a multisite clinical trial matching patients to alcoholism treatment. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 17:1130-1145.
23. Staiger D, Stock JH (1997) Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments. Econometrica 65:557-586.
24. Stock JH, Wright JH, Yogo M (2002) A survey of weak instruments and weak identification in generalized method of moments. J Bus Econ Stat 20:518-529.
25. Sussman JB, Hayward R (2010) An IV for the RCT: using instrumental variables to adjust for treatment contamination in randomized controlled trials. Br Med J 340:1181-1184.
26. Tonigan JS, Toscova R, Miller WR (1996) Meta-analysis of the literature on Alcoholics Anonymous: sample and study characteristics moderate findings. J Stud Alcohol 57:65-72.
27. Walitzer KS, Dermen KH, Barrick C (2009) Facilitating involvement in Alcoholics Anonymous during outpatient treatment: a randomized clinical trial. Addiction 104:391-401.
28. Ye Y, Kaskutas LA (2009) Using propensity scores to adjust for selection bias when assessing the effectiveness of Alcoholics Anonymous in observational studies. Drug Alcohol Depend 104:56-64.