Influence of gestational diabetes mellitus on neonatal weight outcome in twin pregnancies

Diabetic Medicine

Volumn 31, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 1651-1656

  Guillen M A ^a   Herranz, L ^a   Barquiel, B ^a   Hillman, N ^a   Burgos, M A ^b   Pallardo, L F ^a  

^a Department of Endocrinology and Nutrition   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO LA PAZ   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE; HEMOGLOBIN A1C; INSULIN; ANTIDIABETIC AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIRTH WEIGHT; BODY MASS; CONCEPTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELIVERY; EVALUATION STUDY; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; HUMAN; HYPERGLYCEMIA; INCIDENCE; INSULIN TREATMENT; LARGE FOR GESTATIONAL AGE; MACROSOMIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL HYPERTENSION; NEWBORN; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREECLAMPSIA; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY DIABETES MELLITUS; PREGNANT WOMAN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SMALL FOR DATE INFANT; SMOKING HABIT; THIRD TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; TWIN PREGNANCY; CASE CONTROL STUDY; DIABETES, GESTATIONAL; FETAL MACROSOMIA; HYPERTENSION, PREGNANCY-INDUCED; INFERTILITY THERAPY; MALE; OVERWEIGHT; PRE-ECLAMPSIA; RISK FACTOR; SMOKING; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

ADULT; BIRTH WEIGHT; BODY MASS INDEX; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; DIABETES, GESTATIONAL; FEMALE; FETAL MACROSOMIA; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION, PREGNANCY-INDUCED; HYPOGLYCEMIC AGENTS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INSULIN; MALE; OVERWEIGHT; PRE-ECLAMPSIA; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY, TWIN; REPRODUCTIVE TECHNIQUES, ASSISTED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SMOKING;

EID: 84911369022     PISSN: 07423071     EISSN: 14645491     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/dme.12523     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Ricart W, López J, Mozas J, Pericot A, Sancho MA, González N et al. Spanish Group for the Study of the impact of Carpenter and Coustang GDM thresholds. Potential impact of American Diabetes Association (2000) criteria for diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus in Spain. Diabetología 2005; 48: 1135-1141.
2. HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group. The hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcome. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 1991-2002.
3. González-González NL, Medina V, Ruano A, Perales A, Pérez-Mendaña JM, Melchor JC. Base de datos perinatales nacionales 2004 (National perinatal data sets 2004). Prog Obstet Ginecol 2006; 49: 646-656.
4. González-González NL, Goya M, Bellart J, Lopez J, Sancho MA, Mozas J et al. Obstetric and perinatal outcome in women with twin pregnancy and gestational diabetes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 25: 1084-1089.
5. Luke B, Brown MB. The changing risk of infant mortality by gestation, plurality, and race: 1989-1991 versus 1999-2001. Pediatrics 2006; 118: 2488.
6. Simões T, Queirós A, Correia L, Rocha T, Dias E, Blickstein I. Gestational diabetes mellitus complicating twin pregnancies. J Perinat Med 2011; 39: 437-440.
7. Klein K, Mailath-Pokorny M, Leipold H, Krampl-Bettelheim E, Worda C. Influence of gestational diabetes mellitus on weight discrepancy in twin pregnancies. Twin Res Hum Genet 2010; 13: 393-397.
8. Cho HJ, Shin JS, Yang JH, Ryu HM, Kim MY, Han JY et al. Perinatal outcome in twin pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus: a comparative study. J Korean Med Sci 2006; 21: 457-459.
9. Luo ZC, Simonet F, Wei SQ, Xu H, Rey E, Fraser WD. Diabetes in pregnancy may differentially affect neonatal outcomes for twins and singletons. Diabet Med 2011; 28: 1068-1073.
10. Victoria A, Mora G, Arias F. Perinatal outcome, placental pathology and severity of discrepancy in monochorionic and dichorionic twins. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 97: 310-315.
11. Fox NS, Rebarber A, Klauser CK, Roman AS, Saltzman DH. Intrauterine growth restriction in twin pregnancies: incidence and associated risk factors. Am J Perinatol 2011; 28: 267-272.
12. National Diabetes Data Group. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and other categories of glucose intolerance. Diabetes 1979; 28: 1039-1057.
13. Santamaria R, Verdú LI, Martín C, García G. Tablas españolas de pesos neonatales según edad gestacional (Spanish neonatal birth weight charts for gestational age). Segovia: Laboratorios Menarini SA, 1998. Available at http://www.menarini.es/component/content/article/3073-Tablas Last accessed 22 June 2014.
14. Pallardo F, Herranz L, Garcia-Ingelmo T, Grande C, Martin-Vaquero P, Jañez M et al. Early postpartum metabolic assessment in women with prior gestational diabetes. Diabetes Care 1999; 22: 1053-1058.
15. Hamilton EF, Platt RW, Morin L, Usher R, Kramer M. How small is too small in a twin pregnancy? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 179: 682-685.
16. Garite TJ, Clark RH, Elliott JP, Thorp JA. Twins and triplets: the effect of plurality and growth on neonatal outcome compared with singleton infants. Am J Perinatol 2004; 191: 700-707.
17. Lindheimer MD, Taler SJ, Cunningham FG. ASH position article: hypertension in pregnancy. J Am Soc Hypertens 2008; 2: 484-494.
18. WHO. Report of a WHO consultation. Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic. Technical report series no. 894:i-xii. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2000: 1-253.
19. Sibai BM, Ross MG. Hypertension in gestational diabetes mellitus: pathophysiology and long-term consequences. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2010; 23: 229-233.
20. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Special problems of multiple gestation. In: ACOG Educational Bulletin 253. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1999; 64: 323-333.
21. Moses RG, Webb AJ, Lucas EM, Davis WS. Twin pregnancy outcomes for women with gestational diabetes mellitus compared with glucose tolerant women. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2003; 43: 38-40.
22. Martínez-Frías ML, Bermejo E. Frequency and trends of congenital defects in Spain: usefulness and significance of different frequencies. Med Clin 1999; 113: 459-462.
23. Bermejo E, Cuevas L, Mendioroz J, Grupo Periférico del ECEMC y Martínez-Frías ML. Frecuencia de anomalías congénitas en España: Vigilancia epidemiológica en el ECEMC en el período 1980-2007 (Frequency of congenital anomalies in Spain: Epidemiological surveillance in the ECEMC during the period 1980-2007). Boletín del ECEMC: Revista de Dismorfología y Epidemiología 2008; 7: 58-87.