Improving teaching and learning in higher education: Metaphors and models for partnership consultancy

Evaluation and Research in Education

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 31-44

  Morrison, Keith ^a  

^a Inter University Institute of Macau   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

communicative action; Consultancy; Habermas; higher education; partnerships

Indexed keywords

EID: 84911020540     PISSN: 09500790     EISSN: 17477514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14664200308668289     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Althusser, L., 1972. “ Ideology and ideological state apparatuses ”. In Education: Structure and Society, Edited by: Cosin, B. R., 242–280. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
2. Assessment Reform Group. 2002. Assessment for Learning: 10 Principles, London: Assessment Reform Group.
3. Black, P., and Wiliam, D., 1998. Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards through Classroom Assessment, London: Kings College, University of London. http://www.pdkintl.org=kappan=kbla9810.htm
4. Bohm, D., 1996. On Dialogue, New York: Routledge.
5. Cohen, L., Manion, L., and Morrison, K. R.B., 2000. Research Methods in Education, 5th edn, London: RoutledgeFalmer.
6. Cohen, L., Manion, L., and Morrison, K. R.B., 2004. A Guide to Teaching Practice, 5th edn, London: RoutledgeFalmer.
7. Edwards, A. D., and Furlong, J., 1978. The Language of Teaching, London: Heinemann.
8. Giddens, A., 1976. New Rules of Sociological Method, London: Hutchinson.
9. Giddens, A., 1979. Central Problems in Social Theory, London: Macmillan.
10. Habermas, J., 1970. On systematically distorted communication. Inquiry, 13: 205–218.
11. Habermas, J., 1979. Communication and the Evolution of Society, London: Heinemann.
12. Habermas, J., 1982. “ A reply to my critics ”. In Habermas: Critical Debates, Edited by: Thompson, J. B., and Held, D., London: Macmillan.
13. Habermas, J., 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action. Volume One: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, Boston: Beacon Press.
14. Habermas, J., 1987. The Theory of Communicative Action. Volume Two: Lifeworld and System, Boston: Beacon Press.
15. Lieberman, A., ed. 1990. Schools as Collaborative Cultures, London: Falmer.
16. Micklethwait, J., and Wooldridge, A., 1997. The Witch Doctors, London: Mandarin.
17. Morrison, K. R.B., 1995. Habermas and the school curriculum: An evaluation and case study, University of Durham. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis
18. Morrison, K. R.B., 1998. Management Theories for Educational Change, London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
19. Morrison, K. R.B., 2002. School Leadership and Complexity Theory, London: Routledge Falmer.
20. Norman, D. A., 1978. “ Notes towards a complex theory of learning ”. In Cognitive Psychology and Instruction, Edited by: Lesgold, A. M., New York: Plenum.
21. Office for Standards in Education. 2003. Handbook for Inspecting Secondary Schools, London: Office for Standards in Education.
22. Peters, R. S., 1966. Ethics and Education, London: Allen and Unwin.
23. Qualifications and Curriculum Authority. 2001. Feedback http://www.qca.org.uk=ca=5–14=afl=fbnotvery.asp
24. Senge, P., 1990. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organisation, London: Century Business.
25. Stacey, R. D., 2000. Strategic Management and Organisational Dynamics, 3rd edn, Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
26. Stacey, R. D., 2001. Complex Responsive Processes in Organizations: Learning and Knowledge Creation, London: Routledge.
27. Stake, R., 1976. The countenance of educational evaluation, cited in D. Jenkins, Six alternative models of curriculum evaluation, Unit 20, E203, Curriculum Design and Development, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
28. Tuckman, B. W., 1965. Development sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63: 384–399.
29. Wenger, E., 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity, New York: Cambridge University Press.