Attitude towards the incorporation of the selective collection of biowaste in a municipal solid waste management system: A case study

Waste Management

Volumn 34, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 2434-2444

  Bernad Beltran D ^a   Simo A ^a   Bovea, M D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT JAUME I   (Spain)

Author keywords

Binary logistic regression; Biowaste selective collection; Linear regression; Ordinal logistic regression; Willingness to participate; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

BINS; ECONOMICS; LINEAR REGRESSION; LOGISTIC REGRESSION; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

BINARY LOGISTIC REGRESSION; BIO-WASTE; ORDINAL LOGISTIC REGRESSION; WILLINGNESS TO PARTICIPATE; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE;

LEGISLATION; MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOCIOECONOMIC CONDITIONS; WASTE DISPOSAL; WASTE MANAGEMENT; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOWASTE; CASE STUDY; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HOUSEHOLD; HUMAN; INCOME; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; SOCIAL ATTITUDE; SOCIAL PARTICIPATION; SOCIAL STATUS; SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT; SPAIN; WASTE; WORK ENVIRONMENT; ANALYSIS; ATTITUDE; FAMILY SIZE; PROCEDURES; SOCIOECONOMICS; SOLID WASTE; VERY ELDERLY; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

SPAIN;

SOLID WASTE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ATTITUDE; FAMILY CHARACTERISTICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; SOLID WASTE; SPAIN; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84910685966     PISSN: 0956053X     EISSN: 18792456     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.08.023     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Afroz R., Masud M., Akhtar R., Duasa J. Survey and analysis of public knowledge, awareness and willingness to pay in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: a case study on household WEEE management. J. Cleaner Prod. 2013, 52:183-195.
2. Bartlett J., Kortlik J., Higgins C. Organizational research: determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Inf. Technol., Learn. Perform. J. 2001, 19:43-50.
3. Basili M., Di Matteo M., Ferrini S. Analysing demand for environmental quality: a willingness to pay/accept study in the province of Siena (Italy). Waste Manage. 2006, 26:209-219.
4. Begum R., Siwar C., Pereira J., Jaafar A. Attitude and behavioral factors in waste management in the construction industry of Malaysia. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2009, 53:321-328.
5. Bernad-Beltrán D., Bovea M.D., Prades M., Gallardo A., Colomer F.J. Actitud ante la recolección selectiva de biorresiduos. Rev. Int. Contam. Ambient. 2012, 28:39-44.
6. Boccaletti S., Moro D. Consumer willingness-to-pay for GM food products in Italy. AgBioForum 2000, 3(4):259-267.
7. Carson R.T., Hanemann W.M. Contingent valuation. Handbook Environ. Econ. 2005, 2:821-936.
8. Chen, C.H., Hughes, J., 2004. Using ordinal regression model to analyse student satisfaction questionnaires. IR Applications 1.
9. Coggins P.C. Who is the recycler?. J. Waste Manage. Resour. Recov. 1994, 11:69-75.
10. Darby L., Obara L. Household recycling behavior and attitudes towards the disposal of small electrical and electronic equipment. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2005, 44:17-35.
11. De Feo G. Sociological survey in a municipality with a high level separate collection programme in an area of historic unpopularity. Waste Manage. 2014, 34:1369-1380.
12. De Feo G., De Gisi S. Domestic separation and collection of municipal solid waste: opinion and awareness of citizens and workers. Sustainability 2010, 2(5):1297-1326.
13. De Feo G., De Gisi S., Williams I.D. Public perception of odour and environmental pollution attributed to MSW treatment and disposal facilities: a case study. Waste Manage. 2013, 33(4):974-987.
14. Dwivedy M., Mittal R.K. Willingness of residents to participate in e-waste recycling in India. Environ. Dev. 2013, 6:48-68.
15. European Commission, 2000. Success Stories on Composting and Separate Collection. Directorate-General for the Environment.
16. European Commission, 2008. Green Paper on the Management of Biowaste in the European Union. Directorate-General for the Environment.
17. European Union, 1999. Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on Landfill of Waste. Official Journal of the European Union, 16/07/1999.
18. European Union, 2008. Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 19 November 2008 on Waste and Repealing Certain Directives. Official Journal of the European Union, 22/11/2008.
19. Gellynck X., Jacobsen R., Verhelst P. Identifying the key factors in increasing recycling and reducing residual household waste: a case study of the Flemish region of Belgium. J. Environ. Manage. 2011, 92:2683-2690.
20. Giró F., 2009. Challenges in mediterranean countries. The case of Catalonia (Spain). In: Proceedings of the Conference "Bio-Waste - Need for EU-Legislation? (accessed 07.2014). http://www.biowaste.eu/.
21. Heredia J., Rodríguez A., Vilalta J.A. Empleo de la regresión logística ordinal para la predicción del rendimiento académico. Rev. Investigación Operacional 2012, 33:252-267.
22. INE, 2011. Instituto Nacional de Estadística. (accessed 07.2014). http://www.ine.es.
23. Jacobs H., Bailey J., Crews J. Development and analysis of a community-based resource recovery program. J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 1984, 17:127-145.
24. Junquera B., del Brío J.A., Muñiz M. Citizen's attitude to reuse of municipal solid waste: a practical application. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2001, 33:51-60.
25. Karousakis K., Birol E. Investigating household preferences for kerbside recycling services in London: a choice experiment approach. J. Environ. Manage. 2008, 88:1099-1108.
26. Klaeboe R., Turunen-Rise I.H., Hårvik L., Madshus C. Vibration in dwellings from road and rail traffic - Part II: exposure-effect relationships based on ordinal logit and logistic regression models. Appl. Acoust. 2003, 64:89-109.
27. Ley 22, 2011, de 28 de julio, de residuos y suelos contaminados. (accessed 07.2014). http://www.boe.es.
28. Longe E., Longe O., Ukpebor E. People's perception on household solid waste management in Ojo local government area in Nigeria. Iran J. Environ., Health Sci. Eng. 2009, 6:209-216.
29. Marrero X., 2010. El 5° contenedor llega a Vitoria-Gasteiz: el reto de los residuos orgánicos. Congreso Nacional del Medio Ambiente. (accessed 07.2014). http://www.conama10.es.
30. McDonald S., Ball R. Public participation in plastics recycling schemes. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 1998, 22:123-141.
31. McDonald S., Oates C. Reasons for non-participation in a kerbside recycling scheme. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2003, 39:369-385.
32. Miafodzyeva S., Brandt N. Recycling behaviour among householders: synthesizing determinants via meta-analysis. Waste Biomass Valorization 2013, 4(2):221-235.
33. Mitchell R.C., Carson R.T. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method 1989, McGraw-Hill Series in Industrial, New York.
34. Nakatani J., Aramaki T., Hanaki K. Evaluating source separation of plastic waste using conjoint analysis. Waste Manage. 2008, 28:2393-2402.
35. Owens J., Dickerson S., Macintosh D. Demographic covariates of residential recycling efficiency. Environ. Behav. 2000, 32:637-650.
36. Perrin D., Barton J. Issues associated with transforming household attitudes and opinions into materials recovery: a review of two kerbside recycling schemes. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2001, 33:61-74.
37. Perry G.D.R., Williams I.D. The participation of ethnic minorities in kerbside recycling: a case study. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2007, 49:308-323.
38. PNIR, 2009. Plan Nacional Integrado de Residuos 2008-2015. (accessed 07.2014). http://www.boe.es.
39. PRUCL, 2004. Plan de Residuos Urbanos de Castilla y León 2004-2010. Junta de Castilla y León. (accessed 07.2014). http://www.jcyl.es.
40. Refsgaard K., Magnussen K. Household behavior and attitudes with respect to recycling food waste - experience from focus groups. J. Environ. Manage. 2009, 90:760-771.
41. Sadeco, 2008. Memoria de Saneamientos de Córdoba. (accessed 07.2014). http://www.sadeco.es.
42. Scott D. Equal opportunity, unequal results: determinants of household recycling intensity. Environ. Behav. 1999, 31:267-290.
43. Song Q., Wang Z., Li J. Residents' behaviors, attitudes and willingness to pay for recycling e-waste in Macau. J. Environ. Manage. 2012, 106:8-16.
44. Tadesse T., Ruijs A., Hagos F. Household waste disposal in Mekelle city, Northern Ethiopia. Waste Manage. 2008, 28:2003-2012.
45. Torsten J.G., Mahmudova I. Determinants of price mark-up tolerance for green electricity - lessons for environmental marketing strategies from a study of residential electricity customers in Germany. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2010, 19:304-318.
46. Vicente P., Reis E. Segmenting households according to recycling attitudes in a Portuguese urban area. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2007, 52:1-12.
47. Vining J., Ebreo A. Predicting recycling behavior from global and specific environmental attitudes and changes in recycling opportunities. J. Appl. Psychol. 1992, 20:1580-1607.
48. Wang Z., Zhang B., Yin J., Zhang X. Willingness and behavior towards e-waste recycling for residents in Beijing city, China. J. Cleaner Prod. 2011, 19:977-984.
49. Williams I.D., Kelly J. Green waste collection and the public's recycling behavior in the borough of Wyre, England. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2003, 38:139-159.
50. Yuan H. A model for evaluating the social performance of construction waste management. Waste Manage. 2012, 32:1218-1228.
51. Zhuang Y., Wu S., Wang Y., Wu W., Chen Y. Source separation of household waste: a case study in China. Waste Manage. 2008, 28:2022-2030.