Comparison of some aggregation techniques using group analytic hierarchy process

Expert Systems with Applications

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 2198-2204

  Grošelj, Petra ^a   Zadnik Stirn, Lidija ^a   Ayrilmis, Nadir ^b   Kuzman, Manja Kitek ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

^b ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Analytic hierarchy process; Construction; Decision analysis; Decision support systems; Group decision making; Wood

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CONSTRUCTION; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; DECISION THEORY; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; WOOD;

AGGREGATION TECHNIQUES; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP); CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING; DECISION-MAKING PROBLEM; EVALUATION MEASURES; GROUP DECISION MAKING; MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION MAKING; PERFORMANCE INDICES;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS;

EID: 84910683742     PISSN: 09574174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.09.060     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ahmad, F., Saman, M. Y. M., Mohamad, F. S., Mohamad, Z., & Awang, W. S. W. (2014). Group decision support system based on enhanced AHP for tender evaluation. International Journal of Digital Information and Wireless Communications (IJDIWC), 4(2), 248-257.
2. Ananda, J., & Herath, G. (2008). Multi-attribute preference modelling and regional land-use planning. Ecological Economics, 65, 325-335.
3. Cortés-Aldana, F. A., García-Melón, M., Fernández-de-Lucio, I., Aragonés-Beltrán, P., & Poveda-Bautista, R. (2009). University objectives and socioeconomic results: A multicriteria measuring of alignment. European Journal of Operational Research, 199, 811-822.
4. De Brucker, K., Macharis, C., & Verbeke, A. (2013). Multi-criteria analysis and the resolution of sustainable development dilemmas: A stakeholder management approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 224(1), 122-131.
5. de Luca, S. (2014). Public engagement in strategic transportation planning: An analytic hierarchy process based approach. Transport Policy, 33, 110-124.
6. Dyer, R. F., & Forman, E. H. (1992). Group decision support with the analytic hierarchy process. Decision Support Systems, 8, 99-124.
7. Forman, E., & Peniwati, K. (1998). Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 108, 165-169.
8. Hosseinian, S., Navidi, H., & Hajfathaliha, A. (2012). A new linear programming method for weights generation and group decision making in the analytic hierarchy process. Group Decision and Negotiation, 21, 233-254.
9. Huang, Y. S., Liao, J. T., & Lin, Z. L. (2009). A study on aggregation of group decisions. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 26, 445-454.
10. Ishizaka, A., & Labib, A. (2011a). Selection of new production facilities with the group analytic hierarchy process ordering method. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(6), 7317-7325.
11. Ishizaka, A., & Labib, A. (2011b). Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(11), 14336-14345.
12. Kuzman, M. K., Grošelj, P., Ayrilmis, N., & Zbasnik-Senegacnik, M. (2013). Comparison of passive house construction types using analytic hierarchy process. Energy and Buildings, 64, 258-263.
13. Lai, V. S., Wong, B. K., & Cheung, W. (2002). Group decision making in a multiple criteria environment: A case using the AHP in software selection. European Journal of Operational Research, 137, 134-144.
14. Lee, A. H. I., Chang, H. J., & Lin, C. Y. (2009). An evaluation model of buyer-supplier relationships in high-tech industry - The case of an electronic components manufacturer in Taiwan. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 57, 1417-1430.
15. Leskovar Žegarac, V., & Premrov, M. (2012). Influence of glazing size on energy efficiency of timber-frame buildings. Construction & Building Materials, 30, 92-99.
16. Peniwati, K. (2007). Criteria for evaluating group decision-making methods. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46, 935-947.
17. Praznik, M., Butala, V., & Zbašnik-Senegačnik, M. (2014). A simple method for evaluating the sustainable design of energy efficient family houses. Strojniški Vestnik, 60(6), 425-436.
18. Regan, H. M., Colyvan, M., & Markovchick-Nicholls, L. (2006). A formal model for consensus and negotiation in environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 80, 167-176.
19. Ren, J., Fedele, A., Mason, M., Manzardo, A., & Scipioni, A. (2013). Fuzzy multi-actor multi-criteria decision making for sustainability assessment of biomass-based technologies for hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 38(22), 9111-9120.
20. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
21. Skorupski, J. (2014). Multi-criteria group decision making under uncertainty with application to air traffic safety. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(16), 7406-7414.
22. Srdjevic, B. (2007). Linking analytic hierarchy process and social choice methods to support group decision-making in water management. Decision Support Systems, 42, 2261-2273.
23. Srdjevic, Z., Lakicevic, M., & Srdjevic, B. (2013). Approach of decision making based on the analytic hierarchy process for urban landscape management. Environmental Management, 51 (3), 777-785.
24. Sun, L., & Greenberg, B. (2006). Multicriteria group decision making: Optimal priority synthesis from pairwise comparisons. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 130, 317-339.
25. Sun, J., & Li, H. (2009). Financial distress early warning based on group decision making. Computers & Operations Research, 36, 885-906.
26. Taylor, A. D., & Pacelli, A. M. (2008). Mathematics and politics: Strategy, voting, power and proof (2nd ed.). New York: Springer Verlag.
27. Wang, J. Q., Peng, L., Zhang, H. Y., & Chen, X. H. (2014). Method of multi-criteria group decision-making based on cloud aggregation operators with linguistic information. Information Sciences, 274, 177-191.
28. Yu, L., & Lai, K. K. (2011). A distance-based group decision-making methodology for multi-person multi-criteria emergency decision support. Decision Support Systems, 51(2), 307-315.