New hybrid FE-PSO-CGAs sensitivity base technique for damage detection of laminated composite beams

Composite Structures

Volumn 118, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 68-73

  Vosoughi, A R ^a   Gerist, S ^a  

^a SHIRAZ UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Continuous genetic algorithm; Hybrid damage detection technique; Laminated composite beams; Particle swarm optimization; Sensitivity analysis

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPOSITE BEAMS AND GIRDERS; DAMAGE DETECTION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; LAMINATED COMPOSITES; LAMINATING; MODAL ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SHEAR DEFORMATION;

CONTINUOUS GENETIC ALGORITHMS; DAMAGE DETECTION TECHNIQUE; FIRST-ORDER SHEAR DEFORMATION THEORY; GOVERNING EQUATIONS; LAMINATED COMPOSITE BEAM; OPTIMIZATION METHOD; OPTIMIZATION TECHNIQUES; PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION TECHNIQUE;

PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION (PSO);

EID: 84910610858     PISSN: 02638223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.07.012     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Koh BH, Dyke SJ. Structural health monitoring for flexible bridge structures using correlation sensitivity modal data. Comput Struct 2007;85:117-30.
2. Guo HY, Li ZL. A two-stage method to identify structural damage sites and extents by using evidence theory and micro-search genetic algorithm. Mech Syst Sig Process 2009;23:769-82.
3. Fan W, Qiao P. Vibration-based damage identification methods: are view and comparative study. Struct Health Monit 2011;10:83-111.
4. Koh CG, Perry MJ. Structural identification and damage detection using genetic algorithm. London: CRC Press; 2010.
5. Naseralavi SS, Gerist S, Salajegheh E, Salajegheh J. Elaborate structural damage detection using an improved genetic algorithm and modal data. Int J Struct Stab Dyn 2013;13(6):57-79.
6. Au FTK, Cheng YS, Tham LG, Bai ZZ. Structural damage detection based on a micro-genetic algorithm using incomplete and noisy test data. J Sound Vib 2003;259(5):1081-94.
7. Perera R, Ruiz A. A multistage FE updating procedure for damage identification in large-scale structures based on multiobjective evolutionary optimization. Mech Syst Sig Process 2008;22:970-91.
8. Friswell MI. Damage identification using inverse methods. Philos Trans R Soc 2007;365:393-410.
9. Naseralavi SS, Salajegheh J, Salajegheh E, Fadaee MJ. An improved genetic algorithm using sensitivity analysis and micro search for damage detection. Asian J Civ Eng 2010;11(6):717-40.
10. Araujo Dos Santos JV, Mota Soares CM, Mota Soares CA, Pina HLG. Identification of damage in composite structures: a numerical model. Mech Compos Mater Struct 1999;6(4):363-76.
11. Pérez MA, Gil L, Oller S. Impact damage identification in composite laminates using vibration testing. Compos Struct 2014;108:267-76.
12. Cawley P, Adams RD. A vibration technique for non-destructive testing of fiber composite structures. J Compos Mater 1979;13:161-75.
13. Cawley P, Adams RD. The location of defects in structure from measurements of natural frequencies. J Strain Anal 1979;14:49-57.
14. Hu H, Wang BT, Lee CH, Su JS. Damage detection of surface cracks in composite laminates using modal analysis and strain energy method. Compos Struct 2006;74:399-405.
15. Manoach E, Samborski S, Mitura A, Warminski J. Vibration based damage detection in composite beams under temperature variations using Poincare maps. Int J Mech Sci 2012;62:120-32.
16. Reddy JN. An introduction to the finite element method. New Delhi: McGraw- Hill; 2004.
17. Davis L. Handbook of genetic algorithm. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1991.
18. Goldberg DE. Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1989.
19. Kennedy J, Eberhart R. Particle swarm optimization. In: Proc IEEE int conf neural netw IV, vol. 4. Piscataway, NJ: 1995. p. 1942-1948.
20. Timoshenko S, Young DH, Weaver W. Vibration problems in engineering. New York: Wiley; 1974.