Quantitative measurement of soil erosion from TLS and UAV data

International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives

Volumn 40, Issue 1W2, 2013, Pages 119-124

  Eltner, A ^a   Mulsow, C ^a   Maas, H G ^a  

^a DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Change detection; High resolution; Laser scanning; Soil erosion; Soil surface model; UAV

Indexed keywords

AIRCRAFT DETECTION; CAMERAS; LASER APPLICATIONS; SEEBECK EFFECT; SOIL CONSERVATION; SOIL SURVEYS; SOILS; SURFACE ANALYSIS; SURVEYING INSTRUMENTS; UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES (UAV);

CHANGE DETECTION; DIGITAL TERRAIN MODEL; HIGH RESOLUTION; LASER SCANNING; SOIL EROSION; SOIL SURFACE MODEL; SOIL SURFACES; SURFACE MODELING; TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING; UNMANNED AIRBORNE VEHICLES;

EROSION;

EID: 84910601745     PISSN: 16821750     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.5194/isprsarchives-xl-1-w2-119-2013     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Agisoft LLC, 2012. Agisoft PhotoScan User Manual: Professional Edition, Version 0.9.0. http://downloads.agisoft.ru/pdf/photoscan-pro-0-9-0-en. pdf
2. Barneveld, R., Seeger, M., Maalen-Johansen, I., 2013. Assessment of terrestrial laser scanning technology for obtaining high-resolution DEMs of soils. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 38, p. 90-94
3. Boehler, W., Bordas, V., Marbs, M., 2003. Investigating Laser Scanner accuracy. International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. XXXIV-5, Part C15, p. 696-701
4. Bracken, L., Kirkby, M., 2005. Differences in hillslope runoff and sediment transport rates within two semi-arid catchments in southeast Spain. Geomorphology, 68(3-4), p. 183-200
5. Castillo, C., 2012. Comparing the Accuracy of Several Field Methods for Measuring Gully Erosion. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 76(4), p. 1319-1332
6. d'Oleire-Oltmanns, S., Marzolff, I., Peter, K., Ries, J., 2012. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) for Monitoring Soil Erosion in Morocco. Remote Sensing, 4, p. 3390-3416
7. Eisenbeiß, H., 2009. UAV Photogrammetry. Dissertation, Institut für Geodäsie und Photogrammtrie, ETH Zürich, IGP Mitteilungen, 105
8. Eltner, A., 2013. Konzeption einer Methode zur quantitativen Erfassung von Bodenerosion durch integrierte Aufnahme mit einer Mikrodrohne und einem terrestrischen Laserscanner. DGPF Tagungsband, 22, p. 289-297
9. Faust, D., Schmidt, M., 2009. Soil erosion processes and sediment fluxes in a Mediterranean marl landscape, Campiña de Cádiz, SW Spains. Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie N. F., 52(2), p. 247-265
10. Furukawa, Y., Ponce, J., 2007. Accurate, dense, and robust multi-view stereopsis. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 17-22 June, Minneapolis, USA, pp. 1-8
11. Haala, N., 2009. Comeback of Digital Image Matching. Photogrammetric Week, 2009, p. 289-301
12. Hancock, G., Crawter, D., Fityus, S., Chandler, J., Wells, T., 2008. The measurement and modelling of rill erosion at angle of repose slopes in mine spoil. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 33, p. 1006-1020
13. Haubrock, S.-N., Kuhnert, M., Chabrillat, S., Güntner, A., Kaufmann, H., 2009. Spatiotemporal variations of soil surface roughness from in-situ laser scanning. Catena, 79, p. 128-139
14. Hirschmüller, H., 2005. Accurate and Efficient Stereo Processing by Semi-Global Matching and Mutual Information. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recoginition, June 2005, San Diego, CA, USA, Volume 2, p. 807-814
15. James, M., Robson, S., 2012. Straight-forward reconstruction of 3D surfaces and topography with a camera: Accuracy and geosciences application. Journal of Geophysical Research Earth Surface. doi:10.1029/2011JF002289
16. Jester, W.. Klik, A., 2005. Soil surface roughness measurementmethods, applicability, and surface representation. Catena, 64, p. 174-192
17. Küng, O., Strecha, C., Beyeler, A., Zufferey, J.-C., Floreano, D., Fua, P., Gervaix, F., 2012. The Accuracy of Automatic Photogrammetric Techniques on Ultra-light UAV Imagery. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. XXXVIII-1, Part C22
18. Lowe, D., 1999. Object recognition from local scale-invariant features. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision, 2, p. 1150-1157
19. Marzolff, I., Poesen, J., 2009. The potential of 3D gully monitoring with GIS using high-resolution aerial photography and a digital photogrammetry system. Geomorphology, 111, p. 48-60
20. Perroy, R., Bookhagen, B., Asner, G., Chadwick, O., 2010. Comparison of gully erosion estimates using airborne and ground-based LiDAR on Santa Cruz Island, California. Geomorphology, 118, p. 288-300
21. Poesen, J., Hooke, J., 1997. Erosion, flooding and channel management in Mediterranean Environments of southern Europe. Progress in Physical Geography, 21(2), p. 157-199.
22. Rieke-Zapp, D., Nearing, M., 2005. Digital Close Range Photogrammetry for Measurement of Soil Erosion. The Photogrammetric Record, 20(109), p. 69-87
23. Rusu, R., Cousins, S., 2011. 3D is here: Point Cloud Library (PCL). IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), May 9-13, 2011
24. Schmid, T., Schack-Kirchner, H., Hildebrand, E., 2004. A case study of terrestrial laser scanning in erosion research: calculation of roughness and volume balance at a logged forest site. International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. XXXVI-8, Part W2, p. 114-118
25. Schneider, A., Gerke, H., Maurer, T., Seifer, S., Nenov, R., Hüttl, R., 2012. Evaluation of remotely-sensed DEMs and modification based on plausibility rules and initial sediment budgets of an artificially-created catchment. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 37, p. 708-725
26. Schürch, P., Densmore, A., Rosser, N., Lim, M., McArdell, B., 2011. Detection of surface change in complex topography using terrestrial laser scanning: application to the Illgraben debrisflow channel. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 36, p. 1847-1859
27. Smith, M., Cox, N., Bracken, L., 2011. Terrestrial laser scanning soil surfaces: a field methodology to examine soil surface roughness and overland flow hydraulics. Hydrological Processes, 25, p. 842-860
28. Snavely, N., Seitz, S., Szeliski, R., 2008. Modeling the world from internet photo collections. International Journal of Computer Vision, 80, p. 189-210
29. Soudarissanane, S., Lindenbergh, R., Menenti, M., Teunissen, P., 2011. Scanning geometry: Influencing factor on the quality of terrestrial laser scanning points. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 66(4), p. 389-399
30. Westoby, M., Brasington, J., Glasser, N., Hambrey, M., Reynolds, J., 2012. 'Structure-from-Motion' photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool forgeoscience applications. Geomorphology, 179, p. 300-314
31. Wolf, D., Faust, D., 2013. Holocene sediment fluxes in a fragile loess landscape (Saxony, Germany). Catena, 103, p. 87-102