Dynamics of silver nanoparticle release from wound dressings revealed via in situ nanoscale imaging

Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine

Volumn 25, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 2481-2489

  Holbrook, R David ^a   Rykaczewski, Konrad ^b   Staymates, Matthew E ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b Arizona State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MACROS; METAL NANOPARTICLES; NANOPARTICLES; NANOTECHNOLOGY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

ANTI-MICROBIAL PROPERTIES; ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH; ENVIRONMENTAL SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPES; NANOSCALE CHARACTERIZATION; SILVER NANOPARTICLES; SILVER NANOPARTICLES (AGNPS); SITU VISUALIZATION; WATER CONDENSATION;

SILVER;

SILVER NANOPARTICLE; WATER; ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; DELAYED RELEASE FORMULATION; METAL NANOPARTICLE; SILVER;

ARTICLE; COOLING; ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH; FIBER; METHODOLOGY; NANOIMAGING; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; WOUND DRESSING; ADMINISTRATION AND DOSAGE; BANDAGE; CHEMISTRY; DELAYED RELEASE FORMULATION; DIFFUSION; MATERIALS TESTING; MOLECULAR IMAGING; PROCEDURES;

ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; BANDAGES; DELAYED-ACTION PREPARATIONS; DIFFUSION; MATERIALS TESTING; METAL NANOPARTICLES; MOLECULAR IMAGING; SILVER;

EID: 84910150249     PISSN: 09574530     EISSN: 15734838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10856-014-5265-6     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Chopra I. The increasing use of silver-based products as antimicrobial agents: a useful development or a cause for concern? J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007;59:587–90.
2. Maillard JY, Hartemann P. Silver as an antimicrobial: facts and gaps in knowledge. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2013;39:373–83.
3. Morones JR, Elechiguerra JL, Camacho A, et al. The bactericidal effect of silver nanoparticles. Nanotechnology. 2005;16:2346–53.
4. Rai M, Yadav A, Gade A. Silver nanoparticles as a new generation of antimicrobials. Biotechnol Adv. 2009;27:76–83.
5. Rigo C, Roman M, Munivrana I, et al. Characterization and evaluation of silver release from four different dressings used in burns care. Burns. 2012;38:1131–42.
6. Wright JB, Lam K, Burrell RE. Wound management in an era of increasing bacterial antibiotic resistance: a role for topical silver treatment. Am J Infect Control. 1998;26:572–7.
7. Wright JB, Hansen DL, Burrell RE. The comparative efficacy of two antimicrobial barrier dressings: in-vitro examination of two controlled release of silver dressings. Wounds A Compend Clin Res Pract. 1998;10:179–88.
8. Zhang W, Yao Y, Sullivan N, Chen YS. Modeling the primary size effects of citrate-coated silver nanoparticles on their ion release kinetics. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45:4422–8.
9. Michaels JA, Campbell WB, King BM, et al. A prospective randomised controlled trial and economic modelling of antimicrobial silver dressings versus non-adherent control dressings for venous leg ulcers: the VULCAN trial. Health Technol Assess 2009;13. doi:10.3310/hta13560.
10. Moore J, Perkins A. Evaluating antimicrobial efficacy and cost of 3 dressings containing silver versus a novel antimicrobial hydrogel impregnated gauze dressing containing oakin, an oak extract. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2010;23:544–51.
11. Nikkhah D, Gilbert P, Booth S, Dheansa B. Should we be using silver based compounds for donor site dressing in thermal burns? Burns. 2013;39:1324–5.
12. Benn TM, Westerhoff P. Nanoparticle silver released into water from commercially available sock fabrics. Environ Sci Technol. 2008;42:4133–9.
13. Parsons D, Bowler PG, Myles V, Jones S. Silver antimicrobial dressings in wound management: a comparison of antibacterial, physical, and chemical characteristics. Wounds A Compend Clin Res Pract. 2005;17:222–32.
14. Thomas S, McCubbin P. An in vitro analysis of the antimicrobial properties of 10 silver-containing dressings. J Wound Care. 2003;12:305–8.
15. Thomas S, McCubbin P. A comparison of the antimicrobial effects of four silver-containing dressings on three organisms. J Wound Care. 2003;12:101–7.
16. Dibrov P, Dzioba J, Gosink KK, Hase CC. Chemiosmotic mechanism of antimicrobial activity of Ag+ in Vibrio cholerae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46:2668–70.
17. Feng QL, Wu J, Chen GQ, Cui FZ, Kim TN, Kim JO. A mechanistic study of the antibacterial effect of silver ions on Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;52:662–8.
18. Taglietti A, Fernandez YAD, Amato E, et al. Antibacterial activity of glutathione-coated silver nanoparticles against gram positive and gram negative bacteria. Langmuir. 2012;28:8140–8.
19. Silver S, Phung LT, Silver G. Silver as biocides in burn and wound dressings and bacterial resistance to silver compounds. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006;33:627–34.
20. Bondarenko O, Ivask A, Käkinen A, Kurvet I, Kahru A. Particle-cell contact enhances antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e64060. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0064060.
21. Hwang ET, Lee JH, Chae YJ, et al. Analysis of the toxic mode of action of silver nanoparticles using stress-specific bioluminescent bacteria. Small. 2008;4:746–50.
22. Xiu ZM, Zhang QB, Puppala HL, Colvin VL, Alvarez PJJ. Negligible particle-specific antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 2012;12:4271–5.
23. Choi O, Hu ZQ. Size dependent and reactive oxygen species related nanosilver toxicity to nitrifying bacteria. Environ Sci Technol. 2008;42:4583–8.
24. Durmus NG, Webster TJ. Eradicating antibiotic-resistant biofilms with silver-conjugated superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. Adv Healthc Mater. 2013;2:165–71.
25. He D, Bligh MW, Waite TD. Effects of aggregate structure on the dissolution kinetics of citrate-stabilized silver nanoparticles. Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47:9148–56.
26. Holbrook RD, Gorham JM, Murphy KR, Stan G, Winchester M, MacCuspie RI. Characterization of commercially available silver nanotextiles. J Nanopart Res. 2013 (in review).
27. Rykaczewski K, Chinn J, Walker ML, Scott JHJ, Chinn A, Jones W. Dynamics of nanoparticle self-assembly into superhydrophobic liquid marbles during water condensation. ACS Nano. 2011;5:9746–54.
28. Bormashenko E, Bormashenko Y, Musin A, Barkay Z. On the mechanism of floating and sliding of liquid marbles. ChemPhysChem. 2009;10:654–6.
29. Donald AM. The use of environmental scanning electron microscopy for imaging wet and insulating materials. Nat Mater. 2003;2:511–6.
30. Donald AM, He CB, Royall CP, Sferrazza M, Stelmashenko NA, Thiel BL. Applications of environmental scanning electron microscopy to colloidal aggregation and film formation. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2000;174:37–53.
31. Stokes DJ. Principles and practices of variable pressure and environmental scanning electron microscopy. New York: Wiley; 2008.
32. Rykaczewski K, Anand S, Subramanyam SB, Varanasi KK. Mechanism of frost formation on lubricant-impregnated surfaces. Langmuir. 2013;29:5230–8.
33. Rasband WS. ImageJ, U. S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA; 1997–2014. http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/.
34. Rykaczewski K, Scott JHJ. Methodology for imaging nano-to-microscale water condensation dynamics on complex nanostructures. ACS Nano. 2011;5:5962–8.
35. Rykaczewski K, Scott JHJ, Fedorov AG. Electron beam heating effects during environmental scanning electron microscopy imaging of water condensation on superhydrophobic surfaces. Appl Phys Lett. 2011;98:093106-1–3.
36. Gao Y, Cranston R. Recent advances in antimicrobial treatments of textiles. Text Res J. 2008;78:60–72.
37. Lioy PJ, Nazarenko Y, Han TW, Lioy MJ, Mainelis G. Nanotechnology and exposure science what is needed to fill the research and data gaps for consumer products. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2010;16:378–87.
38. Lansdown A, Williams A, Chandler S, Benfield S. Silver adsorption and antibacterial efficacy of silver dressings. J Wound Care. 2005;14:155–60.
39. Sotiriou GA, Meyer A, Knijnenburg JTN, Panke S, Pratsinis SE. Quantifying the origin of released Ag+ ions from nanosilver. Langmuir. 2012;28:15929–36.
40. Glover RD, Miller JM, Hutchison JE. Generation of metal nanoparticles from silver and copper objects: nanoparticle dynamics on surfaces and potential sources of nanoparticles in the environment. ACS Nano. 2011;5:8950–7.
41. He D, Bligh MW, Waite TD. Effects of aggregate structure on the dissolution kinetics of citrate-stabilized silver nanoparticles. Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47:9148–56.
42. Liu JY, Hurt RH. Ion release kinetics and particle persistence in aqueous nano-silver colloids. Environ Sci Technol. 2010;44:2169–75.
43. Joanny JF, Degennes PG. A model for contact-angle hysteresis. J Chem Phys. 1984;81:552–62.
44. de Gennes P-G, Brochard-Wyart F, Quere D. Capillarity and wetting phenomena: drops, bubbles, pearls. Waves: Springer; 2003.
45. Paxson AT, Varanasi KK. Self-similarity of contact line depinning from textured surfaces. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1492. doi:10.1038/ncomms2482.
46. Quadros ME, Pierson R, Tulve NS, et al. Release of silver from nanotechnology-based consumer products for children. Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47:8894–901.
47. Kissa E. Wetting and wicking. Text Res J. 1996;66:660–8.
48. Davis MDP, Wang MZ, Yiannias JA, et al. Patch testing with a large series of metal allergens: findings from more than 1,000 patients in one decade at mayo clinic. Dermatitis. 2011;22:256–71.
49. Monopoli MP, Aberg C, Salvati A, Dawson KA. Biomolecular coronas provide the biological identity of nanosized materials. Nat Nanotechnol. 2012;7:779–86.
50. Monopoli MP, Pitek AS, Lynch I, Dawson KA. Formation and characterization of the nanoparticle–protein corona. Nanomater Interfaces Biol Methods Mol Biol. 2013;1025:137–55.