The feasibility of implementing cross-border land-use management strategies: A report from three Upper Silesian Euroregions

IForest

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 396-402

  Spyra, Marcin ^a  

^a OPOLE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Cross border land use management strategy; Czech Polish borderland; Euroregion; Upper silesia

Indexed keywords

EID: 84910099678     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19717458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3832/ifor1248-007     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. AEBR (2000). Practical guide to cross-border cooperation (3rd edn). Association of European Border Regions-AEBR, European Commission, Gronau, Germany, pp. 405. [online] URL: http:// www.aebr.eu/files/publications/lace_guide.en.pd f.
2. Beunen R, Opdam P (2011). When landscape planning becomes landscape governance, what happens to the science? Landscape and Urban Planning 100: 324-326.-doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan. 2011.01.018.
3. Cantiani M (2012). Forest planning and public participation: a possible methodological approach. iForest 5: 72-82.-doi: 10.3832/ifor0602-009.
4. Cumming G, Norwood C (2012). The community voice method: using participatory research and filmmaking to foster dialog about changing landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 105: 434-444.-doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.01. 018.
5. Council of Europe (2000). European landscape convention. Council of Europe Treaty Series no. 176, Florence, Italy, pp. 4. [online] URL: http:// www.coe.int/t/dg4/cultureheritage/heritage/Land scape/default_en.asp.
6. Jedraszko A (2005). Zagospodarowanie przestrzenne w Polsce-drogi i bezdroza regulacji ustawowych [Spatial planning in Poland-roads and off-roads of statutory regulations]. Unia Metropolii Polskich, Warsaw, Poland, pp. 245- 307.
7. Kordecki M, Smolorz D (2011). Górny slask = Oberschlesien. Dom Wspólpracy Polsko-Niemieckiej, Gliwice, Poland.
8. Kotkowska A (2012). Polsko-Czeskie pogranicze. Bariery we wspólpracy i sposoby ich przelamywania. Wspólne planowanie przestrzenne i strategiczne [Polish-Czech borderland. Barriers to cooperation and ways of overcoming them. Bilateral land-use planning]. In: Proceedings of the conference "Infrastruktura transportowa oraz planowanie strategiczne i przestrzenne w relacjach Polsko-Czeskich [Transport infrastructure and strategic and spatial planning in Polish- Czech relations]". Wroclaw (Poland) 5 Oct 2012, pp. 5. [in Polish] [online] URL: http://www.osw. waw.pl/sites/default/files/wydarzenia/zaprosze nie-wroclaw-cz__0.pdf.
9. Lepik KL (2009). Euroregions as mechanisms for strengthening cross-border cooperation in the Baltic Sea Region. Trames 13: 265-284.-doi: 10.3176/tr.2009.3.05.
10. MacKay B, McKiernan P (2010). Creativity and dysfunction in strategic processes: the case of scenario planning. Futures 42: 271-281.-doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2009.11.013.
11. Ministerstwo Budownictwa Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej (2006). Studium zagospodarowania przestrzennego pogranicza polsko-czeskiego [Land-use study of Polish-Czech borderland]. Ministerstwo Budownictwa Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej, Departament Ladu Przestrzennego i Architektury, Wroclaw, Poland and Ministerstvo pro Místní Rozvoj Ceské Republiky, Odbor Územních Vazeb, Prague, Czech Republic. [in Polish].
12. Nelson R (2010). Extending foresight: the case for and nature of Foresight 2.0. Futures 42: 282-294.- doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2009.11.014.
13. Paasi A (2010). Regions are social constructs, but who or what "constructs" them? Agency in question. Environment and Planning A 42: 2296- 2301.-doi: 10.1068/a42232.
14. Perkmann M (2003). Cross-border regions in Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies 10: 153-171.-doi: 10.1177/0969776403010002004.
15. Perkmann M, Spicer A (2007). "Healing the scars of history": projects, skills and field strategies in institutional entrepreneurship. Organization Studies 28: 1101-1122.-doi: 10.1177/017084060 7078116.
16. Ratcliffe J, Krawczyk E (2011). Imagineering city futures: the use of prospective through scenarios in urban planning. Futures 43: 642-653.-doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2011.05.005.
17. Sevenant M, Antrop M (2010). Transdisciplinary landscape planning: does the public have aspirations? Experiences from a case study in Ghent (Flanders, Belgium). Land Use Policy 27: 373- 386.-doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.05.005.
18. Spyra M (2013). Economic Development Opportunities for the Pradziad Euroregion Borderland. In: "Cross-border landscape of Euroregion Pradziad" (Spyra M eds). Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Opolskiej, Opole, Poland, pp. 84-91.
19. Steiner F (2008). The living landscape. an ecological approach to landscape planning. Island Press, Washington, USA, pp. 8.
20. Stenseke M (2009). Local participation in cultural landscape maintenance: lessons from Sweden. Land Use Policy 26: 214-223.-doi: 10.1016/j.- landusepol.2008.01.005.
21. Stevenson T (2006). From vision into action. Futures 38: 667-672.-doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2005. 10.009.
22. Thackara J (2006). In the bubble: designing in the complex world. MIT Press, Cambridge, USA, pp. 43.
23. Whittington R (1996). Strategy as practice. Long Range Planning 29: 731-735.-doi: 10.1016/002 4-z6301(96)00068-4.
24. van Hulst M (2012). Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning. Planning Theory 11: 299- 318.-doi: 10.1177/1473095212440425.
25. Varum CA, Melo C (2010). Directions in scenario planning literature-a review of the past decades. Futures 42: 355-369.-doi: 10.1016/j.futures. 2009.11.021.