Interpreting symptoms of cognitive load in speech input

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 407, Issue , 1999, Pages 235-244

  Berthold, Andre ^a   Jameson, Anthony ^a  

^a SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER SCIENCE; COMPUTERS;

ARTIFICIAL DATA; COGNITIVE LOADS; COMPUTING DEVICES; LIMITED OBSERVATIONS; SENTENCE FRAGMENTS; SPEECH INPUT;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS;

EID: 84910067535     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7091-2490-1_23     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Amold, S. R. (1997). Wo das Perlhuhn trudelt. Die Zeit 33-34. 6 July 1997.
2. Baber, C., Mellor, B., Graham, R., Noyes, J. M., and Tunley, C. (1996). Workload and the use of automatic speech recognition: The effects of time and resource demands. Speech Communication 20:37-53.
3. Berthold, A. (1998). Repräsentation und Verarbeitung “sprachlicher Indikatoren für kognitive Ressourcenbeschränkungen [Representation and processing of linguistic indicators of cognitive resource limitations]. Master’s thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Saarbrücken, Germany.
4. Goldman-Eisler, F. (1968). Psycholinguistics: Experiments in Spontaneaus Speech. London: Academic Press.
5. Henrion, M., Pradhan, M., Favero, B. D., Huang, K., Provan, G., and O’Rourke, P. (1996). Why is diagnosis using belief networks insensitive to imprecision in probabilities? In Horvitz, E., and Jensen, F., eds., Proceedings ofthe Twelfth Conference on Uncertainty in Arti.ficialintelligence. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann. 307-314.
6. Jameson, A., Schäfer, R., Weis, T., Berthold, A., and Weyrath, T. (1999). Making systemssensitive to the user’s time and working memory constraints. In Maybury, M. T., ed., IUI99: International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. New York: ACM. 79-86.
7. Jameson, A. (1996). Numerical uncertainty management in user and student modeling: An overview of systems and issues. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 5:193-251.
8. Jameson, A. (1998). Adapting to the user’s time and working memory limitations: New directions of research. In Timm, U. J., and Rössel, M., eds., ABIS-98, Adaptivität und Benutzermodeliierung in interaktiven Softwaresystemen. Erlangen, Germany: FORWISS.
9. Pearl, J. (1988). Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Jnference. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
10. Roßnagel, C. (1995a). Kognitive Belastung und Hörerorientierung beim monologischen Instruieren [Cognitive Ioad and listener-orientation in instruction monologs]. Zeitschriftfür Experimentelle Psychologie 42:94-110.
11. Roßnagel, C. (1995b). Übung und Hörerorientierung beim monologischen Instruieren: Zur Differenzierung einer Grundannahme [Practice and listener-orientation in the delivery of instruction monologs: Differentiation of a basic assumption]. Sprache & Kognition 14:16-26.
12. Russell, S. J., and Norvig, P. (1995). Arti.ficialintelligence: A Modern Approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
13. Schäfer, R., and Weyrath, T. (1997). Assessing temporallyvariable user properties with dynamic Bayesian networks. In Jameson, A., Paris, C., and Tasso, C., eds., User Modeling: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference, UM97. Vienna, New York: Springer Wien New York. 377-388.