Fuzzy TOPSIS method for ranking renewable energy supply systems in Turkey

Renewable Energy

Volumn 75, Issue , 2015, Pages 617-625

  Şengül, Ümran ^a   Eren, Miraç ^b   Eslamian Shiraz, Seyedhadi ^c   Gezder, Volkan ^d   Sengül, Ahmet Bilal ^a  

^a ÇANAKKALE ONSEKIZ MART UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b ATATÜRK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c University College of Nabi Akram   (Iran)

^d SHW 8 Regional Directorate Directorate of Dams and HPS   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Fuzzy TOPSIS; Interval shannon's entropy; Multi criteria decision making; Renewable energy supply systems

Indexed keywords

FUZZY TOPSIS; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING; RENEWABLE ENERGIES; SHANNON'S ENTROPY;

CARBON EMISSION; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; GEOTHERMAL POWER; POWER PLANT; RENEWABLE RESOURCE;

TURKEY;

EID: 84910046427     PISSN: 09601481     EISSN: 18790682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2014.10.045     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Satman A. Turkey's energy vision. Geothermal Energy Seminar, 30 kasim-2 aralik, aydin turkey 2005, http://www.mmo.org.tr/resimler/dosya_ekler/8188c7e9965c217_ek.pdf.
2. Irkiçatal BO. Renewable Energy Sources, Energy Market Regulatory Authority, [accessed 17.04.13]. http://web.ogm.gov.tr/diger/iklim/Dokumanlar/Biyoenerji%20%C3%87al%C4%B1%C5%9Ftay%C4%B1/CalistaySunumlari/EPDK%20Sunum%20BET%C3%9CL.pdf.
3. Şeker V. Modeling and analysis of renewable energy sources with ANP in electricity generation of Turkey 2010, Unpublished M.Sc. Thesis, Gazi University, Ankara,Turkey.
4. Satman A. Turkey's fossil resources (Petroleum, natural Gas and coal) and assessment their potential. Strategic Res Study Cent 2011, 9(16):178-203.
5. MENR in Turkey Energy investors handbook 2012, [accessed 02.04.13]. http://www.epdk.gov.tr/documents/strateji/rapor_yayin/yatirimciel_kitabi/Sgb_Rapor_Yayin_Yatirimciel_Kitabi_Tr_2012_y6Xj7FNVt7F6.pdf.
6. Atiş I., Ay H., Çaylidemirci M. Renewable energy sources and unit cost Analysis 2010, 58. Development Bank Publication of Turkey.
7. Sezer H.R. Turkey's electricity system technical and economic impacts of renewable energy sources and EU applications 2005, Turkeys Electricity Transmission Corporation, Research Planning CoordinationDepartment, [accessed 10.04.13]. http://www.emo.org.tr/ekler/6a4d89ba25627b2_ek.pdf.
8. Türkyilmaz O., Özgiresun C. Turkey view of Energy 2012, Turkey Chamber of Mechanical Engineers Report.
9. Kahraman C., Kaya I˙. AFuzzy multicriteria methodology for selection among energy alternatives. Expert Syst Appl 2010, 37:6270-6281.
10. Çakir M.T. Wind energy potential of Turkey and its place in EU Countries. Politeknik J 2010, 13(4):287-293.
11. San Cristóbal J.R. Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable energy project in spain: The Vikor method. Renew Energy 2011, 36(2):498-502.
12. Atici K.B., Ulucan A. Multi criteria decision analysis approaches in Energy projects evaluation process and Turkey applications. Hacattepe Univ Fac Econ Adm Sci J 2009, 27(1):161-186.
13. Pohekar S.D., Ramachandran M. Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning-A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2004, 8:365-381.
14. Abu-Taha R. Multi-criteria applications in renewable energy analysis: a literature review. Technology Management in the Energy Smart World (PICMET), Proceedings of PICMET 2011, 11:1-8.
15. Wang J.J., Jing Y.Y., Zhang C.F., Zhao J.H. Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2009, 13(9):2263-2278.
16. Kaya T., Kahraman C. Multicriteria renewable energy planning using an integrated Fuzzy VIKOR & AHP methodology: the case of Istanbul. Energy 2010, 35(6):2517-2527.
17. Kaya T., Kahraman C. Multicriteria decision making in energy planning using a modified Fuzzy TOPSIS methodology. Expert Syst Appl 2011, 38(6):6577-6585.
18. Georgopoulou E., Lalas D., Papagiannakis L.A. multicriteria decision aid approach for energy planning problems: the case of renewable energy option. Eur J Oper Res 1997, 103:38-54.
19. Haralambopoulos D.A., Polatidis H. Renewable energy projects: structuring a multicriteria group decision-making framework. Renew Energy 2003, 28:961-973.
20. Polatidis H., Haralambopoulos D.A. Local renewable energy planning: a participatory multi-criteria approach. Energy Sources 2004, 26:1253-1264.
21. Polatidis H., Haralambopoulos D.A. Selecting an appropriate multi-criteria decision analysis technique for renewable energy planning. Energy Sources Part B 2006, 1:181-193.
22. Dicorato M., Forte G., Trovato M. Environmental-constrained energy planning using energy-efficiency and distributed-generation facilities. Renew Energy 2008, 33:1297-1313.
23. Menegaki A. Valuation for renewable energy: a comparative review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2008, 12:2422-2437.
24. Önüt S., Tuzkaya U.R., Saadet N. Multiple criteria evaluation of current energy resources for Turkish manufacturing industry. Energy Convers Manag 2008, 49:1480-1492.
25. Streimikiene D., Balezentis T., Krisciukaitiene I., Belezentis A. Prioritizing sustainable elecricity production technologies: MCDM approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2012, 16:3302-3311.
26. Tuncer G., Eskibalci M.F. Evaluation studies of energy raw material potential of Turkey. Istanbul Univ Eng Fac J Earth Sci 2003, 16(1):81-92.
27. Renewable Energy Directorate in Turkey, 2013, [accessed 11.04.13]. http://www.eie.gov.tr/iklim_deg/emisyon_ticareti.aspx.
28. Toklu E., Güney M.S., Işik M., Comakli O., Kaygusuz K. Energy production, consumption, policies and recent developments in Turkey. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2010, 14:1172-1186.
29. Wang T.C., Chang T.H. Application of TOPSIS in evaluating initial training aircraft under a Fuzzy environment. Expert Syst Appl 2007, 33:870-880.
30. Zadeh L.A. Fuzzy sets. Inform Control 1965, 8:338-353.
31. Chaghooshi A.J., Fathi M.R., Kashef M. Integration of Fuzzy Shannon's entropy with Fuzzy TOPSIS for industrial robotic system selection. JInd Eng Manag 2012, 5(1):102-114.
32. Baykal N., Beyan T. Principles and fundamentals of Fuzzy Logic 2004, Biçaklar Bookstore, Ankara. 1st ed.
33. Shannon C.E. Amathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 1948, 27:379-423.
34. Ghorbani M., Arabzad S.M., Bahrami M. Implementing Shannon entropy, SWOT and mathematical programming for supplier selection and order allocation. Int J Supply Chain Manag 2010, 1(1):43-47.
35. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi F., Fallahnejad R. Imprecise Shannon's entropy and multi attribute decision making. Entropy 2010, 12:53-62.
36. Bottani E., Rizzi A. AFuzzy TOPSIS methodology to support outsourcing of logistics services. Supply Chain Management. An Int J 2006, 11(4):294-308.
37. Pang B., Bai S. An integrated fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach for supplier selection based on analytic network process. JIntell Manuf 2013, 24:163-174.
38. Nugeyen H.T., Dawal S.Z.M., Nukman Y., Aoyama H. Ahybrid approach for fuzzy multi-attribute decision making in machine tool selection with consideration of the interactions of attributes. Expert Syst Appl 2014, 41:3078-3090.
39. Feizizadeh B., Jankowski P., Blaschke T. AGIS based spatially-explicit sensitivity and uncertainty analysis approach for multi-criteria decision analysis. Comput Geosci 2014, 64:81-95.