Agent technology for distributed organizational memories the frodo project

ICEIS 2003 - Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems

Volumn 2, Issue , 2003, Pages 3-10

  Abecker, Andreas ^a   Bernardi, Ansgar ^a   Van Elst, Ludger ^a  

^a GERMAN RESEARCH CENTER FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DFKI   (Germany)

Author keywords

Agent mediated knowledge management; Distributed organizational memory; Organizational memory; Socially enabled agents

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SOFTWARE AGENTS;

AGENT TECHNOLOGY; AGENT-MEDIATED KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; CONTEXT REPRESENTATION; DISTRIBUTED ORGANIZATIONAL MEMORY; DYNAMIC NEGOTIATION; ORGANIZATIONAL BOUNDARIES; ORGANIZATIONAL MEMORY; SHARED UNDERSTANDING;

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84910045510     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Abecker, A., Bernardi, A., Hinkelmann, K., Kühn, O., and Sintek, M., 1998. Toward a technology for organizational memories. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 13(3):40- 48.
2. Abecker, A., Bernardi, A., Hinkelmann, K., Kühn, O., and Sintek, M., 2000. Context-aware, proactive delivery of task-specific knowledge: The Know More project. Int. J. on Information Systems Frontiers, 2(3/4):139-162.
3. Abecker, A., Bernardi, A., van Elst, L., Lauer, A., Maus, H., Schwarz, S., and Sintek, M., 2001. FRODO: A framework for distributed organizational memories. Milestone M1: Requirements analysis and system architecture. Document D-01-01, DFKI, Kaiserslautern.
4. Bellifemine, F., Poggi, A., and Rimassa, G., 2001. Developing multi agent systems with a FIPA compliant agent framework. Software - Practice And Experience, 31:103-128.
5. Blake, M.B., 2002. An agent-based cross-organizational workflow architecture in support of Web services. In 11th IEEE WETICE 2002. IEEE Computer Society Press, Pittsburgh.
6. Bourdieu, P., and Wacquant, L., 1992. An invitation to reflexive sociology. Polity Press, Chicago.
7. Castelfranchi, C., 2000. Engineering Social Order. In: A. Omicini, R. Tolksdorf, F. Zambonelli (eds.), Engineering Societies in the Agent World, 1st Int. Workshop, LNCS 1972, Springer-Verlag.
8. Chaouch, Kaies, 2002. Intelligent ontology-based information access in the music area. Diploma Thesis. Universität Kaiserslautern.
9. Colomb, R.M., 1998. A digital library needs many indexes. http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/colomb/Phronesis.
10. Davies, J., Fensel, D., and van Harmelen, F. (eds.), 2002. Towards the semantic web: ontology-driven knowledge management. Jon Wiley & Sons.
11. Dignum, V., 2002. An overview of agents in knowledge management. http://www.cs.uu.nl/people/virginia/-dignum-ekaw.ps.
12. Elst, L. van, Abecker, A., and Maus, H., 2001. Exploiting user and process context for knowledge management systems. In: Workshop on User Modelling for Context- Aware Applications at UM-2001, Sonthofen.
13. Elst, L. van, and Abecker, A., 2002. Ontologies for information management: balancing formality, stability, and sharing scope. Expert Systems with Applications, 23(4), pp. 357-366. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.
14. Hofmann, K., 2002. Prozeßorientierte Unterstützung wissensintensiver Tätigkeiten am Beispiel der Publikationsplanung. Diploma Thesis. Universität Kaiserslautern.
15. Jennings, N. R., Faratin, P., Norman, T.J., O'Brien, P., and Odgers, B., 2000. Autonomous agents for business process management. Int. Journal of Applied Artificial Intelligence 14(2):145-189.
16. Kerschberg, L., 1997. The role of intelligent software agents in advanced information systems. Invited Paper for the 15th British National Conference on Databases, Birkbeck College, University of London.
17. Klein, B., and Abecker, A., 1999. Towards distributed knowledge-based parsing for document analysis and understanding. In IEEE Forum on Research and Technology Advances in Digital Libraries, Sixth IEEE ADL '99. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos.
18. Lesser, V., Horling, B., Klassner, F., Raja, A., Wagner, T., and Zhang, S., 2000. BIG: An agent for resourcebounded information gathering and decision making. Artificial Intelligence Journal, 118(1-2):197-244.
19. Maus, H. 2001. Workflow context as a means for intelligent information support. In: V. Akman, P. Bouquet, R. Thomason, R.A. Young (eds.): Modeling and Using Context. 3rd Int. and Interdisciplinary Conference. Springer LNAI 2116.
20. Motik, B., Maedche, A., and Volz, R., 2002. A conceptual modeling approach for building semantics-driven enterprise applications. In: ODBASE-02, 1st Int. Conf. on Ontologies, Databases and Application of Semantics.
21. Newell, A., 1982. The knowledge level. Artificial Intelligence, 18: 87-127.
22. Pang, G., 2000. Implementation of an agent-based business process. Diploma Thesis. Universität Zürich.
23. Schillo, M., Fley, B., Florian, M., Hillebrandt, F., and Hinck, D., 2002. Self-organization in multiagent systems. In 3rd Int. Workshop on Modelling Artificial Societies and Hybrid Organizations (MASHO).
24. Stormer, H., 2001. A flexible agent-workflow system. In: Workshop on Agent-Based Approaches to B2B at the 5th Int. Conf. on Autonomous Agents (AGENTS 2001).
25. Vicinus, R., 2002. Soziale Agenten für das Management von Domänen-Ontologien in verteilten Organizational Memories. Diploma Thesis, Universität Kaiserslautern.
26. Wiederhold, G., and Genesereth, M.R., 1997. The conceptual basis for mediation services. IEEE Expert 12(5): 38-47 .
27. Wooldridge, M., and Jennings, N. R., 1995. Intelligent agents: Theory and practice. Knowledge Engineering Review, 10(2).
28. Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N. R., and Kinny, D., 2000. The Gaia methodology for agent-oriented analysis and design. In Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 3, 285-312, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
29. Yu, L. and Schmid, B.F., 1999. A conceptual framework for agent-oriented and role-based workflow modeling. In G. Wagner and E. Yu (eds.), 1st Int. Workshop. on Agent-Oriented Information Systems.