Public participation in sustainable forestry: The case of forest planning in Slovakia

IForest

Volumn 7, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 414-422

  Sarvašová, Zuzana ^a,b   Dobšinská, Zuzana ^c   Šálka, Jaroslav ^c  

^a NATIONAL FOREST CENTRE   (Slovakia)

^b CZECH UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES PRAGUE   (Czech Republic)

^c TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY IN ZVOLEN   (Slovakia)

Author keywords

Evaluation of participation process; Forest management planning; National forest program; Participatory approaches

Indexed keywords

EID: 84910027906     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19717458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3832/ifor1174-007     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Beckley T., Parkins J, Sheppard S (2005). Public participation in sustainable forest management: a reference guide. Sustainable Forest Management Network, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, pp. 60. [online] URL: http://www.northeasternforests. org/FRPC/files/1237487548SR_200506beckleypub_ en.pdf
2. Benz A (2004). Governance - Regieren in komplexen Regelsystemen [Governance in complex control systems]. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, Germany, pp. 240. [in German]
3. Boon T.E., Meilby H (2000). Enhancing public participation in state forest management: a user council survey. Forestry 73 (2): 155-164. - doi: 10.1093/forestry/73.2.155
4. Bouriaud L., Nichiforel L, Weiss G, Bajraktari A, Curovic M., Dobsinska Z, Glavonjic P, Jarský V, Sarvasova Z., Teder M, Zalite Z (2013). Governance of private forests in Eastern and Central Europe: an analysis of forest harvesting and management rights. Annals of Forest Research 56 (1): 199-215. [online] URL: http://www.editurasilvica. ro/afr/56/1/bouriaud.pdf
5. Brukas V., Sallnäs O (2011). Forest management plan as a policy instrument: carrot, stick or sermon? Land Use Policy 29 (3): 605-613. - doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.10.003
6. Buchy M., Hoverman S (2000). Understanding public participation in forest planning: a review. Forest Policy and Economics 1: 15-25. - doi: 10.1016/S1389-9341(00)00006-X
7. Buttoud G (1999a). Principles of participatory processes in public decision-making. In: "Regional Forest Programmes: A Participatory Approach to Support Forest Based Regional Development" (Niskanen A, Vayrynen J eds). EFI Proceedings 32, Joensuu, Finland, pp. 11-28. [online] URL: http://fefr.org/files/attachments/ publications/proc32_net.pdf#page=11
8. Buttoud G (1999b). Negotiation methods to support participatory forestry planning. In: "Regional Forest Programmes: A Participatory Approach to Support Forest Based Regional Development". EFI Proceedings 32, Joensuu, Finland, pp. 29-46. [online] URL: https://elearning.unipd. it/scuolaamv/pluginfile.php/14995/mod_resource/ content/1/2_negotiation%20methods %20(by%20G.%20Buttoud).pdf
9. Cantiani MG (2012). Forest planning and public participation: a possible methodological approach. iForest 5:72-82 - doi: 10.3832/ifor0602-009
10. European Commission (2001). European governance. A white paper. COM(2001) 428 final, Brussels, Belgium. [online] URL: http://eurlex. europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri= CELEX:52001DC0428&rid=2
11. Dryzek JS (2000). Deliberative democracy and beyond: liberals, critics, contestations. University Press, Oxford, UK, pp. 208.
12. Elsasser P (2002). Rules for participation and negotiation and their possible influence on the content of a National Forest Programme. Forest Policy and Economics 4 (4): 291-300. - doi: 10.1016/S1389-9341(02)00071-0
13. Elsasser P (2007). Do "stakeholders" represent citizen interests? An empirical inquiry into assessment of policy aims in the National Forest Programme for Germany. Forest Policy and Economics 9 (8): 1018-1030. - doi: 10.1016/j.forpol. 2006.10.002
14. Farcy C (2004). Forest planning in Europe: state of the art, international debates, emergent tools. In: "Towards the sustainable use of Europe's forests - Forest ecosystem and landascape research: scientific challenges and opportunities" (Andersson F, Birot Y, Päivinen R eds). EFI Proceedings 49, pp. 11-20.
15. FAO (2010). Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010. Main Report. FAO Forestry Paper 163, FAO, Rome, Italy, pp. 378. [online] URL: http:// www.fao.org/docrep/013/i1757e/i1757e.pdf
16. FAO/ECE/ILO (2000). Public participation in forestry in Europe and North America. Report of the Team of Specialists on Participation in Forestry, Committee on Forest Technology, Management, and Training, International Labour Office, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 144.
17. UNECE/FAO (2011). State of Europe's Forests 2011: status and trends in sustainable forest management in Europe. Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe, Forest Europe, Liaison Unit, Oslo, Norway, pp. 337. [online] URL: http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DA M/publications/timber/Forest_Europe_report_20 11_web.pdf
18. Hamersley Chambers F, Beckley T (2003). Public involvement in sustainable boreal forest management, In: "Towards Sustainable Management of the Boreal Forest, NRC Research Press" (Burton, PJ, Messier C, Smith DW, Adamowicz WL eds). NRC Research Press, Canada, pp. 113-154. [online] URL: http://www.nrcresearchpress.com /doi/abs/10.1139/9780660187624#page=120
19. Hogl K., Kvarda E (2008). The Austrian forest dialogue: introducing a new mode of governance process to a well entrenched sectoral domain. In- FER, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna, pp. 82.
20. Hruška J (2008). The Czech National Forest Programme II - a cautious optimism. The nature conservation journal 1/2008, web site. [in Czech] [online] URL: http://www.casopis.ochra naprirody.cz/Pece-o-prirodu-a-krajinu/narodni-le snicky-program-ii.html
21. Jeanrenaud S (1999). Participation and partnership in forestry - why, what, who and how. WWF/IUCN, St. George, Switzerland, pp. 8.
22. Kangas A., Kangas J, Kurttila M (2008). Decision support for forest management. In: "Managing forest ecosystems", vol. 16, Springer, Berlin, Germany, pp. 222.
23. Kovalčík M., Sarvašová Z, Schwarz M, Moravčík M, Oravec M, Lásková J, Tutka J (2012). Financial and socio-economic impacts of nature conservation on forestry in Slovakia. Journal of Forest Science 58 (10): 425-435. [online] URL: http://agriculturejournals.cz/publicFiles/75875.p df
24. Kruger LE (2001). What is essential may be invisible to the eye: understanding the role of place and social learning in achieving sustainable landscapes. In: "Forests and Landscapes: Linking Ecology, Sustainability, and Aesthetics" (Sheppard SRJ, Harshaw HW eds). IUFRO Research Series No. 6, CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK, pp. 173-187.
25. Kulla L., Bošela M, Burgan K (2010). Potreba a možnosti inovácie rámcového plánovania HÚL na Slovensku [Needs and possibilities of framework planning innovations in Slovak forest management]. In: "Súčasnost' a budúcnost' hospodárskej úpravy lesov na Slovensku" (Bortel S, Bavlšík J eds). NLC, Zvolen, Slovakia, pp. 42- 49. [in Slovak]
26. st edn). Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development of SR in cooperation with National Forest Centre Research Institute, Zvolen, Slovakia, pp.102.
27. Moravčík M., Novotný J, Toma P (2007). Národný lesnícky program Slovenskej republiky [National forest programme of the Slovak republic]. Ministerstvo pôdohospodárstva SR, Národné lesnícke centrum - Lesnícky výskumný ústav, Zvolen, Slovakia. [in Slovak]
28. Ollonquist P (2006). National Forest Program in sustainable forest management. Working Papers of the Finnish Forest Research Institute 38: 14- 27.
29. O'Neill J (2001). Representing people, representing nature, representing the world, Environment and Planning. Government and Policy 19 (4): 483-500. - doi: 10.1068/c12s
30. Primmer E., Kyllönen S (2006). Goals for public participation implied by sustainable development, and the preparatory process of the Finnish National Forest Programme. Forest Policy and Economics 8: 838-853. - doi: 10.1016/j.forpol. 2005.01.002
31. Rhodes RAW (1997). Understanding governance: policy networks, governance, reflexivity, and accountability. Open University Press, Buckingham and Philadelphia, USA, pp. 235.
32. Rowe G., Frewer L (2000). Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation. Science, Technology and Human Values 25 (1): 3-29. - doi: 10.1177/016224390002500101
33. Saarikoski H., Tikkanen J, Leskinen LA (2010). Public participation in practice - assessing public participation in the preparation of regional forest programs in Northern Finland. Forest Policy and Economics 12: 349-356 - doi: 10.1016/j.forpol. 2010.02.006
34. Sedmák R., Fabrika M, Bahýl J, Pôbiš I, Tuček J (2013). Application of simulation and optimization tools for developing forest management plans in the Slovak natural and management conditions In: "Implementation of DSS tools into the forestry practice" (Tuček J, Smreček R, Majlingová A, Garcia-Gonzalo J eds). Technical University in Zvolen, Slovakia, pp. 139-152.
35. Sheppard SRJ, Meitner M (2005). Using multicriteria analysis and visualisation for sustainable forest management planning with stakeholder groups. Forest Ecology and Management, 207 (1-2): 171-187. - doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004. 10.032
36. Šulek R., Šálka J, Sarvašová Z (2007). Innovations in forestry - National Forest Programme of the Slovak Republic. In: Proceedings of the Internation Workshop "Status and Perspectives of Innovation in forestry". Prague (Czech Republic) 25 Sep 2007. Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, pp. 34-37. [in Czech]
37. Zingari PC (1998). French forest communes and sustainable development in mountain areas. Unasylva 49 (195): 55-57.