Operationalizing environmental indicators for real time multi-purpose decision making and action support

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 295, Issue , 2015, Pages 66-74

  Klug, Hermann ^a   Kmoch, Alexander ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALZBURG   (Austria)

^b AUCKLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Early warning system; OGC; SDI; Sensors; Water resources management; WebGIS

Indexed keywords

EARLY WARNING SYSTEM; OGC; SDI; WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT; WEB-GIS;

SENSORS;

ACTION PLAN; DATA ACQUISITION; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; EARLY WARNING SYSTEM; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATOR; GIS; REAL TIME; SENSOR; WATER MANAGEMENT; WORLD WIDE WEB;

EID: 84910024319     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.04.009     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Ahmad S., Simonovic S.P. An intelligent decision support system for management of floods. J. Water Resour. Manage. 2006, 20:391-410.
2. Akyildiz I.F., Su W., Sankarasubramaniam Y., Cayirci E. Wireless sensor networks: a survey. Comput. Networks 2002, 38:393-422.
3. Andrews F.T., Croke B.F.W., Jakeman A.J. An open software environment for hydrological model assessment and development. J. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2011, 26:1171-1185.
4. Baronti P., Pillai P., Chook V.W.C., Chessa S., Gotta A., Hu Y.F. Wireless sensor networks: a survey on the state of the art and the 802.15.4 and ZigBee standards. Comput. Commun. 2007, 30:1655-1695.
5. Bastin L., Cornford D., Jones R., Heuvelink G.B.M., Pebesma E., Stasch C., Nativi S., Mazzetti P., Williams M. Managing uncertainty in integrated environmental modelling: the UncertWeb framework. J. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2013, 39:116-134.
6. Beven K. On model uncertainty, risk and decision making. Hydrol. Process. 2000, 14:2605-2606.
7. Blaney H.F., Criddle W.D. Determining Water Requirements in Irrigated Areas from Climatological and Irrigation Data. US Dep. Agr., Soil Sci. Techn. Paper No. 96 1950, US Dep. Agr., Soil Sci. Techn.
8. Boschetti F., de La Tour A., Fulton E.A., Little L.R. Interactive modelling for natural resource management. J. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2010, 25:1075-1085.
9. ® sensor web enablement: overview and high level architecture. GeoSensor Networks 2008, 4540:175-190. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.
10. Bröring A., Echterhoff J., Jirka S., Simonis I., Everding T., Stasch C., Liang S., Lemmens R. New generation sensor web enablement. Sensors 2011, 11:2652-2699.
11. Caminiti J.E. Catchment modelling-a resource manager's perspective. J. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2004, 19:991-997.
12. Castelletti A., Soncini-Sessa R. A procedural approach to strengthening integration and participation in water resource planning. J. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2006, 21:1455-1470.
13. Castronova A.M., Goodall J.L., Elag M.M. Models as web services using the Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) Web Processing Service (WPS) standard. J. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2013, 41:72-83.
14. Castronova A.M., Goodall J.L., Ercan M.B. Integrated modeling within a Hydrologic Information System: an OpenMI based approach. J. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2013, 39:263-273.
15. Chapman P.M. Adaptive monitoring based on ecosystem services. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 415:56-60.
16. Cools J., Broekx S., Vandenberghe V., Sels H., Meynaerts E., Vercaemst P., Seuntjens P., Van Hulle S., Wustenberghs H., Bauwens W., Huygens M. Coupling a hydrological water quality model and an economic optimization model to set up a cost-effective emission reduction scenario for nitrogen. J. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2011, 26:44-51.
17. Crout N.M.J., Tarsitano D., Wood A.T. Is my model too complex? Evaluating model formulation using model reduction. J. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2009, 24:1-7.
18. Cuddy S.M., Gandolfi C. Integrated catchment modelling and decision support. J. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2004, 19:989-990.
19. David O., Ascough Ii J.C., Lloyd W., Green T.R., Rojas K.W., Leavesley G.H., Ahuja L.R. A software engineering perspective on environmental modeling framework design: the object modeling system. J. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2013, 39:201-213.
20. de Groot R. Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes. J. Landscape Urban Plann. 2006, 75:175-186.
21. Dechmi F., Burguete J., Skhiri A. SWAT application in intensive irrigation systems: model modification, calibration and validation. J. Hydrol. 2012, 470-471:227-238.
22. Díaz L., Bröring A., McInerney D., Libertá G., Foerster T. Publishing sensor observations into Geospatial Information Infrastructures: a use case in fire danger assessment. J. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2013, 48:65-80.
23. Directive, 2000/60/EC Establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Directive, 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 2000.
24. European Commission, 2003/4/EC Directive 2003/4/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2003 on public access to environmental information and repealing Council Directive 90/313/EEC 2003.
25. Gao J., Gao Y., Zhao G., Hörmann G. Minimum ecological water depth of a typical stream in Taihu Lake Basin, China. Quat. Int. 2010, 226:136-142.
26. Grabaum O., Meyer B. Multicriteria optimization of landscapes using GIS-based functional assessments. J. Landscape Urban Plann. 1998, 43:21-34.
27. Granell C., Díaz L., Schade S., Ostländer N., Huerta J. Enhancing integrated environmental modelling by designing resource-oriented interfaces. J. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2013, 39:229-246.
28. Green C.H., van Griensven A. Autocalibration in hydrologic modeling: using SWAT2005 in small-scale watersheds. J. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2008, 23:422-434.
29. Guse B., Reusser D.E., Fohrer N. How to improve the representation of hydrological processes in SWAT for a lowland catchment - temporal analysis of parameter sensitivity and model performance. Hydrol. Process. 2014, 28:2651-2670.
30. Han Q., Hakkarinen D., Boonma P., Suzuki J. Quality-aware sensor data collection. Int. J. Sens. Netw. 2010, 7:127-140.
31. Hart J.K., Martinez K. Environmental sensor networks: a revolution in the earth system science?. Earth Sci. Rev.V 78 2006, 177-191.
32. Havlik D., Schade S., Sabeur Z.A., Mazzetti P., Watson K., Berre A.J., Mon J.L. From sensor to observation web with environmental enablers in the future internet. Sensors 2011, 11:3874-3907.
33. Horsburgh J.S., Tarboton D.G., Hooper R.P., Zaslavsky I. Managing a community shared vocabulary for hydrologic observations. J. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2014, 52:62-73.
34. Jardak C., Rerkrai K., Kovacevic A., Riihijarvi J., Mahonen P. Design of large-scale agricultural wireless sensor networks: email from the vineyard. Int. J. Sens. Netw. 2010, 8:77-88.
35. Jorgensen L.F., Refsgaard J.C., Hojberg A.L. The inadequacy of monitoring without modelling support. J. Environ. Monit. 2007, 9:931-942.
36. Kafetzoglou S., Papavassiliou S. Energy-efficient framework for data gathering in wireless sensor networks via the combination of sleeping MAC and data aggregation strategies. Int. J. Sens. Netw. 2011, 10:3-13.
37. Kawai T., Wakamiya N., Murata M. Design and evaluation of a wireless sensor network architecture for urgent information transmission. Int. J. Sens. Netw. 2009, 6:101-114.
38. Klug H. An integrated holistic transdisciplinary landscape planning concept after the Leitbild approach. J. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 23:616-626.
39. Klug H., Bretz B. Discover INSPIRE compliant harmonised soil data and services. Final Product Summary of the GS Soil Project on "Assessment and Strategic Development of INSPIRE Compliant Geodata-Services for European Soil Data". Co-funded by the Community Programme eContentplus ECP_2008_GEO_318004, Salzburg 2012, 60. Lodron University Salzburg, Paris.
40. Klug H., Kmoch A. A SMART Groundwater Portal: an OGC web services framework for hydrology to improve data access and visualisation in New Zealand. Comput. Geosci. 2014, 10.1016/j.cageo.2014.04.016.
41. Klug H., Kmoch A. A SMART Groundwater Portal: a user centred knowledge inventory. J. Hydrol. (NZ) 2014, (in press).
42. Knapen R., Janssen S., Roosenschoon O., Verweij P., de Winter W., Uiterwijk M., Wien J.-E. Evaluating OpenMI as a model integration platform across disciplines. J. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2013, 39:274-282.
43. Kragt M.E., Newham L.T.H., Bennett J., Jakeman A.J. An integrated approach to linking economic valuation and catchment modelling. J. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2011, 26:92-102.
44. Krysanova V., Hattermann F., Wechsung F. Implications of complexity and uncertainty for integrated modelling and impact assessment in river basins. J. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2007, 22:701-709.
45. Laniak G.F., Olchin G., Goodall J., Voinov A., Hill M., Glynn P., Whelan G., Geller G., Quinn N., Blind M., Peckham S., Reaney S., Gaber N., Kennedy R., Hughes A. Integrated environmental modeling: a vision and roadmap for the future. J. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2013, 39:3-23.
46. Letcher R.A., Giupponi C. Policies and tools for sustainable water management in the European Union. J. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2005, 20:93-98.
47. Lux T., Matthews W.A. Advanced technology for environmental modelling. J. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2007, 22:279-280.
48. Makler-Pick V., Gal G., Gorfine M., Hipsey M.R., Carmel Y. Sensitivity analysis for complex ecological models-a new approach. J. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2011, 26:124-134.
49. Marinoni O., Higgins A., Hajkowicz S., Collins K. The multiple criteria analysis tool (MCAT): a new software tool to support environmental investment decision making. J. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2009, 24:153-164.
50. Matthies M., Giupponi C., Ostendorf B. Environmental decision support systems: current issues, methods and tools. J. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2007, 22:123-127.
51. Minacapilli M., Iovino M., D'Urso G. A distributed agro-hydrological model for irrigation water demand assessment. J. Agricult. Water Manag. 2008, 95:123-132.
52. Morreale P., Qi F., Croft P. A green wireless sensor network for environmental monitoring and risk identification. Int. J. Sens. Netw. 2011, 10:73-82.
53. Nativi S., Mazzetti P., Geller G.N. Environmental model access and interoperability: the GEO Model Web initiative. J. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2013, 39:214-228.
54. OGC OpenGIS Catalogue Service Implementation Specification (ISO 19115), v2.0.2, CSW 2.0.2. 2007, The Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC), http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/is.
55. OGC OpenGIS Web Processing Service 1.0.0, WPS 2007, The Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC), http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/wps.
56. OGC Observations and Measurements-XML Implementation, O&M v2.0, O&M 2.0 2011, The Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC), http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/is.
57. OGC OGC Sensor Event Service Interface Specification 2011, 96. The Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC), http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=29576&passcode=24xe3ascfqxca8b14fah.
58. OGC OGC Sensor Planning Service Implementation Standard 2011, The Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC), http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/sps; http://www.opengis.net/doc/IS/SPS/2.0.
59. OGC OGC Sensor Observation Service Interface Standard, v2.0, SOS 2.0 2012, The Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC), http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/is.
60. OGC OGC WaterML 2.0: Part 1-Timeseries 2012, The Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC), http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/waterml, ht*tp://www.opengis.net/doc/IS/waterml/2.0.
61. Overeem I., Berlin M.M., Syvitski J.P.M. Strategies for integrated modeling: the community surface dynamics modeling system example. J. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2013, 39:314-321.
62. Pahl-Wostl C. The implications of complexity for integrated resources management. J. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2007, 22:561-569.
63. Potschin M., Klug H. Planning landscape visions and its implementation. J. Futures 2010, 42:653-655.
64. Potschin M., Klug H., Haines-Young R. From vision to action: framing the Leitbild concept in the context of landscape planning. J. Futures 2010, 42:656-667.
65. Raj Shrestha R., Rode M. Multi-objective calibration and fuzzy preference selection of a distributed hydrological model. J. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2008, 23:1384-1395.
66. Ratto M., Castelletti A., Pagano A. Emulation techniques for the reduction and sensitivity analysis of complex environmental models. J. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2012, 34:1-4.
67. Refsgaard J.C., van der Sluijs J.P., Højberg A.L., Vanrolleghem P.A. Uncertainty in the environmental modelling process-a framework and guidance. J. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2007, 22:1543-1556.
68. Reusser D.E., Zehe E. Inferring Model Structural Deficits by Analyzing Tem-poral Dynamics of Model Performance and Parameter Sensitivity. Water Resour. Res. 2011, 47:W07550.
69. Schimak G., Rizzoli A.E., Watson K. Sensors and the environment-modelling and ICT challenges. J. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2010, 25:975-976.
70. Scholten H., Kassahun A., Refsgaard J.C., Kargas T., Gavardinas C., Beulens A.J.M. A methodology to support multidisciplinary model-based water management. J. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2007, 22:743-759.
71. Sen M., Duffy T. GeoSciML: development of a generic GeoScience Markup Language. Comput. Geosci. 2005, 31:1095-1103.
72. Terzis A., Musaloiu E., Cogan R., Szlavecz J., Szalay K., Gray A., Ozer J., Chieh S., Gupchup J.M.L., Burns J.R. Wireless sensor networks for soil science. Int. J. Sens. Netw. 2010, 7:53-70.
73. The OpenMI Association Technical Committee OpenMI Standard 2 Reference for the OpenMI (Version 2.0), OpenMI 2.0 2010, The OpenMI Association, http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/requests/101.
74. The OpenMI Association Technical Committee OpenMI Standard 2 Specification for the OpenMI (Version 2.0), OpenMI 2.0 2010, The OpenMI Association, http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/requests/101.
75. Thomas B., Steidl J., Dietrich O., Lischeid G. Measures to sustain seasonal minimum runoff in small catchments in the mid-latitudes: a review. J. Hydrol. 2011, 408:296-307.
76. Tress B., Tress G., van Apeldoorn R., Fry G. Interdisciplinarity and Transdisciplinary Landscape Studies: Potentials and Limitations 2003, 192. Delta Program, Wageningen, ISBN: 90-807637-1-3.
77. Ulbrich K., Drechsler M., Wätzold F., Johst K., Settele J. A software tool for designing cost-effective compensation payments for conservation measures. J. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2008, 23:122-123.
78. Usländer T., Jacques P., Simonis I., Watson K. Designing environmental software applications based upon an open sensor service architecture. J. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2010, 25:977-987.
79. Voinov A., Bousquet F. Modelling with stakeholders. J. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2010, 25:1268-1281.
80. Voinov A., Cerco C. Model integration and the role of data. J. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2010, 25:965-969.
81. White M.J., Storm D.E., Busteed P.R., Smolen M.D., Zhang H., Fox G.A. A quantitative phosphorus loss assessment tool for agricultural fields. J. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2010, 25:1121-1129.
82. Wriedt G., Van der Velde M., Aloe A., Bouraoui F. Estimating irrigation water requirements in Europe. J. Hydrol. 2009, 373:527-544.
83. Yick J., Mukherjee B., Ghosal D. Wireless sensor network survey. Comput. Netw. 2008, 52:2292-2330.
84. Zhang Y., Meratnia N., Havinga P.J.M. Ensuring high sensor data quality through use of online outlier detection techniques. Int. J. Sens. Netw. 2010, 7:141-151.
85. Ziehn T., Tomlin A.S. GUI-HDMR-a software tool for global sensitivity analysis of complex models. J. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2009, 24:775-785.