The case for streaming multimedia with TCP

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2158, Issue , 2001, Pages 213-218

  Krasic, Charles ^a   Li, Kang ^a   Walpole, Jonathan ^a  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS;

CONGESTION AVOIDANCE; MARGINAL BENEFIT; POSITION PAPERS; SERVICE MODEL; STREAMING MULTIMEDIA; TCP-FRIENDLY; TRANSPORT PROTOCOLS; VIDEO APPLICATIONS;

TRANSMISSION CONTROL PROTOCOL;

EID: 84910019558     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-44763-6_22     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Uvaiz Ahmed and Jamai Hadi Salim. Performance evaluation of explicit congestion notification (ECN) in IP networks. IETF RFC 2884, July 2000.
2. Paul Barford and Mark Crovella. Critical Path Analysis of TCP Transactions. In In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGCOMM Conference, September 2000.
3. Shanwei Cen and Jonathan Walpole. Flow and congestion control for internet streaming applications. In Proceedings Multimedia Computing and Networking (MMCN98), 1998.
4. Dah-Ming Chiu and Raj Jain. Analysis of the Increase and Decrease Algorithms for Congestion Avoidance in Computer Networks. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 17, 1989.
5. Nick Feamster, Deepak Bansal, and Hari Balakrishnan. On the Interactions Between Layered Quality Adaptation and Congestion Control for Streaming Video. In 11th International Packet Video Workshop (PV2001), Kyongiu, Korea, April 2001.
6. Van Jacobson and Michael J. Karels. Congestion Avoidance and Control. In In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM’88, pages pp. 79–88, August 1988.
7. Charles Kasic and Jonathon Walpole. Qos scalability for streamed media delivery. CSE Technical Report CSE-99-011, Oregon Graduate Institute, September 1999.
8. Charles Krasic, Jonathan Walpole, Kang Li, and Asvin Goel. The case for streaming multimedia with tcp. Technical report, Oregon Graduate Institute, CSE Technical Report 2001. CSE-01-003.
9. J.R. Li, D. Dwyer, and V. Bharghavan. A transport protocol for heterogeneous packet flows. In IEEE Infocom’99, 1999.
10. Kang Li, Charles Krasic, Jonathan Walpole, Molly H. Shor, and Calton Pu. The minimal buffering requirements of congestion controlled interactive multimedia applications. In IDMS, Lancaster, UK, September 2001.
11. J. Liu and S. Singh. ATCP: TCP for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks, 2001.
12. K. G. Lockyer. Introduction to Critical Path Analysis. Pitman Publishing Co., New York, N.Y., 1964.
13. S. McCreary and K. Claffy. Trends in Wide Area IP Traffic Patterns: A View fromA mes Internet Exchange.
14. Jitendra Padhye, Victor Firoiu, Don Towsley, and JimK urose. Modeling TCP Throughput: A Simple Model and its Empirical Validation. In In Proceedings of ACM SICOMM’98, 1998.
15. K. K. Ramakrishnan, Sally Floyd, and D. Black. The Addition of Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) to IP. IETF Internet-Draft, January 2001.
16. R. Rejaie, M. Handley, and D. Estrin. RAP: An end-to-end rate-based congestiong control mechanism for realtime streams in the internet. In Proceeedings of IEEE Infocomm, March 1999.
17. Wai tan Tan and Avideh Zakhor. Internet video using error resilient scalable compression and cooperative transport prototocl. In Proc. ICIP, volume 1, pages 17–20, 1998.
18. The TCP-friendly website. http://www.psc.edu/networking/tcp friendly.html.