A quantitative examination of punishment research

Research in Developmental Disabilities

Volumn 36, Issue , 2015, Pages 470-484

  Lydon, Sinéad ^a   Healy, Olive ^a   Moran, Laura ^b   Foody, Ciara ^b  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Autism; Behavior reduction; Behavioral intervention; Challenging behavior; Developmental disabilities; Intellectual disability; Problem behavior; Punishment; Treatment

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR CONTROL; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDER; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INTELLECTUAL IMPAIRMENT; META ANALYSIS; PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS; PUNISHMENT; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; SOCIAL VALIDITY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

EID: 84910011537     PISSN: 08914222     EISSN: 18733379     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.10.036     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Ager A., O'May F. Issues in the definition and implementation of "best practice" for staff delivery of interventions for challenging behavior. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability 2001, 26:243-256.
2. Azrin N.H., Holz W.C. Punishment. Operant behavior: Areas of research and application 1966, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York. W.K. Honig (Ed.).
3. Carr E.G. Functional equivalence as a mechanism of response generalization. Generalization and maintenance: Life-style changes in applied settings 1988, 221-241. Brookes, Baltimore. R.H. Horner, G. Dunlap, R.L. Koegel (Eds.).
4. Catania A.C. Learning 1979, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Prevalence of autism spectrum disorders: Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, United States, 2008. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly 2012, 61(SSO3):1-19. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/ss/ss6103.pdf.
6. Delfs C.H., Campbell J.M. A quantitative synthesis of developmental disability research: The impact of functional assessment methodology on treatment effectiveness. Behavior Analyst Today 2010, 11(1):4-19.
7. Fabiano G.A., Pelham W.E., Manos M.J., Gnagy E.M., Chronis A.M., Onyango A.N., et al. An evaluation of three time-out procedures for children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Behavior Therapy 2004, 35:449-469.
8. Fisher W., Piazza C.C., Bowman L.G., Hagopian L.P., Langdon N.A. Empirically derived consequences: A data-based method for prescribing treatments for destructive behavior. Research in Developmental Disabilities 1994, 15:133-149.
9. Grace N.C., Kahng S.W., Fisher W.W. Balancing social acceptability with treatment effectiveness of an intrusive procedure: A case report. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1994, 27:171-172.
10. Hagopian L.P., Fisher W.W., Sullivan M.T., Acquisto J., LeBlanc L.A. Effectiveness of functional communication training with and without extinction and punishment: A summary of 21 inpatient cases. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1998, 31:211-235.
11. Healy O., Brett D., Leader G. A comparison of experimental functional analysis and the Questions About Behavioral Function (QABF) in the assessment of challenging behavior of individuals with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders 2013, 7:66-81.
12. Heyvaert M., Saenen L., Campbell J.M., Maes B., Onghena P. Efficacy of behavioral interventions for reducing problem behavior in persons with autism: An updated quantitative synthesis of single-subject research. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2014, 35:2463-2476.
13. Holden B., Gitlesen J.P. A total population study of challenging in the county of Hedmark, Norway: Prevalence, and risk markers. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2006, 27:456-546.
14. Jacobson J.W. Problem behavior and psychiatric impairment within a developmentally disabled population. I: Behavior frequency. Applied Research in Mental Retardation 1982, 3:121-139.
15. Johnston J.M. "Replacing" problem behavior: An analysis of tactical alternatives. The Behavior Analyst 2006, 29(1):1-11.
16. Kahng S., Iwata B.A., Lewin A.B. Behavioral treatment of self-injury, 1964 to 2000. American Journal on Mental Retardation 2002, 107:212-221.
17. Kang S., O'Reilly M., Lancioni G., Falcomata T.S., Sigafoos J., Xu Z. Comparison of the predictive validity and consistency among preference assessment procedures: A review of the literature. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2013, 34:1125-1133.
18. Kazdin A.E. Evidence-based treatment and practice: new opportunities to bridge clinical research and practice, enhance the knowledge base, and improve patient care. American Psychologist 2008, 63(3):146-159.
19. LeBlanc L.A., Patel M.R., Carr J.E. Recent advances in the assessment of aberrant behavior maintained by automatic reinforcement in individuals with developmental disabilities. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 2000, 31:137-154.
20. Lerman D.C., Vorndran C.M. On the status of knowledge for using punishment: Implications for treating behavior disorders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 2002, 35:431-464.
21. Lydon S., Healy O., O'Reilly M., McCoy A. A systematic review and evaluation of response redirection as a treatment for challenging behavior in individuals with developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2013, 34:3148-3158.
22. Matson J.L., Bamburg J.W., Mayville E.A., Pinkston J., Bielecki J., Kuhn D., et al. Psychopharmacology and mental retardation: a 10 year review (1990-1999). Research in Developmental Disabilities 2000, 21:263-296.
23. Matson J.L., Kazdin A.E. Punishment in behavior modification: Pragmatic, ethical, and legal issues. Clinical Psychology Review 1981, 1:197-210.
24. Matson J.L., Taras M.E. A 20 year review of punishment and alternative methods to treat problem behaviors in developmentally delayed persons. Research in Developmental Disabilities 1989, 10:85-104.
25. McClintock K., Hall S., Oliver C. Risk markers associated with challenging behaviours in people with intellectual disabilities: A meta analytic study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 2003, 47:405-416.
26. Murphy O., Healy O., Leader G. Risk factors for challenging behaviors among 157 children with autism spectrum disorder in Ireland. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders 2009, 3:474-482.
27. Newsom C., Kroeger K.A. Nonaversive treatment. Controversial therapies for developmental disabilities: Fad, fashion, and science in professional science 2005, 405-422. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. J.W. Jacobsen, R.M. Foxx, J.A. Mulick (Eds.).
28. Oliver C., Murphy G.H., Corbett J.A. Self-injurious behavior in people with mental handicap: a total population study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 1987, 31:147-162.
29. Pelios L., Morren J., Tesch D., Axelrod S. The impact of functional analysis methodology on treatment choice for self injurious and aggressive behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1999, 32:185-195.
30. Rapp J.T., Vollmer T.R. Stereotypy I: A review of behavioral assessment and treatment. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2005, 26:527-547.
31. Sidman M. Coercion and its fallout 1989, Authors Cooperative, Boston.
32. U.S.National Institutes of Health Consensus development conference on treatment of destructive behaviors in persons with developmental disabilities report 1989, National Institutes of Health, Office of Medical Applications Research, Bethesda, MD.
33. Vollmer T.R. The concept of automatic reinforcement: Implications for behavioral research in developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities 1994, 15:187-207.
34. Vollmer T.R. Punishment happens: Some comments on Lerman and Vorndran's review. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 2002, 35:469-473.
35. Wendt, O. (2009, May). Calculating effect sizes for single subject experimental designs: An overview and comparison. Paper presented at the Ninth Annual Campbell Collaboration Colloquium, Oslo, Norway. Retrieved from. http://www.campbellcollaboration.org/artman2/uploads/1/Wendt_calculating_effect_sizes.pdf.