State estimation in three dimensional impedance imaging – Use of fluid dynamical evolution models

2nd World Congress on Industrial Process Tomography

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 198-206

  Seppanen A ^a   Vauhkonen, M ^a   Vauhkonen, P J ^a   Somersalo, E ^b   Kaipio, J P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

^b AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Electrical impedance tomography; Kalman Smoother; Process tomography; State estimation

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE MEASUREMENT; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY; HEAT CONVECTION; STATE ESTIMATION; STATE SPACE METHODS; STOCHASTIC MODELS; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS;

CONVECTION-DIFFUSION MODELS; DYNAMICAL EVOLUTION; ELECTRICAL IMPE DANCE TOMOGRAPHY (EIT); ELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY; KALMAN SMOOTHER; PROCESS TOMOGRAPHY; RECONSTRUCTION PROBLEMS; STATE SPACE REPRESENTATION;

DIFFUSION IN LIQUIDS;

EID: 84910010397     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. ANDERSON, B.D.O. and MOORE, J.B. (1979), Optimal Filtering, Prentice Hall.
2. BAROUDI, D., KAIPIO, J.P. and SOMERSALO E. (1998), Dynamical electric wire tomography: Time series approach, Inv Probl, 14:799-813.
3. BIRD, R.B. (1960), Transport phenomena, New York, N.Y. Wiley cop.
4. CHENG, K.-S., ISAACSON, D., NEWELL, J.C. and GISSER, D.G. (1989), Electrode models for electric current computed tomography, IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 36:918–924.
5. KAIPIO, J.P., KARJALAINEN, P.A., SOMERSALO, E. and VAUHKONEN, M. (1999), State estimation in time-varying electrical impedance tomography, Ann New York Acad Sci, 873:430–439.
6. MELSA, J.L. and COHN, D.L. (1978), Decision and Estimation Theory, McGraw-Hill.
7. SEPPÄNEN, A., VAUHKONEN, M., VAUHKONEN, P.J., SOMERSALO, E. and KAIPIO, J.P. (2000a), State estimation with fluid dynamical evolution models in process tomography – EIT application, Technical Report 6/2000, University of Kuopio, Department of Applied Physics. http://venda.uku.fi/research/IP/publications/deptrep/fluiddyneit.pdf.
8. SEPPÄNEN, A., VAUHKONEN, M., VAUHKONEN, P.J., SOMERSALO, E. and KAIPIO, J.P. (2000b)
9. Fluid dynamical models and state estimation in process tomography: Effect due to inaccuracies in flow fields, J Electr Imaging, In Press.
10. SEPPÄNEN, A., VAUHKONEN, M., VAUHKONEN, P.J., SOMERSALO, E. and KAIPIO, J.P. (2000c), State estimation with fluid dynamical evolution models in process tomography – an application with impedance tomography, Inv Probl, In Press.
11. SOMERSALO, E., CHENEY, M. and ISAACSON, D. (1992), Existence and uniqueness for electrode models for electric current computed tomography, SIAM J Appl Math, 52:1023–1040.
12. VAUHKONEN, M., KARJALAINEN, P.A. and KAIPIO, J.P (1998), A Kalman filter approach to track fast impedance changes in electrical impedance tomography, IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 45:486–493.
13. VAUHKONEN, P.J., VAUHKONEN, M. and KAIPIO, J.P. (2001), Fixed-lag smoothing and state estimation in dynamic electrical impedance tomography, Int J Numer Methods Eng, 50:2195–2209.
14. VAUHKONEN, P.J., VAUHKONEN, M., MÄKINEN, T., KARJALAINEN, P.A. and KAIPIO, J.P (2000), Dynamic electrical impedance tomography – phantom studies. Inv Prob Eng, 8:495–510.
15. VAUHKONEN, P.J., VAUHKONEN, M., SAVOLAINEN, T. and KAIPIO, J.P (1999), Three dimensional electrical impedance tomography based on the complete electrode model. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 46:1150–1160.