The role of the bipolar plasmakinetic TURP over 100 g prostate in the elderly patients

International Urology and Nephrology

Volumn 46, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 2071-2077

  Coskuner, Enis Rauf ^a   Ozkan, Tayyar Alp ^b   Koprulu, Sefik ^a   Dillioglugil, Ozdal ^b   Cevik, Ibrahim ^a  

^a ISTANBUL YENI YUZYIL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b KOCAELI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

BPH; Open prostatectomy; Plasmakinetic; Prostate; TURP

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BIPOLAR PLASMAKINETIC; CATHETER REMOVAL; HEMATURIA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERNATIONAL INDEX OF ERECTILE FUNCTION; INTERNATIONAL PROSTATE SYMPTOM SCORE; LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOM; LUNG EDEMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSTATE HYPERTROPHY; PROSTATE VOLUME; PROSTATECTOMY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENESCENCE; SUPRAPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; THERAPY EFFECT; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION; URETHRA STRICTURE; URETHROTOMY; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; URINE FLOW RATE; URINE RETENTION; VERY ELDERLY; ECHOGRAPHY; ELECTROSURGERY; ORGAN SIZE; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROSTATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; ELECTROSURGERY; HUMANS; MALE; ORGAN SIZE; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF PROSTATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84909996321     PISSN: 03011623     EISSN: 15732584     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11255-014-0803-1     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. McVary KT, Roehrborn CG, Avins AL, Barry MJ, Bruskewitz RC, Donnell RF, Foster HE Jr, Gonzalez CM, Kaplan SA, Penson DF, Ulchaker JC, Wei JT (2011) Update on AUA guideline on the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 185(5):1793–1803
2. Rassweiler J, Teber D, Kuntz R, Hofmann R (2006) Complications of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)—incidence, management, and prevention. Eur Urol 50(5):969–979 (discussion 980)
3. Hon NH, Brathwaite D, Hussain Z, Ghiblawi S, Brace H, Hayne D, Coppinger SW (2006) A prospective, randomized trial comparing conventional transurethral prostate resection with PlasmaKinetic vaporization of the prostate: physiological changes, early complications and long-term followup. J Urol 176(1):205–209
4. Mebust WK, Holtgrewe HL, Cockett AT, Peters PC (2002) Transurethral prostatectomy: immediate and postoperative complications. a cooperative study of 13 participating institutions evaluating 3,885 patients,1989. J Urol 167(2 Pt 2):999–1003 (discussion 1004)
5. Mamoulakis C, Skolarikos A, Schulze M, Scoffone CM, Rassweiler JJ, Alivizatos G, Scarpa RM, de la Rosette JJ (2012) Results from an international multicentre double-blind randomized controlled trial on the perioperative efficacy and safety of bipolar vs monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate. BJU Int 109(2):240–248
6. Mamoulakis C, Trompetter M, de la Rosette J (2009) Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate: the ‘golden standard’ reclaims its leading position. Curr Opin Urol 19(1):26–32
7. Mendez-Probst CE, Nott L, Pautler SE, Razvi H (2011) A multicentre single-blind randomized controlled trial comparing bipolar and monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate. Can Urol Assoc J 5(6):385–389
8. Condie JD Jr, Cutherell L, Mian A (1999) Suprapubic prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia in rural Asia: 200 consecutive cases. Urology 54(6):1012–1016
9. Gratzke C, Schlenker B, Seitz M, Karl A, Hermanek P, Lack N, Stief CG, Reich O (2007) Complications and early postoperative outcome after open prostatectomy in patients with benign prostatic enlargement: results of a prospective multicenter study. J Urol 177(4):1419–1422
10. Ahyai SA, Gilling P, Kaplan SA, Kuntz RM, Madersbacher S, Montorsi F, Speakman MJ, Stief CG (2010) Meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic enlargement. Eur Urol 58(3):384–397
11. McAllister WJ, Karim O, Plail RO, Samra DR, Steggall MJ, Yang Q, Fowler CG (2003) Transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate: Is it any better than conventional transurethral resection of the prostate? BJU Int 91(3):211–214
12. Giulianelli R, Brunori S, Gentile BC, Vincenti G, Nardoni S, Pisanti F, Shestani T, Mavilla L, Albanesi L, Attisani F, Mirabile G, Schettini M (2011) Comparative randomized study on the efficaciousness of treatment of BOO due to BPH in patients with prostate up to 100 gr by endoscopic gyrus prostate resection versus open prostatectomy. Preliminary data. Archivio italiano di urologia, andrologia: organo ufficiale [di] Societa italiana di ecografia urologica e nefrologica/Associazione ricerche in urologia 83(2):88-94
13. Gupta NP, Anand A, Mishra S (2009) Transurethral vapor resection of prostate–an alternative treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia >100 g. J Endourol Endourol Soc 23(11):1883–1886
14. Gu X, Vricella GJ, Spaliviero M, Wong C (2012) Does size really matter? The impact of prostate volume on the efficacy and safety of GreenLight HPS laser photoselective vaporization of the prostate. J Endourol Endourol Soc 26(5):525–530
15. Elmansy H, Baazeem A, Kotb A, Badawy H, Riad E, Emran A, Elhilali M (2012) Holmium laser enucleation versus photoselective vaporization for prostatic adenoma greater than 60 ml: preliminary results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Urol 188(1):216–221
16. Chen YB, Chen Q, Wang Z, Peng YB, Ma LM, Zheng DC, Cai ZK, Li WJ, Ma LH (2013) A prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing plasmakinetic resection of the prostate with holmium laser enucleation of the prostate based on a 2-year followup. J Urol 189(1):217–222
17. Fayad AS, Sheikh MG, Zakaria T, Elfottoh HA, Alsergany R (2011) Holmium laser enucleation versus bipolar resection of the prostate: a prospective randomized study. Which to choose? J Endourol Endourol Soc 25(8):1347–1352
18. Lee SW, Choi JB, Lee KS, Kim TH, Son H, Jung TY, Oh SJ, Jeong HJ, Bae JH, Lee YS, Kim JC (2013) Transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic enlargement: a quality and meta-analysis. Int Neurourol J 17(2):59–66
19. Kuntz RM, Lehrich K (2002) Transurethral holmium laser enucleation versus transvesical open enucleation for prostate adenoma greater than 100 gm.: a randomized prospective trial of 120 patients. J Urol 168(4 Pt 1):1465–1469
20. Elzayat EA, Elhilali MM (2006) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP): the endourologic alternative to open prostatectomy. Eur Urol 49(1):87–91
21. Kuntz RM, Lehrich K, Ahyai SA (2008) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus open prostatectomy for prostates greater than 100 grams: 5-year follow-up results of a randomised clinical trial. Eur Urol 53(1):160–166
22. Mamoulakis C, Ubbink DT, de la Rosette JJ (2009) Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Urol 56(5):798–809
23. Kan CF, Tsu HL, Chiu Y et al (2014) A prospective study comparing bipolar endoscopic enucleation of prostate with bipolar transurethral resection in saline for management of symptomatic benign prostate enlargement larger than 70 g in a matched cohort. Int Urol Nephrol 46(3):511–517
24. Zhu G, Xie C, Wang X, Tang X (2012) Bipolar plasmakinetic transurethral resection of prostate in 132 consecutive patients with large gland: three-year follow-up results. Urology 79(2):397–402
25. Otsuki H, Kuwahara Y, Kosaka T, Tsukamoto T, Nakamura K, Shiroki R, Hoshinaga K (2012) Transurethral resection in saline vaporization: evaluation of clinical efficacy and prostate volume. Urology 79(3):665–669
26. Neyer M, Reissigl A, Schwab C, Pointner J, Abt D, Bachmayer C, Schmid HP, Engeler DS (2013) Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: results of a comparative, prospective bicenter study–perioperative outcome and long-term efficacy. Urol Int 90(1):62–67
27. De Nunzio C, Lombardo R, Autorino R et al (2013) Contemporary monopolar and bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate: prospective assessment of complications using the Clavien system. Int Urol Nephrol 45(4):951–959
28. Wein AJ, Kavoussi, L, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters CA (2012) Campbell-Walsh urology, vol 3, 10th edn, pp 2695–2703
29. Pu X, Wang X, Wang H, Hu L (2006) Erectile dysfunction after PlasmaKinetic vaporization of the prosatate: incidence and risk factors. J Endourol 20(9):693–697
30. Zhao Z, Ma W, Xuan X et al (2012) Impact of plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate (PKEP) on sexual function: results of a prospective trial. J Sex Med 9(5):1478–1481
31. Issa MM (2008) Technological advances in transurethral resection of the prostate: bipolar versus monopolar TURP. J Endourol 22:1587–1595
32. Zhoo Z, Zeng G, Zhong W et al (2010) A prospective randomised trial comparing plasmakinetic enucleation to standard transurethral resection of the prostate for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: three year follow-up results. Eur Urol 58:8