Fluency of pharmaceutical drug names predicts perceived hazardousness, assumed side effects and willingness to buy

Journal of Health Psychology

Volumn 19, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 1241-1249

  Dohle, Simone ^a   Siegrist, Michael ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

adherence; drugs; effectiveness; perception; risk; side effects

Indexed keywords

NON PRESCRIPTION DRUG;

ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DRUG LABELING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NOMENCLATURE; PATIENT PREFERENCE; STANDARDS; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; DRUG LABELING; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; NONPRESCRIPTION DRUGS; PATIENT PREFERENCE; TERMINOLOGY AS TOPIC; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84909968924     PISSN: 13591053     EISSN: 14617277     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1359105313488974     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Botti S, Orfali K, Iyengar SS. Tragic choices: Autonomy and emotional responses to medical decisions. The Journal of Consumer Research. 2009 ; 36: 337-352
2. Chaiken S Social Influence: The Ontario Symposium. Zanna MP Olson JM Herman CP, ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum ; 1987: 3-39.
3. Gilovich T, Savitsky K Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgement. Gilovich T Griffin DW Kahneman D, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp ; 2002: 617-624.
4. Gilovich T, Griffin DW, Kahneman D Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ; 2002 :
5. Gray WN, Janicke DM, Fennell EB, et al. Piloting behavioral family systems therapy to improve adherence among adolescents with HIV: A case series intervention study. Journal of Health Psychology. 2011 ; 16: 828-842
6. Green PE, Krieger AM. Segmenting markets with conjoint-analysis. Journal of Marketing. 1991 ; 55: 20-31
7. Hair J, Anderson R, Tatham R, et al Multivariate Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall ; 1998 :
8. Hsee CK. The evaluability hypothesis: An explanation for preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of alternatives. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1996 ; 67: 247-257
9. Hsee CK. Less is better: When low-value options are valued more highly than high-value options. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 1998 ; 11: 107-121
10. Judd CM, Kenny DA, McClelland GH. Estimating and testing mediation and moderation in within-subject designs. Psychological Methods. 2001 ; 6: 115-134
11. Loewenstein G. Hot-cold empathy gaps and medical decision making. Health Psychology. 2005 ; 24: S49 - S56
12. O'hea EL, Grothe KB, Bodenlos JS, et al. Predicting medical regimen adherence: The interactions of health locus of control beliefs. Journal of Health Psychology. 2005 ; 10: 705-717
13. Osterberg L, Blaschke T. Drug therapy - Adherence to medication. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2005 ; 353: 487-497
14. Pratkanis AR. How to sell a pseudoscience. Skeptical Inquirer. 1995 ; 19: 19-25
15. Reber R, Schwarz N, Winkielman P. Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience?. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2004 ; 8: 364-382
16. Saal W, Kagee A. The applicability of the theory of planned behaviour in predicting adherence to ART among a South African sample. Journal of Health Psychology. 2012 ; 17: 362-370
17. Schwarz N. Metacognitive experiences in consumer judgment and decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology. 2004 ; 14: 332-348
18. Schwarz N, Song H, Xu J The Social Psychology of Consumer Behavior. Wänke M, ed. New York: Psychology Press ; 2009: 201-223.
19. Siminoff LA, Step MA. A communication model of shared decision making: Accounting for cancer treatment decisions. Health Psychology. 2005 ; 24: S99 - S105
20. Song H, Schwarz N. If it's difficult to pronounce, it must be risky. Psychological Science. 2009 ; 20: 135-138
21. SPSS Conjoint 16.0. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc ; 2007 :