Water-extractable priority contaminants in LUFA 2.2 soil: back to basics, contextualisation and implications for use as natural standard soil

Ecotoxicology

Volumn 23, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 1814-1822

  Bastos, A C ^a   Prodana, M ^a   Oliveira, J M M ^a   Calhoa C F ^a   Santos, M J G ^a   Soares, A M V M ^a,b   Loureiro, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AVEIRO   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO TOCANTINS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Contaminants; LUFA 2.2; Potential bioavailability; Standard soil; Toxicity thresholds

Indexed keywords

ACENAPHTHENE; ACENAPHTHYLENE; ANTHRACENE; ASPARTIC ACID; BENZO[A]PYRENE; BENZO[B]FLUORANTHENE; BENZO[GHI]PERYLENE; BENZO[K]FLUORANTHENE; BENZ[A]ANTHRACENE; CADMIUM; CHEMICAL COMPOUND; CHROMIUM; CHRYSENE; COBALT; COPPER; DIBENZ[A,H]ANTHRACENE; FLUORANTHENE; FLUORENE; INDENO[1,2,3 CD]PYRENE; LEAD; MERCURY; NAPHTHALENE; NICKEL; PHENANTHRENE; POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBON; PYRENE; SURFACE WATER; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; WATER; ZINC; METAL; SOIL; SOIL POLLUTANT;

BIOAVAILABILITY; CHEMICAL POLLUTANT; PAH; SOIL POLLUTION; SOIL QUALITY; TOXICITY; WETTING;

ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTAMINANT EXTRACTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECOTOXICOLOGY; EXTRACTION; SANDY LOAM; SOIL ANALYSIS; SOIL CHEMISTRY; SOIL POLLUTION; ANALYSIS; CHEMISTRY; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; PROCEDURES; SOIL; SOIL POLLUTANT; STANDARDS;

ECOTOXICOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; METALS; POLYCYCLIC HYDROCARBONS, AROMATIC; SOIL; SOIL POLLUTANTS; WATER;

EID: 84909968361     PISSN: 09639292     EISSN: 15733017     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10646-014-1335-2     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Antoniadis V, Alloway BJ (2002) The role of dissolved organic carbon in the mobility of Cd, Ni and Zn in sewage sludge-amended soils. Environ Pollut 117:515–521
2. Caetano AL, Gonçalves F, Sousa JP, Cachada A, Pereira E, Duarte AC, Ferreira da Silva E, Pereira R (2012) Characterization and validation of a Portuguese natural reference soil to be used as substrate for ecotoxicological purposes. J Environ Monit 14(3):925–936
3. Campos I, Abrantes N, Vidal T, Bastos AC, Gonçalves F, Keizer JJ (2012) Assessment of the toxicity of ash-loaded runoff from a recently burnt eucalypt plantation. Eur J For Res 131(6):1889–1903. doi:10.1007/s10342-012-0640-7
4. Chuan MC, Shu GY, Liu JC (1996) Solubility of heavy metals in a contaminated soil: effects of redox potential and pH. Water Air Soil Pollut 90:543–556
5. COM (2006) 232 Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the protection of soil and amending Directive 2004/35/EC. COM/2006/0232 final-COD 2006/0086. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52006PC0232&from=EN
6. Directive 2008/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008, on environmental quality standards in the field of water policy, amending and subsequently repealing Council Directives 82/176/EEC, 84/513/EEC, 84/491/EEC, 86/280/EEC and amending Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2008:348:0084:0097:EN:PDF. Accessed 15 June 2011
7. Domene X, Chelinho S, Campana P, Natal-da-Luz T, Alcaniz JM, Andres P, Rombke J, Sousa P (2011) Influence of soil properties on the performance of Folsomia candida: implications for its use in soil ecotoxicology testing. Environ Toxicol Chem 30(7):1497–1505
8. EC (1996) Technical Guidance Documents in support of Directive 93/97/EC of new notified substances and Regulation EC No 1488/94 on risk assessment of existing substances, Brussels
9. EC (2003) Technical Guidance Documents in support of Directive 93/97/EC of new notified substances, Regulation EC No 1488/94 on risk assessment of existing substances and Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market, Brussels
10. Economou-Eliopoulos M, Megremi I, Vasilatos C (2011) Factors controlling the heterogeneous distribution of Cr(VI) in soil, plants and groundwater: evidence from the Assopos basin, Greece. Chemie der Erde - Geochemistry 71(1):39–52
11. Eisentraeger A, Rila J-P, Hund-Rinke K, Roembke J (2004) Proposal of a testing strategy and assessment criteria for the ecotoxicological assessment of soil or soil materials. J Soils Sediments 4(2):123–128. doi:10.1007/BF02991056
12. Fernández MD, Vega MM, Tarazona JV (2006) Risk-based ecological soil quality criteria for the characterization of contaminated soils. Combination of chemical and biological tools. Sci Total Environ 366(2–3):466–484. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.01.013
13. Frische T (2002) Screening for soil toxicity and mutagenicity using luminescent bacteria—a case study of the explosive 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 51(2):133–144. doi:10.1006/eesa.2001.2124
14. Frische T, Mebes K-H, Filser J (2003) Assessing the Bioavailability of Contaminants in Soils: A Review on Recent Concepts. Umweltbundesamt, Germany
15. Gonçalves SF, Calado R, Gomes NCM, Soares AMVM, Loureiro S (2013) An ecotoxicological analysis of the sediment quality in a European Atlantic harbor emphasizes the current limitations of the Water Framework Directive. Mar Pollut Bull 72(1):197–204. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.04.003
16. Holmstrup M, Petersen BF, Larsen MM (1998) Combined effects of copper, desiccation, and frost on the viability of earthworm cocoons. Environ Toxicol Chem 17(5):897–901. doi:10.1002/etc.5620170518
17. Hund-Rinke K, Kördel W (2003) Underlying issues in bioaccessibility and bioavailability: experimental methods. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 56(1):52–62
18. Jablonowski ND, Linden A, Köppchen S, Thiele B, Hofmann D, Burauel P (2012) Dry–wet cycles increase pesticide residue release from soil. Environ Toxicol Chem 31(9):1941–1947. doi:10.1002/etc.1851
19. Jensen J, Pedersen M (2006) Ecological Risk Assessment of Contaminated Soil. In: Albert L, Voogt P, Gerba C et al. (eds) Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology, vol 186. Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology. Springer, New York, pp 73-105. doi:10.1007/0-387-32883-1_3
20. Kelsey JW, Kottler BD, Alexander M (1997) Selective chemical extractants to predict bioavailability of soil-aged organic chemicals. Environ Sci Technol 31(1):214–217. doi:10.1021/es960354j
21. Kuhnt G, Murphy P, Poremski HJ, Herrmann M (1994). Background and historical evolution of the EUROSOILproject. In: Kuhnt G, Muntau H (eds) EUROSOILS identification, collection, treatment, characterization. European Commission, Ispra (Italy), Special Publication No. 1.94.60, pp 3–9
22. Lanno R, Wells J, Conder J, Bradham K, Basta N (2004) The bioavailability of chemicals in soil for earthworms. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 57(1):39–47. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2003.08.014
23. Loureiro S, Ferreira AL, Soares AM, Nogueira AJ (2005a) Evaluation of the toxicity of two soils from Jales Mine (Portugal) using aquatic bioassays. Chemosphere 61(2):168–177. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.02.070
24. Loureiro S, Soares AM, Nogueira AJ (2005b) Terrestrial avoidance behaviour tests as screening tool to assess soil contamination. Environ Pollut 138(1):121–131
25. Ma W-C, van Kleunen A, Immerzeel J, de Maagd PG-J (1998) Bioaccumulation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by earthworms: assessment of equilibrium partitioning theory in in situ studies and water experiments. Environ Toxicol Chem 17(9):1730–1737. doi:10.1002/etc.5620170913
26. Maliszewska-Kordybach B, Klimkowicz-Pawlas A, Smreczak B (2008) Soil reference materials in ecotoxicity testing—application of the concept of EURO-soils to soils from Poland. Polish J Environ Stud 17(2):257–266
27. Merrington G, Fishwick S, Brooke D (2006) The derivation and use of soil screening values for metals for the ecological risk assessment of contaminated land: a regulatory perspective. Land Contam Reclam 14(3):673–684
28. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (1984) Earthworm acute toxicity tests. OECD Guideline 207. Paris, France
29. Reimann C, Garrett RG (2005) Geochemical background—concept and reality. Sci Total Environ 350(1–3):12–27. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.01.047
30. Rocha L, Rodrigues SM, Lopes I, Soares AMVM, Duarte AC, Pereira E (2011) The water-soluble fraction of potentially toxic elements in contaminated soils: relationships between ecotoxicity, solubility and geochemical reactivity. Chemosphere 84(10):1495–1505. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.04.035
31. Rodrigues SM, Henriques B, Ferreira da Silva E, Pereira ME, Duarte AC, Romkens PF (2010) Evaluation of an approach for the characterization of reactive and available pools of twenty potentially toxic elements in soils: part I—the role of key soil properties in the variation of contaminants’ reactivity. Chemosphere 81(11):1549–1559
32. Römbke J, Jansch S, Junker T, Pohl B, Scheffczyk A, Schallnass HJ (2006) Improvement of the applicability of ecotoxicological tests with earthworms, springtails, and plants for the assessment of metals in natural soils. Environ Toxicol Chem 25(3):776–787
33. Sijm D, Kraaij R, Belfroid A (2000) Bioavailability in soil or sediment: exposure of different organisms and approaches to study it. Environ Pollut 108(1):113–119. doi:10.1016/S0269-7491(99)00207-9
34. Smedley PL, Kinniburgh DG (2002) A review of the source, behaviour and distribution of arsenic in natural waters. Appl Geochem 17(5):517–568
35. Suter II GW (1995) Guide for Performing Screening Ecological Risk Assessments at DOE Facilities. ES/ER/TM-153 US department of Energy, Oak Ridge National Laboratory. http://rais.ornl.gov/documents/tm153.pdf
36. Suter II GW, Tsao CL (1996) Toxicological benchmarks for screening potential contaminants of concern for effects on aquatic biota: 1996 Revision. ES/ER/TM-96/R2 US department of Energy, Oak Ridge National Laboratory. http://rais.ornl.gov/documents/tm96r2.pdf
37. ter Laak TL, Barendregt A, Hermens JLM (2006) Freely dissolved pore water concentrations and sorption coefficients of PAHs in spiked, aged, and field-contaminated soils. Environ Sci Technol 40(7):2184–2190. doi:10.1021/es0524548
38. U.S. EPA (1992) Great Lakes water quality initiative Tier II water quality values for protection for aquatic life in ambient water. Supporting documents
39. U.S. EPA (1993a) Water quality guidance for the Great Lakes system and correction. Proposed rules. Fed Regist 58(72):20802–201047
40. U.S. EPA (1993b) Methods for measuring the acute toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to freshwater and marine organisms, 4th edn. Weber CI (ed) Federal Register EPA/600/4-90/027F
41. U.S. EPA (1996) Ecotox thresholds. Office of solid waste and emergency response (OSWER). ECO Update 3(2):1–12
42. van Gestel CAM (2008) Physico-chemical and biological parameters determine metal bioavailability in soils. Sci Total Environ 406(3):385–395
43. van Gestel CA, Koolhaas JE (2004) Water-extractability, free ion activity, and pH explain cadmium sorption and toxicity to Folsomia candida (Collembola) in seven soil-pH combinations. Environ Toxicol Chem 23(8):1822–1833
44. van Gestel CAM, van der Waarde JJ, Derksen JG, van der Hoek EE, Veul MF, Bouwens S, Rusch B, Kronenburg R, Stokman GN (2001) The use of acute and chronic bioassays to determine the ecological risk and bioremediation efficiency of oil-polluted soils. Environ Toxicol Chem 20(7):1438–1449
45. van Straalen NM, Donker MH, Vijver MG, van Gestel CA (2005) Bioavailability of contaminants estimated from uptake rates into soil invertebrates. Environ Pollut 136(3):409–417
46. Weeks JM, Comber SDW (2005) Ecological risk assessment of contaminated soil. Mineral Mag 69(5):601–613. doi:10.1180/0026461056950274