Temporal trends and morbidities of vacuum, forceps, and combined use of both

Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

Volumn 27, Issue 18, 2014, Pages 1886-1891

  Fong, Alex ^a   Wu, Erica ^a   Pan, Deyu ^b   Chung, Judith H ^a   Ogunyemi, Dotun A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b CHARLES R DREW UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

California; Incidence; Operative vaginal delivery; Outcomes; Population based study

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; ENDOMETRITIS; FEMALE; FORCEPS DELIVERY; HEMATOMA; HUMAN; ICD-9; INCIDENCE; LACERATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL MORBIDITY; MATERNAL MORTALITY; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; PELVIC HEMATOMA; PLACENTAL DELIVERY; POSTPARTUM HEMORRHAGE; THROMBOEMBOLISM; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREND STUDY; UNITED STATES; UTERINE CERVIX LACERATION; VACUUM EXTRACTION; VAGINA FORTH DEGREE LACERATION; VAGINA THIRD DEGREE LACERATION; ADVERSE EFFECTS; BIRTH INJURIES; DELIVERY; DEVICES; MIDDLE AGED; MORBIDITY; NEWBORN; OBSTETRIC FORCEPS; PREGNANCY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TRENDS; VACUUM; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BIRTH INJURIES; CALIFORNIA; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; INFANT, NEWBORN; MIDDLE AGED; MORBIDITY; OBSTETRICAL FORCEPS; POSTPARTUM HEMORRHAGE; PREGNANCY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; VACUUM; VACUUM EXTRACTION, OBSTETRICAL; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84909957306     PISSN: 14767058     EISSN: 14764954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2014.904282     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ, et al. Births: final data for 2010. National Vital Statistics Report 2012;61:10.
2. Barber EL, Lundsberg LS, Belanger K, et al. Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:29-38.
3. Boyle A, Reddy UM. Epidemiology of cesarean delivery: the scope of the problem. Semin Perinatol 2012;36:308-14.
4. Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Ventura SJ. Births: preliminary data for 2011. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2012;61:1-20.
5. Caughey AB, Sandberg PL, Zlatnik MG, et al. Forceps compared with vacuum: rates of neonatal and maternal morbidity. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106:908-12.
6. Liu S, Heaman M, Joseph KS, et al. Risk of maternal postpartum readmission associated with mode of delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:836-42.
7. Fitzpatrick M, Behan M, O'Connell PR, O'Herlihy C. Randomised clinical trial to assess anal sphincter function following forceps or vacuum assisted vaginal delivery. BJOG 2003;110:424-9.
8. Johanson RB, Menon BK. Vacuum extraction versus forceps for assisted vaginal delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000:CD000224.
9. Ezenagu LC, Kakaria R, Bofill JA. Sequential use of instruments at operative vaginal delivery: is it safe? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180:1446-9.
10. Revah A, Ezra Y, Farine D, Ritchie K. Failed trial of vacuum or forceps-maternal and fetal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 176:200-4.
11. Alexander JM, Leveno KJ, Hauth JC, et al. Failed operative vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:1017-22.
12. Murphy DJ, Liebling RE, Patel R, et al. Cohort study of operative delivery in the second stage of labour and standard of obstetric care. BJOG 2003;110:610-15.
13. Murphy DJ, Macleod M, Bahl R, Strachan B. A cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of sequential instruments at operative vaginal delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2011;156:41-5.
14. Gardella C, Taylor M, Benedetti T, et al. The effect of sequential use of vacuum and forceps for assisted vaginal delivery on neonatal and maternal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:896-902.
15. Schmitt SK, Sneed L, Phibbs CS. Costs of newborn care in California: a population-based study. Pediatrics 2006;117:154-60.
16. Gilbert WM, Danielsen B. Pregnancy outcomes associated with intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188: 1596-9; discussion 1599-601.
17. Zwecker P, Azoulay L, Abenhaim HA. Effect of fear of litigation on obstetric care: a nationwide analysis on obstetric practice. Am J Perinatol 2011;28:277-84.
18. Powell J, Gilo N, Foote M, et al. Vacuum and forceps training in residency: experience and self-reported competency. J Perinatol 2007;27:343-6.
19. Gei AF. Prevention of the first cesarean delivery: the role of operative vaginal delivery. Semin Perinatol 2012;36: 365-73.
20. Case logs statistical reports. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Available from: https://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/tabid/274/DataCollectionSystems/ResidentCaseLog System/CaseLogsStatisticalReports.aspx [last accessed 20 Feb 2014].
21. Goetzinger KR, Macones GA. Operative vaginal delivery: current trends in obstetrics. Womens Health (Lond Engl) 2008;4:281-90.
22. Damron DP, Capeless EL. Operative vaginal delivery: a comparison of forceps and vacuum for success rate and risk of rectal sphincter injury. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:907-10.
23. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin number 17, Operative vaginal delivery. Washington, DC; 2000.
24. Yasmeen S, Romano PS, Schembri ME, et al. Accuracy of obstetric diagnoses and procedures in hospital discharge data. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;194:992-1001.
25. Vintzileos AM, Ananth CV, Smulian JC. The use of a comparability scoring system in reporting observational studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014;210:112-16.