Human content filtering in Twitter: The influence of metadata

International Journal of Human Computer Studies

Volumn 74, Issue , 2015, Pages 32-40

  Chorley, Martin J ^a   Colombo, Gualtiero B ^a   Allen, Stuart M ^a   Whitaker, Roger M ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cues; Decision making; Metadata; Recognition; Twitter

Indexed keywords

CONTENT FILTERING; CUES; RECOGNITION; TWITTER;

METADATA;

EID: 84909606525     PISSN: 10715819     EISSN: 10959300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.10.001     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Abel, F., Gao, Q., Houben, G.-J., Tao, K., 2011. Analyzing user modeling on twitter for personalized news recommendations. In: User Modeling, Adaption and Personalization. Springer, pp. 1-12.
2. Agichtein, E., Castillo, C., Donato, D., Gionis, A., Mishne, G., 2008. Finding high-quality content in social media. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Search and Web Data Mining. ACM, pp. 183-194.
3. Barchard, K.A., Williams, J., 2008. Practical advice for conducting ethical online experiments and questionnaires for United States psychologists. Behav. Res. Methods 40, 1111-1128.
4. Cataldi, M., Di Caro, L., Schifanella, C., 2010. Emerging topic detection on twitter based on temporal and social terms evaluation. In: Proceedings of the Tenth International Workshop on Multimedia Data Minin. ACM, p. 4.
5. Chen, J.J., Menezes, N.J., Bradley, A.D., North, T., 2011. Opportunities for crowdsourcing research on amazon mechanical turk. Hum. Factors 5, 3.
6. Chorley, M.J., Colombo, G.B., Allen, S.M., Whitaker, R.M., 2012. Better the tweeter you know: social signals on twitter. In: 2012 ASE/IEEE International Conference on Social Computing, pp. 277-282.
7. Das Sarma, A., Das Sarma, A., Gollapudi, S., Panigrahy, R., 2010. Ranking mechanisms in twitter-like forums. In: Proceedings of the Third ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, WSDM '10, ACM, pp. 21-30.
8. Dawes, R.M., 1979. The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making. Am. Psychol. 34, 571.
9. Duan, Y., Jiang, L., Qin, T., Zhou, M., Shum, H.-Y., 2010. An empirical study on learning to rank of tweets. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 295-303.
10. Felstiner, A.L., 2011. Working the crowd: employment and labor law in the crowdsourcing industry. Berkeley J. Employ. Labor Law 32 (2011).
11. Fishburn, P.C., 1974. Lexicographic orders, utilities and decision rules: a survey. Manag. Sci. 20, 1442-1471.
12. Gigerenzer, G., Gaissmaier, W., 2011. Heuristic decision making. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 62, 451-482.
13. Goldberg, L.R., 1993. The structure of phenotypic personality traits. Am. Psychol. 48, 26-34.
14. Goldstein, D.G., Gigerenzer, G., 2002. Models of ecological rationality: the recognition heuristic. Psychol. Rev. 109, 75-90.
15. Hannon, J., Bennett, M., Smyth, B., 2010. Recommending twitter users to follow using content and collaborative filtering approaches. In: Proceedings of the Fourth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. ACM, pp. 199-206.
16. Hoßfeld, T., Hirth, M., Tran-Gia, P., 2011. Modeling of crowdsourcing platforms and granularity of work organization in future internet. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Teletraffic Congress, ITCP, pp. 142-149.
17. Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., Tseng, B., 2007. Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities. In: Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 Workshop on Web Mining and Social Network Analysis, ACM, pp. 56-65.
18. Kapanipathi, P., Orlandi, F., Sheth, A.P., Passant, A., 2011. Personalized filtering of the twitter stream. In: SPIM, pp. 6-13.
19. Martignon, L., Hoffrage, U., 2002. Fast, frugal, and fit: simple heuristics for paired comparison. Theory Decis. 52, 29-71.
20. Mason, W., Suri, S., 2012. Conducting behavioral research on amazons mechanical turk. Behav. Res. Methods 44, 1-23.
21. Morris, M.R., Counts, S., Roseway, A., Hoff, A., Schwarz, J., 2012. Tweeting is believing?: understanding microblog credibility perceptions. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, pp. 441-450.
22. Nagmoti, R., Teredesai, A., De Cock, M., 2010. Ranking approaches for microblog search. In: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, vol. 01, WI-IAT '10. IEEE Computer Society, pp. 153-157.
23. Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., Ipeirotis, P., 2010. Running experiments on amazon mechanical turk. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 5, 411-419.
24. Phelan, O., McCarthy, K., Smyth, B., 2009. Using twitter to recommend real-time topical news. In: Proceedings of the Third ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, ACM. pp. 385-388.
25. Quercia, D., Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D., Crowcroft, J., 2011. Our twitter profiles, our selves: predicting personality with twitter. In: Proceedings of the Third IEEE International Conference on Social Computing, SocialCom '11, pp. 180-185.
26. Ratcliff, R., McKoon, G., 1989. Similarity information versus relational information-differences in the time course of retrieval. Cognit. Psychol. 21, 139-155.
27. Reips, U.-D., 2002a. Standards for internet-based experimenting. Exp. Psychol. 49, 243-256.
28. Reips, U., 2002b. Internet-based psychological experimenting: five dos and five don'ts. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 20, 241-249.
29. Schooler, L.J., Hertwig, R., 2005. How forgetting aids heuristic inference. Psychol. Rev. 112, 610.
30. Sherman, S.J., Corty, E., 1984. Cognitive heuristics. Handbook of Social Cognition 1, 189-286.
31. Snow, R., O'Connor, B., Jurafsky, D., Ng, A.Y., 2008. Cheap and fast-but is it good?: evaluating non-expert annotations for natural language tasks. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 254-263.
32. Webberley, W., Allen, S., Whitaker, R., 2011. Retweeting: a study of message-forwarding in twitter. In: 2011 Workshop on Mobile and Online Social Networks (MOSN), pp. 13-18.
33. Welch, M.J., Schonfeld, U., He, D., Cho, J., 2011. Topical semantics of twitter links. In: Proceedings of the Fourth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, WSDM '11, ACM, pp. 327-336.
34. Weng, J., Lim, E.P., Jiang, J., He, Q., 2010. TwitterRank: finding topic-sensitive influential twitterers. In: Proceedings of the Third ACM International Conference on Web Search and data Mining. ACM, pp. 261-270.
35. Yamaguchi, Y., Takahashi, T., Amagasa, T., Kitagawa, H., 2010. Turank: twitter user ranking based on user-tweet graph analysis. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering, WISE'10. Springer-Verlag, pp. 240-253.
36. Yu, J., Shen, Y., Xie, J., 2013. Mining user interest and its evolution for recommendation on the micro-blogging system. In: Web-Age Information Management, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 679-690.
37. Zhao, D., Rosson, M.B., 2009. How and why people twitter: the role that microblogging plays in informal communication at work. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work. ACM, pp. 243-252.
38. Zhu, D., Carterette, B., 2010. An analysis of assessor behavior in crowdsourced preference judgments. In: SIGIR 2010 Workshop on Crowdsourcing for Search Evaluation, pp. 17-20.