Supporting SLEUTH - Enhancing a cellular automaton with support vector machines for urban growth modeling

Computers, Environment and Urban Systems

Volumn 49, Issue , 2015, Pages 66-81

  Rienow, Andreas ^a   Goetzke, Roland ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cellular automata; Logistic regression; Probability map; SLEUTH; Support vector machines; SVM; Urban growth model

Indexed keywords

SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

LOGISTIC REGRESSIONS; PROBABILITY MAPS; SLEUTH; SVM; URBAN GROWTH MODELING;

CELLULAR AUTOMATA;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CELLULAR AUTOMATON; LAND COVER; LAND USE CHANGE; PROBABILITY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STOCHASTICITY; URBAN GROWTH; URBANIZATION;

COLOGNE; GERMANY; NORTH RHINE-WESTPHALIA; RHINE VALLEY;

EID: 84909587130     PISSN: 01989715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.05.001     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Aerts J.C.J.H., Clarke K.C., Keuper A.D. Testing popular visualization techniques for representing model uncertainty. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 2003, 30(3):249-261.
2. Altman D.G. Practical Statistics for Medical Research 1990, Chapman Hall, London.
3. Antrop M. Landscape change and the urbanization process in Europe. Landscape and Urban Planning 2004, 67(1-4):9-26.
4. Batty M. Cities and Complexity: Understanding Cities with Cellular Automata, Agent-Based Models, and Fractals 2005, The MIT Press, Boston.
5. BBSR (2012). Trends der Siedlungsflächenentwicklung. Status quo und Projektion 2030. BBSR-Analysen KOMPAKT. Bonn: Bundesinstitut für Bau-, Stadt- und Raumforschung (BBSR) im Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung.
6. Benenson I., Torrens P.M. Geosimulation: Automata-Based Modeling of Urban Phenomena 2004, John Wiley Sons, West Sussex.
7. BMVBS/BBSR (2009). Einflussfaktoren der Neuinanspruchnahme von Flächen. Forschungen 139. Bonn: Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Bau und Stadtentwicklung (BMVBS) und Bundesinstitut für Bau-, Stadt- und Raumforschung (BBSR).
8. Brown, D.G., Walker, R., Manson, S., Seto, K. (2004). Modeling Land Use and Land Cover Change. In: Gutman, G., Janetos, A.C., Jusitce, C.O., Moran, E.F., Mustard, J.F., Rindfuss, R.R., Skole, D., et al. (Eds.), Land Change Science - Observing, Monitoring and Understanding Trajectories of Change on the Earth's Surface. pp. 395-410.
9. Burges C.J.C. A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 1998, 2:121-167.
10. Chaudhuri G., Clarke K.C. The SLEUTH land use change model: A review. International Journal of Environmental Resources Research 2013, 1(1):88-104.
11. Clarke K.C., Hoppen S., Gaydos L. A self-modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco Bay area. Environment and Planning B 1997, 24:247-262.
12. Congalton R.G. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment 1991, 37:35-46.
13. Cortes C., Vapnik V. Support-vector networks. Machine Learning 1995, 20(3):273-297.
14. Costanza R., Maxwell T. Spatial ecosystem modelling using parallel processors. Ecological Modelling 1991, 58(1-4):159-183.
15. Drucker H., Wu D., Vapnik V.N. Support vector machines for spam categorization. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 1999, 10(5):1048-1054.
16. Fleiss J.L., Levin B., Paik M.C. The Measurement of Interrater Agreement 2004, John Wiley Sons, New York.
17. Gestel T.V., Suykens J.A.K., Baestaens D., Lambrechts A., Lanckriet G., Vandaele B., et al. Financial time series prediction using least squares support vector machines within the evidence framework. IEEE Transactions on NeuralL Networks 2001, 12(4).
18. Goetzke R. Entwicklung eines fernerkundungsgestützten Modellverbundes zur Simulation des urban-ruralen Landnutzungswandels in Nordrhein-Westfalen 2012, disserta Verlag, Hamburg.
19. Goetzke, R., Over, M., Braun, M. (2006). A method to map land-use change and urban growth in North Rhine-Westphalia (Germany). In: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop of the EARSeL SIG on Land Use and Land Cover, pp. 102-110.
20. Guo Q., Kelly M., Graham C.H. Support vector machines for predicting distribution of Sudden Oak Death in California. Ecological Modelling 2005, 182(1):75-90.
21. Hägerstrand T. The computer and the geographer. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 1967, 42:1-19.
22. Herold, M., Menz, G., Clarke, K.C. (2001): Remote Sensing and Urban Growth Models. Demands and Perspectives. In: Juergens, C. (2001): Proceedings of the Symposium on Remote Sensing of Urban Areas. Regensburg, Germany, 22-23 June 2001. Regensburger Geographische Schriften 35, CD-ROM.
23. Hsu, C.-W., Chang, C.-C., Lin, C.-J. (2010). A Practical Guide to Support Vector Classification. Taipei: Department of Computer Science National Taiwan University. Retrieved <> Access 15.04.14. http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/papers/guide/guide.pdf.
24. Huang B., Xie C., Tay R. Support vector machines for urban growth modeling. GeoInformatica 2010, 14(1):83-99.
25. Hughes G.F. On the mean accuracy of statistical pattern recognizers. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 1968, 14(1):55-63.
26. Hullmann A., Cloos B. Mobilität und Verkehrsverhalten der Ausbildungs- und Berufspendlerinnen und -pendler 2002, Landesamt für Datenverarbeitung und Statistik Nordrhein-Westfalen, Düsseldorf.
27. IT NRW. (2013). Landesdatenbank NRW. Landesdatenbank NRW.
28. Judex, M. (2008). Modellierung der Landnutzungsdynamik in Zentralbenin mit dem XULU-Framework. Bonn.
29. LAG21 (Ed.). (2008). Flächenmanagement als partizipativer Prozess einer nachhaltigen Stadtentwicklung - Dokumentation. Schwerte.
30. Lambin, E.F., Geist, H.J. (2006). Introduction: Local processes with global impacts. In: Lambin, E.F. Geist, H.J. (Eds.), Land-Use and Land-Cover Change: Local Processes and Global Impacts, pp. 1-8.
31. Landis J.R., Koch G.G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977, 33(1):159-174.
32. Langford M., Unwin D.J. Generating and mapping population density surfaces within a geographical information system. The Cartographic Journal 1994, 31(1):21-26.
33. Laux, H.D. Zepp, H. (1998). Bonn und seine Region - Geoökologische Grundlagen, historische Entwicklung und Zukunftsperspektiven. In: Stiehl, E. (Eds.): Die Stadt Bonn und ihr Umland - Ein geographischer Exkursionsführer, pp. 9-32.
34. Lee D.B. Requiem for large-scale models. SIGSIM Simulation Digest 1975, 6(2-3):16-29.
35. Lesschen, J.P., Verburg, P.H., Staal, S.J. (2005). Statistical methods for analysing the spatial dimension of changes in land use and farming systems. LUCC Report Series 7 (IGBP).
36. Mayr A., Temlitz K. Nordrhein-Westfalen - ein landeskundlicher Überblick. Geographische Rundschau 2006, 58(1):4-10.
37. Menard S. Applied Logistic Regression Analysis (Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences) 2001, Sage Publications, London.
38. Messina J., Evans T., Manson S., Shortridge A., Deadman P., Verburg P. Complex systems models and the management of error and uncertainty. Journal of Land Use Science 2008, 3(1):11-25.
39. Mewes T. The Impact of the Spectral Dimension of Hyperspectral Datasets on Plant Disease Detection 2011, ULB, Bonn.
40. Mielke B., Münter A. Demographischer Wandel und Flächeninanspruchnahme. ILS NRW Schriften 2007, 203:58-64.
41. Mountrakis G., Im J., Ogole C. Support vector machines in remote sensing: A review. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 2011, 66(3):247-259.
42. Nguyen M.H., de la Torre F. Optimal feature selection for support vector machines. Pattern Recognition 2010, 43(3):584-591.
43. Okwuashi, O., McConchie, J., Nwilo, P., Eyo, E. (2009). Stochastic GIS cellular automata for land use change simulation: Application of a kernel based model. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on GeoComputation University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. 30 November - 02 December 2009, pp. 1-7.
44. Orekan V. Implementation of the Local Land-use and Land-Cover Change Model CLUE-s for Central Benin by Using Socio-economic and Remote Sensing Data 2007, Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Bonn, Bonn.
45. Platt J.C. Probabilistic outputs for support vector machines and comparisons to regularized likelihood methods. Advances in Large Margin Classifiers 1999, 61-74.
46. Pontius R.G. Quantification error versus location error in comparison of categorical maps. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 2000, 66(8):1011-1016.
47. Pontius, Jr., R.G., Malizia, N.R. (2004). Effect of category aggregation on map comparison. In: Egenhofer, M.J., Freska, C., Miller, H.J. (Eds.), GIScience, pp. 251-268.
48. Pontius R.G., Boersma W., Castella J.-C., Clarke K., Nijs T., Dietzel C., et al. Comparing the input, output, and validation maps for several models of land change. The Annals of Regional Science 2008, 42(1):11-37.
49. Pontius R.G., Huffaker D., Denman K. Useful techniques of validation for spatially explicit land-change models. Ecological Modelling 2004, 179(4):445-461.
50. Pontius R.G., Schneider L.C. Land-cover change model validation by an ROC method for the Ipswich watershed, Massachusetts, USA. Agriculture, Ecosystems Environment 2001, 85(1-3):239-248.
51. Rafiee R., Mahiny A.S., Khorasani N., Darvishsefat A.A., Danekar A. Simulating urban growth in Mashad City, Iran through the SLEUTH model (UGM). Cities 2009, 26(1):19-26.
52. Ramankutty, N., Graumlich, L., Achard, F., Alves, D., Chhabra, A., DeFries, R.S., Foley, J.A., Geist, H., Houghton, R.A., Goldewijk, K.K., Lambin, E.F., Millington, A., Rasmussen, K., Reid, R.S., Turner, B.L. (2006): Global land-cover change: Recent progress, remaining challenges. In: Lambin, E.F. Geist, H. (Eds.): Land-Use and Land-Cover Change: Local Processes and Global Impacts, pp. 9-40.
53. Robinson W.S. Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review 1950, 15(3):351-357.
54. Schmitz, M., Bode, T., Thamm, H.-P. Cremers A.B. (2005). XULU - A generic JAVA-based platform to simulate land use and land cover change (LUCC). In: MODSIM 2007 International Congress on Modelling and Simulation. Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand, December 2007, pp. 4-7.
55. Schoettker, B. (2003). Monitoring statewide urban development using multitemporal multisensoral satellite data covering a 40-year time span in north Rhine-Westphalia (Germany). In: Proceedings of the SPIE 10th International Symposium on Remote Sensing, 8-12th September 2003, Barcelona, pp. 252-261.
56. Schwarz, N., Haase, D. (2007). Models of Rural-Urban Systems - A Systematic Compilation and Review of Existing Methodologies in Systems Dynamics and Causality Approaches for Evaluating Rural-Urban Land Use Relationships. Kopenhagen: PLUREL. Retrieved <> Access 15.04.14. http://www.plurel.net/images/summary_D411.pdf.
57. Siedentop S. Urban Sprawl - Verstehen, messen, steuern. Ansatzpunkte für ein empirisches Mess- und Evaluationskonzept der urbanen Siedlungsentwicklung. DISP 2006, 160:23-35.
58. Siedentop, S. Fina, S. (2008): Urban Sprawl beyond Growth: From a growth to a decline perspective on the costs of sprawl. In: 44th Iscocarp Congress, September 2008. Retrieved <> Access 15.04.14. http://www.uni-stuttgart.de/ireus/publikationen/ISOCARP_Paper_Siedentop-Fina.pdf.
59. Silva E.A., Clarke K.C. Complexity, emergence and cellular urban models: Lessons learned from applying SLEUTH - To two Portuguese metropolitan areas. European Planning Studies 2005, 13(1):93-115.
60. Steven D.P., Hoffman M., Parker D.C., Manson S.M., Manson S.M., Janssen M.A., et al. Multi-agent systems for the simulation of land-use and land-cover change: A review. Annals of The Association of American geographers 2002, 93:314-337.
61. Unwin D.J. Geographical information systems and the problem of 'error and uncertainty'. Progress in Human Geography 1995, 19(4):549-558.
62. Vapnik V. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory 1995, Springer, New York.
63. Vapnik V. Statistical Learning Theory 1998, John Wiley Sons, New York.
64. Veldkamp A., Lambin E.F. Predicting land-use change. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 2001, 85:1-6.
65. Verburg, P.H. (2006). Modeling land-use and land-cover change. In: Lambin, E.F. Geist, H.J. (Eds.), Land-Use and Land-Cover Change: Local Processes and Global Impacts, pp. 117-136.
66. Verburg, P.H. Veldkamp, A. (2005). Introduction to the special issue on spatial modeling to explore land use dynamics. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 19(2), 99-102.
67. Verburg P.H., de Koning G.H.J., Kok K., Veldkamp A., Bouma J. A spatial explicit allocation procedure for modelling the pattern of land use change based upon actual land use. Ecological Modelling 1999, 116(1):45-61.
68. Verburg P.H., Soepboer W., Veldkamp A., Limpiada R., Espaldon V., Mastura S.S.A. Modeling the spatial dynamics of regional land use: The CLUE-S model. Environmental Management 2002, 30(3):391-405.
69. Verburg P.H., van Eck J.R.R., de Nijs T.C.M., Dijst M.J., Schot P. Determinants of land-use change patterns in the Netherlands. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2004, 31(1):125-150.
70. Verplancke T., Looy S.V., Benoit D., Vansteelandt S., Depuydt P., Turck F.D., et al. Support vector machine versus logistic regression modeling for prediction of hospital mortality in critically ill patients with haematological malignancies. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2008, 8(1):56.
71. Visser, H. (2004). The MAP COMPARISON KIT: Methods, Software and Applications. Maastricht: Research Institute for Knowledge Systems (RIKS)). Retrieved <> (Access 15.04.14. http://storage.riks.nl/pub/MCK/MCK_Reader.pdf.
72. Waske B., van der Linden S., Benediktsson J.A., Rabe A., Hostert P. Sensitivity of support vector machines to random feature selection in classification of hyperspectral data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2010, 48(7):2880-2889.
73. Wegener M. From macro to micro - How much micro is too much?. Transport Reviews 2011, 31(2):161-177.
74. Wu X., Hu Y., He H.S., Bu R., Onsted J., Xi F. Performance evaluation of the SLEUTH model in the Shenyang metropolitan area of northeastern China. Environmental Modeling Assessment 2008, 14(2):221-230.
75. Wu T.F., Lin C.J., Weng R.C. Probability estimates for multi-class classification by pairwise coupling. Journal of Machine Learning Research 2004, 5:975-1005.
76. Wu N., Silva E.A. Artificial intelligence solutions for urban land dynamics: A review. Journal of Planning Literature 2010, 24(3):246-265.
77. Xie C. Support Vector Machines for Land Use Change Modeling 2006, UCGE Reports, Calgary.
78. Yang Q., Li X., Shi X. Cellular automata for simulating land use changes based on support vector machines. Computers Geosciences 2008, 34(6):592-602.