NOx emissions in France and Sweden: Advanced fee schemes versus regulation

Choosing Environmental Policy: Comparing Instruments and Outcomes In the United States and Europe

Volumn 9781936331468, Issue , 2004, Pages 117-132

  Millock, Katrin ^a   Sterner, Thomas ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS 1 PANTHÉON SORBONNE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^c RESOURCES FOR THE FUTURE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NOX EMISSIONS;

EID: 84909446337     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781936331468     Document Type: Chapter

References (13)

1. ADEME. 1995-97. Taxe parafiscale sur la pollution atmosphérique. Rapport d'Activité 1990/95, 1995, 1996, 1997, Agence de l'Environnement et de la Maîtrise de l'Energie. Paris.
2. Goulder, L.H., I.W.H. Parry, R.C. Williams III, and D. Burtraw. 1999. The Cost-Effectiveness of Alternative Instruments for Environmental Protection in a Second-Best Setting. Journal of Public Economics 72(3): 329-360.
3. Höglund, L. 2000. Essays on Environmental Regulation with Application to Sweden. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Gothenburg, memorandum series 99. Göteborg University, Department of Economics.
4. Lindgren, M. 2003. SEPA. Personal communication, February 5, 2003.
5. Millock, K., and C. Nauges. 2003. The French Tax on Air Pollution: Some Preliminary Results on its Effectiveness. FEEM Nota di Lavoro 44.2003. Milan: Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
6. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA). 1993-98. Memorandum 733-3720-93 Mt, 733-4143-94 Mt, 733-6828-95 Mr, 733-4238-96 Mr, 733-4677-97 Mr, 713-3713-98 Rt. Stockholm.
7. x-avgift-utvärdering. Report 4717. Stockholm: SEPA.
8. SEPA (Swedish Environmental Protection Agency). 2000. The Swedish charge on nitrogen oxides. Stockholm. Available at http://www.environ.se/.
9. x. Available at http://www.environ.se/.
10. SOU. 1989. Ekonomiska Styrmedel i Miljöpolitiken. Delbetänkande av miljöavgiftsutredningen.
11. Sterner, T., and L. Höglund. 2000. Output Based Refunding of Emissions Payments: Theory, Distribution of Costs, and International Experience. Discussion paper 00-29. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
12. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1998. 1997 Compliance Report-Acid Rain Program. Washington, DC.
13. Yohe, G.W., and P. MacAvoy. 1987. A Tax cum Subsidy Regulatory Alternative for Controlling Pollution. Economic Letters 25: 177-182.