Proscribed forms of social cognition: Taboo trade-offs, blocked exchanges, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals

Relational Models Theory: A Contemporary Overview

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 247-262

  Tetlock, Philip E ^a   McGraw, A Peter ^b   Kristel, Orie V ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Strategy Team Ltd   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84909442092     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410611413     Document Type: Chapter

References (23)

1. Berlin, I. (1991). The crooked timber of humanity: Chapters in the history of ideas. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
2. Calabresi, G., & Bobbit, P. (1978). Tragic choices. New York: Norton.
3. Charmley, J. (1993). Churchill, the end of glory: A political biography. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
4. Fiske, A. P. (1991). Structures of social life: The four elementary forms of social relations. New York: Free Press.
5. Fiske, A., & Tetlock, P. E. (1997). Taboo trade-offs: Reactions to transactions that transgress spheres of justice. Political Psychology, 18, 255-297.
6. Fiske, S., & Taylor, S. (1991). Social psychology. New York: McGraw Hill.
7. Kagel, J., & Roth, A. (1995). Handbook of experimental economics. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
8. Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J., & Thaler, R. (1990). Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 1325-1348.
9. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgement of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430-453.
10. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341-350.
11. Koehler, J. (1996). The base rate fallacy reconsidered: Descriptive, normative, and methodological challenges. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 1-53.
12. March, J., & Olson, J. (1989). Rediscovering institutions. New York: The Free Press.
13. McGraw, A. P., & Tetlock, P. E. (2004). Relational framing: The power to determine the acceptability of changes. Working paper, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
14. McGraw, A. P., Tetlock, P. E., & Kristel, O. V. (2003). The limits of fungibility: Relational schemata and the value of things. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 219-229.
15. Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 7-59.
16. Tetlock, P. E. (1999). Theory-driven reasoning about possible pasts and probable futures: Are we prisoners of our preconceptions? American Journal of Political Science, 43, 335-366.
17. Tetlock, P. E. (2000). Coping with trade-offs: Psychological constraints and political implications. In S. Lupia, M. McCubbins, & S. Popkin (Eds.), Political reasoning and choice (pp. 239-263). Berkeley: University of California Press.
18. Tetlock, P. E. (2002). Social functionalist frameworks for judgment and choice: People as intuitive politicians, theologians, and prosecutors. Psychological Review, 109, 451-471.
19. Tetlock, P. E., & Belkin, A. (1996). Counterfactual thought experiments in world politics: Logical, methodological, and psychological perspectives. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
20. Tetlock, P. E., Kristel, O., Elson, B., Green, M., & Lerner, J. (2000). The psychology of the unthinkable: Taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 853-870.
21. Tetlock, P. E., Peterson, R., & Lerner, J. (1996). Revising the value pluralism model: Incorporating social content and context postulates. In C. Seligman, J. Olson, & M. Zanna (Eds.), Ontario symposium on social and personality psychology: Values (Vol. 8, pp. 25-51). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Thaler, R. H. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1, 39-60.
23. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1982). Evidential impact of base rates. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 153-160). New York: Cambridge University Press.