Media diversity: Economics, ownership, and the FCC

Media Diversity: Economics, Ownership, and the FCC

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 1-249

  Einstein, Mara ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84909441932     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410609014     Document Type: Book

References (212)

1. Adalian, J. (2001, October 26). Sony unplugs TV: Columbia TriStar TV dismantles primetime unit. Variety, 1, 19.
2. Adalian, J. (2002, June 26). Tube's tied: Flagging fortunes force nets to throw out their old script. Variety, 1, 8.
3. Adarand Constructors, Inc., v. Pena, 515 U.S. 200 (1995).
4. Albiniak, P. (2002, April 15). OK on NBC-Telemundo deal. Broadcasting & Cable. Retrieved July 9, 2002, from http://www.broadcastingcable.com
5. Amendment of Part 76 of the commission's rules with respect to carriage of digital television broadcast signals (2001). Retrieved January 2, 2003, from www.fcc.gov/bureaus/cable/ orders/2001/fcc01022.txt
6. Amendment of Part 73 of the commission's rules and regulations with respect to competition and responsibility in network television broadcasting, Report and Order, 23 FCC 2d 382 (1970)
7. Amendment of Part 73 of the commission's rules with respect to competition and responsibility in network television broadcasting. Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 45 FCC 2146 (1965)
8. Amendment of 47 CFR 73.658(j)(l)(i) and (ii), the syndication and financial interest rules.
9. Amendment of 47 CFR 73.658(j), the syndication and financial interest rule. Notice of proposed rule making in docket 82-345. (1982).
10. The analyses that touched it all off. (1969, November 24). Broadcasting, 50-51.
11. Andersen, R. (1995). Consumer culture & TVprogramming. Boulder, CO:WestviewPress.
12. Bagdikian, B. H. (1992). The media monopoly (4th ed.). Boston: Beacon Press.
13. Barnouw, E. (1990). Tube of plenty. New York: Oxford University Press.
14. Baxter, W. F. (1974). Regulation and diversity in communications media. The American Economic Review, 64(2), 392-399.
15. Besen, S. M., & Johnson, L. L. (1984). Regulation of media ownership by the Federal Communications Commission: an assessment. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
16. Besen, S. M., Krattenmaker, T. G., Metzger, A. R., Jr., & Woodbury, J. R. (1984). Misregulating television: Network dominance and the FCC. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17. Bielby, W. T., & Bielby, D. D. (1994). All hits are flukes. American Journal of Sociology, 99(5) 1287-1313.
18. Big deals alter the list of big deals. (2002, May 13). Broadcasting & Cable, 42-49.
19. Blumenthal, H. J., & Goodenough, O. R. (1998). This business of television.NewYork: Billboard Books.
20. Brants, K., & McQuail, D. (1992). The Netherlands. In B. S. Ostergaard (Ed), The media in Western Europe: The Euromedia handbook (pp. 152-166). London: Sage.
21. Burch supports Agnew; Shift in F.C.C. role seen. (1969, November 15). The NewYork Times, pp. 1, 20.
22. Byrne, B. (1999). NBC Moves in on PAX. E!Online News. Retrieved July 9, 2002, from http://www.eonline.com/News/Items/Pf/0,1527,5319,00.html
23. Cable newswars: Behind the battle for cable news viewers. (2002, March). Retrieved July 9, 2002, from www.pbs.org/newshour/media/cablenews
24. Cantor,M. G. (1988). The Hollywood TV producer: His work and his audience. New York: Basic Books.
25. Cantor,M. G., & Cantor, J.M. (1992). Prime-time television: Content and control.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
26. Cass, R. A. (1981). Revolution in the wasteland: Value and diversity in television. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
27. CBS-TV affiliates throw support to repeal of financial-interest rules. (1982, November 22). Broadcasting, 48.
28. Chief to chief. (1991, March 4). Broadcasting & Cable, 6.
29. Columbia Journalism Review (n.d.). Who owns what. Retrieved May 10, 2002, from http://www.cjr.org/owners Colvin, G. (1983, May 2). The battle for TV's rerun dollars. Forbes, 116-120.
30. Colvin, G. (1983, May 2). The battle for TV's rerun dollars. Forbes, 116-120.
31. Commercial television network practices and the ability of station licensees to serve the public interest. Notice of Inquiry, 62 FCC 2d, p. 548. (1977).
32. Commercial television network practices. Further Notice of Inquiry, 69FCC2d, p. 1524 (1978).
33. Competition in Television Production Act: Hearings before the Subcommittee on Communications. 98th Cong., 1st sess. (1983).
34. Comstock, G. (1991). Television in America. Newbury Park, CA.: Sage Publications.
35. Congress takes up financial interest, syndication issue. (1983, March 28). Broadcasting, 34-35.
36. Covington,W. G., Jr. (1994). The financial interest and syndication rules in retrospect: History and analysis. Communications and the Law 16(2), 3-19.
37. Crandall, R.W., Noll, R. G., & Owen, B. M. (1983). Economic effects of the financial interest and syndication rule: Comments on the ICF Report.Washington, DC: Owen Greenhalgh & Myslinski Economics Inc.
38. Culbert, D. (1983). Television's Nixon: The politician and his image. In J. E. O'Connor (Ed.), American history American television: Interpreting the video past (pp. 184-207). New York: Frederick Ungar Publishing Co.
39. Curran, J. (1991). Mass media and democracy: A reappraisal. In J. Curran & M. Gurevitch (Eds.), Mass media and society (pp. 82-117). London: Edward Arnold.
40. Current (1998). The advisory committee's 10 recommendations, 1998. Retrieved July 11, 2002, from http://www.current.org/dtv/dtv823g.html
41. De Jong, A. S., & Bates, B. J. (1991). Channel diversity in cable television. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 35, 159-166.
42. Disney. (n.d.). What we're made of. Retrieved July 11, 2002, from http://Disney.go.com/disneychannel/playhouse/grown-ups/phd_about.html
43. Dominick, J. R., & Pearce, M. C. (1976). Trends in network prime-time programming, 1953-1974, Journal of Communication, 26, 70-80.
44. Dunham, C. B. (1997). Fighting for the First Amendment: Stanton of CBS vs. Congress and the Nixon White House. Westport, CT: Praeger.
45. Entman, R. M. (1985). Newspaper competition and First Amendment ideals: Does monopoly matter? Journal of Communication, 35(3), 147-165
46. Entman, R. M., & Wildman, S. S. (1992). Reconciling economic and non-economic perspectives on media policy: Transcending the "marketplace of ideas." Journal of Communication, 42(1), 5-19.
47. Evaluation of the syndication and financial interest rules. 8 FCCR 3283 (1993).
48. Evaluation of the syndication and financial interest rules. Report and Order, 6 FCCR 3094 (1991).
49. FCC Financial Data. (1967-1975). Washington, DC: Author.
50. FCC Network Inquiry Special Staff. (1980). Final report: New television networks: Entry, jurisdiction, ownership and regulation, Vol. 1. Washington, DC: GPO.
51. FCCNetwork Inquiry Special Staff (1980). Background Reports,Vol. 2.Washington,DC:GPO.
52. Federal Communications Commission. (2002). Reviewof the commission's broadcast ownership rules and other rules adopted pursuant to Section 202 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Retrieved July 9, 2002, from www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/ 2000/fcc00191.txt
53. Federal Communications Commission. (2002). DTV stations authorized to be on the air, June 12, 2002. Retrieved July 12, 2002, from http://www.fcc.gov/mb/video/files/ dtvonairsum.html
54. Federal Communications Commission. (1993) Broadcast signal carriage issues. 1993 FCC Lexis 1835 (1993).
55. Federal Communications Commission. (1996). Report and order, in the matter of policies and rules concerning children's television programming, revision of programming policies for television broadcast stations. Retrieved July 9, 2002, from www.fcc.gov/ Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1996/fcc96335.htm
56. Federal Communications Commission. (1971). 37th annual report/fiscal 1971.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
57. Federal Communications Commission. (1973). 39th annual report/fiscal 1973.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Federal Communications Commission v. League of Women Voters of California, 468 U.S.
58. Federal Communications Commission v. League of Women Voters of California, 468 U.S. 364 (1984).
59. Federal Communications Commission. Statement of policy on minority ownership of broadcasting facilities, 68 FCC 2d 979 (1978), 980-981.
60. Financial interest and syndication rules: Hearings before the Subcommittee on Telecommunications, Consumer Protection and Finance. 98th Cong., Sess 1 (1983).
61. Fisher, F.M. (1991). The financial interest and syndication rules in network television regulatory fantasy and reality (1985). In J. Monz (Ed.), Industrial organization, economics and the law: The collected papers of Franklin M. Fisher (pp. 289-322). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
62. Fortunato, J. A., & Martin, S. E. (1999). The courts v. the FCC: Diversity and the broadcast provisions of the 1996Telecommunications Act. Communications & theLaw, 21(3), 19-41.
63. Fox denies any 'Simpsons' favoritism. (1993, March 22). Broadcasting & Cable, 22-23.
64. Freer public access to medium sought. (1970, May 25). Broadcasting, pp. 28-29.
65. Gallup reports 77% back Nixon. (1969, November 5). The New York Times, p. 24.
66. Geller, H. (1982). FCC media ownership rules: The case for regulation. Journal of Communication, 32(4), 148-156.
67. Gerbner, G. L. (1967). An institutional approach to mass communication research. In L. Thayer (Ed.), Communication: Theory and Research. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
68. Gitlin, T. (1983). Inside prime-time. New York: Pantheon.
69. Glovinsky, E. H. (1984). Stay tuned for new technology: The paradoxes of the proposed financial interest and syndication rules. Hastings Communications-Communications Entertainment Law Journal, 6(3), 589-620.
70. Greenberg, E., & Barnett, H. J. (1971). TV program diversity-New evidence and old theories. The American Economic Review, 61, 89-93.
71. Grego, M. (2001, April 2). Cable on off-net rights tear, Variety, 40.
72. Halonen, D. (2002, June 3). Program stakes in danger. Electronic Media, 1, 37.
73. Harris, K. (1995, September 4). Lights! camera! regulation. Fortune, 83-86.
74. Head, S.W. (1989). A framework for programming strategies. In S. T. Eastman, S.W. Head, & L. Klein (Eds.), Broadcast/cable programming: Strategies and practices. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
75. Heeter, C. (1985). Program selection with abundance of choice: A process model. Human Communication Research, 12, 125-152.
76. Herskovitz, M. L. (1997). The repeal of the financial interest and syndication rules: The demise of program diversity and television network competition? Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 15(1), 177-212.
77. Higgins, J. M., & McClellan, S. (2002, February 25). Everything's in play. Broadcasting & Cable, 18-23.
78. Hollywood's short-lived win on fin-syn. (1983, September 26). Broadcasting, 28-29.
79. Hollywood wins D.C. compromise. (1983, November 2). Variety, 1, 76.
80. Hontz, J., & Littleton, C. (1999, January 8). Sonywas steady if not stellar.Variety, 10, 12, 34.
81. Hundt, R. (1996, March 28). News flash! FCC wins Oscar for brave-hearted application of anti-trust theory of vertical integration in broadcasting. Speech presented at the American Bar Association, Washington DC. Retrieved July 9, 2002, from www.fcc.gov/ Speeches/Hundt/spreh617.txt
82. ICF Incorporated. (1983). An analysis of the impacts of the repeal of the financial interest and syndication rule: Report to the Committee for Prudent Deregulation. Unpublished manuscript.
83. Iosifides, P. (1999). Diversity versus concentration in the deregulated mass media domain. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 76(1), 152-162.
84. Jensen, E. (1992, November 9). Media: Networks gain in syndication dispute, but many see rerun of battles ahead. The Wall Street Journal, p. B1.
85. Jensen, E. (1993, April 2).FCCangers cable firms, aids networks; Rerun profits could enrich big broadcasters. The Wall Street Journal, p. B1.
86. Jensen, E. (1994, September 9). Television (a special report): Where the money goes: Still kicking: A year ago, the networks seemed headed for extinction; No longer. The Wall Street Journal, p. R3.
87. Jessell, H. A. (1992, November 9). Appeals court vacates rules. Broadcasting, 4-8.
88. Kalb, M. (1994). The Nixon memo: Political respectability, Russia, and the press. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
89. Kelly, M., & Truetzschler,W. (1992). Ireland. In B. S. Ostergaard (Ed), The media inWestern Europe: The Euromedia handbook (pp.108-122). London: Sage.
90. Kleinsteuber, H. J., & Wilke, P. (1992). Germany. In B. S. Ostergaard (Ed), The media in Western Europe: The Euromedia handbook (pp. 75-94). London: Sage.
91. Kintzer, E. L. (1984). The proposed repeal of the financial interest and syndication rules: Network dominion or public interest representation? Hastings Communications-Communications Entertainment Law Journal, 6(3), 513-620.
92. Kissell, R. (2002, May 24). Peacock's final flourish, Variety, 1, 21.
93. Kleiman, H. (1991). Content diversity and the FCC's minority and gender licensing policies. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 35, 411-429.
94. Krasnow, E. G., Longley, L. D., & Terry, H. A. (1982). The politics of broadcast regulation. New York: St. Martin's Press.
95. Krasnow, E. G., & Berg, M. D. (2002, April 15). Where things stand. Broadcasting & Cable. Retrieved April 15, 2002, from http://www.tvinsite.com/broadcastingcable/index. asp?layout=story_stocks&articleid=&doc_id=80906&pubdate=4/11/2002
96. Krattenmaker, T.G. (1998). Telecommunications law and policy. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
97. Krattenmaker, T. G., & Powe, L. A., Jr. (1994). Regulating broadcast programming. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
98. Lacter, M. (2001, May 28). Making crime pay. Fortune, 158-161.
99. Lamprecht v. Federal Communications Commission, 958 F. 2d 382 (D.C. Cir. 1992).
100. Ledbetter, J., Borow, Z., & Moodie, D. (1996, January 16). Merger overkill. The Village Voice, p. 30.
101. Le Duc, D. R. (1982). Deregulation and the dream of diversity. Journal of Communication, 32(4), 164-178.
102. Lee, T. A. (1995). Legal research guide to television broadcasting and programsyndication. Buffalo, NY: William S. Heim & Co., Inc.
103. Lentz, K. M. (2000). Quality versus relevance: Feminism, race, and the politics of the sign in 1970s television. Camera Obscura, 15(1), 45-93.
104. Levin, H. J. (1971). Program duplication, diversity, and effective viewer choices: Some empirical findings. The American Economic Review, 61, 81-88.
105. Lewine, R. F., Eastman, S. T., & Adams, W. J. (1989). Prime time network television programming. In S. T. Eastman, S. W. Head, & L. Klein (Eds.), Broadcast/cable programming: Strategies and practices (pp. 134-172). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
106. Lin, C. A. (1995). Diversity of network prime-time program formats during the 1980s. The Journal of Media Economics, 8(4), 17-28.
107. Litman, B. R. (1998). The changing role of the television networks. In A. Alexander, J. Owers, & R. Carveth (Eds.), Media economics theory and practice (pp. 225-244). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
108. Litman, B. R. (1979). The television networks, competition and program diversity. Journal of Broadcasting, 23(4), 393-409.
109. Little, A. D. (1969). Television program production, procurement, distribution and scheduling. Unpublished manuscript.
110. Long, S. L. (1979). The development of the television network oligopoly.NewYork: Arno Press.
111. Longworth, J. L., Jr. (2000). TV creators: Conversations with America's top producers of television drama. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
112. Lopes, P. D. (1992). Innovation and diversity in the popular music industry, 1969 to 1990. American Sociological Review, 57(1), 56-71.
113. Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod v. Federal Communications Commission, 141 F3d (D.C. Cir. 1998).
114. MacDonald, J. F. (1990). One nation under television: The rise and decline of network TV. New York: Pantheon Books.
115. Mason, L., Bachen, C. M., & Craft, S. L. (2001). Support for FCC minority ownership policy: How broadcast station ownership race or ethnicity affects news and public affairs programming diversity. Communication Law & Policy, 6, 37-73.
116. McChesney, R.W. (1997). Rise of the media giants. Fair/Extra! Retrieved January 6, 2003 from www. fair.org/extra/9711/gmg.html
117. McClellan, S. (2002a, July 1). Fox duops in Chicago, will pay $450M forWPWR-TV, giving it combos in top three markets, Broadcasting & Cable, 8.
118. McClellan, S. (2002b, May 27). Winning, and losing, too. Broadcasting & Cable, 6-7.
119. McClellan, S. (2002c, May 27). Cross-platform construction. Broadcasting & Cable, 12.
120. McClellan, S. (2002d, May 20). Faith, hope and stability: As broadcast nets announce fall schedules, some are more desperate than others. Broadcasting & Cable, 16-29.
121. McClintock, P. (2002a, June 11). Org makes a plea to D.C. Variety, 1, 22.
122. McClintock, P. (2002b, April 3). FCC is told to rethink owner regs. Variety, 1, 17.
123. McClintock, P. (2002c, April 1). FCC lets Viacom doff cap. Variety, 1, 15.
124. McCombs, M. E.,& Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176-187.
125. McGowan, J. J. (1967, Fall). Competition, regulation, and performance in television broadcasting. Washington University Law Quarterly, 499-520.
126. McNeil, A. (1996). Total television: The comprehensive guide to programming from 1948 to the present (4th ed.). New York: Penguin.
127. Media Dynamics (1998). TV dimensions '98. New York: Author.
128. Media Ownership: Diversity and Concentration: Hearings before the Subcommittee on Communications. 101st Cong., sess. 1 (1989).
129. Mermigas, D. (2002, June 3). Fin-syn repeal has yet to pay off. Electronic Media, 30.
130. Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, 110 SC 2997 (1990).
131. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo, 418 U.S. 241 (1974).
132. Miller, M. C. (1996, June 3). Free the media. The Nation.
133. Moser, J. D. (Ed.). (1997). 1997 International television & video almanac. New York: Quigley Publishing Company, Inc.
134. Mt. Mansfield Television, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, 442 F.2d 470 (D.C. Cir. 1971).
135. Napoli, P. M. (1996, August). Assessing diversity in broadcast syndication. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Anaheim, CA.
136. Napoli, P. M. (1999). Deconstructing the diversity principle. Journal of Communication, 49(4), 7-34.
137. Napoli, P. M. (1997). Rethinking program diversity assessment: An audience-centered approach. The Journal of Media Economics, 10(4), 59-74.
138. National Cable & Telecommunications Association (NCTA). (2002, February).Television and cable households, 1979-2001. Retrieved July 9, 2002, fromwww.ncta.com/industry_overview/ NBC Business Development & International Finance (1996, December). TV ad expenditure trends.
139. NBC Business Development & International Finance (1996, December). TV ad expenditure trends.
140. NBC has record $2.74B upfront (2002, June 6). Broadcasting & Cable. Retrieved July 7, 2002, from http://www.brodcastingcable.com
141. Networks nervous over Reagan briefing from FCC's Fowler. (1983, October 10). Broadcasting, 42.
142. Networks win financial interest, syndication battle. (1983, August 8). Broadcasting, 27-31.
143. Networks win, Hollywood winces as fin-syn barriers fall. (1993, November 22). Broadcasting, 6, 16.
144. New fin-syn rules disappoint White House. (1991, April 22). Broadcasting, 32-33.
145. News Corp. buys Chris-Craft. (2000, August 13). CNN Money. Retrieved July 9, 2002, from http://money.cnn.com/2000/08/13/deals/chriscraft/
146. Nickelodeon: The facts. (n.d.). Retrieved July 11, 2002, from www.viacom.com/ prodbyunit1.tin?ixBusUnit=20
147. Nixon comments on news analysis. (1969, December 15). Broadcasting, 28.
148. Nixon ready to move on FCC. (1969, September 1). Broadcasting, 21.
149. Orbit Communication Corp. (n.d.). About satellite-TV. Retrieved July 23, 2001, from http:// www.orbitsat.com/AboutSat/higsoty2.htm
150. Oudes, B. (Ed.). (1989). From the President: Richard Nixon's secret files.NewYork: Harper & Row.
151. Owen, B. M. (1977). Regulating diversity: The case of radio formats. Journal of Broadcasting, 21, 305-319.
152. Owen, B. M. (1978). The economic view of programming. Journal of Communication, 28, 43-50.
153. Owen, B. M., Beebe, J. H., & Manning,W. G., Jr. (1974). Television economics. New York: Lexington Books.
154. Owen, B. M., & Wildman, S. S. (1992). Video economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
155. PBS. (n.d.). Sponsorship Messages. Retrieved July 11, 2002, from http://sponsorship.pbs.org/ secure/messages_credit.htm
156. Pearce, A. (1973). The economics of prime time access. Washington, DC: FCC.
157. Peterson, R. A., & Berger, D. G. (1975). Cycles in symbol production: The case of popular music. American Sociological Review, 40(2), 158-173.
158. Phipps, J. L. (2002, June 3). Editorial: Senators on the right track with Powell. Electronic Media, 9.
159. Pool, I. (1983). Technologies of freedom. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.
160. President 'proud'to have Agnewin administration. (1969, October 31). The NewYork Times, pp. 1, 25.
161. The president's priorities. (1983, November 7). The New York Times, p. A22.
162. Producers, stations band together to protect PTAR-related rules. (1982, May 17). Broadcasting, 41-42.
163. Reagan upstages the networks on syndication. (1983,November 7). Businessweek, 51-52.
164. Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v.Federal Communications Commission, 395 U.S. 367 (1969).
165. Review of the syndication and financial interest rules, Sections 73.659-73.663 of the Commission's Rules, Report and Order, 10 FCCR 12, 165 (1995, Report and Order).
166. Revision of radio rules and policies, 7 F.C.C.R. 2775 (1992).
167. Roberts, J. L. (1998, October 19). TV turns vertical. Newsweek, 54-56.
168. Romano, A. (2002, June 24). P & G makes a discovery. Broadcasting & Cable, 17.
169. Schiesel, S. (2002, April 3). F.C.C. rules on ownership under review. The New York Times, p. C1.
170. Schlosser, J. (1998a, September 21). 'Seinfeld's' got plenty of nothing. Broadcasting & Cable, 74-75.
171. Schlosser, J. (1998b,November 2). Sewing up off-net plans. Broadcasting & Cable, 45-46.
172. Schlosser, J. (1999, July 12). Disney closes TV ranks. Broadcasting & Cable, 10.
173. Schurz Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, 982 F 2d 1043 (7th Circuit 1992).
174. Shooshan, H. M., III, & Sloan, C. R. (1982). FCC media ownership rules: The case for repeal. Journal of Communication, 32(4), 153-159.
175. Spear, J.C. (1984). Presidents and the press: The Nixon legacy. Cambridge,MA:MITPress.
176. Spring, G. (1998, January 26). Networks drain thin talent pool. Electronic Media, 9.
177. Steele v. Federal Communications Commission, 770 F. 2d 1192 (D.C. Cir. 1985).
178. Steiner,G.A. (1963). The people look at television: A study of audience attitudes.NewYork: Knopf.
179. Steiner, P. O. (1952). Program patterns and preferences, and the workability of competition in radio broadcasting. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 66, 194-223.
180. Sterling, C. H., & Kittross, J. M. (1978). Stay tuned: A concise history of American broadcasting. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
181. Sterngold, J. (1997, October 7). Cries of 'foul' as networks buy into shows. The New York Times, pp. D1-D2.
182. Stroud, M. (1998, June 8). Muscling in on the money. Broadcasting & Cable, 26.
183. Syndication, financial-interest comments: High-stake rulemaking. (1983, January 31). Broadcasting, 28-32.
184. Television Bureau of Advertising. (2002). TVB: Trends in Media-Nighttime TV costs and CPM trends. Retrieved July 7, 2002, from www.tvb.org/tvfacts/index.html
185. Television Network Financial Interest and Syndication Rules: Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed. 98th Cong., 1st sess. (1983).
186. Text of President Nixon's address to nation on U.S. policy in the war in Vietnam. (1969, November 4). The New York Times, p. 16.
187. Tisch, L. (1989). Before the Subcommittee on Communication of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation. In M. H. Lauer & C. C. Murray (Eds.), Motion Pictures and Television: The 1990's and Beyond (pp. 309-336). Los Angeles, CA: The Regents of the University of California.
188. Transcript of address by Agnewcriticizing television on its coverage of the news. (1969, November 14). The New York Times, p. 24.
189. Trigoboff, D. (2002, April 8). Less is more asViacom retakes top spot. Broadcasting and Cable, 46.
190. Tunstall, J. (1986). Communications Deregulation: The unleashing of America's communications industry. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
191. Tunstall, J. (1992). The United Kingdom. In B. S. Ostergaard (Ed.), The media in Western Europe: The Euromedia handbook (pp. 238-255). London: Sage.
192. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission [Turner I], 114 S. Ct. 2445 (1994).
193. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission [Turner II], 117 S. Ct. 1174 (1997).
194. Turow, J. (1991). A mass communication perspective on entertainment industries. In J. Curran & M. Gurevitch (Eds.), Mass media and society (pp. 82-117). London: Edward Arnold.
195. TV9, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, 495 F 2d 929 (D.C. Cir. 1973).
196. TV Season Preview (1999, August 31). Variety, A1-A42.
197. Valenti, J. (1989a). Come, networks, let us reason together. InM. H. Lauer & C. C. Murray (Eds.), Motion Pictures and Television: The 1990's and Beyond (pp. 273-286). Los Angeles, CA: The Regents of the University of California.
198. Valenti, J. (1989b). Keep your eye on the distant objective and not the one nearest you. In M. H. Lauer & C. C. Murray (Eds.), Motion Pictures and Television: The 1990's and Beyond (pp. 155-185). Los Angeles, CA: The Regents of the University of California.
199. Valenti, J. (1989c). Letters to The Honorable John D. Dingell. In M. H. Lauer & C.C. Murray (Eds.), Motion Pictures and Television: The 1990's and Beyond (pp. 127-135). Los Angeles, CA: The Regents of the University of California.
200. TheVietnam Speech: What to listen for tomorrownight. (1969, November 2). The New York Times, p. 2.
201. Vogel, H. L. (2001). Entertainment industry economics: A guide for financial analysis (5th ed.). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
202. Webster, J.G. (1986). Audience behavior in the newmedia environment. Journal of Communication, 36(3), 77-91.
203. Webster, J. G., & Phalen, P. F. (1994).Victim, consumer of commodity? Audience models in communication policy. In J. S. Ettema & D. C. Whitney (Eds.), Audiencemaking: How the media create the audience (pp. 19-37). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
204. Wild, D. (1999). The showrunners: A season inside the billion-dollar, death-defying, madcap world of television's real stars. New York: HarperCollins.
205. Wildman, S. S., & Robinson, K. S. (1995). Network programming and off-network syndication profits: Strategic links and implications for television policy. The Journal of Media Economics, 8(2), 27-48.
206. Wired. (1999, September 7).Viacom to Buy CBS. Retrieved July 9, 2002, fromwww.wired.com/ news/business
207. TheWisdom Fund. (1997, July 25). Broadcasting fairness doctrine promised balanced coverage. Retrieved April 30, 2002, from http://www.twf.org/News/Y1997/Fairness.html
208. Wober, J. M. (1989). The U.K.: The constancy of audience behavior. In L. B. Becker & K. Schoenbach (Eds.), Audience responses to media diversification: Coping with plenty (pp. 91-108). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
209. Wright, R. C. (1989a). Letter to The Honorable John D. Dingell. In M. H. Lauer & C. C. Murray (Eds.), Motion Pictures and Television: The 1990's and Beyond (pp. 121-126). Los Angeles, CA: The Regents of the University of California.
210. Wright, R. C. (1989b).Testimony of Robert C. Wright, President and Chief Executive officer National Broadcasting Company, Inc., Subcommittee on Communications, Commerce Committee, United States Senate. In M. H. Lauer & C.C. Murray (Eds.), Motion Pictures and Television: The 1990's and Beyond (pp. 337-366). Los Angeles, CA: The Regents of the University of California.
211. Youn, S. (1994). Program type preference and program choice in a multichannel situation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 38, 465-475.
212. Zap2it. (2002). TV Showlist. Retrieved July 11, 2002, from http://tv.zap2it.com/shows/ showlist/