Relational autonomy and family law

Rights, Gender and Family Law

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 257-275

  Herring, Jonathan ^a  

^a EXETER COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84909126893     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203869475     Document Type: Chapter

References (57)

1. M. Chen-Wishart, 'Undue influence: vindicating relationships of influence' in J. Holder and C. O'Cinneide (eds), Current Legal Problems, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007, p 231.
2. J. Raz, The Morality of Freedom, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986, p 369.
3. H. Reece, Divorcing Responsibly, Oxford: Hart, 2003, p 13.
4. M. Fineman, The Autonomy Myth, New York: New Press, 2004, p 263.
5. R. Dworkin Life's Dominion, London: Harper Collins, 1993, p 166.
6. A. Alghrani and J. Harris, 'Reproductive liberty: should the foundation of families be regulated?' (2006) 18 Child and Family Law Quarterly, 191, 192.
7. A. Donchin, 'Understanding autonomy relationally', (2001) 26 Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 365.
8. J. Bridgeman, Parents, Young Children and Healthcare Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007, p 11.
9. A. Macdonald, 'Legal aid reform - beyond "no more money"' (2007) 37 Family Law 130.
10. J. Eekelaar, Family Law and Personal Life,Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007, p 82.
11. N. Woolcock, 'It's no nanny state, more an extended family, minister says', The Times, 26 November 2004.
12. M. Glendon, The Transformation of Family Law, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989.
13. H. Reece, 'Divorcing responsibly' (2000) 8 Feminist Legal Studies 65.
14. P. Scheininger, 'Legal separateness, private connectedness: An impediment to gender equality in the family' (1998) 31 Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems 283.
15. R. West, 'Universalism, liberal theory, and the problem of gay marriage' (1998) 25 Florida State University Law Review, 705, 729.
16. M. Eichner, 'Principles of the law of relationships among adults' (2007) 41 Family Law Quarterly, 433.
17. J. Herring, 'The Human Rights Act and the welfare principle - conflicting or complimentary?' (1999) 11 Child and Family Law Quarterly, 223.
18. K. Baker, 'Family, the law, and the constitution(s)', available at SSRN: http://ssrn. com/abstract=1106423, p 16.
19. J. Nedelsky, 'Property in potential life? A relational approach to choosing legal categories' (1993) 6 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 343, 343.
20. J. Eekelaar and M.Maclean, 'The Significance ofMariage: Contrasts betweenWhite British and Ethnic Minority Groups in England' (2005) 27 Law and Policy 379.
21. M. Minow and M. Lyndon Shanley, 'Relational rights: Revisioning the family in liberal political theory and law' (1996) 11 Hypatia 4.
22. P. Laufer-Ukeles, 'Selective recognition of gender difference in the law: Revaluing the caretaker role' (2008) 31 Harvard Journal of Law and Gender, 1.
23. C. Gilligan, In a Different Voice, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1982, p 17.
24. M. Friedman, 'Autonomy, social disruption, and women', in C. MacKenzie and N. Stoljar, Relational Autonomy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000, p 47.
25. S. Mendus, 'Human rights in political theory' (1995) 43 Political Studies, 10.
26. L. Code, 'Second Persons', in L. Code (ed.) What Can She Known? Feminist Theory and the Construction of Knowledge, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, p 78.
27. M. Becker, 'Patriarchy and inequality: Towards a substantive feminism' (1999) University of Chicago Legal Forum, 21.
28. S. Carle, 'Theorizing agency' (2005) 55 American Universities Law Review, 307.
29. E. Barvosa-Carter, 'Mestiza autonomy as relational autonomy: Ambivalence and the social character of free will' (2007) 15 Journal of Political Philosophy, 1.
30. A. Donchin, 'Autonomy, interdependence, and assisted suicide: respecting boundaries/crossing lines' (2000) 14 Bioethics, 187.
31. J. Nedelsky, 'Reconceiving autonomy: sources, thoughts and possibilities' (1989) 1 Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 7-36.
32. A. Johnson, Gender Knot, Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1997, p 30.
33. L. Barclay, 'Autonomy and the social self ', in C. Mackenzie and N. Stoljar (eds), Relational Autonomy, New York: Oxford University Press, 2000, pp 52-71.
34. M.Verkerk, 'A care perspective on coercion and autonomy' (1999) 13 Bioethics, 358.
35. E. Feder Kittay, 'Searching for an overlapping consensus: a secular care ethics feminist responds to religious feminists' (2007) 4 University of St Thomas Law Journal, 468-88.
36. E. Frazer and N. Lacey, The Politics of Community: A Feminist Critique of the Liberal Communitarian Debate, Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatshear, 1993, p 178
37. R. Leckey, 'Contracting claims and family law feuds' (2007) 57 University of Toronto Law Journal, 1.
38. S. Cretney, 'Private ordering and divorce - how far can we go' (2003) 33 Family Law, 399, 403.
39. J. Singer, 'The privatization of family law' (1992) 5 Wisconsin Law Review, 1443-1567.
40. V. Held, The Ethics of Care, New York: Oxford University Press, 2006, p 15.
41. S. Sevenhuijsen (1998) Citizenship and the Ethics of Care: Feminist Considerations about Justice, Morality and Politics, London: Routledge, p 171.
42. M. Tushnet, 'A critique of rights' (1984) Texas Law Review, 1363, 1364.
43. C. Smart, 'Children and the transformation of family law', in J. Dewar and S. Parker (eds), Family Law Processes, Practices, Pressures, Oxford: Hart, 2003, pp 238-39.
44. J. Herring, 'Why financial orders on divorce should be unfair' (2005) 19 International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 218.
45. K. Silbaugh, 'Turning labor into love: Housework and the law' (1996) 91 Northwestern University Law Review 27.
46. M. Case, 'How high the apple pie? A few troubling questions about where, why, and how the burden of care for children should be shifted' (2001) 78 Chicago-Kent Law Review, 1753.
47. L. Ferguson, 'Family, social inequalities, and the persuasive force of interpersonal obligation' (2008) 22 International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 61.
48. J. Williams, Unbending Gender, New York: Oxford University Press, 2000, pp 124-27.
49. J. Williams, 'Towards a reconstructive feminism: reconstructing the relationship of market work and family work' (1998) 19 Northern Illinois University Law Review, 119.
50. C. Smith, 'Philosophical models of marriage and their influence on property division methods at divorce' (2000) Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 214.
51. M. Regan, Alone Together; Law and the Meaning of Marriage Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999, p 166.
52. See, J. Herring, 'Children's abortion rights' (1997) 5 Medical Law Review, 257.
53. J. Herring, 'The place of carers', in M. Freeman, Law and Bioethics, Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2008.
54. J. Bridgeman 'Because we care? The medical treatment of children', in S. Sheldon and M. Thomson, Feminist Perspectives on Health Care, London: Cavendish, 1998, pp 97-113.
55. J. Herring, 'Children's rights for grown-ups', in S. Fredman and S. Spencer (eds), Age as An Equality Issue, Oxford: Hart, 2004, pp 145-72.
56. M. Freeman, The Moral Status of Children, London: Martinus Nijhoff, 1997, p 38.
57. T. Cockburn, 'Children and the feminist ethic of care', (2005) 12 Childhood, 71.