A closed community: Fredric Jameson and the commodification of political science

New Political Science

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 265-280

  McGovern, Patrick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84909114166     PISSN: 07393148     EISSN: 14699931     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/713687917     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Somit, Albert, and Tanenhaus, Joseph. 1967. The Development of American Political Science: From Burgess to Behavioralism, 43Boston: Allyn and Bacon. See Chapter IV, Footnote 3, for a description of the wide-ranging character of their activities outside of academia.
2. Haddow, Aima. 1969. Political Science in American Colleges and Universities, 180New York: Octagon Books., quoted in Gunnell, p. 51. Gunnel], p. 51. Somit and Tanenhaus, in Development of Political Science, are quick to point out that Burgess was adamantly opposed to graduate education for women, questioning their ability to participate successfully in higher education.
3. Burgess, John William. 1934. Reminiscences of an American Scholar, 199New York: Columbia University Press., quoted in Somit and Tanenhaus, pp. 46-47.
4. Helm, Charles. 1988. review of The Tragedy of Political Science: Politics, Scholarship, and Democracy, by David Ricci, in. Ethics, 98 (3): 591
5. Seidelman, Raymond, and Harpham, Edward J., 1985. Disenchanted Realists: Political Science and the American Crisis, 1884-1984, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
6. Easton, David, Gunnell, John G., and Stein, Michael, eds. 1995. Regime and Discipline: Democracy and the Development of Political Science, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.); and Luke.
7. Simon, Herbert. 1993. "The State of American Political Science: Professor Lowi's View of Our Discipline,". PS: Political Science and Politics, 26 (1): 49–51.
8. Calvert, Randall. 1993. "Lowi's Critique of Political Science: A Response,". PS: Political Science and Politics, 26 (2): 196–198., for a critique of Lowi's article.
9. Duvall, Tim. 1998. "The Discipline's Community: The Effects of Method and Market on Research Relevance,". paper presented at the American Political Science Association Meeting. 1998, Boston. Included here are the following: Easton, "The New Revolution"; Wolin; Ricci; and
10. Storer, Norman W., 1966. The Social System of Knowledge, New York Holt.
11. Ravetz, Jerome R., 1971. Scientific Knowledge and Its Special Problems, New York: Oxford University Press.) for more on the structure of scientific communities
12. Jameson, Fredric. 1985. "Postmodernism, or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism,". New Left Review, 149: 53–92.
13. Mandel, Ernest. 1975. Late Capitalism, London: NLB.
14. Jameson, Fredric. 1992. History and Theory, 32 (2): 296–310. Martin Jay and Jane Flax, review of Postmodernism, or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism, by
15. Stone, Deborah. 1997. The Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making, New York: Norton.) for a description of the nature of market values.