Levels of expertise and trading zones: Combining cognitive and social approaches to technology studies

Scientific and Technological Thinking

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 287-302

  Gorman, Michael E ^a  

^a University of Virginia   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84909113589     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410611314     Document Type: Chapter

References (35)

1. Allenby, B. (2001). Earth systems engineering and management. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 19(4), 10-21.
2. Alvarez, W. (1997). T.rex and the crater of doom. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3. Anzai, Y. (1991). Learning and use of representations for physics expertise. In K. A. Ericsson & J. Smith (Eds.), Toward a general theory of expertise (pp. 64-92). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
4. Baird, D., & Cohen, M. (1999). Why trade? Perspectives on Science, 7, 231-254.
5. Bijker, W. E. (1995). Of bicycles, bakelites and bulbs: Toward a theory of sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Carlson, W. B., & Gorman, M. E. (1990). Understanding invention as a cognitive process: The case of Thomas Edison and early motion pictures, 1888-1891. Social Studies of Science, 20, 387-430.
8. Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152.
9. Clement, J. (1991). Nonformal reasoning in experts and science students: The use of analogies, extreme cases, and physical intuition. In J. F. Voss, D. N. Perkins, & S. J. W. (Eds.), Informal reasoning and education (pp. 345-362). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Collins, H. M., & Evans, R. (2002). The third wave of science studies. Social Studies of Science, 32, 235-296.
11. Collins, H., & Pinch, T. (1998). The Golem at large: What you should know about technology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
12. Epstein, S. (1995). The construction of lay expertise: AIDs activism and the forging of credibility in the reform of clinical trials. Science, Technology & Human Values, 20, 408-437.
13. Epstein, S. (1996). Impure science: AIDs, activism, and the politics of knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.
14. Galison, P (1997). Image & logic: A material culture of microphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. Gooding, D. (1990). Experiment and the making of meaning: Human agency in scientific observation and experiment. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
16. Gorman, M. E. (1997). Mind in the world: Cognition and practice in the invention of the telephone. Social Studies of Science, 27, 583-624.
17. Gorman, M. E. (2002a). Turning students into professionals: Types of knowledge and ABET engineering criteria. Journal of Engineering Education, 91, 339-344.
18. Gorman, M. E. (2002b). Types of knowledge and their roles in technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer, 27, 219-231.
19. Gorman, M. E., & Mehalik, M. M. (2002). Turning good into gold: A comparative study of two environmental invention Networks. Science, Technology & Human Values, 27, 499-529.
20. Graham, L. R. (1993). The ghost of the executed engineer: Technology and the fall of the Soviet Union. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. Green, A. J. K., & Gilhooly, K.J. (1992). Empirical advances in expertise research. In M. T. Keane & K. J. Gilhooly (Eds.), Advances in the psychology of thinking (Vol. I, pp. 45-70). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
22. Hughes, T. P (1998). Rescuing Prometheus. New York: Pantheon.
23. Ippolito, M. F., & Tweney, R. D. (1995). The inception of insight. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 433-462). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Jasanoff, S. (1992). Science, politics and the renegotiation of expertise at EPA. Osiris, 7, 195-217.
25. Johnson, M. (1993). Moral imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. Larkin, J. H., McDermott, J., Simon, D. R, & Simon, H. A. (1980, June 20). Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems. Science, 208, 1335-1342.
28. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29. Pamplin, B. R., & Collins, H. (1975). Spoon bending: An experimental approach. Nature, 257, 8.
30. Schunn, C. D., & Anderson, J. R. (2001). Acquiring expertise in science: Explorations of what, when and how. In K. Crowley, C. D. Schunn, & T. Okada (Eds.), Designing for science: Implications for everyday, classroom, and professional settings (pp. 83-114). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
31. Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
32. Sklar, F. H., Fitz, H. C., Wu, Y., Zee, R. V, & McVoy, C. (2001). The design of ecological landscape models for Everglades restoration. Ecological Economics, 37, 379-401.
33. South Florida Water Management District. (2002). 2002 Everglades Consolidated Report. West Palm Beach, FL: Author.
34. Tweney, R. D. (2001). Scientific thinking: A cognitive-historical approach. In K. Crowley, C. D. Schunn, & T. Okada (Eds.), Designing for science: Implications for everyday, classroom, and professional settings (pp. 141-173). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
35. Woolgar, S. (1987). Reconstructing man and machine: A note on sociological critiques of cognitivism. In W. E. Bjiker, T. Hughes, & T. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems (pp. 311-328). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.