Youth policy and institutional change

Beyond Resistance!: Youth Activism and Community Change: New Democratic Possibilities for Practice and Policy for America's Youth

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 301-318

  Males, Mike ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84909087149     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203961001     Document Type: Chapter

References (44)

1. Adams, K., (2003). Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science The effectiveness of juvenile curfews at crime prevention, 587, 136 -159.
2. Amnesty International. (2004). Execution of child offenders since 1990. Retrieved 8 February 2005, from http://web.amnesty.org/pages/deathpenalty-children-stats-eng.
3. Bishop, D., Frazier, C. Lanza-Kaduce, L. & Winner, L. (1996). Crime & Delinquency The transfer of juveniles to criminal court: Does it make a difference? 42, 171 -191.
4. Brunsma, B. L., & Rockquemore, K. A. (1998). The effects of student uniforms on attendance, behavior problems, substance use, and academic achievement Journal of Education Research 92, 53 -62.
5. California Criminal Justice Statistics Center. (1970-2003). Crime and delinquency in California [Annual reports]. With supplement, California Criminal Justice Profiles,1977-2003 [Annual reports]. Sacramento: California Department of Justice.
6. California Department of Corrections. (2004). Prisoners and Parolees 2002. Retrieved 4 December 2004, from http://www.corr.ca.gov/OffenderInfoServices/Reports/OffenderInformation.asp.
7. California Youth Authority. (1987-2003). Length of institutional stay for first-time parole releases for the Department of Corrections and Youth Authority [Annual reports]. Sacramento: California Youth Authority.
8. Center for Health Statistics. (1960-2003). Vital Statistics of California [Annual reports] and Birth Public Use File 2001-2002 [electronic data set]. Sacramento: California Department of Health Services.
9. Center for Health Statistics. (1965-2003). Vital Statistics of California [Annual reports] and Death Public Use File 2000-2002 [electronic data set]. Sacramento: California Department of Health Services.
10. Centers for Disease Control. (1990-2003). HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report [Annual reports]. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control.
11. Dee, T., & Evans, E. (2001). AEA Papers and Proceedings Behavioral policies and teen traffic safety. 91, 91 -96.
12. Demos, J. (1979). Images of the American family, then and now. In V. Tufte & B. Meyerhoff (Eds.), The changing American family (pp.43 -60)New Haven,CT: Yale University Press.
13. DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, 1989.
14. Drug Abuse Warning Network.(2002). Annual Emergency Department Data, and Annual Medical Examiner Data[Annual report]. Washington,DC: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
15. Drug Abuse Warning Network.(2000). Club Drugs: The DAWN Report. Washington,DC: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, U.S. Departmentof Health and Human Services..
16. Drug Abuse Warning Network.(2004). Club Drugs: The DAWN Report. Washington,DC: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services..
17. Federal Bureau of Investigation. (1970-2003). Uniform Crime Reports for the United States [Annual reports]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
18. Goode, E. (2005). Drugs in American society. New York: McGraw-Hill.
19. Hayes-Bautista, D. E., Schinck, W. O., & Chapa, J, (1988). The burden of support: Young Latinos in an aging society. Stanford,CA: Stanford University Press.
20. Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, 1988.
21. Hodgson v. Minnesota, 1990.
22. Ingraham v. Wright, 1977.
23. Johnston L. D., O'Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (1975-2004). Monitoring the Future [Annual reports]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Institute for Social Research.
24. Larner, M. B. (Ed.)(1999). When school is out [Special issue.] The Future of Children, 9(2). Retrieved 15 October 2004, from http://www.futureofchildren.org/pubs-info2825/pubs-info_show.htm?doc_id=71873..
25. Lopez, M. H. Kirby, E. Sagoff, J. (2005). The youth vote, 2004. The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement. Retrieved 12 June 2005, from http://www.civicyouth.org/PopUps/FactSheets/FS_Youth_Voting_72-04.pdf.
26. Lundman, Richard (2001). Prevention and control of juvenile delinquency (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
27. Males, M., (2000). Criminal Justice Policy Review Vernon, Connecticut's juvenile curfew: The circumstances of youths cited and effects on crime. 11, 254 -267.
28. Males, M. & Macallair, D. (1999). TAn analysis of curfew enforcement and juvenile crime in California. Western Criminology Review, 1(2). Retrieved 1 June 2002, from http://wcr.sonoma.edu/v1n2/males.html..
29. Mead, D. (1970). Culture and commitment: A study of the generation gap. New York: Doubleday.
30. Mead, M. (1978). Culture and commitment: The new relationships between the generations in the 1970s(Rev. ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.
31. National Association of Secretaries of State.(1999). Survey on youth attitudes: New millennium project. WashingtonDC: National Association of Secretaries of State.
32. National Center for Health Statistics. (1960-2003). Vital statistics of the United States, Part 1: Mortality [Annual reports], and U.S. Mortality Detail File [electronic data set]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
33. National Institute on Drug Abuse. (1975-2003). National household survey on drug abuse [Annual reports]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
34. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.(2000). Juvenile offenders and victims, 1999: National update. WashingtonDC: U.S. Department of Justice.
35. Public Agenda. (2000). Kids these days '99: What Americans really think about the next generation. Retrieved 1 August 2001, from http://www.publicagenda.org/specials/kids/kids.htm..
36. Reynolds, M., Seydlitz, R. & Jenkins, P. (2000). Justice Quarterly Do juvenile curfew laws work? A timeseries analysis of the New Orleans law 17, 205 -220.
37. Rigotti, N. A., DiFranza, J. R. Chang, Y. Tisdale, T. Kemp, B. & Singer, D. E (1997). New England Journal of Medicine, The effect of enforcing tobacco-sales laws on adolescents' access to tobacco and smoking behavior. 337, 1044 -1051.
38. Rothstein, R. (2004). Class and schools: Using social, economic, and educational reform to close the black-white achievement gap. New York: Economic Policy Institute,Columbia University Teachers College.
39. Sanford v. Kentucky, 1989.
40. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.(2000). National survey on drug use and health. WashingtonDC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
41. UNICEF. (2004). Convention on the Rights of a Child: Who Has Not Ratified, and Why Not?.Retrieved XXXX from http://www.unicef.org/crc/faq.htm#009.
42. U.S. Bureau of the Census.(2004). Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States, 2003. WashingtonDC: U.S. Department of Commerce..
43. Wenglinsky, H. Coley, R. & Barton, P. (1998). Order in the classroom: Violence, discipline, and student achievement. PrincetonNJ: Educational Testing Service Policy Information Center.
44. Yamaguchi, R. Johnston, L. O'Malley, P. (2004). CDrug testing in schools: Policies, practices, and association with student drug use. Ann Arbor,MI: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, 2003..