Introduction

Conflicts of Interest: Challenges and Solutions in Business, Law, Medicine, and Public Policy

Volumn 9780521844390, Issue , 2005, Pages 1-10

  Moore, Don A ^a   Loewenstein, George ^b   Cain, Daylian M ^a   Bazerman, Max H ^c  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84909080630     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511610332.001     Document Type: Editorial

References (10)

1. Antle, R. (1984). Auditor independence. Journal of Accounting Research, 22(1), 1–20.
2. Camerer, C. F., & Thaler, R. H. (1995). Ultimatums, dictators, and manners. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(2), 209–219.
3. Davis, M. (2001). Introduction. In M. Davis & A. Stark (Eds.), Conflict of interest in the professions, (pp. 3–19). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Güth, W. (1995).Onultimatum bargaining experiments–Apersonal view. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 27, 329–344.
5. Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B. (1982). An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3, 367–388.
6. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.
7. Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1986). Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Entitlements and the market. American Economic Review, 76(4), 728–741.
8. Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1987). Fairness and the assumptions of Economics. In R. M. Hogarth & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Rational choice: The contract between economics and psychology, (pp. 101–116). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
10. Scalia, A. (2004). Richard B. Cheney, Vice President of the United States, et al. v. United District Court for the District of Columbia et al., on petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (Vol. 03–475): Supreme Court of the United States. Downloaded September 3, 2004 from: http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/03pdf/03-475.pdf.