The culture of enterprise in neoliberalism: Specters of entrepreneurship

The Culture of Enterprise in Neoliberalism: Specters of Entrepreneurship

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 1-247

  Marttila, Tomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BAMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84909076894     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203094693     Document Type: Book

References (373)

1. Agamben, Giorgio, 2007: Infancy and History: On the Destruction of Experience. London: Verso.
2. Akerstrøm Andersen Niels, 2005: “Political Administration.” In Howarth, David (Ed.), Discourse Theory in European Politics: Identity, Policy and Governance. Basingstoke: Macmillan. Pp. 139–169.
3. Akerstrøm Andersen Niels, 2003: Discursive Analytical Strategies: Understanding Foucault, Kosellack, Laclau, Luhmann. Bristol: Policy Press.
4. Althusser, Louis, 1971: Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. London: NLB.
5. Alvesson, Mats and Sköldberg, Kaj, 2000: Refl exive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications.
6. Amin, Ash 1994: Post-Fordism: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.
7. Amin, Ash and Malmberg, Anders, 1994: “Competing Structural and Institutional Infl uences on the Geography of Production in Europe.” In Amin, Ash (Ed.), Post-Fordism: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell. Pp. 227–248.
8. Amin, Ash and Thrift, Nigel, 1994: “Holding Down the Global.” In Amin, Ash and Thrift, Nigel (Eds.), Globalisation, Institutions and Regional Development in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 257–260.
9. Amiran, Eyal, 2000: “After Dynamic Narratology.” In Style. Vol. 34, No. 2. Pp. 212–226.
10. Anderson, Jenny, 2005: “Kritik och Kunskapskamp: Ett Perspektiv på den Starka Statens Fall.” In Rothstein, Bo and Vahlne Westerhäll, Lotta (Eds.), Bortom den Starka Statens Politik? Stockholm: SNS Förlag. Pp. 24–41.
11. Andriessen, Daniel and Gubbins, Claire, 2009: “Metaphor Analysis as an Approach for Exploring Theoretical Concepts.” In Organization Studies. Vol. 30, No. 8. Pp. 845–863.
12. Angermüller, Johannes, 2007: “Was fordert die Hegemonietheorie? Zu den Möglichkeiten und Grenzen ihrer methodischen Umsetzung.” In Nonhoff, Martin (Ed.), Diskurs, Radikale Demokratie, Hegemonie. Zum Politischen Denken von Ernesto Laclau und Chantal Mouffe. Bielefeld: Transcript. Pp. 159–172.
13. Angermüller, Johannes, 2005: “Sozialwissenschaftliche Diskursanalyse in Deutschland. Zwischen Rekonstruktion und Dekonstruktion.” In Keller, Rainer—Hirseland, Andreas—Schneider, Werner—Viehöver, Willy (Eds.), Die Diskursive Konstruktion von Wirklichkeit. Zum Verhältnis von Wissenssoziologie und Diskursforschung. Konstanz: UVK Verlagsgesellschaft. Pp. 23–47.
14. Audretsch, David, 2000: “Entrepreneurship in Germany.” In Sexton, Donald L. and Landström, Hans (Eds.), The Blackwell Handbook of Entrepreneurship. Oxford: Blackwell. Pp. 107–127.
15. Bachelard, Gaston, 1988: Der neue wissenschaftliche Geist. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
16. Bachelard, Gaston, 1978b: Die Philosophie des Nein: Versuch einer Philosophie des neuen wissenschaftlichen Geistes. Wiesbaden: Heymann.
17. Bachelard, Gaston, 1978a: Die Bildung des wissenschaftlichen Geistes. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
18. Balibar, Etienne, 1994: Für Althusser. Mainz: Decaton.
19. Bauman, Zygmunt, 1991: Modernity and Ambivalence. Cambridge: Polity Press.
20. Baumol, William J., 1990: “Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive.” In The Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 98, No. 5. Pp. 893–921.
21. Baxandall, Phineas, 2004: Constructing Unemployment: The Politics of Joblessness in East and West. Ashgate: Aldershot.
22. Benner, Mats, 1997: The Politics of Growth- Economic Regulation in Sweden 1930–1994. Lund: Arkiv.
23. Berger, Peter and Luckmann, Thomas, 1991: The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Penguin Books.
24. Bergmark, Åke and Palme, Joakim, 2003: “Welfare and the Unemployment Crisis: Sweden in the 1990s.” In International Journal of Social Welfare. Vol. 12. Pp. 108–122.
25. Bernstein, Richard, J. 1983: Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics and Practice. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
26. Bertramsen, Rene—Frølund Thomsen, Jens Peter—Torfing Jacob, 1991: “From the Problems of Marxism to the Primacy of Politics.” In Bertramsen, Rene— Frølund Thomsen, Jens Peter—Torfi ng, Jacob (Eds.), State, Economy and Society. London: Unwin Hyman. Pp. 1–34.
27. Blomqvist, Paula and Rothstein, B, 2000: Välfärdsstatens Nya Ansikte. Stockholm: Agora.
28. Blum, Ulrich and Leibbrand, Frank (Eds.), 2001: Entrepreneurship und Unternehmertum. Denkstrukturen füreine neue Zeit. Wiesbaden: Dr. Th. Gobler.
29. Blyth, Mark, 2001: “The Transformation of the Swedish Model. Economic Ideas, Distributional Confl ict and Institutional Change.” In World Politics. Vol. 54. Pp. 1–26.
30. Bögenhold, Dieter and Schmidt, Dorothea, 1999: “Einleitung: Alte und neue Gründerzeiten.” In Bögenhold, Dieter andSchmidt, Dorothea (Eds.), Eine neue Gründerzeit? Die Wiederentdeckung kleiner Unternehmen in Theorie und Praxis. Gründungsforschung, Band 1. GtB Verlag Fakultas, Amsterdam. Pp. 1–6.
31. Boltanski, Luc and Chiapello, Éve, 1999: Der Neue Geist des Kapitalismus. Konstanz: UVK.
32. Boreham, Nick, 2006: “The Knowledge Economy, Work Process: Knowledge and the Learning Citizen—Central but Vulnerable.” In Kuhn, Michael—Tomassini Massimo—Simons, Robert -Jan, P. (Eds.), Towards a Knowledge Based Economy? Knowledge and Learning in European Educational Research. New York: Peter Lang. Pp. 129–147.
33. Boréus, Kristina, 1994: Högervåg: Nyliberalism och Kampen om Språket i Svensk Debatt 1969–1989. Stockholm: Tidens Förlag.
34. Bourdieu, Pierre, 2008: Science of Science and Refl exivity. Cambridge. Polity Press.
35. Bourdieu, Pierre and Wacquant, Loïc, 2006: Die Ziele der Reflexiven Sozioanalyse. In Bourdieu, Pierre andWacquant, Loïc (Eds.) (2006): Refl exive Anthropologie. Frankfurt am Main. Suhrkamp. Pp. 95–123.
36. Brenner, Neil, 1994: “Foucault’s New Functionalism.” In Theory and Society. Vol. 23. Pp. 679–709.
37. Bröckling, Ulrich, 2007a: Das Unternehmerische Selbst: Soziologie einer Subjektivierungs form. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
38. Bröckling, Ulrich, 2007b: “Regime der Selbst—Ein Forschungsprogramm.” In Bonacker, Thorsten and Reckwitz, Andreas (Eds.), Kulturen der Moderne: Soziologische Perspektiven der Gegenwart. Frankfurt: Campus. Pp. 119–139.
39. Bröckling, Ulrich, 2003: “Jeder könnte, aber nicht alle können.” In Mittelweg 36. Vol. 11, No. 4. Pp. 6–26.
40. Brown, Stephen, 2004: “Parasite Logic.” In Journal of Organizational Change Management. Vol. 17, No. 4. Pp. 383–395.
41. Bublitz, Hannelore, 2001: “Diff erenz und Integration. Zur diskursanalytischen Rekonstruktion der Regelstrukturen sozialer Wirklichkeit.” In Keller, Rainer— Hirseland, Andreas—Schneider, Werner—Viehöver, Willy (Eds.), Handbuch Sozialwissenschaftliche Diskursanalyse. Band I: Theorien und Methoden. Opladen: Leske + Budrich. Pp. 101–118.
42. Bührmann, Andrea D., 2005: “The Emerging of the Entrepreneurial Self and Its Current Hegemony. Some Basic Refl ections on How to Analyze the Formation and Transformation of Modern Forms of Subjectivity.” [49 Paragraphs]. In Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, Vol. 6, No. 1. Article 15. http://nbnresolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0501165.
43. Burchell, Graham, 1993: “Liberal Government and Techniques of the Self.” In Economy and Society, Vol. 22, No. 3. Pp. 267–282.
44. Casson, Mark, 2006: “Introduction.” In Casson, Mark—Yeung, Bernhard—Basu, Anuradha—Wadeson, Nigel (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Entrepreneurship. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 1–30.
45. Casson, Mark (Ed.), 1990: Entrepreneurship. Aldershot: Elgar.
46. Casson, Mark, 1982: The Entrepreneur. Oxford: Martin Robertson.
47. Clarke, John, 2004: Changing Welfare, Changing States: New Directions in Social Policy. London: Sage.
48. Considine, Mark, 2001: Enterprising States: The Public Management of Welfare and Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49. Cornelissen, Joep P., 2004: “What Are We Playing at? Theatre, Organization, and the Use of Metaphor.” In Organization Studies. Vol. 25, No. 5. Pp. 705–726.
50. Coser, Lewis A., 1994: “The Sociology of poverty.” In Frisby, David (Ed.), Georg Simmel: Critical Assessments. Volume 3. London and New York: Routledge. Pp. 140–148.
51. Cox, Henry Robert, 2001: “The Construction of an Imperative: Why Welfare Reform Happened in Denmark and the Netherlands but Not in Germany.” World Politics. Vol. 53, No. 3. Pp. 463–498.
52. Critchley, Simon, 1999: Ethics, Politics, Subjectivity: Essays on Derrida, Levinas and Contemporary French Thought. New York: Verso.
53. Critchley, Simon and Marchart, Oliver 2004: Laclau: A Critical Reader. New York: Routledge. Pp. 241–255.
54. Cruikshank, Barbara, 1996: “Revolutions Within: Self-Government and Self- Esteem.” In Barry, Andrew—Osborne, Thomas—Rose, Nikolas (Eds.), Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-liberalism and Rationalities of Government. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Pp. 231–251.
55. Culler, Jonathan, 1986: Ferdinand de Saussure. Revised Edition. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
56. Currie, Mark, 1998: Postmodern Narrative Theory. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
57. De, Dennis, 2000: “SME Policy in Europe.” In Sexton, Donald L. and Landström, Hans (Eds.), The Blackwell Handbook of Entrepreneurship. Oxford: Blackwell. Pp. 87–106.
58. Dean, Mitchell, 1999: Governmentality. Power and Rule in Modern Society. London: Sage Publications.
59. Dean, Mitchell, 1996: “Foucault, Government and the Enfolding of Authority.” In Barry, Andrew—Osborne, Thomas—Rose, Nikolas (Eds.), Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-liberalism and Rationalities of Government. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Pp. 209–229.
60. Deeks, John, 1993: Business and the Culture of the Enterprise Culture. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
61. Deleuze, Gilles and Guattari, Félix, 2003: What Is Philosophy? London: Verso.
62. Deleuze, Gilles, 1999: Foucault. London: Continuum.
63. Deleuze, Gilles, 1988: Spinoza: Praktische Philosophie. Berlin: Merve-Verlag.
64. Della-Giusta, Marina and King, Zella, 2006: “Enterprise Culture.” In Casson, Mark—Yeung, Bernhard—Basu, Anuradha—Wadeson, Nigel (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Entrepreneurship. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 629–647.
65. Derrida, Jacques, 2004: Dissemination. New York and London: Continuum.
66. Derrida, Jacques, 1999: “Justice, Law and Philosophy—an Interview with Jacques Derrida.” In South African Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 18, No. 3. Pp. 279–286.
67. Derrida, Jacques, 1997: Of Grammatology. Baltimore and London: John Hopkins University Press.
68. Derrida, Jacques, 1994: Spectres of Marx: the State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning, and the New International. New York: Routledge.
69. Derrida, Jacques, 1982: “Diff érance.” In Derrida, Jacques, Margins of Philosophy. Brighton: Harvester Press. Pp. 1–29.
70. Derrida, Jacques, 1981a: Positions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
71. Derrida, Jacques, 1981b: “Semiology and Grammatology: Interview with Julia Kristeva.” In Derrida, Jacques, Positions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Pp. 15–36.
72. Derrida, Jacques, 1981c: Writing and Diff erence. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
73. Derrida, Jacques, 1979: “Scribble (Writing-Power).” In Yale French Studies. No. 58. Pp 117–147.
74. Derrida, Jacques, 1977: “Signature Event Context.” In Derrida, Jacques, Limited Inc. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. Pp. 1–23.
75. Deutschmann, Christoph, 2008: Kapitalistische Dynamik: Eine Gesellschaftstheoretische Perspektive. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.
76. Diaz-Bone, Rainer, 2007: “Die französische Epistemologie und ihre Revisionen. Zur Rekonstruktion des methodologischen Standortes der Foucaultschen Diskursanalyse.” [65 Paragraphs]. In Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung. Vol. 8, No. 2. Article 6. http://nbnresolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0702241.
77. Diaz-Bone, Rainer, 2006a: “Die interpretative Analytik als methodologische Position.” In Kerchner, Brigitte and Schneider, Silke (Eds.), Foucault: Diskursanalyse der Politik. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Pp. 68–84.
78. Diaz-Bone, Rainer, 2006b: “Zur Methodologisierung der Foucaultschen Diskursanalyse.” In Historical Social Research. Vol. 31, No. 2. Pp. 243–274.
79. Diaz-Bone, Rainer, 2005: “Die ‘Interpretative Analytik’ als rekonstruktivmethodologische Methodologie. Bemerkungen zur Eigenlogik und strukturalistischen Öff nung der Foucaultschen Diskursanalyse.” In Keller, Rainer—Hirseland, Andreas—Schneider, Werner—Viehöver, Willy (Eds.), Die Diskursive Konstruktion von Wirklichkeit. Zum Verhältnis von Wissenssoziologie und Diskursforschung. Konstanz: UVK Verlagsgesellschaft. Pp. 179–197.
80. Diaz-Bone, Rainer, 2002: Kulturwelt, Diskurs und Lebensstil: Eine Diskurstheoretische Erweiterung der Bourdieuschen Distinktionstheorie. Opladen: Leske+Budrich.
81. Dosse, Francois, 1999: Geschichte des Strukturalismus. Band 1: Das Feld des Zeichens. Hamburg: Junius.
82. Drake, Keith, 1997: “Industrial Competitiveness in the Knowledge-Based-Economy: The New Role of Government.” In OECD (Ed.), Industrial Competitiveness in the Knowledge-Based-Economy. Paris: OECD. Pp. 17–52.
83. Dreyfus Hubert, L. and Rabinow Paul, 1982: Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
84. Dugay, Paul, 1996: Consumption and Identity at Work. London: Sage.
85. Dugay, Paul, 1991: “Enterprise Culture and the Ideology of Excellence.” In New Formations. Vol. 13. Pp. 45–61.
86. Dumézil, Georges, 1989: “Der Götterbote: Interview mit Francois Ewald.” In Ewald, Francois (Ed.), Pariser Gespräche. Berlin: Merve. Pp. 61–82.
87. Dyrberg, Torben Bech, 2004: “The Political and Politics in Discourse Analysis.” In Critchley, Simon and Marchart, Oliver (Eds.), Laclau: A Critical Reader. New York: Routledge. Pp. 241–255.
88. Dyrberg, Torben Bech, 1998: “Diskursanalyse als postmoderne politische Theorie.” In Marchart, Olivier (Ed.), Das undarstellbare der Politik: Zur Hegemonietheorie Ernesto Laclaus. Wien: Turia+ Kant. Pp. 23–51.
89. Dyrberg, Torben Bech, 1997: The Circular Structure of Power: Politics, Identity, Community. London: Verso.
90. Edelman, Murray, 1971: Politics as Symbolic Action. Chicago: Markham.
91. Elander, Ingemar, 1999: “Partnerskap och Demokrati—Omaka par i Nätverkspolitikens Tid?” In Globalisering. Bidrag till Demokratiutredningens Forskarvolym IX. SOU 1999: 83. Stockholm: Fritzes. Pp. 327–364.
92. Elliott, John E., 1980: “Marx and Schumpeter on Capitalism’s Creative Destruction: A Comparative Restatement.” In The Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 95, No. 1. Pp. 45–68.
93. European Commission, 2003: Green Paper: Entrepreneurship in Europe. Brussels: Offi ce for Offi cial Publications of the European Communities.
94. European Commission, 1995: Teaching and learning—Towards the Learning Society. Brussels: White Paper. Offi ce for Offi cial Publications of the European Communities.
95. Fairclough, Norman, 1992: Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
96. Farrell, Larry C., 2001: The Entrepreneurial Age: Awakening of the Spirit of Enterprise in People, Companies, and Countries. New York: Allworth Press.
97. Finlayson, Alan, 2004: “Political Science, Political Ideas and Rhetoric.” In Economy and Society. Vol. 33, No.4. Pp. 528–549.
98. Florida, Richard, 2002: The Rise of the Creative Class. New York: Basic Books.
99. Flynn, Thomas R., 2004: “Foucault as Philosopher of the Historical Event.” In Rölli, Marc (Ed.), Ereignis auf Französisch: Von Bergson bis Deleuze. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag. Pp. 209–234.
100. Foucault, Michel, 2007: Security, Territory, Population. Lecture at the Collège de France 1978/79. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
101. Foucault, Michel, 2006: Geburt der Biopolitik: Geschichte der Gouvernementalität II. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
102. Foucault, Michel, 2005: Analytik der Macht. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
103. Foucault, Michel, 2004: “Die Ethik der Sorge um sich als Praxis der Freiheit.” In Defert, Daniel (Ed.), Schriften in vier Bänden. Vol. 4. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Pp. 875–902.
104. Foucault, Michel, 2002a: The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Routledge.
105. Foucault, Michel, 2002b: “The Subject of Power.” In Faubion, James D. (Ed.), Power. London: Penguin Books. Pp. 326–348.
106. Foucault, Michel, 1998: The Will to Knowledge. The History of Sexuality, Vol. 1. London: Penguin Books.
107. Foucault, Michel, 1994a: “Die Wahrheit und die juristischen Formen.” In Defert, Daniel (Ed.), Schriften in Vier Bänden. Vol. 4. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Pp. 669–792.
108. Foucault, Michel, 1994b: “Nietzsche, Freud, Marx.” In Defert, Daniel (Ed.), Schriften in vier Bänden. Vol. 1. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Pp. 727–743.
109. Foucault, Michel, 1994c: Überwachen und Strafen: Die Geburt des Gefängnisses. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
110. Foucault, Michel, 1991a: “Governmentality.” In Burchell, Graham—Gordon, Colin—Miller, Peter (Eds.), Foucault Eff ect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Pp. 87–118.
111. Foucault, Michel, 1991b: “Politics and the Study of Discourse.” In Burchell, Graham— Gordon, Colin—Miller, Peter (Eds.), The Foucault Effect. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Pp. 53–72.
112. Foucault, Michel, 1989: Der Gebrauch der Lüste: Sexualität und Wahrheit. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
113. Foucault, Michel, 1988: “Technologies of the Self.” In Luther, Martin H.—Gutman, Huck—Hutton, Patrick H. (Eds.), Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press. Pp. 16–49.
114. Foucault, Michel, 1984a: “Truth and Power.” In Rabinow, Paul (Ed.), The Foucault Reader. London: Penguin Books. Pp. 51–75.
115. Foucault, Michel, 1984b: “What Is Enlightenment?.” In Rabinow, Paul (Ed.), The Foucault Reader. London: Penguin Books. Pp. 32–50.
116. Foucault, Michel, 1981: “The Order of Discourse.” In Young, Robert (Ed.), Untying the Text: A Post-Structuralist Reader. London and Boston: Routledge and Kegan. Pp. 48–78.
117. Foucault, Michel, 1980a: “Language to Infi nity.” In Bouchard, Donald F. (Ed.), Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews by Michel Foucault. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Pp. 53–68.
118. Foucault, Michel, 1980b: “Preface to Transgression.” In Bouchard, Donald F. (Ed.), Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews by Michel Foucault. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Pp. 29–52.
119. Foucault, Michel, 1977: “Nietzsche, Genealogy and History.” In Bouchard, Donald F. (Ed.), Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews by Michel Foucault. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Pp. 139–164.
120. Foucault, Michel, 1970: The Order of Things: Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Pantheon Books.
121. Freeden, Michael, 1996: Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
122. Freeden, Michael, 1994: “Political Concepts and Ideological Morphology.” In Journal of Political Philosophy. Vol. 2, No. 2. Pp. 140–164.
123. Frick, Siegfried, 1999: “‘Kulturen der Selbständigkeit’ in Deutschland? Zur theoretischen und empirischen Fundierung eines aktuellen Begriff s der Wirtschaftspolitik.” In Bögenhold, Dieter and Schmidt, Dorothea (Eds.), Eine neue Gründerzeit? Die Wiederentdeckung kleiner Unternehmen in Theorie und Praxis. Gründungsforschung, Band 1. Amsterdam: GtB Verlag Fakultas. Pp. 7–41.
124. Fuchs, Stephan, 2001: Against Essentialism: A Theory of Society and Culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
125. Garsten, Christina and Jacobsson, Kerstin (Eds.), 2004: Learning to be Employable. New Agendas on Work, Responsibility and Learning in a Globalizing World. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
126. Gehring, Petra, 2004: “Sind Foucaults Widerstandspunkte Ereignisse oder sind sie es nicht?” In Rölli, Marc (Ed.), Ereignis auf Französisch: Von Bergson bis Deleuze. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag. Pp. 275–284.
127. Gemünden, Hans Georg and Konrad, Elmar D., 2005: “Unternehmerisches Verhalten: Eine kritische Würdigung und Bestandaufnahme verschiedener Erklärungsansätze.” In Gemünden, Hans, Georg—Salomo, Sören—Müller, Thilo (Eds.), Entrepreneurial Excellence: Unternehmertum, unternehmerische Kompetenz und Wachstum junger Unternehmen. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts- Verlag. Pp. 1–38.
128. Gibson, Andrew, 1996: Towards a Postmodern Theory of Language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
129. Glasze, Georg, 2007: “Vorschläge zur Operationalisierung der Diskustheorie von Laclau und Mouff e in einer Triangulation von lexikometrischen und interpretativen Methoden.” [73 Paragraphs]. In Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, Vol. 8, No. 2, Article 14. http://nbnresolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0702143.
130. Glynos, Jason and Howarth, David, 2008: “Critical Explanation in Social Science: A Logics Approach.” In Swiss Journal of Sociology, Vol. 54, No. 1. Pp. 5–35.
131. Glynos, Jason and Howarth, David, 2007: Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. London and New York: Routledge.
132. Glynos, Jason, 2001: “The Grip of Ideology: a Lacanian Approach to the Theory of Ideology.” In Journal of Political Ideologies. Vol. 6, No. 2. Pp. 191–214.
133. Glynos, Jason, 2000: “Sexual Identity, Identifi cation and Diff erence: A Psychoanalytic Contribution to Discourse Theory.” In Philosophy & Social Criticism. Vol. 6, No. 6. Pp. 85–108.
134. Gordon, Colin, 1991: “Governmental Rationality: An Introduction.” In Burchell, Graham—Gordon, Colin—Miller, Peter (Eds.), The Foucault Eff ect. Studies in Governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Pp. 1–51.
135. Gramsci, Antonio, 1971: Selection of Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
136. Gray, John, 2000: “Inclusion: A Radical Critique.” In Askonas, Peter and Stewart, Angis (Eds.), Social Inclusion: Possibilities and Tensions. London: Macmillan Press. Pp. 52–80.
137. Greene, Francis J.—Mole, Kevin F.—Storey, David J., 2008: Three Decades of Enterprise Culture: Entrepreneurship, Economic Regeneration and Public Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
138. Greimas, Algirdas Julien, 1990: The Social Sciences: A Semiotic View. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
139. Greimas, Algirdas Julien, 1987: On Meaning: Selected Writings in Semiotic Theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
140. Greimas, Algirdas Julien, 1971: Strukturale Semantik. Methodologische Untersuchungen Braunschweig: Vieweg.
141. Griggs, Stephen and Howarth, David, 2002: “An Alliance of Interest and Identity: Explaining the Campaign against Manchester Airport’s Second Runway.” In Mobilization. Vol. 7, No. 1. Pp. 43–58.
142. Grit, Kor, 1997: “The Rise of the Entrepreneurial University: A Heritage of the Enlightenment?” In Science Studies. Vol, 10, No. 2. Pp. 3–22.
143. Grossberg, Lawrence, 2007: “Leben und Zeit der Kultur.” In Winter, Rainer (Ed.), Die Perspektiven der Cultural Studies: Der Lawrence-Grossberg-Reader. Köln: Herbert von Halem Verlag. Pp. 13–33.
144. Grossberg, Lawrence, 2006: “Does Cultural Studies Have Futures? Should It? (or What’s the Matter with New York?).” In Cultural Studies. Vol. 20, No. 1. Pp. 1–32.
145. Grossberg, Lawrence-Wartella, Ellen-Whitney, Charles D., 1998: Media Making: Mass Media in a Popular Culture. London: Sage.
146. Gülich, Elisabeth and Quasthoff Uta M., 1985: “Narrative Analysis.” In van Dijk, Teun A. (Ed.), Handbook of Discourse Analysis: Vol 2, Dimensions of Discourse. London: Academic Press. Pp. 169–198.
147. Hajer, Maarten A., 2003: “A Frame in the Fields: Policymaking and the Reinvention of Politics.” In Hajer, Maarten A. and Wegener, Hendrik (Eds.), Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 88–110.
148. Hajer, Maarten A., 1995: The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
149. Hall, Peter A., 1993: “Policy Paradigms, Social Learning and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain.” In Comparative Politics. Vol. 25, No. 3. Pp. 275–296.
150. Harrison, Bennett, 1994: “The Myth of Small Firms as the Predominant Job Generators.” In Economic Development Quarterly. Vol. 8, No. 1. Pp. 3–18.
151. Harvey, David, 1989: “From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism: The Transformation in Urban Governance in Late Capitalism.” In Geografi ska Annaler; Series B: Human Geography. Vol. 71, No. 1. Pp. 3–17.
152. Harvey, David, 1987: “Flexible Accumulation through Urbanization: Refl ections on Post-modernism in the American City.” In Antipode. Vol. 19. Pp. 260–286.
153. Hay, Colin and Smith, Nicola, 2005: “Horses for Courses? The Political Discourse of Globalisation and European Integration in the UK and Ireland.” In West European Politics. Vol. 28, No. 1. Pp. 124–158.
154. Hay, Colin, 2002: Political Analysis: A Critical Introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
155. Hayles, Katherine, 1995: “Searching for Common Ground.” In Soule, Michael E. and Lease, Gary (Eds.), Reinventing Nature? Responses to Postmodern Deconstruction. Washington, DC: Island Press. Pp. 47–64.
156. Heelas, Paul and Morris, Paul, 1992: “Enterprise Culture: Its Values and Value.” In Heelas, Paul and Morris, Paul (Eds.), The Values of the Enterprise Culture. The Moral Debate. London: Routledge. Pp. 1–26.
157. Heidegger, Martin, 2008: Basic Writings. London: Routledge and Kegan.
158. Henrekson, Magnus and Roine, Jesper, 2007: “Promoting Entrepreneurship in the Welfare State.” In Audretsch, David—Grilo, Isabel—Thurik, Roy A. (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship Policy. Cheltenham: Edvard Elgar. Pp. 64–93.
159. Henrekson, Magnus, 2005: “Entrepreneurship: A Weak Link in the Welfare State?” In Industrial and Corporate Change. Vol. 14, No. 3. Pp. 437–467.
160. Henrekson, Magnus, 1999: “Drivkrafter för Entreprenörskap, Nyföretagande och Företagstillväxt.” In Calmfors, Lars and Persson, Mats (Eds.), Tillväxt och Ekonomisk Politik. Lund: Studentlitteratur. Pp. 373–400.
161. Henton, Douglas-Walesh, Kim-Melville John, 1997: Grassroot Leaders for New Economy: How Civic Entrepreneurs Are Building Prosperous Communities. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
162. Hetzel, Andreas, 2001: Zwischen Poiesis und Praxis. Elemente einer kritischen Theorie der Kultur. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.
163. Hjelm, Michael, 2004: “Immigrant Entrepreneurship in the Swedish Welfare State.” In Sociology. Vol. 38, No. 4. Pp. 739–756.
164. Hjorth, Daniel-Jones, Campbell-Gartner William B., 2008: “Recreating/ Recontextualising Entrepreneurship.” In Scandinavian Journal of Management. Vol. 21. Pp. 81–84.
165. Hodenius, Birgit, 1997: “Neue Leitbilder; alte Tugenden oder: Wie aus dem Unternehmer ein Gründer wurde.” In Thomas, Michael (Ed.), Selbständige- Gründer- Unternehmer. Berlin: Berliner Debatte Wissenschaftsverlag. Pp. 122–138.
166. Howarth, David, 2005: “Applying Discourse Theory: The Method of Articulation.” In Howarth, David and Torfi ng, Jacob (Eds.), Discourse Theory in European Politics: Identity, Policy and Governance. Basingstoke: MacMillan. Pp. 316–349.
167. Howarth, David, 2004: “Hegemony, Political Subjectivity, and Radical Democracy.” In Critchley, Simon and Marchart, Oliver (Eds.), Laclau: A Critical Reader. New York: Routledge. Pp. 256–276.
168. Howarth, David, 2002: “An Archaeology of Political Discourse? Michel Foucault and the Critique of Ideology.” In Political Studies. Vol. 50, No. 1. Pp. 117–135.
169. Howarth, David and Stavrakakis, Yannis, 2000: “Introducing Disocurse Theory and Political Analysis.” In Howarth, David—Norval, Aletta—Stavrakakis, Yannis (Eds.), Discourse Theory and Political Analysis: Identities, Hegemonies and Social Change. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Pp. 1–23.
170. Hutter, Michael and Teubner, Günther, 1994: “Der Gesellschaft fette Beute. Homo Juridicus und Homo Oeconomicus als kommunikationserhaltende Fiktionen.” In Fuchs, Peter and Göbel, Andreas (Eds.), Der Mensch—Das Medium der Gesellschaft? Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Pp. 110–145.
171. Jacobsson, Kerstin, 1999: “Den Off entliga Demokratisynen.” In SOU 1999: 77: Demokrati och Medborgarskap. Stockholm: Fakta Info. Pp. 161–223.
172. Jäger, Siegfried, 1993: “Text- und Diskursanalyse: Eine Einleitung zur Analyse politischer Texte.” In Diss-Texte. No. 16. Duisburg: D.I.S.S.
173. Jakobson, Roman, 1990: On Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
174. Jameson, Fredric, 1990: Signatures of the Visible. New York: Routledge.
175. Jessop, Bob, 2008: “A Cultural Political Economy of Competitiveness and Its Implications for Higher Education.” In Jessop, Bob—Fairclough, Norman— Wodak, Ruth (Eds.), Education and the Knowledge-Based Economy in Europe. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. Pp. 13–40.
176. Jessop, Bob, 2006: “From Micro-Powers to Governmentality: Foucault’s Work on Statehood, State Formation, Statecraft and State Power.” In Political Geography. Vol. 26, No.1. Pp. 34–40.
177. Jessop, Bob and Sum, Ngai-Ling, 2006: Beyond the Regulation Approach: Putting Capitalist Economies in their Place. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
178. Jessop, Bob, 2004: “Critical Semiotic Analysis and Cultural Political Economy.” In Critical Discourse Analysis. Vol. 1, No. 1. Pp. 1–16.
179. Jessop, Bob, 2002: The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
180. Jessop, Bob, 2000: “The Changing Governance of Welfare: Recent Trends in Its Primary Functions, Scale, and Modes of Coordination.” In Social Policy and Administration. Vol. 33, December. Pp. 348–359.
181. Jessop, Bob and Peck, Jamie, 1998: “Fast Policy/Local discipline: The Politics of Scale and the Neo-liberal Workfare Off ensive.” Paper presented at the conference of the association of American geographers. Boston. March 25–29.
182. Jessop, Bob, 1994: “Post-Fordism and the State.” In Amin, Ash (Ed.), Post-Fordism: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell. Pp. 251–279.
183. Jessop, Bob, 1993: “The Transition to Post-Fordism and the Schumpeterian Workfare State.” In Burrows, Roger and Loader, Brian (Eds.), Towards a Post-Fordist Welfare State. London: Routledge. Pp. 13–37.
184. Johannisson, Bengt, 2003: “Entrepreneurship as a Collective Phenomenon.” Unpublished Working Paper. SIRE, Växjö University.
185. Johannisson, Bengt and Lindmark, Leif, 1996: “Det Mångfasetterade Småföretagandet.” In Johannisson, Bengt and Lindmark, Leif (Eds.), Företag, Företagare, Företagsamhet. Stiftelsen för Småföretagsforskning. Lund: Studentlitteratur. Pp. 11–23.
186. Johansson, Anders L. and Magnusson, Lars, 1998: LO- Det Andra Halvseklet. Fackföreningsrörelsen och Samhället. Stockholm: Atlas.
187. Jones, Campbell and Spicer, André, 2009: Unmasking the Entrepreneur. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
188. Jones, Campbell and Spicer, André 2005: “The Sublime Object of Entrepreneurship.” In Organization. Vol.12, No. 2. Pp. 223–246.
189. Joseph, Jonathan, 2001: “Derrida’s Spectres of Ideology”. In Journal of Political Ideologies. Vol.6, No. 1. Pp. 95–115.
190. Keller, Rainer, 2008: Wissensoziologische Diskursanalyse: Grundlegung eines Forschungsprogramms. 2nd edition. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
191. Keller, Rainer, 2001: “Wissenssoziologische Diskursanalyse.” In Keller, Rainer— Hirseland, Andreas—Schneider, Werner—Viehöver, Willy (Eds.), Handbuch sozialwissenschaftliche Diskursanalyse. Band I: Theorien und Methoden. Opladen: Leske + Budrich. Pp. 113–143.
192. Kirzner, Israel M., 1973: Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
193. Knudsen, Sven-Eric, 2006: Luhmann und Husserl: Systemtheorie im Verhältnis zur Phänomenologie. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.
194. Kooiman, Jan, 2003: Governing as Governance. London: Sage.
195. Lacan, Jacques, 1991: Encore. Das Seminar Buch 20. Weinheim and Berlin: Quadriga.
196. Lacan, Jacques, 1977: Ecrits. A Selection. London: Tavistock Publications.
197. Lacan, Jacques, 1976: The Language of the Self. The Function of Language in Psychoanalysis. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
198. Laclau, Ernesto, 2006: “Why Constructing of People Is the Main Task of Radical Politics.” In Critical Inquiry. Summer. Pp. 646–680.
199. Laclau, Ernesto, 2005a: “Populism: What Is in a Name.” In Panizza, Francisco (Ed.), Populism and the Mirror of Democracy. London: Verso. Pp. 32–49.
200. Laclau, Ernesto, 2005b: On Populist Reason. London and New York. Verso.
201. Laclau, Ernesto, 2004: “Glimpsing the Future.” In Critchley, Simon and Marchart, Oliver (Eds.), Laclau: A Critical Reader. New York: Routledge. Pp. 279–328.
202. Laclau, Ernesto and Mouffe, Chantal, 2001: Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso.
203. Laclau, Ernesto, 2000a: “Identity and Hegemony: The Role of Universality in the Constitution of Political Logics.” In Butler, Judith—Laclau, Ernesto—Žižek, Slavoj (Eds.), Contingency, Hegemony, Universality. Contemporary Dialogues on the Left. London and New York: Verso. Pp. 44–89.
204. Laclau, Ernesto, 2000b: “The Politics of Rhetoric.” In Cohen, Tom—Cohen, Barbara— Miller, Hillis J.,—Warminski, Andrzej (Eds.), Material Events. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press. Pp. 229–263.
205. Laclau, Ernesto, 2000c: “Structure, History and the Political.” In Butler, Judith— Laclau, Ernesto—Žižek, Slavoj (Eds.), Contingency, Hegemony, Universality. Contemporary Dialogues on the Left. London and New York: Verso. Pp. 182–212.
206. Laclau, Ernesto and Bhaskar, Roy, 1998: “Discourse Theory vs. Critical Realism.” In Alethia. Vol. 1, No. 2. Pp. 9–14.
207. Laclau, Ernesto, 1996a: “Deconstruction, Pragmatism, Hegemony.” In Mouff e, Chantal (Ed.), Deconstruction and Pragmatism. Routledge. New York. Pp. 47–67.
208. Laclau, Ernesto, 1996b: Emancipation(s). London: Verso.
209. Laclau, Ernesto and Zac, Lilian, 1994: “Minding the Gap: The Subject of Politics.” In Laclau, Ernesto (Ed.), The Making of Political Identities. London: Verso. Pp. 11–39.
210. Laclau, Ernesto, 1993: “Discourse.” In Goodin, Robert E. and Petit, Philip (Eds.), Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Pp. 431–438.
211. Laclau, Ernesto, 1990a: “The Impossibility of the Society.” In Laclau, Ernesto (Ed.), New Refl ections of the Revolution of our Time. London: Verso. Pp. 89–92.
212. Laclau, Ernesto, 1990b: New Refl ections of the Revolution of our Time. London: Verso.
213. Laclau, Ernesto and Mouffe, Chantal, 1990: “Post-Marxism without Apologies.” In Laclau, Ernesto (Ed.), New Refl ections of the Revolution of Our Time. London: Verso. Pp. 97–132.
214. Laclau, Ernesto, 1980: “Populist Rupture and Discourse.” In Screen Education. Vol. 34, No. 34. Pp. 87–93.
215. Latour, Bruno, 1986: “The Powers of Association.” In Law, John (Ed.), Power, Action, and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? London: Routledge and Paul Kegan. Pp. 264–280.
216. Lavoie, Dan and Chamlee-Wright, Emily, 2000: Culture and Enterprise: The Development, Representation and Morality of Business. London and New York: Routledge.
217. Law, John, 2004: After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. New York: Routledge.
218. Lawlor, Leonard, 1982: “Temporality and Spatiality: A Note to a Footnote in Jacques Derrida’s ‘Writing and Diff erence’.” In Research in Phenomenology. Vol. 12. Pp. 149–165.
219. Lee, Jonathan Scott, 1990: Jacques Lacan. Boston: Twayne Publishers.
220. Lefort, Claude and Gauchet, Marcel, 1990: “Über die Demokratie: Das Politische und die Instituierung des Gesellschaftlichen.” In Rödel, Ulrich (Ed.), Autonome Gesellschaft und Libertäre Demokratie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Pp. 89–122.
221. Lefort, Claude, 1988: Democracy and Political Theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
222. Lefort, Claude, 1986: The Political Forms of Modern Society. Bureaucracy, Democracy, Totalitarianism. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
223. Lemke, Thomas, 2000: “Neoliberalismus, Staat und Selbsttechnologien. Ein kritischer Überblick über die Governmentality Studies.” In Politische Vierteljahresschrift. Vol. 41, No. 1. Pp. 31–47.
224. Lessenich, Stephan, 2003a: “Der Arme in Aktivgesellschaft: Zum sozialen Sinn des Förderns und Forderns.” In WSI-Mitteilungen. Vol. 56, No. 4. Pp. 214–220.
225. Lessenich, Stephan, 2003b: “Einleitung: Wohlfahrtstaatliche Grundbegriff e— Semantiken des Wohlfahrtsstaates.” In Lessenich, Stephan (Ed.), Wohlfahrtsstaatliche Grundbegriff e—historische und aktuelle Diskurse. Frankfurt: Campus-Verlag. Pp. 9–22.
226. Lessenich, Stephan, 2003c: “Soziale Subjektivität: Die Neue Regierung der Gesellschaft.” In Mittelweg. Vol. 36, No. 4. Pp. 80–93.
227. Lindvall, Johannes, 2006: “The Politics of Purpose.” In Comparative Politics. Vol. 38, No. 2. Pp. 253–272.
228. Lindvall Johannes, 2005: “Den Starka Statens Ekonomiska Politik.” In Rothstein, Bo and Vahlne-Westerhäll, Lena (Eds.), Bortom Den Starka Statens Politik. Stockholm: SNS förlag. Pp. 111–133.
229. Link, Jürgen, 2005: “Warum Diskurse nicht von personalen Subjekten ‘ausgehandelt’ werden. Von der Diskurs—zur Interdiskurstheorie.” In Keller, Rainer— Hirseland, Andreas—Schneider, Werner—Viehöver, Willy (Eds.), Die diskursive Konstruktion von Wirklichkeit. Zum Verhältnis von Wissenssoziologie und Diskursforschung. Konstanz: UVK Verlagsgesellschaft. Pp. 77–99.
230. Link, Jürgen, 1997: Versuch über den Normalismus. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
231. Link, Jürgen, 1988: “Literaturanalyse als Interdiskursanalyse.” In Horhmann, Jürgen and Müller, Harro (Eds.), Diskurstheorien und Literaturwissenschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Pp. 284–307.
232. Link, Jürgen, 1984: “Über ein Modell synchroner Systeme von Kollektivsymbolen sowie seine Rolle bei der Diskurskonstitution.” In Link, Jürgen and Wülfi ng, Wulf (Eds.), Bewegung und Stillstand in Metaphern und Mythen. Fallstudien zum Verhältnis von elementarem Wissen und Literatur im 19. Jahrhundert. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta. Pp. 63–91.
233. Luhmann, Niklas, 1997: Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
234. Luhmann, Niklas, 1993: “Deconstruction as Second-Order Observing.” In New Literary History. Vol. 24, No. 4. Pp. 763–782.
235. Luhmann, Niklas, 1988: “Wie ist das Bewusstsein an Kommunikation beteiligt?” In Gumbrecht, Hans Ulrich and Pfeiff er, Ludwig K. (Eds.), Materialität der Kommunikation. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Pp. 884–908.
236. Luhmann, Niklas, 1984: Social Systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
237. Lundell, Elin (Ed.), 1998: Det Ekonomiska Läget: Näringspolitikens Möjligheter. Stockholm: Industriförbundet.
238. Lundquist, Lennart, 2001: Medborgardemokratin och Eliterna. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
239. Lundquist, Torbjörn, 2005: “Konkurrenspolitiken och den Svenska Modellen.” In Rothstein, Bo and Vahlne-Westerhäll, Lena (Eds.), Bortom den Starka Statens Politik. Stockholm: SNS förlag.
240. Lyotard, Jean-François, 1986: Das Postmoderne Wissen. Vienna: Edition Passagen.
241. Mahieu, Ron, 2006: Agents of Change and Policies of Scale. A Policy Study of Entrepreneurship and Enterprise in Education. Department of Teacher Training in Swedish and Social Sciences, Umeå University.
242. Majone, Giandomenico, 1989: Evidence, Argument, and Persuasion in the Policy Process. New Haven: Yale University Press.
243. Marchart, Oliver, 2010: Die Politische Diff erenz: Zum Denken des Politischen bei Nancy, Lefort, Badiou, Laclau und Agamben. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
244. Marchart, Oliver, 2007: Post-Foundational Political Thought. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
245. Marchart, Oliver, 1998: “Einleitung: Undarstellbarkeit und ‘ontologische Diff erenz’.” In Marchart, Oliver (Ed.), Das Undarstellbare der Politik: Zur Hegemonietheorie Ernesto Laclaus. Wien: Turia + Kant. Pp. 7–20.
246. Marquand, David, 1992: “The Enterprise Culture: Old Wine in New Bottles?” In Heelas, Paul and Morris, Paul (Eds.), The Values of the Enterprise Culture. The Moral Debate. London: Routledge. Pp. 61–72. Marttila, Tomas, forthcoming: Political Diff erence and Social Analysis. Unpublished book manuscript.
247. Marttila, Tomas, 2012a: “Governmentalization of the Entrepreneur: A Case Study.” Article in Peer Review.
248. Marttila, Tomas, 2012b: “Kritische Epistemologie der poststrukuralistischen Hegemonietheorie“. In Langer, Antje—Nonhoff, Martin—Reisigl, Martin (Eds.), Diskursanalyse und Kritik. Forthcoming.
249. Marttila, Tomas, 2010a: “Constrained Constructivism in Post-Structural Discourse Analysis.” In Sociologia Internationalis. Vol. 48, No. 1. Pp. 91–112.
250. Marttila, Tomas, 2010b: “Foucault’s Theory of Cultural Transgression.” Paper presented at the conference ‘Power of Law,’ Helsinki Law School, University of Helsinki. January 28–30.
251. Marttila, Tomas and Schillinger, Henrik, 2007: “The Governmentalisation of the World Trade Regime: Finding Reason for Institutional Innovation in the Governance of World Trade.” Paper presented at Worskshop ‘Institutionelle Innovationen’, University of Bamberg. October 20–21.
252. Marttila, Tomas, 2004: Refurnishing Regions: Explaining Identity-Policies in Swedish Regionalisation. Unpublished Master Thesis. Lund University Sweden.
253. Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich, 2003: “The Manifesto of the Communist Party.” In Blaisdell, Robert (Ed.), The Communist Manifesto and Other Revolutionary Writings. Mineola, NY: Dover. Pp. 123–150.
254. McKinsey, 1995: Swedens Economic Performance. http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/mgi/research/productivity_competitiveness_and_growth/economic_performance:of_sweden. Accessed February 17, 2009.
255. Messner, Dirk, 1997: The Network Society: Economic Development and International Competitiveness as Problems of Social Governance. London and Portland: Frank Cass.
256. Messner, Dirk, 1996: Die Bedeutung von Staat, Markt und Netzwerksteuerung für systemische Wettbewerbsfähigkeit. Duisburg: Gerhard-Mercator-Universität Duisburg.
257. Miller, Hillis J., 2004: “ ‘Taking up a Task’: Moments of Decision in Ernesto Laclau’s Thought.” In Critchley, Simon and Marchart, Oliver (Eds.), Laclau: A Critical Reader. New York: Routledge. Pp. 217–225.
258. Miller, Paul Allen, 1999: “Toward a Post-Foucauldian History of Discursive Practices.” In Confi gurations. No. 7. Pp. 211–225.
259. Miller, Peter and Rose, Nikolas, 2008: Governing the Present. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
260. Miller, Peter and Rose, Nikolas, 1990: “Governing Economic Life.” In Economy and Society. Vol. 19, No. 1. Pp. 1–31.
261. Moebius, Stephan and Reckwitz, Andreas, 2008: “Einleitung: Poststrukturalismus und Sozialwissenschaften: Eine Standortbestimmung.” In Moebius, Stephan and Reckwitz, Andreas (Eds.), Poststrukturalistische Sozialwissenschaften. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Pp. 7–26.
262. Moebius, Stephan, 2005: “Diskurs—Ereignis—Subjekt. Diskurs—und Handlungstheorie im Ausgang einer poststrukturalistischen Sozialwissenschaft.” In Keller, Rainer—Hirseland, Andreas—Schneider, Werner—Viehöver, Willy (Eds.), Die diskursive Konstruktion von Wirklichkeit. Zum Verhältnis von Wissenssoziologie und Diskursforschung. Konstanz: UVK Verlagsgesellschaft. Pp. 127–148.
263. Mouffe, Chantal, 2005: On the Political. London: Routledge.
264. Mouffe, Chantal, 1993: Return of the Political. London and New York: Verso.
265. Newman, Janet 2001: Modernising Governance. London: Sage.
266. Nonhoff, Martin, 2007: “Politische Diskursanalyse als Hegemonieanalyse.” In Nonhoff, Martin (Ed.), Diskurs, Radikale Demokratie, Hegemonie: Zum Politischen Denken von Ernesto Laclau und Chantal Mouffe. Bielefeld: Transcript. Pp. 173–193.
267. Nonhoff, Martin, 2006: Politischer Diskurs und Hegemonie. Das Projekt Soziale Marktwirtschaft. Bielefeld: Transcript.
268. Norval, Aletta J., 2000: “Review Article: The Things We Do with Words—Contemporary Approaches to the Analysis of Ideology.” In British Journal of Political Science. Vol. 30. Pp. 313–346.
269. Nullmeier, Frank and Rüb, Friedbert, 1993: Die Transformation der Sozialpolitik. Vom Sozialstaat zum Sicherungsstaat. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag.
270. OECD, 2001: Putting the Young in Business: Policy Challenges for Youth Entrepreneurship. Paris: OECD.
271. OECD, 1989: Towards an ‘Enterprising’ Culture: A Challenge for Education and Training. Paris: OECD.
272. Ogbor, John O., 2000: “Mythicizing and Reifi cation in Entrepreneurial Discourse: Ideology-Critique of Entrepreneurial Studies.” In Journal of Management Studies. Vol. 37, No. 5. Pp. 606–635.
273. O’Malley, Pat, 2000: “Uncertain Subjects: Risks, Liberalism and Contract.” In Economy and Society. Vol. 29, No. 4. Pp. 460–484.
274. O’Malley Pat—Weir, Lorna—Shearing Clifford, 1997: “Governmentality, Criticism, Politics.” In Economy and Society. Vol. 26, No. 4. Pp. 501–517.
275. Opitz, Sven, 2007: “Gouvernementalität im Postfordismus: Zur Erkundung unternehmerischer Steuerunsgregime der Gegenwart.” In Kaindl, Christina (Ed.), Subjekte im Neoliberalismus—Kritische Wissenschaften 2. Marburg: BdWi-Verlag. Pp. 93–108.
276. Osborne, David and Gaebler, Ted, 1993: Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Sector. Reading, MA: Addison- Wesley.
277. Pêcheux, Michel, 1982: Language, Semantics and Ideology: Stating the Obvious. London and Basingstoke: Macmillan.
278. Perkin, Harold, 1992: “The Enterprise Culture in Historical Perspective: Birth, Life, Death—and Resurrection?” In Heelas, Paul and Morris, Paul (Eds.), The Values of the Enterprise Culture. The Moral Debate. London: Routledge. Pp. 36–60.
279. Peters, Michael, 1992: “Starship Education: Enterprise Culture in New Zealand.” In Access: Critical Perspectives on Educational Policy. Vol. 11, No. 1. Pp. 1–12.
280. Phillips, Louise and Jörgensen, Marianne, 2002: Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London: Sage.
281. Pongratz, Hans J., 2008: “Eine Gesellschaft von Unternehmern: Expansion und Profanierung ‘Schöpferischer Zerstörung’ in kapitalistischen Ökonomie.” In Berliner Journal für Soziologie. Vol. 18, No. 3. Pp. 457–475.
282. Pongratz, Hans J. and Voß, Günter G., 2003: Arbeitskraftunternehmer: Erwerbsorientierung in entgrenzten Arbeitsformen. Berlin: Edition Sigma.
283. Pongratz, Hans J. and Voß, Günter G., 2000: “Vom Arbeitsnehmer zum Arbeitskraftunternehmer— Zur Entgrenzung der Ware Arbeitskraft.” In Minssen, Heiner (Ed.), Begrenzte Entgrenzungen: Wandlungen von Organisation und Arbeit. Berlin: Sigma. Pp. 225–247.
284. Prince, Gerald, 1999: “Revisiting Narrativity.” In Grünzweig, Walter and Solbach, Andreas (Eds.), Narratologie, Linguistik und Rhetorik. Tübingen: Gunter Narr. Pp. 43–51.
285. Pühl, Katharina, 2003: “Der Bericht der Hartz-Kommission und die ‘Unternehmerin ihrer selbst’: Geschlechterverhältnisse, Gouvernementalität und Neoliberalismus.” In Pieper, Marianne and Gutiérrez Rodríguez, Encarnación (Eds.), Gouvernementalität: ein sozialwissenschaftliches Konzept in Anschluss an Foucault. Frankfurt am Main: Campus-Verlag. Pp. 111–135.
286. Purvis, Trevor and Hunt, Alan, 1993: “Discourse, Ideology, Discourse, Ideology”. In British Journal of Sociology. Vol. 44. Pp. 473–499.
287. Rabinow, Paul, 1984: “Introduction.” In Rabinow, Paul (Ed.), The Foucault Reader. London: Penguin Books. Pp. 3–29.
288. Rasch, William, 1997: “Locating the Political: Schmitt, Mouff e, Luhmann, and the Possibility of Pluralism.” In International Review of Sociology. Vol. 7, No. 1. Pp. 103–116.
289. Reckwitz, Andreas, 2007: “Die Moderne und das Spiel der Subjekte: Kulturelle Diff erenzen und Subjektordnungen in der Kultur der Moderne.” In Bonacker, Thorsten and Reckwitz, Andreas (Eds.), Kulturen der Moderne: Soziologische Perspektiven der Gegenwart. Frankfurt/New York: Campus Verlag. Pp. 97–118.
290. Reckwitz, Andreas, 2006: Das hybride Subjekt: eine Theorie der Subjektkulturen von den bürgerlichen Moderne zur Postmoderne. Wiesbaden: Velbrück Wissenschaft.
291. Reckwitz, Andreas, 2002: “Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Cultural Theorizing.” In European Journal of Social Theory. Vol. 5, No.2. Pp. 245–265.
292. Reyes, Oscar, 2005: “New Labour’s Politics of the Hard-Working Family.” In Howarth, David and Torfi ng, Jacob (Eds.), Discourse Theory in European Politics: Identity, Policy and Governance. Basingstoke: Macmillan. Pp. 233–254.
293. Ricoeur, Paul, 1991: “Myth as a Bearer of Possible Worlds.” In Valdés, Mario, J. (Ed.), Refl ection and Imagination. New York: Harvester/Wheatsheaf. Pp. 482–490.
294. Ricoeur, Paul, 1979: The Rule of Metaphor: Multi-Disciplinary Studies of the Creation of Meaning in Language. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
295. Rorty, Richard. 1980: Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
296. Rose, Nikolas, 1999: Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
297. Rose, Nikolas, 1996a: “The Death of the Social? Re-fi guring the Territory of Government.” In Economy and Society. Vol. 25, No. 3. Pp. 327–356.
298. Rose, Nikolas, 1996b: Inventing Ourselves: Psychology, Power, and Personhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
299. Rose, Nikolas, 1993: “Government, Authority and Expertise in Advanced Liberalism.” In Economy and Society. Vol. 22, No. 3. Pp. 283–299.
300. Rose, Nikolas and Miller, Peter, 1992: “Political Power Beyond the State: Problematics of Government.” In The British Journal of Sociology. Vol. 43, No. 2. Pp. 173–205.
301. Rose, Nikolas, 1990: Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self. London: Routledge.
302. Rothstein, Bo and Vahlne Westerhäll Lotta (Eds.), 2005: Bortom den Starka Statens Politik? Stockholm: SNS Förlag.
303. Rothstein, Bo, 1992: Den Korporativa Staten. Intresseorganisationer och Statsförvaltning i Svensk Politik. Stockholm: Norstedts juridik.
304. Rövik, Kjell-Arne, 2000: Moderna Organisationer. Malmö: Liber.
305. Salais, Robert, 2003: “Toward a Capability Approach.” In Zeitlin, Jonathan and Trubek, David M. (Eds.), Governing Work and Welfare in a New Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 317–344.
306. Saussure, Ferdinand, 1966: Course in General Linguistics. London: Peter Owen.
307. Schmid, Günther, 2004: “Gewährleistungsstaat und Arbeitsmarkt: Neue Formen von Governance in der Arbeitsmarktpolitik.” WZB Discussion Paper. Berlin: WZB.
308. Schmid, Günther and Kull, Silke, 2004: “Die Europäische Beschäftigungsstrategie. Anmerkungen zur ‘Methode der off enen Koordinierung’.” Working Paper. Berlin: WZB.
309. Schmidt, Vivien A., 2003: “How Where and When Does Discourse Matter in Small State’s Welfare State Adjustment?” In New Political Economy. Vol. 8, No. 1. Pp. 127–146.
310. Schmidt-Wellenburg, Christian, 2009: “Die neoliberale Gouvernementalität des Unternehmens—Management und Managementberatung zu Beginn des 21. Jahrhunderts.” In Zeitschrift für Soziologie. Vol. 38, No. 4. Pp. 320–341.
311. Schneider, Werner and Hirseland, Andreas, 2005: “Macht—Wissen—Gesellschaftliche Praxis: Dispositivanalyse und Wissenssoziologie.” In Keller, Rainer—Hirseland, Andreas—Schneider, Werner—Viehöver, Willy (Eds.), Die Diskursive Konstruktion von Wirklichkeit. Zum Verhältnis von Wissensoziologie und Diskursforschung. Konstanz: UVK Verlagsgesellschaft. Pp. 251–275.
312. Schumpeter, Joseph A., 1961: The Theory of Economic Development. London: Oxford University Press.
313. Schumpeter, Joseph A., 1928: “Unternehmer.” In Elster, Ludwig—Webern, Adolf— Wieser, Friedrich (Eds.), Handwörterbuch der Staatswissenschaften. Vol. 4. Jena: G. Fischer. Pp. 476–487.
314. Schwab-Trapp, Michael, 2001: “Diskurs als soziologisches Konzept. Bausteine für eine soziologisch orientierte Diskursanalyse.” In Keller, Rainer—Hirseland, Andreas—Schneider, Werner—Viehöver, Willy (Eds.), Handbuch Sozialwissenschaftliche Diskursanalyse. Band I: Theorien und Methoden. Opladen: Leske + Budrich. Pp. 261–283.
315. Seeleib-Kaiser, Martin, 1999: Globalisierung und Sozialpolitik: Ein Vergleich der Diskurse und Wohlfahrtssysteme in Deutschland, Japan und USA. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag.
316. Serres, Michel, 1982: The Parasite. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
317. Shakespeare, William, 2008: Hamlet: Prince of Denmark. 8th edition. Edwards, Philip (Ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
318. Shore, Cris and Wright, Susan, 1997: “Policy: A New Field of Anthropology.” In Shore, Cris and Wright, Susan (Eds.), Anthropology of Policy: Critical Perspectives on Governance and Power. London: Routledge. Pp. 3–40.
319. Simmel, Georg, 1992: “Der Arme.” In Simmel, Georg (Ed.), Soziologie. Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung. Georg-Simmel Gesamtausgabe, Band 8. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Pp. 345–374.
320. Smith, Ann Marie, 1998: Laclau and Mouffe: The Radical Democratic Imaginary. London: Routledge.
321. Smyth, John, 2004: “Schooling and Enterprise Culture: Pause for a Critical Policy Analysis.” In Journal of Education Policy. Vol. 14, No. 4. Pp. 435–444.
322. Somers, Margaret S., 1994: “The Narrative Constitution of Identity: A Relational and Network Approach.” In Theory and Society. Vol. 23. Pp. 605–649.
323. Stäheli, Urs, 2011: “Decentring the Economy: Governmentality Studies and Beyond?” In Bröckling, Ulrich- Krasmann and Susanne- Lemke, Thomas (Eds.), Governmentality: Current Issues and Future Challenges. New York: Routledge. Pp. 269–284.
324. Stäheli, Urs, 2007a: “Diff erenzierte Moderne: Zur Heterogenität funktionaler Diff erenzierung am Beispiel der Finanzökonomie.” In Bonacker, Thorsten and Reckwitz, Andreas (Eds.), Kulturen der Moderne: Soziologische Perspektiven der Gegenwart. Frankfurt am Main: Campus. Pp. 183–198.
325. Stäheli, Urs, 2007b: Spektakuläre Spekulation. Das Populäre der Ökonomie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
326. Stäheli, Urs, 2007c: “Von der Herde zur Horde? Zum Verhältnis von Hegemonie— und Aff ektpolitik.” In Nonhoff, Martin (Ed.), Diskurs, Radikale Demokratie, Hegemonie. Zum politischen Denken von Ernesto Laclau und Chantal Mouffe. Bielefeld: Transcript. Pp. 123–138.
327. Stäheli, Urs, 2004: “The Competing Figures of the Limit.” In Critchley, Simon and Marchart, Oliver (Eds.), Laclau: A Critical Reader. London: Routledge. Pp. 226–240.
328. Stäheli, Urs, 2003a: “Financial Noises: Inclusion and the Promise of Meaning.” In Soziale Systeme. Vol. 9, No. 2. Pp. 244–256.
329. Stäheli, Urs, 2003b: “The Popular in the Political System.” In Cultural Studies. Vol. 17, Part 2. Pp. 275–299.
330. Stäheli, Urs, 2001: “Die politische Theorie der Hegemonie: Ernesto Laclau und Chantal Mouff e.” In Brodocz, André and Schaal, Gary S. (Eds.), Politische Theorien der Gegenwart II: Eine Einführung. Opladen: Leske + Budrich. Pp. 194–223.
331. Stäheli, Urs, 2000: Sinnzusammenbrüche. Eine Dekonstruktive Lektüre von Niklas Luhmanns Systemtheorie. Weilerswist: Velbrück Wissenschaft.
332. Stäheli, Urs, 1998: “Die Nachträglichkeit der Semantik: Zum Verhältnis von Sozialstruktur und Semantik.” In Soziale Systeme. No. 4. Pp. 315–339.
333. Stäheli, Urs, 1997: “Exorcising the ‘Popular’ Seriously: Luhmann’s Concept of Semantics.” In International Review of Sociology. Vol. 7, No. 1. Pp. 127–145.
334. Stäheli, Urs, 1995: “Gesellschaftstheorie und die Unmöglichkeit Ihres Gegenstandes: Diskurstheoretische Perspektiven.” In Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Soziologie. Vol. 21, No. 2. Pp. 361–390.
335. Stavrakakis, Yannis, 2007: The Lacanian Left: Psychoanalysis, Theory, Politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
336. Stavrakakis, Yannis, 1999: Lacan and the Political. London and New York: Routledge.
337. Stavrakakis, Yannis, 1997: “Green Ideology: A Discursive Reading.” In Journal of Political Ideologies. Vol. 2, No. 3. Pp. 259–279.
338. Steinmo, Sven, 2005: “The Evolution of the Swedish Model.” In Soederberg, Susanne—Menz, Georg—Cerny, Philip (Eds.), Internalizing Globalization. The Rise of Neoliberalism and the Decline of National Varieties of Capitalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Pp. 56–73.
339. Stephens, John D., 1996: “The Scandinavian Welfare States: Achievements, Crises and Prospects.” In Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (Ed.), Welfare States in Transition: National Adaptions in Global Economies. London: Sage. Pp. 32–65.
340. Stevensson, Lois and Lundström, Anders, 2000: “Dressing the Emperor: The Fabric of Entrepreneurship Policy.” In Audretsch, David B.—Grilo, Isabek— Thurik, Roy A. (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship Policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Pp. 94–129.
341. Steyert, Chris and Katz, Jerome, 2004: “Reclaiming the Space of Entrepreneurship in Society: Geographical, Discursive and Social Dimensions.” In Entrepreneurship & Regional Development. Vol. 16, May. Pp. 179–196.
342. Stichweh, Rudolf, 2005: Inklusion und Exklusion. Studium zur Gesellschaftstheorie. Bielefeld: Transcript-Verlag.
343. Strauss, Anselm L., 1994: Grundlagen qualitativer Sozialforschung: Datenanalyse und Theoriebildung in der empirischen und soziologischen Forschung. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.
344. Svensson, Torsten, 2001: Marknadsanpassningens Politik. Den Svenska Modellens Förändring 1980–2000. Uppsala: Uppsala Acta Universitatis.
345. Swedberg, Richard, 2000: “The Social Science View of Entrepreneurship: Introduction and Practical Implications.” In Swedberg, Richard (Ed.), Entrepreneurship: The Social Science View. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 7–44.
346. Szerszynski, Bronislaw, 1996: “On Knowing What to Do: Environmentalism and the Modern Problematic.” In Lash, Scott—Szerszynski, Bronislaw—Wynne, Brian (Eds.), Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology. London: Sage. Pp. 104–137.
347. Teubner, Günther, 2006: “Rights of Non-humans: Electronic Agents and Animals as New Actors in Politics of Law.” In Journal of Law and Society. Vol. 33, No. 4. Pp. 497–521.
348. Thedvall, Renita, 2004: “‘Do It Yourself’: Making Up the Self-Employed Individual at a Swedish Public Employment Office.” In Garsten, Christina and Jacobsson, Kerstin (Eds.), Learning to Be Employable. New Agendas on Work, Responsibility and Learning in a Globalizing World. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Pp. 131–152.
349. Thibaud, Paul, 1985: “The Triumph of the Entrepreneur.” In Telos. No. 64. Summer. Pp. 134–140.
350. Timonen, Virpi, 2001: “Earning welfare Citizenship: Welfare State Reform in Finland and Sweden. In Taylor-Gooby, Peter (Ed.), Welfare States under Pressure. London: SAGE. Pp. 29–52.
351. Torfing, Jacob, 2005: “Discourse Theory: Achievements, Arguments and Challenges.” In Howarth, David and Torfi ng, Jacob (Eds.), Discourse Theory in European Politics: Identity, Policy and Governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Pp. 1–32.
352. Torfing, Jacob, 1999a: New Theories of Discourse: Laclau, Mouff e and Žižek. Oxford: Blackwell.
353. Torfing, Jacob, 1999b: “Towards a Schumpeterian Workfare Postnational Regime: Path-Shaping and Path-Dependency in Danish Welfare State Reform.” In Economy and Society. Vol. 28, No. 3. Pp. 369–402.
354. Trubek, David and Mosher, James S., 2003: “New Governance, Employment Policy, and the European Social Model.” In Zeitlin, Jonathan and Trubek, David M. (Eds.), Governing Work and Welfare in a New Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 33–58.
355. Tsoukas, Haridimos, 1993: “Analogical Reasoning and Knowledge Generation in Organization Theory.” In Organization Studies. Vol. 14, No. 3. Pp. 323–346.
356. Van Dijk, Teun A., 1985: “Semantic Discourse Analysis.” In Van Dijk, Teun, A. (Ed.), Handbook of Discourse Analysis: Vol 2: Dimensions of Discourse. Academic Press: London. Pp. 103–136.
357. Viehöver, Willy, 2003: “Die Wissenschaft und die Wiederverzauberung des sublunaren Raumes. Der Klimadiskurs im Licht der narrativen Diskursanalyse.” In Keller, Rainer—Hirseland, Andreas—Schneider, Werner—Viehöver, Willy (Eds.), Handbuch Sozialwissenschaftliche Diskursanalyse. Band II: Forschungspraxis. Opladen: Leske + Budrich. Pp. 233–267.
358. Viehöver, Willy, 2001: “Diskurse als Narrationen.” In Keller, Rainer—Hirseland, Andreas—Schneider, Werner—Viehöver, Willy (Eds.), Handbuch Sozialwissenschaftliche Diskursanalyse. Band I: Theorien und Methoden. Opladen: Leske + Budrich. Pp. 177–206.
359. Von Mises Ludwig, 1980b: Planning for Freedom and Sixteen Other Essays. South Holland, IL: Libertarian Press.
360. Von Mises Ludwig, 1980a: Nationalökonomie: Theorie des Handelns und Wirtschaftens. München: Philosophia Verlag.
361. von Schmidtchen Dieter, 1995: “Unternehmertum, Wettbewerb und Evolution: Anmerkungen zu Helmut Arndts Theorie der Wirtschaftsentwicklung.” In Jahresbuch für Nationalökonomie und Statistik. Vol. 214, No. 5. Stuttgart: G. Fischer Verlag.
362. Weber, Max, 2006: Die protestantische Ethik und der Geistdes Kapitalismus. München: Beck.
363. Weber, Max, 1949: “Objectivity in Social Science and Social Policy.” In Shils, Edward A. and Finch, Henry A. (Eds.), The Methodology of the Social Science. New York: Free Press. Pp. 49–112.
364. Williams, Raymond, 1977: Marxism and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
365. Zižek, Slavoj, 1997: The Plaque of Fantasies. London: Verso.
366. Zižek, Slavoj, 1995: Looking Awry: An Introduction to Jacques Lacan through Popular Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
367. Zižek, Slavoj, 1994a: The Metastases of Enjoyment. London: Verso.
368. Zižek, Slavoj, 1994b: “The Spectre of Ideology.” In Žižek, Slavoj (Ed.), Mapping Ideology. London: Verso. Pp. 1–33.
369. Zižek, Slavoj, 1993: Tarrying with the Negative. Kant, Hegel, and the Critique of Ideology. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
370. Zižek, Slavoj, 1991a: For They Do Not Know What They Do. Enjoyment as a Political Factor. London: Verso.
371. Zižek, Slavoj, 1991b: “The Truth Arises from Misrecognition.” In Ragland-Sullivan, Ellie and Bracher, Mark (Eds.), Lacan and the Subject of Language. New York and London: Routledge. Pp. 188–212.
372. Zižek, Slavoj, 1990: “Beyond Discourse Analysis.” In Laclau, Ernesto (Ed.), New Refl ections of the Revolution of our Time. London: Verso. Pp. 249–260.
373. Zižek, Slavoj, 1989: The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso.Agamben, Giorgio, 2007: Infancy and History: On the Destruction of Experience. London: Verso.