Contemporary Critical Theory and Methodology

Contemporary Critical Theory and Methodology

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 1-258

  Strydom, Piet ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84909046405     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203875568     Document Type: Book

References (266)

1. Aboulafia, M., Bookman, M. and Kemp, C. (eds) (2002) Habermas and Pragmatism. London: Routledge.
2. Adorno, T. (1970) Negative Dialektik. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
3. Adorno, T. W., Albert, H., Dahrendorf, R., Habermas, J., Pilot, H. and Popper, K. R. (1976) The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology. London: Heinemann.
4. Apel, K.-O. (1962) Die Idee der Sprache. Bonn: Bouvier.
5. Apel, K.-O. (1967) ‘Einführung: Der philosophische Hintergrund der Entstehung des Pragmatismus bei Charles Sanders Peirce’, in K.-O. Apel (ed.) Charles S. Piece: Schriften I. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 13-153.
6. Apel, K.-O. (1970) ‘Einführung: Peirces Denkweg vom Pragmatismus zum Pragmatizismus’, in K.-O. Apel (ed.) Charles S. Piece: Schriften II. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 11-211.
7. Apel, K.-O. (1973) Transformation der Philosophie, Vols I—II. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
8. Apel, K.-O. (1974) ‘Zur Idee einer transzendentalen Sprachpragmatik’, in J. Simon (ed.) Aspekte und Probleme der Sprachphilosophie. Freiburg: Alber, pp. 283-326.
9. Apel, K.-O. (1977) ‘Types of social science in the light of human interests of knowledge’, Social Research 44(3): 425-70.
10. Apel, K.-O. (1980) Towards a Transformation of Philosophy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
11. Apel, K.-O. (1981) Charles S. Peirce. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
12. Apel, K.-O. (1984 [1979]) Understanding and Explanation: A Transcendental-Pragmatic Perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Apel, K.-O. (1995) Charles S. Peirce. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.
14. Apel, K.-O. (1998) Auseinandersetzungen in Erprobung des transzendental-pragmatischen Aufsatzes. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
15. Apel, K.-O. (2003) ‘Wahrheit als regulative Idee’, in D. Böhler, M. Kettner and G. Skirbekk (eds) Reflexion und Verantwortung: Auseinandersetzungen mit Karl-Otto Apel. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 171-96.
16. Apel, K.-O., von Bormann, C., Bubner, R., Gadamer, H.-G., Giegel, H. J. and Habermas, J. (1971) Hermeneutik und Ideologiekritik. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
17. Archer, M., Bhaskar, R., Collier, A., Lawson, T. and Norrie, A. (eds) (1998) Critical Realism. London: Routledge.
18. Baecker, D. (1999) ‘Kommunikation im Medium der Information’, in R. Maresch and N. Werber (eds) Kommunikation, Medien, Macht. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 174-91.
19. Basaure, M. (2009) ‘Foucault and the “Anti-Oedipus Movement”, History of Psychiatry 20(3): 340-59.
20. Basaure, M. (2011) ‘Continuity through rupture with the Frankfurt School: Axel Honneth’s theory of recognition’, in G. Delanty and S. Turner (eds) Handbook of Social and Political Theory. London: Routledge.
21. Beck, U. (2006) The Cosmopolitan Vision. Cambridge: Polity
22. Beck, U. and Grande, E. (2007) ‘Cosmopolitanism: Europe’s way out of crisis’, European Journal of Social Theory 10(1): 67-85.
23. Benhabib, S. (1986) Critique, Norm and Utopia. New York: Columbia University Press.
24. Benhabib, S. (2008) Another Cosmopolitanism. New York: Oxford.
25. Bernstein, R. (1971) Praxis and Action. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
26. Bernstein, R. (1975) Praxis und Handlung. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
27. Bernstein, R. (1976) The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
28. Bernstein, R. (1983) Beyond Objectivism and Relativism. Oxford: Blackwell.
29. Bernstein, R. (1991) The New Constellation. Cambridge: Polity
30. Bhaskar, R. (1978) A Realist Theory of Science. London: Harvester.
31. Bhaskar, R. (1989 [1979]) The Possibility of Naturalism. London: Harvester.
32. Bhaskar, R. (1998) ‘General introduction’, in M. Archer, R. Bhaskar, A. Collier, T. Lawson and A. Norrie (eds) Critical Realism. London: Routledge, pp. ix-xxiv
33. Bhaskar, R. and Collier, A. (1998) ‘Explanatory critiques’, in M. Archer, R. Bhaskar, A. Collier, T. Lawson and A. Norrie (eds) Critical Realism. London: Routledge, pp. 385-94.
34. Bleicher, J. (1980) Contemporary Hermeneutics. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
35. Böhler, D., Kettner, M. and Skirbekk, G. (eds) (2003) Reflexion und Verantwortung: Auseinandersetzungen mit Karl-Otto Apel. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
36. Bohman, J. (1991) New Philosophy of Social Science. Cambridge: Polity
37. Bohman, J. (1993) ‘Welterschließung und radikale Kritik’, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 41(3): 563-74.
38. Bohman, J. (1999) ‘Theories, practices, and pluralism: A pragmatic interpretation of critical social science’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 29(4): 459-80.
39. Bohman, J. (2000) ‘Demokratischer und methodologischer Pluralismus: Eine pragmatische Interpretation der kritische Forschung’, in S. Müller-Doohm (ed.) Das Interesse der Vernunft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 299-327.
40. Bohman, J. (2001) ‘Participants, observers, and critics’, in W. Rehg and J. Bohman (eds) Pluralism and the Pragmatic Turn: The Transformation of Critical Theory - Essays in Honor of Thomas McCarthy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 87-113.
41. Boltanski, L. (2008) ‘Die pragmatische Soziologie der Kritik heute: Gespräch mit Mauro Basaure’, Berlin Journalfür Soziologie 18(4): 1-24.
42. Boltanski, L. and Chiapello, E. (2005) ‘The role of criticism in the dynamics of capitalism’, in M. Miller (ed.) Worlds of Capitalism. London: Routledge, pp. 237-67.
43. Boltanski, L. and Chiapello, E. (2007) The New Spirit of Capitalism. New York: Verso.
44. Boltanski, L. and Honneth, A. (2009) ‘Soziologie der Kritik oder Kritische Theorie? Ein Gespräch mit Robin Celikates’, in R. Jaeggi and T. Wesche (eds) Was ist Kritik? Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 81-114.
45. Boltanski, L. and Thevenot, L. (1991) De la Justification. Paris: Gallimard.
46. Bourdieu, P. (1977 [1972]) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47. Bourdieu, P. (1986 [1979]) Distinction. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
48. Bourdieu, P. (1990 [1980]) The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity.
49. Bourdieu, P. (1993 [1984]) Sociology in Question. London: Sage.
50. Bourdieu, P. (1998) Acts of Resistance. Cambridge: Polity.
51. Bourdieu, P. (2000 [1997]) Pascalian Meditations. Cambridge: Polity.
52. Bourdieu, P. (2001) Science de la science et reflexivite. Paris: Raisons d’Agir.
53. Bourdieu, P. et al. (1999) The Weight of the World. Cambridge: Polity.
54. Bourdieu, P., Chamboredon, J.-C. and Passeron, J.-C. (1991 [1968]) The Craft of Sociology. Berlin: de Gruyter.
55. Bourdieu, P. and Wacquant, L. (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity.
56. van den Brink, B. (1997) ‘Gesellschaftstheorie und Übertreibungskunst’, Neue Rundschau 1: 37-59.
57. van den Brink, B. and Owen, D. (2007) Recognition and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58. Brunkhorst, H. (2004) ‘Critical Theory and the analysis of contemporary mass society’, in F. Rush (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Critical Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 248-79.
59. Brunkhorst, H. (2005) Solidarity. Cambridge, MA: MIT
60. Bubner, R., Cramer, K. and Wiehl, R. (eds) (1970) Hermeneutik und Dialektik, Vols I—II. Tubingen: Mohr.
61. Butler, J. (1997) The Psychic Life of Power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
62. Celikates, R. (2009) Kritik als soziale Praxis. Frankfurt: Campus.
63. Coleman, J. (1990) Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
64. Cooke, M. (2006) Re-presenting the Good Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
65. Cooke, M. (2009) ‘Zur Rationalität der Gesellschaftskritik’, in R. Jaeggi and T. Wesche (eds) Was ist Kritik? Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 117-33.
66. Danermark, B., Jakobsen, L. and Karlsson, J. C. (2002) Explaining Society: Critical Realism in the Social Sciences. London: Routledge.
67. Delanty, G. and Strydom, P. (2003) Philosophies of Social Science. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
68. Dewey, J. (1927). The Public and Its Problems. New York: Holt.
69. Dewey, J. (1938) Logic, the Theory of Inquiry. New York: Holt.
70. Dews, P. (2000) ‘Die Entsublimierung der Vernunft als Habermas’ Leitgedanke’, in S. Müller-Doohm (ed.) Das Interesse der Vernunft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 144-74.
71. Dubiel, H. (1988) Kritische Theorie der Gesellschaft. Weinheim: Juventa.
72. Eder, K. (1988) Die Vergesellschaftung der Natur. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
73. Eder, K. (1993) The New Politics f Class. London: Sage.
74. Eder, K. (1996) The Social Construction of Nature. London: Sage.
75. Eder, K. (1999) ‘Societies learn and yet the world is hard to change’, European Journal of Social Theory 2(2): 195-215.
76. Eder, K. (2000) Kulturelle Identität zwischen Tradition und Utopie. Frankfurt: Campus.
77. Eder, K. (2001) ‘Sustainability as a discursive device for mobilizing European publics’, in K. Eder and M. Kousis (eds) Environmental Politics in Southern Europe. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 25-52.
78. Eder, K. (2006) ‘Making sense of the public sphere’, in G. Delanty (ed.) Handbook of Contemporary European Social Theory. London: Routledge, pp. 333-46.
79. Eder, K. (2007) ‘The public sphere and European democracy’, in J. E. Fossum and P Schlesinger (eds) The European Union and the Public Sphere. London: Routledge.
80. Eder, K. (2009) ‘Rational action, communicative action, and the narrative structure of social life’, in S. O’Tuama (ed.) Critical Turns in Critical Theory. London: Tauris, pp. 63-79.
81. Eder, K., Giesen, B., Schmidtke, O. and Tambini, D. (2002) Collective Identities in Action. Aldershot: Ashgate.
82. Eder, K. and Schmidtke, O. (1998) ‘Ethnische Mobilisierung und die Logik von Identitätskämpfen’, Zeitschrift für Soziologie 27: 418-37.
83. Fink-Eitel, H. (1993) ‘Innerweltlichen Transzendenz’, Merkur 47(3): 237-45.
84. Foucault, M. (1961) ‘Introduction to Kant’s “Anthropology from a Pragmatic Perspective”’, translated by Adrianna Bove, accessed 12 May 2010.
85. Foucault, M. (1979 [1975]) Discipline and Punish. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
86. Foucault, M. (1982) ‘The subject and power’, in H. L. Dreyfus and P. Rabinow, Michel Foucault. London: Harvester, pp. 208-26.
87. Foucault, M. (1986a) ‘What is Enlightenment?’, in P. Rabinow (ed.) The Foucault Reader. Harmondsworth: Penguin, pp. 32-50.
88. Foucault, M. (1986b) ‘Nietzsche, genealogy, history’, in P. Rabinow (ed.) The Foucault Reader. Harmondsworth: Penguin, pp. 76-100.
89. Foucault, M. (as Maurice Florence) (1998a) ‘Foucault’, in J. D. Faubion (ed.) Aesthetics, Method, andEpistemology. New York: New Press, pp. 459-63.
90. Foucault, M. (1998b) ‘Structuralism and post-structuralism’, in J. D. Faubion (ed.) Aesthetics, Method, and Epistemology. New York: New Press, pp. 433-58.
91. Foucault, M. (1998c) ‘Return to history’, in J. D. Faubion (ed.) Aesthetics, Method, and Epistemology. New York: New Press, pp. 419-32.
92. Fraser, N. (1989) Unruly Practices. Cambridge: Polity
93. Fraser, N. (1997) Justice Interruptus. London: Routledge.
94. Fraser, N. (2003) ‘Distorted beyond all recognition: A rejoinder to Axel Honneth’, in N. Fraser and A. Honneth, Redistribution or Recognition? London: Verso, pp. 198-236.
95. Fraser, N. and Honneth, A. (2003) Redistribution or Recognition? London: Verso.
96. Gadamer, H.-G. (1975 [1960]) Truth and Method. London: Sheed & Ward.
97. Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity.
98. Grenfell, M. (ed.) (2008) Pierre Bourdieu. London: Acumen.
99. Gronke, H. (2003) ‘Die Relevanz von regulativen Ideen zur Orientierung Mitverantwortung’, in D. Böhler, M. Kettner and G. Skirbekk (eds) Reflexion und Verantwortung. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 260-82.
100. Habermas, J. (1954) Die Absolute und die Geschichte. Neuwied: Luchterhand.
101. Habermas, J. (1970) ‘Toward a theory of communicative competence’, in H. P. Dreitzel (ed.) Recent Sociology No. 2. London: Macmillan, pp. 115-48.
102. Habermas, J. (1972 [1968]) Knowledge and Human Interests. London: Heinemann.
103. Habermas, J. (1974) Theory and Practice. London: Heinemann.
104. Habermas, J. (1979) Communication and the Evolution of Society. London: Heinemann.
105. Habermas, J. (1984) Vorstudien und Ergänzungen zur Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
106. Habermas, J. (1987 [1985]) The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity.
107. Habermas, J. (1984/87) The Theory of Communicative Action, Vols I-II. London: Heinemann.
108. Habermas, J. (1988 [1967]) On the Logic of the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Polity.
109. Habermas, J. (1990) Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge: Polity
110. Habermas, J. (1991a) ‘Peirce über Kommunikation’, in J. Habermas, Texte und Kontexte. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 9-33.
111. Habermas, J. (1991b) ‘Exkurs: Transzendenz von innen, Transzendenz ins Diesseits’, in J. Habermas, Texte und Kontexte. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 127-69.
112. Habermas, J. (1992) Postmetaphysical Thinking. Cambridge: Polity
113. Habermas, J. (1993) Justification and Application. Cambridge: Polity
114. Habermas, J. (1996 [1992]) Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge: Polity
115. Habermas, J. (1998a [1996]) The Inclusion of the Other. Cambridge: Polity
116. Habermas, J. (1998b) On the Pragmatics of Communication. Cambridge: Polity (edited by Maeve Cooke).
117. Habermas, J. (2001) Zeit der Übergänge. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
118. Habermas, J. (2002) ‘Postscript’, in M. Aboulafia, M. Bookman and C. Kemp (eds) Habermas and Pragmatism. London: Routledge, pp. 223-33.
119. Habermas, J. (2003 [1999]) Truth and Justification. Cambridge: Polity.
120. Habermas, J. (2005) Zwischen Naturalismus und Religion. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
121. Habermas, J. (2006) ‘Political communication in the media society’, Communication Theory 16: 411-26.
122. Habermas, J. and Luhmann, N. (1971) Theorie der Gesellschaftung oder Sozialtechnologie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
123. Halton, E. (2005) ‘Pragmatism’, in G. Ritzer (ed.) Encyclopedia of Social Theory, Vol. II. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 595-99.
124. Hanssen, B. (2004) ‘Critical Theory and poststructuralism’, in F. Rush (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Critical Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 280-309.
125. Hegel, G. W. F. (1967 [1821]) Philosophy of Right. London: Oxford University Press.
126. Heidegger, M. (1967 [1927]) Being and Time. Oxford: Blackwell.
127. Honneth, A. (1985) Kritik der Macht. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
128. Honneth, A. (1992) Kampf um Anerkennung. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
129. Honneth, A. (1999) ‘Reply to Andreas Kalyvas, “Critical Theory at the crossroads”’, European Journal of Social Theory 2(2): 249-52.
130. Honneth, A. (2000a) ‘The possibility of a disclosing critique: the Dialectic of Enlightenment in light of current debates in social criticism’, Constellations 7(1):116-27.
131. Honneth, A. (2000b) Das Andere der Gerechtigkeit. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
132. Honneth, A. (2001) Leiden an Unbestimmtheit. Stuttgart: Reclam.
133. Honneth, A. (2002a) An interview with Axel Honneth’, interviewed by Anders Petersen and Rasmus Willig, European Journal of Social Theory 5(2): 265-77.
134. Honneth, A. (2002b) Befreiung aus der Mündigkeit. Frankfurt: Campus.
135. Honneth, A. (2003) ‘The point of recognition’, in N. Fraser and A. Honneth, Redistribution or Recognition. London: Verso, pp. 237-67.
136. Honneth, A. (2004a) ‘A social pathology of reason: on the intellectual legacy of Critical Theory’, in F. Rush (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Critical Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 336-60.
137. Honneth, A. (2004b) ‘Organized self-realization: some paradoxes of individualization’, European Journal of Social Theory 7(4): 463-78.
138. Honneth, A. (2007a) ‘Pathologies of the social: the past and present of social philosophy’, in Disrespect: The Normative Foundations of Critical Theory. Cambridge: Polity, pp. 1-48.
139. Honneth, A. (2007b) ‘The social dynamics of disrespect: on the location of Critical Theory today’, in A. Honneth, Disrespect: The Normative Foundations of Critical Theory. Cambridge: Polity, pp. 63-79.
140. Honneth, A. (2007c) ‘Rekonstruktive Gesellschafskritik unter genealogischem Vorbehalt’, in A. Honneth, Pathologien der Vernunft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 57-69.
141. Honneth, A. (2007d) ‘Eine soziale Pathologie der Vernunft’, in A. Honneth, Pathologien der Vernunft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 28-56.
142. Honneth, A. (2007e) ‘Idiosynkrasie als Erkenntnismittel: Gesellschafskritik im Zeitalter des normalisierten Intellektuellen’, in A. Honneth, Pathologien der Vernunft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 219-34.
143. Honneth, A. (2007f) Pathologien der Vernunft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
144. Honneth, A. (2008) Reification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
145. Honneth, A. (2009a) ‘Die Anerkennung ist ein Grundmechanismus sozialer Existenz: Gespräch mit Krassimir Stojanov’, in M. Basaure, J. P. Reemtsma and R. Willig (eds) Erneuerung der Kritik. Frankfurt: Campus, pp. 1149-66.
146. Honneth, A. (2009b) ‘Erbe und Erneuerung der Kritischen Theorie: Gespräch mit Internationalen Studiengruppe zur Kritischen Theorie’, in M. Basaure, J. P. Reemtsma and R. Willig (eds) Erneuerung der Kritik. Frankfurt: Campus, pp. 49-81.
147. Honneth, A. (2009c) ‘Das soziologische Defizit der Kritischen Theorie’, in M. Basaure, J. P. Reemtsma and R. Willig (eds) Erneuerung der Kritik. Frankfurt: Campus, pp. 83-9.
148. Honneth, A. (2009d) ‘Schwierigkeiten kapitalismuskritischer Zeitdiagnosen: Gespräch mit Christoph Lieber’, in M. Basaure, J. P. Reemtsma and R. Willig (eds) Erneuerung der Kritik. Frankfurt: Campus, pp. 137-47.
149. Honneth, A. (2009e) ‘Vorwort’, in R. Celikates, Kritik als soziale Praxis. Frankfurt: Campus, pp. 8-13.
150. Honneth, A. and Saar, M. (2003) Zwischenbilanz einer Rezeption: Frankfurter Foucault-Konferenz 2001. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
151. Horkheimer, M. (1970 [1937]) Traditionelle und kritische Theorie. Frankfurt: Fischer.
152. Horkheimer, M. and Adorno, T (1969 [1944]) Dialektik der Aufklärung. Frankfurt: Fischer.
153. Horkheimer, M. and Adorno, T W. (1972 [1947]) The Dialectic of Enlightenment. New York: Herder and Herder.
154. Iser, M. (2008) Empörung und Fortschritt. Frankfurt: Campus.
155. Jaeggi, R. (2009) ‘Was ist Ideologiekritik’, in R. Jaeggi and Wesche, T (eds) Was ist Kritik? Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 266-95.
156. James, W. (1978) Pragmatism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
157. Joas, H. (1993) Pragmatism and Social Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
158. Kant, I. (1968 [1781]) Critique of Pure Reason. London: Macmillan.
159. Kant, I. (1956 [1788]) Critique of Practical Reason. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
160. Kant, I. (1957a [1784-98]) On History. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
161. Kant, I. (1957b [1795]) Perpetual Peace. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
162. Kant, I. (1972 [1790]) Critique of Judgement. New York: Hafner.
163. Kant, I. (1996 [1798]) Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. Carbondale: Southern Illinois Press.
164. Keat, R. and Urry, J. (1975) Social Theory as Science. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
165. Kelly, T. (2000) ‘The unhappy liberal’, Constellations 7(3): 372-81.
166. Kemp, S. (2003) ‘Rethinking social criticism’, History of the Human Sciences 16(4): 61-84.
167. Kierkegaard, S. (2001 [1846]) A Literary Review. London: Penguin.
168. Kierkegaard, S. (1980 [1849]) The Sickness unto Death. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
169. Kierkegaard, S. (1992 [1843]) Either/Or. London: Penguin.
170. Korsch, K. (1966 [1923]) Marxismus und Philosophie. Frankfurt: Europäische Verlagsanstalt.
171. Kousis, M. and Eder, K. (2001) ‘EU policy-making, local action, and the emergence of institutions of collective action’, in K. Eder and M. Kousis (eds) Environmental Politics in Southern Europe. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 3-21.
172. Kuhlmann, W. (ed.) (1986) Moralität und Sittlichkeit. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
173. Löwith, K. (1964) From Hegel to Nietzsche. London: Constable.
174. Luhmann, N. (1995) Social Systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
175. Lukäcs, G. (1968 [1923]) History and Class Consciousness. London: Merlin Press.
176. McCarthy, T (1978) The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas. London: Hutchinson.
177. McCarthy, T (1991) ‘Complexity and democracy’, in A. Honneth and H. Joas (eds) Communicative Action. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 119-39.
178. McCarthy, T (1993 [1991]) Ideals and Illusions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
179. McCarthy, T (1994a) ‘Philosophy and Critical Theory: A reprise’, in D. C. Hoy and T McCarthy, Critical Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 5-100.
180. McCarthy, T. (1994b) ‘Rejoinder to David Hoy’, in D. C. Hoy and T. McCarthy, Critical Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 217-48.
181. McCarthy, T. (2001a) ‘Die politische Philosophie und das Problem der Rasse’, in L. Wingert and K. Günther (eds) Die Öffentlichkeit der Vernunft und die Vernunft der Öffentlichkeit: Festschrift für Jürgen Habermas. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 627-54.
182. McCarthy, T. (2001b) ‘Critical Theory today: An interview with Thomas McCarthy’, in W. Rehg and J. Bohman (eds) Pluralism and the Pragmatic Turn: The Transformation of Critical Theory - Essays in Honor of Thomas McCarthy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 413-29.
183. McCarthy, T. (2004) ‘Political philosophy and racial injustice: from normative to critical theory’, in S. Benhabib and N. Fraser (eds) Pragmatism, Critique and Judgment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 149-70.
184. Mannheim, K. (1972 [1936]) Ideology and Utopia. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
185. Marcuse, H. (1968) One Dimensional Man. London: Sphere.
186. Marcuse, H. (1969a [1955]) Eros and Civilization. London: Sphere.
187. Marcuse, H. (1969b) ‘Repressive tolerance’, in R. P. Wolff, B. Moore and H. Marcuse, A Critique of Pure Tolerance. London: Cape, pp. 95-137.
188. Marcuse, H. (1972 [1937]) Negations. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
189. Marcuse, H. (1973 [1941]) Reason and Revolution. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
190. Marx, K. (1963) The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. New York: International.
191. Marx, K. (1954 [1867]) Capital, Vol. I. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
192. Marx, K. (1967a [1843]) ‘Toward the critique of Hegel’s philosophy of law’, in L. D. Easton and K. H. Guddat (eds) Writings of the Young Marx on Philosophy and Society. New York: Doubleday.
193. Marx, K. (1967b [1888]) ‘Theses on Feuerbach’, in L. D. Easton and K. H. Guddat (eds.) Writings of the Young Marx on Philosophy and Society. New York: Doubleday.
194. Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1969 [1846]) The German Ideology. New York: International.
195. Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1978 [1847]) The Communist Manifesto. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
196. Maton, K. (2003) ‘Reflexivity, relationism, and research’, Space and Culture 6(1): 52-56.
197. Mead, G. H. (1974 [1934]) Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
198. Mead, G. H. (1959) The Philosophy of the Present. La Salle, IL: Open Court.
199. Menke, C. (2000) ‘Critique and self-reflection’, Constellations 7(1): 100-115.
200. Miller, M. (1986) Kollektive Lernprozesse. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
201. Miller, M. (2002) ‘Some theoretical aspects of systemic learning’, Sozialer Sinn 3: 379-421.
202. Mills, C. W. (1940) ‘Situated actions and vocabularies of motive’, American Sociological Review 5: 904-13.
203. Mills, C. W. (1964) Sociology and Pragmatism. New York: Oxford University Press.
204. Mills, C. W. (1970 [1959]) The Sociological Imagination. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
205. Misgeld, D. (1977) ‘Critical Theory and hermeneutics’, in J. O’Neill (ed.) On Critical Theory. London: Heinemann, pp. 164-83.
206. Morrow, R. and Brown, D. (1994) Critical Theory and Methodology. London Sage.
207. Nietzsche, F. (1994[1887]) On the Genealogy of Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
208. Øfsti, A. (2003) ‘Apriori der idealen Kommunikationgesellschaft’, in D. Böhler et al. (eds) Reflexion und Verantwortung. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 197-219.
209. Outhwaite, W. (1987) New Philosophies of Social Science. London: Macmillan.
210. Outhwaite, W. (2000) ‘Rekonstruktion und methodologischer Dualismus’, in S. Müller-Doohm (ed.) Das Interesse der Vernunft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 218-41.
211. Parsons, T. (1977) Social Systems and the Evolution of Action Theory. New York: Free Press.
212. Peirce, C. S. (1960) Collected Papers, Vol. V Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
213. Peirce, C. S. (1958) Collected Papers, Vol. VIII. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
214. Pels, D. (2003) ‘Unhastening science’, European Journal of Social Theory 6(2): 209-31.
215. Pratschke, J. (2003) ‘Realistic Models?’, Philosophica 71: 13-38.
216. Projektgruppe Zivilisationspolitik (2009) Aufbruch aus dem Patriarchat: Wege in eine neue Zivilisation? Frankfurt: Lang.
217. Putnam, H. (1982) ‘Why reason can’t be naturalized’, Synthese 52: 1-30.
218. Radnitzky, G. (1970) Contemporary Schools of Metascience. Gothenburg: Akademiforlaget.
219. Rawls, J. (1985 [1972]) A Theory of Justice. London: Oxford University Press.
220. Rawls, J. (1993) Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
221. Rockmore, T. (2002) ‘The epistemological promise of pragmatism’, in M. Aboulafia, M. Bookman and C. Kemp (eds) Habermas and Pragmatism. London: Routledge, pp. 47-64.
222. Rorty, R. (1979) Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
223. Rorty, R. (1982) The Consequences of Pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
224. Rorty, R. (1989) Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
225. Rosa, H. (2004) ‘Four levels of self-interpretation: A paradigm for interpretative social philosophy and political criticism’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 30(5-6): 619-720.
226. Rosa, H. (2009) ‘Kritik der Zeitverhältnisse’, in R. Jaeggi and Wesche, T (eds) Was ist Kritik? Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 23-54.
227. Rousseau, J. J. (1966 [1762]) The Social Contract and Discourses. London: Dent.
228. Royce, J. (2001 [1913]) The Problem of Christianity. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.
229. Rusch, G. (1999) ‘Eine Kommunikationstheorie für kognitive Systeme’, in G. Rusch and S. J. Schmidt (eds) Konstruktivismus in der Medien- und Kommunikations-wissenschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 150-84.
230. Saar, M. (2007) Genealogie als Kritik. Frankfurt: Campus.
231. Saar, M. (2009) ‘Genealogische Kritik’, in R. Jaeggi and Wesche, T. (eds) Was ist Kritik? Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 247-65.
232. Sandbothe, M. (ed.) (2000) Die Renaissance des Pragmatismus. Weilerswist: Velbrück Wissenschaft.
233. Sayer, A. (1992 [1984]) Method in Social Science. London: Routledge.
234. Sayer, A. (2000) Realism and Social Science. London: Sage.
235. Schmidt, S. J. (1999) ‘Blickwechsel: Umrisse einer Medienepistemologie’, in G. Rusch and S. J. Schmidt (eds) Konstruktivismus in der Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 119-45.
236. Schnädelbach, H. (1987) Vernunft und Geschichte. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
237. von Schomberg, R. (1992) ‘Argumentation im Kontext wissenschaftlicher Kontroverse’, in K.-O. Apel and M. Kettner (eds) Zur Anwendung der Diskursethik in Politik, Recht und Wissenschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 260-77.
238. Schulz, W. (1962) J G. Fichte. Pfullingen: Neske.
239. Strydom, P. (1987) ‘Collective learning’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 13(3): 265-81.
240. Strydom, P. (1992) ‘The ontogenetic fallacy’, Theory, Culture and Society 9(3): 65-93.
241. Strydom, P. (1993) ‘Sociocultural evolution or the social evolution of practical reason’, Praxis International 13(3): 304-22.
242. Strydom, P. (1999) ‘Triple contingency: the theoretical problem of the public in communication societies’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 25(2): 1-25.
243. Strydom, P. (2000) Discourse and Knowledge. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
244. Strydom, P. (2001) ‘The problem of triple contingency in Habermas’, Sociological Theory 19(2): 165-86.
245. Strydom, P. (2002) Risk, Environment and Society. Buckingham: Open University Press.
246. Strydom, P. (2004) ‘The “contest of the faculties” and cultures of time’, unpublished lecture, Science Faculty Public Lecture Series, University College Cork, 3 February.
247. Strydom, P. (2006a) ‘Intersubjectivity: Interactionist or discursive?’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 32(2): 155-72.
248. Strydom, P. (2006b) ‘Contemporary European cognitive social theory’, in G. Delanty (ed.) Handbook of Contemporary European Social Theory. London: Routledge, pp. 218-29.
249. Strydom, P. (2007) ‘Introduction: A cartography of contemporary cognitive social theory’, European Journal of Social Theory 10(3): 399-56.
250. Strydom, P. (2008a) ‘Philosophies of the social sciences’, in C. Crothers (ed.) Historical Developments and Theoretical Approaches in Sociology, in Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS). Developed under the auspices of UNESCO. Oxford: Eolss Publishers, accessed 11 November 2010.
251. Strydom, P. (2008b) ‘Risk communication: World creation through collective learning under complex contingent conditions’, Journal of Risk Research 11(1-2): 5-22.
252. Strydom, P. (2009a) New Horizons of Critical Theory: Collective Learning and Triple Contingency. Delhi: Shipra.
253. Strydom, P. (2009b) ‘Social practices and cultural models: Outline of a cognitive sociological approach’, unpublished paper, workshop on cognitive sociology/social epistemology/sociology of science/economics of scientific knowledge, Université de Provence, France, 18 March.
254. Strydom, P. (2009c) ‘On normative commitment: Towards a social theory of mechanisms’, unpublished paper, workshop on philosophy of social science, Université de Provence, France, 26 June.
255. Strydom, P. (2011) ‘The cognitive and metacognitive dimensions of social and political theory’, in G. Delanty and S. Turner (eds) Handbook of Contemporary Social and Political Theory. London: Routledge, pp. 328-38.
256. Taylor, C. (1986) ‘Foucault on freedom and truth’, in D. C. Hoy (ed.) Foucault: A Critical Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 69-102.
257. Thompson, J. (1981) Critical Hermeneutics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
258. Touraine, A. (2000) Can We Live Together? Cambridge: Polity
259. Trenz, H.-J. and Eder, K. (2004) ‘The Democratizing Dynamics of a European Public Sphere’, European Journal of Social Theory 7(1): 5-25.
260. Wacquant, L. (2004) ‘Critical thought as solvent of doxa’, Constellations 11(1): 97-101.
261. Walzer, M. (1987) Interpretation and Social Criticism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
262. Walzer, M. (1988) The Company of Critics. New York: Basic Books.
263. Wellmer, A. (1971 [1969]) Critical Theory of Society. London: Heinemann.
264. Wellmer, A. (1986) Ethik und Dialog. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
265. Wellmer, A. (1998) ‘Truth, contingency, and modernity’, in A. Wellmer, Endgames. Cambridge, MA: MIT, pp. 137-54.
266. Wellmer, A. (2003) ‘Der Streit um die Wahrheit: Pragmatismus ohne regulative Ideen’, in D. Böhler, M. Kettner and G. Skirbekk (eds) Reflexion und Verantwortung. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 143-70.