Conflicting Obligations in International Investment Law: Investment Tribunals’ Perspective

The Shifting Allocation of Authority in International Law: Considering Sovereignty, Supremacy and Subsidiarity

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 323-344

  Hirsch, Moshe ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84909006256     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (27)

1. Walde, ‘The Present State of Research Carried Out by the English-Speaking Section of the Centre for Studies and Research’ (2007) Hague Academy Report on International Investment Law 75-6
2. G Van Harten Investment Treaty Arbitration and Public Law (Oxford University Press, 2007) 5-6, 58.
3. A Reinisch, ‘Necessity in International Investment Arbitration-An Unnecessary Split of Opinions in Recent ICSID Cases? Comments on CMS v Argentina and LG&E v Argentina’ (2007) 8 Journal of World Investment and Trade 191
4. AK Bjorklund, ‘Emergency Exceptions to International Obligations in the Realm of Foreign Investment: The State of Necessity and Force Majeure as Circumstances Precluding Wrongfulness’ in C Schreuer et al (eds), Oxford Handbook of International Law on Foreign Investment (Oxford University Press, forthcoming).
5. T Walde, ‘International Investment Under the 1994 Energy Charter Treaty’ (1995) 29 Journal ofWorld Trade 5
6. T Walde (ed), The Energy Charter Treaty: An East-West Gateway for Investment and Trade (The Hague, Kluwer, 1996).
7. C Schreuer, The ICSID Convention: a Commentary (Cambridge University Press, 2001)
8. M Hirsch, The Arbitration Mechanism of the International Center for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (The Hague, Kluwer-Nijhoff, 1993) 33-5.
9. C Knahr and A Reinisch ‘Transparency versus Confidentiality in International Investment Arbitration-The Biwater Gauff Compromise’ (2007) 6 International Courts and Tribunals 97, 98-103
10. J Delaney and DB Magraw ‘Procedural Transparency’ in C Schreuer et al (eds), Oxford Handbook of International Law on Foreign Investment (Oxford University Press, forthcoming).
11. M Hirsch ‘The Sociology of International Law’ (2005) 55 University of Toronto Law Journal 891, at 919-21.
12. C Schreuer, ‘Diversity and Harmonization of Treaty Interpretation in Investment Arbitration’ (2006) 3 Transnational Dispute Management 1
13. JW Salacuse and HJ Braker, ‘The Treatification of International Investment Law’ (2006) 3 Transnational Dispute Management (No 3).
14. AF Lowenfeld, International Economic Law (Oxford University Press, 2002) 378-80, 403-15.
15. RD Bishop, J Crawford andVM Reisman, Foreign Investment Disputes: Cases, Materials and Commentary (The Hague, Kluwer, 2005) 1298-325
16. M Pellonpaa, and M Fitzmaurice, ‘Taking of Property in the Practice of the Iran-US Claims Tribunal’ (1988) 14 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 53, 166, 176
17. O Schachter, ‘Compensation for Expropriation’ (1984) 79 American Journal of International Law 121.
18. T Walde, ‘Remedies and Compensation in International Investment Law’ (July 2005) Paper submitted to ILA Committee on International Law of Foreign Investment, 44-6.
19. A Cassese, International Law (2nd ed, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2005) 509.
20. JG Merrills, The Development of International Law by the European Court of Human Rights (2nd ed, Manchester University Press, 1993) 150-76.
21. Y Shany, ‘Toward a General Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in International Law?’ (2006) 16 European Journal of International Law 907
22. E Benvenisti, ‘Margin of Appreciation, Consensus, and Universal Standards’ (1999) 31 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 843.
23. JE Vinuales, ‘Amicus Intervention in Investor-State Arbitration’ (2007) 61(4) Dispute Settlement Journal 72.
24. K Tienhaara, ‘Third Party Participation in Investment-Environment Disputes: Recent Developments’ (2007) 16 Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 230.
25. Cotula, Briefing 5, International Arbitration (International Institute for Environment and Development), available at http://www.iied.org/pubs/pdf/full/17016IIED.pdf.
26. SE Gaines, ‘International Decisions: Methanex v US’ (2006) 100 American Journal of International Law 683, n 33.
27. D Vis-Dunbar, ‘NGOs Call for Transparency as UNCITRAL Governments Meet in Vienna’ (2007) Investment Treaty News, 7 September