Cohesion and Texture

The Handbook of Discourse Analysis

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 35-53

  Martin, J R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cohesion; Linguistics; Nonstructural relations; Nonstructural resources; Text organization

Indexed keywords

EID: 84908909716     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470753460.ch3     Document Type: Chapter

References (82)

1. Aziz, Y. Y. 1988. Cohesion in spoken Arabic texts. In E. Steiner and R. Veltman (eds), Pragmatics, Discourse and Text: Some Systemically-inspired Approaches. London: Pinter (Open Linguistics Series). 148-57.
2. de Beaugrande, R. and W. Dressler. 1981. Introduction to Textlinguistics. London: Longman (Longman Linguistics Library 26).
3. Benson, J. D. and W. S. Greaves. 1992. Collocation and field of discourse. In W. A. Mann and S. A. Thompson (eds), Diverse Analyses of a Fund Raising Text. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 397-409.
4. Berry, M. 1981. Systemic linguistics and discourse analysis: a multi-layered approach to exchange structure. In M. Coulthard and M. Montgomery (eds), Studies in Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. 120-45.
5. Brown, A. 1989. Piggybook. London: Little Mammoth.
6. Brown, G. and G. Yule. 1983. Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics).
7. Callow, K. 1974. Discourse Considerations in Translating the Word of God. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Zondervan.
8. Chapman, J. 1983. Reading Development and Cohesion. London: Heinemann Educational.
9. Christie, F. and J. R. Martin. 1997. Genre and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School. London: Cassell (Open Linguistics Series).
10. Clark, H. H. and S. E. Haviland. 1977. Comprehension and the given-new contrast. In R. O. Freedle (ed.), Discourse Production and Comprehension. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex. 3-40.
11. Cloran, C. 1995. Defining and relating text segments: Subject and Theme in discourse. In R. Hasan and P. Fries (eds), On Subject and Theme: A Discourse Functional Perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins (Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science). 361-403.
12. Coulthard, M. (ed.). 1992. Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.
13. Davies, M. 1989. Prosodic and nonprosodic cohesion in speech and writing. Word 40.1-2, 255-62.
14. Du Bois, J. W. 1980. Beyond definiteness: the trace of identity in discourse. In W. L. Chafe (ed.), The Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex. 203-74.
15. Eggins, S. and J. R. Martin. 1977. Genres and registers of discourse. In T. A. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as Structure and Process. London: Sage (Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Vol. 1). 230-56.
16. Eggins, S. and D. Slade. 1997. Analysing Casual Conversation. London: Cassell.
17. Fine, J., G. Bartolucci, and P. Szatmari. 1989. Textual systems: their use in creation and miscalculation of social reality. Word 40.1-2, 65-80.
18. Firth, J. R. 1957. A synopsis of linguistic theory, 1930-1955. Studies in Linguistic Analysis (special volume of the Philological Society). London: Blackwell. 1-31. [reprinted in F. R. Palmer (ed.). 1968. Selected Papers of J. R. Firth, 1952-1959. London: Longman. 168-205.]
19. Fox, B. A. 1987. Discourse Structure and Anaphora: written and conversational English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 48).
20. Francis, G. 1985. Anaphoric Nouns. Discourse Analysis Monographs 11. English Language Research, University of Birmingham.
21. Fries, P. H. 1981. On the status of theme in English: arguments from discourse. Forum Linguisticum 6.1, 1-38. [republished in J. S. Petöfi and E. Sözer (eds). 1983. Micro and Macro Connexity of Texts. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag (Papers in Textlinguistics 45). 116-52.]
22. Fries, P. F. 1992. Lexico-grammatical patterns and the interpretation of texts. Discourse Processes 15, 73-91.
23. Ghadessy, M. (ed.). 1995. Thematic Development in English Texts. London: Pinter (Open Linguistics Series).
24. Gleason, H. A. Jr. 1968. Contrastive analysis in discourse structure. Monograph Series on Languages and Linguistics 21 (Georgetown University Institute of Languages and Linguistics). [reprinted in Makkai and Lockwood 1973: 258-76.]
25. Gregory, M. J. 1995. Before and Towards Communication Linguistics: Essays by Michael Gregory and Associates. Seoul: Department of English Language and Literature, Sookmyung Women's University.
26. Gumperz, J. J., H. Kaltman, and M. C. O'Connor. 1984. Cohesion in spoken and written discourse: ethnic style and the transition to literacy. In D. Tannen (ed.), Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex (Advances in Discourse Processes XII). 3-20.
27. Gutwinski, W. 1976. Cohesion in Literary Texts: A Study of Some Grammatical and Lexical Features of English Discourse. The Hague: Mouton ( Janua Linguarum Series Minor 204).
28. Halliday, M. A. K. 1964. The linguistic study of literary texts. In H. G. Lunt (ed.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Linguists. The Hague: Mouton. 302-7. [reprinted in S. Chatman and S. R. Levin. 1967. Essays on the Language of Literature. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 217-23.]
29. Halliday, M. A. K. 1973. Explorations in the Functions of Language. London: Edward Arnold.
30. Halliday, M. A. K. 1978. Language as a Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
31. Halliday, M. A. K. 1985. Spoken and Written Language. Geelong, Vic.: Deakin University Press. [republished by Oxford University Press 1989.]
32. Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. (Second edition). London: Edward Arnold.
33. Halliday, M. A. K. and R. Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman (English Language Series 9).
34. Halliday, M. A. K. and R. Hasan. 1985. Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-semiotic Perspective. Geelong, Vic.: Deakin University Press. [republished by Oxford University Press 1989.]
35. Halliday, M. A. K. and J. R. Martin. 1993. Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. London: Falmer (Critical Perspectives on Literacy and Education).
36. Halliday, M. A. K. and C. M. I. M. Matthiessen. 1999. Construing Experience Through Meaning: A Language Based Approach to Cognition. London: Cassell.
37. Hartnett, C. 1986. Static and dynamic cohesion: signals of thinking in writing. In B. Couture (ed.), Functional Approaches to Writing: Research Perspectives. London: Pinter (Open Linguistics Series). 142-53.
38. Hasan, R. 1968. Grammatical Cohesion in Spoken and Written English, Part One. London: Longman (Programme in Linguistics and English Teaching, Paper No. 7).
39. Hasan, R. 1984. Coherence and cohesive harmony. In J. Flood (ed.), Understanding Reading Comprehension: Cognition, Language and the Structure of Prose. Newark, Del.: International Reading Association. 181-219.
40. Hasan, R. 1985. The texture of a text. In M. A. K. Halliday and R. Hasan, Language, Context and Text. Geelong, Vic.: Deakin University Press. 70-96. [republished by Oxford University Press 1989.]
41. Hawkins, P. 1977. Social Class, the Nominal Group and Verbal Strategies. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul (Primary Socialisation, Language and Education).
42. Hoey, M. 1983. On the Surface of Discourse. London: George Allen and Unwin.
43. Hoey, M. 1991a. Patterns of Lexis in Text. Oxford: Oxford University Press (Describing English Language).
44. Hoey, M. J. 1991b. Another perspective on coherence and cohesive harmony. In Ventola 1991: 385-414.
45. Hymes, D. 1995. Bernstein and poetics. In P. Atkinson, B. Davies and S. Delamont (eds), Discourse and Reproduction: Essays in Honor of Basil Bernstein. Cresskill, N.J.: Hampton Press. 1-24.
46. Iedema, R. 1995. Literacy of Administration (Write it Right Literacy in Industry Research Project-Stage 3). Sydney: Metropolitan East Disadvantaged Schools Program.
47. Iedema, R., S. Feez, and P. White. 1994. Media Literacy (Write it Right Literacy in Industry Research Project-Stage 2). Sydney: Metropolitan East Disadvantaged Schools Program.
48. Jordan, M. P. 1984. Rhetoric of Everyday English Texts. London: George Allen and Unwin.
49. Labov, W. and J. Waletzky. 1967. Narrative analysis. In J. Helm (ed.), Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts (Proceedings of the 1966 Spring Meeting of the American Ethnological Society). Seattle: University of Washington Press. 12-44.
50. Longacre, R. E. 1976. An Anatomy of Speech Notions. Lisse: Peter de Ridder.
51. Makkai, A. and D. Lockwood. 1973. Readings in Stratificational Linguistics. Tuscaloosa, Al.: Alabama University Press.
52. Mann, W. C. and S. A. Thompson (eds). 1992. Discourse Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund-raising Text. Amsterdam: Benjamins (Pragmatics and Beyond, New Series).
53. Mann, W. C., C. M. I. M. Matthiessen, and S. A. Thompson. 1992. Rhetorical structure theory and text analysis. In Mann and Thompson 1992: 39-78.
54. Martin, J. R. 1983a. The development of register. In J. Fine and R. O. Freedle (eds), Developmental Issues in Discourse. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex (Advances in Discourse Processes 10). 1-39.
55. Martin, J. R. 1983b. Participant identification in English, Tagalog and Kâte. Australian Journal of Linguistics 3.1, 45-74.
56. Martin, J. R. 1992. English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
57. Martin, J. R. 1995. Interpersonal meaning, persuasion and public discourse: packing semiotic punch. Australian Journal of Linguistics 15.1, 33-67.
58. Martin, J. R. 1996. Types of structure: deconstructing notions of constituency in clause and text. In E. H. Hovy and D. R. Scott (ed.), Computational and Conversational Discourse: Burning Issues-An Interdisciplinary Account. Heidelberg: Springer (NATO Advanced Science Institute Series F-Computer and Systems Sciences, Vol. 151). 39-66.
59. Martin, J. R. 1997. Register and genre: modelling social context in functional linguistics-narrative genres. In E. Pedro (ed.), Proceedings of the First Lisbon International Meeting on Discourse Analysis. Lisbon: Colibri/ APL. 305-44.
60. Martin, J. R. and G. Plum. 1997. Construing experience: some story genres. Journal of Narrative and Life History 7.1-4 (special issue: Oral Versions of Personal Experience: Three Decades of Narrative Analysis; M. Bamberg, guest editor), 299-308.
61. Martin, J. R. and R. Veel. 1998. Reading Science: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science. London: Routledge.
62. Martin, J. R., F. Christie, and J. Rothery. n.d. Social processes in education: a reply to Sawyer and Watson (and others). In I. Reid (ed.), The Place of Genre in Learning: Current Debates. Geelong, Vic.: Centre for Studies in Literary Education (Typereader Publications 1). 46-57.
63. Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. 1993. Register in the round: diversity in a unified theory of register analysis. In M. Ghadessy (ed.), Register Analysis: Theory and Practice. London: Pinter. 221-92.
64. Nelson, K. and E. Levy. 1987. Development of referential cohesion in children's monologues. In Steele and Threadgold 1987: 119-36.
65. Ochs, E., E. A. Schegloff, and S. A. Thompson (eds). 1996. Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 13).
66. Olson, L. A. and R. Johnson. 1989. Towards a better measure of readability: explanation of empirical performance results. Word 40.1-2, 223-34.
67. Pappas, C. C. 1985. The cohesive harmony and cohesive density of children's oral and written stories. In J. D. Benson and W. S. Greaves (eds), Systemic Perspectives on Discourse. Vol. 2: Selected Theoretical Papers from the 9th International Systemic Workshop. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex. 169-86.
68. Pappas, C. C. 1987. Exploring the textual properties of "proto-reading." In Steele and Threadgold 1987 137-62.
69. Parsons, G. 1990. Cohesion and Coherence: Scientific Texts-A Comparative Study. Department of English Studies, University of Nottingham (Monographs in Systemic Linguistics 1).
70. Parsons, G. 1991. Cohesion coherence: scientific texts. In Ventola 1991: 415-30.
71. Poynton, C. 1985. Language and Gender: Making the Difference. Geelong, Vic.: Deakin University Press. [republished London: Oxford University Press 1989.]
72. Rochester, S. and J. R. Martin. 1979. Crazy Talk: A Study of the Discourse of Schizophrenic Speakers. New York: Plenum.
73. Rose, D., D. McInnes, and H. Körner. 1992. Scientific Literacy (Write it Right Literacy in Industry Research Project Stage 1). Sydney: Metropolitan East Disadvantaged Schools Program.
74. Rothery, J. 1994. Exploring Literacy in School English (Write it Right Resources for Literacy and Learning). Sydney: Metropolitan East Disadvantaged Schools Program.
75. Sinclair, J. McH. and R. M. Coulthard. 1975. Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. London: Oxford University Press.
76. Steele, R. and T. Threadgold (eds). 1987. Language Topics: Essays in Honor of Michael Halliday. Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
77. van Dijk, T. A. 1977. Text and Context: Explorations in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse. London: Longman.
78. Ventola, E. 1987. The Structure of Social Interaction: A Systemic Approach to the Semiotics of Service Encounters. London: Pinter.
79. Ventola, E. (ed.). 1991. Functional and Systemic Linguistics: Approaches and Uses. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter (Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 55).
80. Winter, E. O. 1977. A clause relational approach to English texts: a study of some predictive lexical items in written discourse. Instructional Science 6.1, 1-92.
81. Winter, E. O. 1982. Towards a Contextual Grammar of English. London: George Allen and Unwin.
82. Yang, A. 1989. Cohesive chains and writing quality. Word 40.1-2, 235-54.