Semantic models for scalable search in the internet of things

Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 172-195

  Mietz, Richard ^a   Groppe, Sven ^a   Römer, Kay ^a   Pfisterer, Dennis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LÜBECK   (Germany)

Author keywords

Internet of Things; Probability models; Searching; Sensors

Indexed keywords

EID: 84908895368     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22242708     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/jsan2020172     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Hui, J.; Thubert, P. Compression Format for IPv6 Datagrams over IEEE 802.15.4-Based Networks. RFC 6282 (Proposed Standard), 2011.
2. Shelby, Z.; Hartke, K.; Bormann, C.; Frank, B. Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) (CoRE Working Group). 2012. Available online: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core-coap/(accessed on 27 December 2012).
3. Shelby, Z. Embedded web services. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2010, 17, 52-57.
4. Fielding, R. Architectural Styles and the Design of Network-based Software Architectures. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA, 2000.
5. Pfisterer, D.; Römer, K.; Bimschas, D.; Kleine, O.; Mietz, R.; Truong, C.; Hasemann, H.; Kröller, A.; Pagel, M.; Hauswirth, M.; et al. SPITFIRE: Toward a semantic web of things. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2011, 49, 40-48.
6. Miller, E.; Manola, F. RDF Primer. W3C recommendation, W3C, 2004. Available online: http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-primer-20040210/(accessed on 27 December 2012).
7. Compton, M.; Barnaghi, P.; Bermudez, L.; Garcia-Castro, R.; Corcho, O.; Cox, S.; Graybeal, J.; Hauswirth, M.; Henson, C.; Herzog, A.; et al. The SSN ontology of the W3C semantic sensor network incubator group. Web Semant. 2012, 17, 1-9.
8. Harris, S.; Seaborne, A. SPARQL 1.1 Query Language. W3C Working Draft. Available online: http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/(accessed on 27 December 2012).
9. Elahi, B.M.; Römer, K.; Ostermaier, B.; Fahrmair, M.; Kellerer, W. Sensor Ranking: A Primitive for Efficient Content-based Sensor Search. In Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN 2009), San Francisco, CA, USA, 13-16 April 2009; pp. 217-228.
10. Cai, M.; Frank, M. RDFPeers: A Scalable Distributed RDF Repository Based on a Structured Peer-To-Peer Network. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on World Wide Web, New York, NY, USA, 17-20 May 2004; pp. 650-657
11. Kaoudi, Z.; Koubarakis, M.; Kyzirakos, K.; Miliaraki, I.; Magiridou, M.; Papadakis-Pesaresi, A. Atlas: Storing, updating and querying RDF(S) data on top of DHTs. Web Semant. 2010, 8, 271-277.
12. Ali, L.; Janson, T.; Lausen, G. 3rdf: Storing and Querying RDF Data on Top of the 3nuts Overlay Network. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, September 2011; pp. 257-261.
13. Aberer, K.; Cudŕe-Mauroux, P.; Hauswirth, M.; Pelt, T. GridVine: Building internet-scale semantic overlay networks. Lect. Note. Comput. Sci. 2004, 3298, 107-121.
14. Mietz, R.; Groppe, S.; Kleine, O.; Bimschas, D.; Fischer, S.; Römer, K.; Pfisterer, D. A P2P Semantic Query Framework for the Internet of Things. PIK-Praxis der Informationsverarbeitung und Kommunikation 2013, doi:10.1515/pik-2013-0006.
15. Leggieri, M.; Passant, A.; Hauswirth, M. A Contextualised Cognitive Perspective for Linked Sensor Data. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Semantic Sensor Network, Shanghai, China, November 2010.
16. Pan, F.; Hobbs, J.R. Time Ontology in OWL. W3C working draft, W3C, 2006. Available online: http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-owl-Time-20060927/(accessed on 27 December 2012).
17. Boley, H.; Kifer, M. RIF Overview. W3C working draft, W3C, 2009. Available online: http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-rif-overview-20091001/(accessed on 27 December 2012).
18. Gearon, P.; Schenk, S. SPARQL 1.1 Update. W3C working draft, W3C, 2009. Available online: http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-sparql11-update-20091022/(accessed on 27 December 2012).
19. Deshpande, A.; Guestrin, C.; Madden, S.R.; Hellerstein, J.M.; Hong, W. Model-driven Data Acquisition in Sensor Networks. In Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Conference on Very Large Data Bases VLDB Endowment, (VLDB04), Toronto, Canada, August 2004; pp. 588-599.
20. Chu, D.; Deshpande, A.; Hellerstein, J.M.; Hong, W. Approximate Data Collection in Sensor Networks using Probabilistic Models. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE 06), Washington, DC, USA, April 2006; p. 48.
21. Li, M.; Ganesan, D.; Shenoy, P. PRESTO: Feedback-driven data management in sensor networks. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2009, 17, 1256-1269.
22. Han, Q.; Mehrotra, S.; Venkatasubramanian, N. Energy Efficient Data Collection in Distributed Sensor Environments. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, (ICDCS04), Tokyo, Japan, March 2004; pp. 590-597.
23. Tulone, D.; Madden, S. PAQ: Time series forecasting for approximate query answering in sensor networks. Lect. Note. Comput. Sci. 2006, 3868, 21-37.
24. Tulone, D.; Madden, S. An Energy-efficient Querying Framework in Sensor Networks for Detecting Node Similarities. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Symposium on Modeling Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems (MSWiM06), Terromolinos, Spain, October 2006; pp. 191-300.
25. Gedik, B.; Liu, L.; Yu, P.S. ASAP: An adaptive sampling approach to data collection in sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 2007, 18, 1766-1783.
26. Battle, R.; Kolas, D. Enabling the geospatial Semantic Web with Parliament and GeoSPARQL. Semant. Web 2012, 3, 355-370.
27. Batsakis, S.; Petrakis, E.G.M. SOWL: Spatio-Temporal Representation, Reasoning and Querying over the Semantic Web. In Proceedings the 6th International Conference on Semantic Systems, I-SEMANTICS, Graz, Austria, September 2010.
28. Perry, M.; Jain, P.; Sheth, A.P. SPARQL-ST: Extending SPARQL to Support Spatiotemporal Queries. In Geospatial Semantics and the Semantic Web; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2011; pp. 61-86.
29. Harbelot, B.; Arenas, H.; Cruz, C. The Spatio-Temporal Semantics from a Perdurantism Perspective. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Advanced Geographic Information Systems, Applications, and Services GEOProcessing, Nice, France, February 2013.