A qualitative theory guided analysis of stroke survivors' perceived barriers and facilitators to physical activity

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 36, Issue 22, 2014, Pages 1857-1868

  Nicholson, Sarah L ^a   Donaghy, Marie ^b   Johnston, Marie ^c   Sniehotta, Falko F ^d   Van Wijck, Frederike ^e   Johnston, Derek ^c   Greig, Carolyn ^f   McMurdo, Marion E T ^g   Mead, Gillian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b QUEEN MARGARET UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^d NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^e GLASGOW CALEDONIAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^g UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Barriers; Facilitators; Physical activity; Stroke

Indexed keywords

AFFECT; AGED; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERVIEW; MALE; MOTIVATION; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PATIENT CARE; PSYCHOLOGY; SELF CONCEPT; STROKE; TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORT; VERY ELDERLY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AFFECT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CONTINUITY OF PATIENT CARE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MOTIVATION; MOTOR ACTIVITY; SELF EFFICACY; STROKE; TRANSPORTATION;

EID: 84908893443     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: 14645165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2013.874506     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Strong K, Mathers C, Bonita R. Preventing stroke: saving lives around the world. Lancet Neurol 2007;6:182-7.
2. Johnston M, Bonetti D, Joice S, et al. Recovery from disability after stroke as a target for a behavioural intervention: results of a randomized controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:1117-27.
3. Brainin M, Norrving B, Sunnerhagen KS, et al. Post stroke chronic disease management: towards improved identification and interventions for post stroke spasticity-related complications. Int J Stroke 2011;6:42-6.
4. Field MJ, Gebruers N, Shanmuga Sundaram T, et al. Physical activity after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ISRN Stroke 2013;2013:Article ID 464176, 13 pages. doi:10.1155/2013/464176.
5. Smith A, Saunders DS, Mead GE. Cardiorespiratory fitness after stroke: a systematic review. Int J Stroke 2012;7:499-510.
6. Saunders DH, Greig CA, Young A, Mead GE. Association of activity limitations and lower-limb explosive extensor power in ambulatory people with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89:677-83.
7. Brazzelli M, Saunders DH, Greig CA, Mead GE. Physical fitness training for stroke patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;CD003316. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003316.pub4.
8. Hackam DG, Spence JD. Combining multiple approaches for the secondary prevention of vascular events after stroke: a quantitative modelling study. Stroke 2007;38:1881-5.
9. Gordon NF, Gulanick M, Costa F, et al. Physical activity and exercise recommendations for stroke survivors. An American Heart Association Scientific Statement From the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Subcommittee on Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention; the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism; and the Stroke Council. Circulation 2004;109:2031-41.
10. Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network Management of patients with stroke or TIA: assessment, investigation, immediate management and secondary prevention. A national clinical guideline; 2008.
11. Becker MH, Maiman LA. Sociobehavioral determinants of compliance with health and medical care recommendations. Med Care 1975;13:10-24.
12. Morris J, Oliver T, Kroll T, MacGillivray S. The importance of psychological and social factors in influencing the uptake and maintenance of physical activity after stroke: a structured review of the empirical literature. Stroke Res Treat 2012;2012. Article ID 195249, 20 pages. doi:10.1155/2012/195249.
13. World Health Organization. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva: WHO; 2001. Available from: http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en [last accessed 2 Dec 2013].
14. Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, et al. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Saf Health Care 2005;14:26-33.
15. Carroll SL, Greig CA, Lewis SJ, et al. The use of pedometers in stroke survivors: are they feasible and how well do they detect steps?. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012;93:466-70.
16. Francis JJ, Johnston M, Robertson C, et al. What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychol Health 2010;25:1229-45.
17. Grbich C. Qualitative research in health: an introduction. London: Sage; 1999.
18. Partridge C, Johnston M. Perceived control of recovery from physical disability: measurement and prediction. Br J Clin Psychol 1989;28:53-9.
19. Johnston M, Morrison V, Macwalter R, Partridge C. Perceived control, coping and recovery from disability following stroke. Psychol Health 1999;14:181-92.
20. Booth ML, Bauman A, Owen N, Gore CJ. Physical activity preferences, preferred sources of assistance, and perceived barriers to increased activity among physically inactive Australians. Prev Med 1997;26:131-7.
21. Schutzer KA, Graves BS. Barriers and motivators to exercise in older adults. Prev Med 2004;39:1056-61.
22. Courneya KS, Plotnikoff RC, Hotz SB, Birkett NJ. Social support and the theory of planned behaviour in the exercise domain. Am J Health Behav 2000;24:300-8.
23. Ryan RM, Frederick CM, Lepes D, et al. Intrinsic motivation and exercise adherence. Int J Sports Psychol 1997;28:335-54.
24. Moschny A, Platen P, Klaaben-Mielke R, et al. Barriers to physical activity in older adults in Germany: a cross-sectional study. Int J Behav Nutri Phys Activ 2011;8:121-30.
25. Rimmer JH, Wang E, Smith D. Barriers associated with exercise and community access for individuals with stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev 2008;45:315-22.
26. Damush TM, Plue L, Bakas T, et al. Barriers and facilitators to exercise among stroke survivors. Rehabil Nurs 2007;32:253-60.
27. Hammel J, Jones R, Gossett A, Morgan E. Examining barriers and supports to community living and participation after a stroke from a participatory action research approach. Top Stroke Rehabil 2006;13:43-58.
28. Kaplan RM. Behaviour as the central outcome in health care. Am Psychol 1990;45:1211-20.
29. Bandura A. Self efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychol Rev 1977;84:191-215.
30. Johnston M. Models of disability. Physiothera Theor Pract 1996;12:131-41.
31. Robison J, Wiles R, Ellis-Hill C, et al. Resuming previously valued activities post-stroke: who or what helps? Disabil Rehabil 2009;31:1555-66.
32. Morgan DL. Focus groups as qualitative research. 2nd ed. USA: SAGE publication; 1997.