Effect of graft choice on the outcome of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the multicenter ACL revision study (MARS) cohort

American Journal of Sports Medicine

Volumn 42, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 2301-2310

  Wright, Rick W ^a   Huston, Laura J ^a   Haas, Amanda K ^a   Spindler, Kurt P ^a   Nwosu, Sam K ^a   Allen, Christina R ^a   Anderson, Allen F ^a   Cooper, Daniel E ^a   DeBerardino, Thomas M ^a   Dunn, Warren R ^a   Lantz, Brett A ^a   Stuart, Michael J ^a   Garofoli, Elizabeth A ^a   Albright, John P ^a   Amendola, Annunziato ^a   Andrish, Jack T ^a   Annunziata, Christopher C ^a   Arciero, Robert A ^a   Bach, Bernard R ^a   Baker, Champ L ^a   Bartolozzi, Arthur R ^a   Baumgarten, Keith M ^a   Bechler, Jeffery R ^a   Berg, Jeffrey H ^a   Bernas, Geoffrey A ^a   Brockmeier, Stephen F ^a   Brophy, Robert H ^a   Bush Joseph, Charles A ^a   Butler, J Brad ^a   Campbell, John D ^a   Carey, James L ^a   Carpenter, James E ^a   Cole, Brian J ^a   Cooper, Jonathan M ^a   Cox, Charles L ^a   Creighton, R Alexander ^a   Dahm, Diane L ^a   David, Tal S ^a   Flanigan, David C ^a   Frederick, Robert W ^a   Ganley, Theodore J ^a   Gatt, Charles J ^a   Gecha, Steven R ^a   Giffin, James Robert ^a   Hame, Sharon L ^a   Hannafin, Jo A ^a   Harner, Christopher D ^a   Harris, Norman Lindsay ^a   Hechtman, Keith S ^a   Hershman, Elliott B ^a   Hoellrich, Rudolf G ^a   Hosea, Timothy M ^a   Johnson, David C ^a   Johnson, Timothy S ^a   Jones, Morgan H ^a   Kaeding, Christopher C ^a   Kamath, Ganesh V ^a   Klootwyk, Thomas E ^a   Levy, Bruce A ^a   Ma, C Benjamin ^a   Maiers, G Peter ^a   Marx, Robert G ^a   Matava, Matthew J ^a   Mathien, Gregory M ^a   McAllister, David R ^a   McCarty, Eric C ^a   McCormack, Robert G ^a   Miller, Bruce S ^a   Nissen, Carl W ^a   O'Neill, Daniel F ^a   Owens, Brett D ^a   Parker, Richard D ^a   Purnell, Mark L ^a   Ramappa, Arun J ^a   Rauh, Michael A ^a   Rettig, Arthur C ^a   Sekiya, Jon K ^a   Shea, Kevin G ^a   Sherman, Orrin H ^a   Slauterbeck, James R ^a   Smith, Matthew V ^a   Spang, Jeffrey T ^a   Svoboda, Steven J ^a   Taft, Timothy N ^a   Tenuta, Joachim J ^a   Tingstad, Edwin M ^a   Vidal, Armando F ^a   Viskontas, Darius G ^a   White, Richard A ^a   Williams, James S ^a   Wolcott, Michelle L ^a   Wolf, Brian R ^a   York, James J ^a   more..

^a NONE

Author keywords

ACL revision; anterior cruciate ligament; graft; outcomes

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALLOGRAFT; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION; AUTOGRAFT; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; GAMMA RADIATION; HUMAN; INSTRUMENT STERILIZATION; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PROCEDURES; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECURRENT DISEASE; REOPERATION; RUPTURE; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UNITED STATES;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; ALLOGRAFTS; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION; AUTOGRAFTS; BONE-PATELLAR TENDON-BONE GRAFTING; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; GAMMA RAYS; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECURRENCE; REOPERATION; RUPTURE; STERILIZATION; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84908878653     PISSN: 03635465     EISSN: 15523365     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0363546514549005     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bellamy N. Pain assessment in osteoarthritis: experience with the WOMAC osteoarthritis index. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1989 ; 18 (4). 14-17
2. Bellamy N. WOMAC: a 20-year experiential review of a patient-centered self-reported health status questionnaire. J Rheumatol. 2002 ; 29 (12). 2473-2476
3. Carey JL, Dunn WR, Dahm DL, Zeger SL, Spindler KP. A systematic review of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autograft compared with allograft. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 ; 91 (9). 2242-2250
4. Foster TE, Wolfe BL, Ryan S, Silvestri L, Kaye EK. Does the graft source really matter in the outcome of patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? An evaluation of autograft versus allograft reconstruction results: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med. 2010 ; 38 (1). 189-199
5. George MS, Dunn WR, Spindler KP. Current concepts review: revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2006 ; 34 (12). 2026-2037
6. Hawker G, Melfi C, Paul J, Green R, Bombardier C. Comparison of a generic (SF-36) and a disease specific (WOMAC) (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) instrument in the measurement of outcomes after knee replacement surgery. J Rheumatol. 1995 ; 22 (6). 1193-1196
7. Ihaka R, Gentleman R. R: a language for data analysis and graphics. J Comput Graph Stat. 1996 ; 5 (3). 299-314
8. Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, et al. Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form. Am J Sports Med. 2001 ; 29 (5). 600-613
9. Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, et al. Responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. Am J Sports Med. 2006 ; 34 (10). 1567-1573
10. Kaeding CC, Aros B, Pedroza A, et al. Allograft versus autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: predictors of failure from a MOON prospective longitudinal cohort. Sports Health. 2011 ; 3 (1). 73-81
11. Kamath GV, Redfern JC, Greis PE, Burks RT. Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2011 ; 39 (1). 199-217
12. Krych AJ, Jackson JD, Hoskin TL, Dahm DL. A meta-analysis of patellar tendon autograft versus patellar tendon allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2008 ; 24 (3). 292-298
13. Wright RW, Huston LJ, Spindler KP, et al. Descriptive epidemiology of the Multicenter ACL Revision Study (MARS) cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2010 ; 38 (10). 1979-1986
14. Marx RG, Stump TJ, Jones EC, Wickiewicz TL, Warren RF. Development and evaluation of an activity rating scale for disorders of the knee. Am J Sports Med. 2001 ; 29 (2). 213-218
15. Outerbridge RE. The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1961 ; 43: 752-757
16. Roos EM, Lohmander LS. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 ; 1 (1). 64
17. Roos EM, Roos HP, Ekdahl C, Lohmander LS. Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)-validation of a Swedish version. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1998 ; 8 (6). 439-448
18. Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)-development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998 ; 28 (2). 88-96
19. Roos EM, Toksvig-Larsen S. Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)-validation and comparison to the WOMAC in total knee replacement. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 ; 1 (1). 17
20. Spindler KP, Huston LJ, Wright RW, et al. The prognosis and predictors of sports function and activity at minimum 6 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a population cohort study. Am J Sports Med. 2011 ; 39 (2). 348-359
21. Spindler KP, Parker RD, Andrish JT, et al. Prognosis and predictors of ACL reconstructions using the MOON cohort: a model for comparative effectiveness studies. J Orthop Res. 2013 ; 31 (1). 2-9
22. Wright RW. Knee injury outcomes measures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009 ; 17 (1). 31-39
23. Wright RW. Knee sports injury outcome measures. J Knee Surg. 2005 ; 18 (1). 69-72
24. Wright RW, Dunn WR, Amendola A, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament revision reconstruction: two-year results from the MOON cohort. J Knee Surg. 2007 ; 20 (4). 308-311
25. Wright RW, Gill CS, Chen L, et al. Outcome of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 ; 94 (6). 531-536