Was this review helpful to you? It depends! Context and voting patterns in online content

WWW 2014 - Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 337-347

  Sipos, Ruben ^a   Ghosh, Arpita ^b   Joachims, Thorsten ^a  

^a School of Operations Research and Information Engineering   (United States)

^b Social Dynamics Laboratory   (United States)

Author keywords

Human computation; Online reviews; Ranking; Ratings; User feedback; User generated content

Indexed keywords

ELECTRONIC VOTING; RATING;

HUMAN COMPUTATION; ONLINE REVIEWS; RANKING; USER FEEDBACK; USER-GENERATED CONTENT;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 84908873278     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2566486.2567998     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. E. Agichtein, C. Castillo, D. Donato, A. Gionis, and G. Mishne. Finding high-quality content in social media. In Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, WSDM '08, pages 183-194, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM.
2. G. Askalidis and G. Stoddard. A theoretical analysis of crowdsourced content curation. In The 3rd Workshop on Social Computing and User Generated Content, 2013.
3. C. Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, G. Kossinets, J. Kleinberg, and L. Lee. How opinions are received by online communities: A case study on amazon.com helpfulness votes. In Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web, WWW '09, pages 141-150, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM.
4. A. Ghosh and P. McAfee. Incentivizing high-quality user-generated content. In Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World wide web, WWW '11, pages 137-146, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM.
5. F. M. Harper, D. Raban, S. Rafaeli, and J. A. Konstan. Predictors of answer quality in online Q&A sites. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '08, pages 865-874, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM.
6. N. Jindal and B. Liu. Review spam detection. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web, WWW '07, pages 1189-1190, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM.
7. T. Joachims, L. Granka, B. Pan, H. Hembrooke, F. Radlinski, and G. Gay. Evaluating the accuracy of implicit feedback from clicks and query reformulations in web search. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 25(2), April 2007.
8. S.-M. Kim, P. Pantel, T. Chklovski, and M. Pennacchiotti. Automatically assessing review helpfulness. In Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP '06, pages 423-430, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2006. Association for Computational Linguistics.
9. J. Liu, Y. Cao, C. Y. Lin, Y. Huang, and M. Zhou. Low-Quality Product Review Detection in Opinion Summarization. In Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLP-CoNLL), pages 334-342, 2007.
10. Y. Liu, X. Huang, A. An, and X. Yu. Modeling and predicting the helpfulness of online reviews. In Data Mining, 2008. ICDM '08. Eighth IEEE International Conference on, pages 443-452, 2008.
11. Y. Lu, P. Tsaparas, A. Ntoulas, and L. Polanyi. Exploiting social context for review quality prediction. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web, WWW '10, pages 691-700, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.
12. L. Muchnik, S. Aral, and S. J. Taylor. Social inuence bias: A randomized experiment. Science, 341(6146):647-651, 2013.
13. S. M. Mudambi and D. Schuff. What makes a helpful online review? A study of customer reviews on amazon.com. MIS Q., 34(1):185-200, Mar. 2010.
14. M. Nakayama and Y. Wan. An exploratory study: "Blind-testing" consumers how they rate helpfulness of online reviews. In Conf-IRM, 2012.
15. S. Sen, F. M. Harper, A. LaPitz, and J. Riedl. The quest for quality tags. In Proceedings of the 2007 international ACM conference on Supporting group work, GROUP '07, pages 361-370, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM.
16. S. Siersdorfer, S. Chelaru, W. Nejdl, and J. San Pedro. How useful are your comments?: Analyzing and predicting youtube comments and comment ratings. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web, WWW '10, pages 891-900, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.
17. F. Wu and B. Huberman. How public opinion forms. In C. Papadimitriou and S. Zhang, editors, Internet and Network Economics, volume 5385 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 334-341. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008.
18. Z. Zhang and B. Varadarajan. Utility scoring of product reviews. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management, CIKM '06, pages 51-57, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM.