Limits to co-combustion of coal and eucalyptus due to water availability in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Energy Conversion and Management

Volumn 87, Issue , 2014, Pages 1239-1247

  Hoffmann, Bettina Susanne ^a   Szklo, Alexandre ^a   Schaeffer, Roberto ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Biomass; Co combustion; Coal; Eucalyptus; Fluidized bed combustion; Water availability

Indexed keywords

AVAILABILITY; BIOMASS; COAL; COAL DEPOSITS; COAL INDUSTRY; FLUIDIZED BED COMBUSTION; PROVEN RESERVES;

BRAZILIAN COAL; CO-FIRING BIOMASS; COAL RESERVES; COCOMBUSTION; EUCALYPTUS; RIO GRANDE DO SUL; THERMAL POWER; WATER AVAILABILITY;

COAL COMBUSTION;

EID: 84908702397     PISSN: 01968904     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2014.01.062     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. IEA World energy outlook 2010 OECD/IEA Paris, France
2. ANEEL. BIG - Banco de Informações de Geração; 2011. < http://www.aneel.gov.br/aplicacoes/capacidadebrasil/capacidadebrasil.asp > [accessed 30.06.11].
3. C. do Valle Costa, E. La Rovere, and D. Assmann Technological innovation policies to promote renewable energies: lessons from the European experience for the Brazilian case Renew Sustain Energy Rev 12 1 2008 65 90
4. STCP. Anuário estatístico da Abraf 2010. Associação Brasileira de Produtores de Florestas Plantadas - ABRAF; 2010.
5. K. Ericsson, and L.J. Nilsson Assessment of the potential biomass supply in Europe using a resource-focused approach Biomass Bioenergy 30 1 2006 1 15
6. BP. BP statistical review of world energy 2011; 2011.
7. Pereira Gomes AJ, Cruz PR, Pinheiro Borges L. Recursos Minerais Industriais e Energéticos. In: Geologia, tectônica e recursos minerais do Brasil. Brasília: Serviço Geológico do Brasil CPRM Ministério de Minas e Energia Secretaria de Minas e Metalurgia; 2003.
8. UNFCCC. Quantified economy-wide emissions targets for 2020. Appendix I - quantified economy-wide emissions targets for 2020. < http://unfccc.int/meetings/cop-15/copenhagen-accord/items/5264.php > [accessed 04.07.11].
9. A. Gungor Simulation of co-firing coal and biomass in circulating fluidized beds Energy Convers Manage 65 1 2013 574 579
10. D.R. McIlveen-Wright, Y. Huang, S. Rezvani, J.D. Mondol, D. Redpath, and M. Anderson A techno-economic assessment of the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions through the use of biomass co-combustion Fuel 90 1 2011 11 18
11. T. Abbasi, and S.A. Abbasi Biomass energy and the environmental impacts associated with its production and utilization Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14 4 2010 919 937
12. F. Cucchiella, and I. D'Adamo Issue on supply chain of renewable energy Energy Convers Manage 76 12 2013 774 780
13. 2 emissions reduction scenarios in coal-biomass based electricity production Energy Convers Manage 45 18-19 2004 3053 3074
14. L. Gustavsson, J. Holmberg, V. Dornburg, R. Sathre, T. Eggers, and K. Mahapatra Using biomass for climate change mitigation and oil use reduction Energy Policy 35 11 2007 5671 5691
15. H. Koch, and S. Vögele Dynamic modelling of water demand, water availability and adaptation strategies for power plants to global change Ecol Econ 68 7 2009 2031 2039
16. P.R.deC. Merschmann, E. Vasquez, A.S. Szklo, and R. Schaeffer Modeling water use demands for thermoelectric power plants with CCS in selected Brazilian water basins Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 13 3 2013 87 101
17. H. Zhai, E.S. Rubin, and P.L. Versteeg Water use at pulverized coal power plants with postcombustion carbon capture and storage Environ Sci Technol 45 6 2011 2479 2485
18. B.S. Hoffmann, A. Szklo, and R. Schaeffer An evaluation of the techno-economic potential of co-firing coal with woody biomass in thermal power plants in the south of Brazil Biomass Bioenergy 45 10 2012 295 302
19. Departamento Nacional de Produção Mineral. Anuário Mineral Brasileiro. DNPM; 2010.
20. Departamento Nacional de Produção Mineral. Sistema de Informações Geográficas de Mineração [13.05.13].
21. UNEP. Biomass based fluidized bed combustions boiler: cost economics, case study [13.05.13]. < http://www.unep.org/climatechange/mitigation/sean-cc/Portals/141/doc-resources/TrainingEEtechnologies/Fluidized%20Bed-Asthana.pdf >.
22. Kaltschmitt M. Energie aus Biomasse: Grundlagen, Techniken und Verfahren mit 124 Tabellen. Berlin, Heidelberg [u.a.]: Springer; 2001.
23. J. Koornneef, M. Junginger, and A. Faaij Development of fluidized bed combustion - An overview of trends, performance and cost Prog Energy Combust Sci 33 1 2007 19 55
24. P. Teixeira, H. Lopes, I. Gulyurtlu, N. Lapa, and P. Abelha Evaluation of slagging and fouling tendency during biomass co-firing with coal in a fluidized bed Biomass Bioenergy 39 4 2012 192 203
25. M. Zevenhoven-Onderwater, R. Backman, B.-J. Skrifvars, M. Hupa, T. Liliendahl, and C. Rosén The ash chemistry in fluidised bed gasification of biomass fuels. Part II: Ash behaviour prediction versus bench scale agglomeration tests Fuel 80 10 2001 1503 1512
26. H. Spliethoff Power generation from solid fuels 2010 Springer Heidelberg, Germany, New York
27. P. Basu Combustion and gasification in fluidized beds 2006 CRC/Taylor & Francis Boca Raton
28. x emissions and control. Coal, 2006, [online].
29. x emissions and control. Coal, 2006 [online].
30. A. Delgado Martins Water footprint of electric power generation: modeling its use and analyzing options for a water-scarce future 2012 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Boston (USA)
31. DOE/NETL. Low rank coal to electricity: combustion cases. National Energy Technology Laboratory, DOE/NETL - 2011/1 463; March 2011.
32. CMU Integrated Environmental Control Model (IECM) 2011 Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) Pittsburgh (PA)
33. Koepp M, Mellahn S, Peter F. Bedarf an konventionaller Kraftwerkskapazität in Deutschland. Prognos AG, Berlin; 2011. < http://www.metropoleruhr.de/fileadmin/user-upload/metropoleruhr.de/Regionalplanung/Energiewirtschaft-Fernwaerme/04a-02-Bedarf-konventioneller-Kraftwerkskapazitaet-April-2011.pdf >.
34. EPE Plano Nacional de Energia 2030 2008 MMA Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
35. BNDES. Critéris socioambientais para apoio ao segmento de geração elétrica. < http://www.bndes.gov.br/SiteBNDES/bndes/bndes-pt/Areas-de-Atuacao/Desenvolvimento-Social-e-Urbano/Politica-Socioambiental/criterios-socioambientais-geracao.html > [accessed 13.05.13].
36. CRA and MPX. Relatório de Impacto Ambiental da Usina Termelétrica MPX Sul. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; 2009.
37. Secretaria de Mio Ambiente do Rio Grande do Sul. Hydrographic basins of the state of Rio Grande do Sul [29.09.10].
38. Ecoplan Ltda. Diagnóstico e prognóstico hídrico das bacias hidrográficas do Rio Grande do Sul. Secretaria Estadual do Meio Ambiente, Porto Alegre, Brazil, Relatório Síntese.
39. Centro de Inteligência emFlorestas. Product prices; October 2012.
40. Sifreca - Sistema de Informações de Fretes. Sifreca, Fretes Rodoviários; 2011. < http://log.esalq.usp.br/sifreca/pt/fretes/rodoviarios/index.php > [accessed 14.06.11].
41. EEX. Emission rights spot [16.10.12].
42. Banco Central do Brasil. Taxas de Câmbio; 2011. < http://www4.bcb.gov.br/pec/taxas/batch/taxas.asp?id=txdolar > [accessed 30.06.11].
43. M.G.R. Cannell Environmental impacts of forest monocultures: water use, acidification, wildlife conservation, and carbon storage 1999 Kluwer Academic Publishers
44. Secretaria Estadual do Meio ambiente do rio Grande do Sul. Zoneamento Ambiental da Silvicultura - Estrutura, Metodologia e Resultados. Secretaria estadual do meio ambiente, Porto Alegre, Brazil, vol. 3; March 2010.
45. Lima W de P. As florestas plantadas e a água implementando o conceito da microbacia hidrográfica como unidade de planejamento. São Carlos: RiMa; 2006.
46. SSMA/RS. PORTARIA No. 05/89 - SSMA. Aprova a NORMA TÉCNICA SSMA No. 01/89-DMA. SEMA RS; 1989.
47. CONAMA. Resolução CONAMA no. 397 [04.03.08].
48. EPRI. Water & sustainability: US water consumption for power production - the next half century, 1006786; 2002.